"You canāt separate us, not unless weāre willing to do so."
Mike Driver

oozey mess
official daine visual archive
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

izzy's playlists!
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism
ojovivo
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
tumblr dot com

pixel skylines
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
$LAYYYTER

tannertan36

@theartofmadeline
Claire Keane
KIROKAZE

No title available
š
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Russia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Qatar

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
@castiel-dreamlover
"You canāt separate us, not unless weāre willing to do so."
ah yes, eye podcasts
Already seeing people on tiktok saying āI still hate trump but he ate with this oneā like ⦠babes ⦠you just got propagandized ⦠thatās literally exactly what he created this situation in the hopes you would say ā¦
Reminder, analytical AI and generative AI aren't the same. While I loathe generative AI and feel there is no ethical way to use it at this time, analytical AI can serve valuable purposes in many fields.
from rotteneyejoeĀ š@O1laoghaire
John Oliver platforms Palestinian voices as he advocates for voting for Harris.
If you live in a swing state, please properly consider your role in this election. Remember to distrust the polls, the projections - the presidential election will be infuriatingly close. Nothing is set in stone.
Please think about your queer friends and family, your community that includes people of colour, disabled people, poor people, immigrants. Evaluate the true historical value of what a protest vote does - compare it to the two candidates, one of which will be the president at the end of this final stretch.
Your vote matters. Please, treat it like it does.
itās been long enough iām making an executive decision that we all need to go reread the tgi fridays infinite mozzarella sticks article
still just as good as i remember it
The link is broken nooooo
burning of the fucking library of alexandria right here. anyway everyone say thank you wayback machine
Happy ten years of Caity weavers infinite mozzarella sticks article
āIt is illegal for women to go topless in most cities, yet you can buy a magazine of a woman without her top on at any 7-11 store. So you can sell breasts, but you cannot wear breasts, in America.ā ~ Violet Rose
best quote/statement ever
best cartoon/post ever
official boob post
listen I know it's heartbreaking that Claudia dies and it's understandable to wish she didn't, but let's please not accuse the writers of fridging her. to do so is a fundamental misunderstanding of the story and is frankly insulting to the intelligence and skill of the writers of the show.
Claudia's death, and the overwhelming grief and regret her parents experience because of it, is quite literally the point of the entire story. she dies because Anne's daughter Michele died of leukemia when she was five years old and there was nothing she or her husband could do to prevent it.
writing IWTV was how Anne coped with the unimaginable loss of a parent losing her child. she created a story about a little girl that could not die and then killed her anyway. Claudia's death is a senseless, unavoidable tragedy, just like Michele's was. the grief that haunts Louis and Lestat for the rest of their lives is the same grief that haunted Anne and her husband.
so when you're accusing people of killing Claudia off to benefit a story about two men, please remember that in real life sometimes parents lose their children. please remember Michele Rice.
she's the reason Claudia exists.
she's also the reason Claudia cannot be saved.
oh i know he teared up typing this
i'm founding a new school of media criticism which i've decided to call Bitism. the Bitist school of literary analysis asks a simple question: is this work committed to the bit?
you see, any work of fiction is either committed to the bit or it's not. the worst thing a piece of media can be is ashamed of its own premise, of the genre it in habits, of the tropes and aesthetics we expect from it. to be committed to the bit does not inherently make it good, but it makes it more worthy of respect than those which are not.
also, that's not to say that a story cannot parody or criticize the genre it inhabits or mimics. we can discuss the bit, we can deconstruct the bit, we can ask ourselves whether or not it's a good bit, but to commit to it first will strengthen these discussions, not detract from them. commitment to the bit is, after all, the first step to genuine sincerity. and sincerity will exalt and elevate parody such that it can stand on its own feet.
commitment to the bit turns melodrama into camp, elevates parody to biting commentary, and allows cringe to open up into a resonant, if unpolished, expression of true emotion.
fully expect bitism to take the literary world by storm sometime in the next few years.