from “ask polly: why should i keep going?”

No title available
Cosmic Funnies
Color Me Curious
Mike Driver
todays bird
Monterey Bay Aquarium
ojovivo
No title available
hello vonnie

shark vs the universe
Doug Jones
occasionally subtle

tannertan36
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sade Olutola
Today's Document
Xuebing Du
KIROKAZE
taylor price
The Bowery Presents

seen from Brazil
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from India
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Brazil
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@cephaloprince
from “ask polly: why should i keep going?”
“I think there’s a rich ream of horror, from The Haunting of Hill House to Ghostwatch, that delves into the idea that certain places can simply go wrong – and once these bad environments have been established and ostracised by society, they can’t be exorcised. They simply keep accruing power through the individual stories that play tragically out in their shadow.
“I mention a real-life example of that kind of bad architecture in one episode; the Pope Lick Bridge in Kentucky, a place that looks and feels so sinister that it developed its own local folklore about a goat-man who attacks people who stray too close to the edge – and which has ended up resulting in deaths as visitors peer over the side trying to get a peek at the monster.
“I find this kind of stuff fascinating, because it plays into my own paranoia about environments, and my dislike of ghost stories with explicably human antagonists. Like David says in the first episode, people aren’t frightening. Places are frightening.
“If I’m sitting alone at home on a dark and stormy night, and I glance nervously up towards the bedroom doorway, my fear is not that my house is being haunted by a spirit called Mabel who died in the 19th century at the age of fourteen and is constantly seeking her favourite teddy bear… because all of these details both humanise her and make her ridiculous.
“My fear is that there will be something standing in the doorway, because the doorway is where things come to stand.
“Because unoccupied spaces, in our imaginations, must find something to fill them.”
— from “The Saturday Interview: ‘I Am in Eskew’ podcast”
Bioluminescence series by Rob Rey
(Rob Rey’s Tumblr)
This is so goddamn beautiful
Katharine Hepburn as Amazon warrior princess Antiope & Colin Keith-Johnston as Theseus in stage production of The Warrior’s Husband (1932) (Corbis)
ok. ok
all right I’ll allow it
Okay so some fun and interesting tidbits of info that @queer-taako gave me a while back regarding Katherine Hepburn: she may have possibly been either nonbinary or transmasc. She had a male persona, and gay men (as in exclusively gay men, men who only had sex with and were attracted to other men) had sex with her. They viewed her as just as much a man as any of them. In fact, the only reason I’m still using “her” and not “him”/“them” is because it was never confirmed (and let’s be real, it could have been very dangerous for her back then). But that information is out there.
This is a pretty good article going into detail about Hepburn’s identity as well as how the era sort of impacted her experience. She described herself later in life as “the missing link between genders” and even as a child, had a secret name for herself which she preferred to be called among friends (Jimmy) and the information she gave about her childhood like not getting why everyone seemed to treat her like a girl, not wanting anything to do with feminine things, having a secret name, at the very least resonates with gnc and butch women, trans men and nonbinary people.
We have no way of knowing what she really was, and we cant really ascribe an identity to her, but she had relationships with men and women and wanted pretty much nothing to do with womanhood in her private life. Being non straight and/or not cis in Hollywood, especially back then, was such a minefield to navigate, and there was virtually no language to express yourself if your identity was anything other than gay or straight cis person, and even the term ‘lesbian’ wasnt used as often as youd think.
I did not know this.
“while I don’t want to speak on behalf of all trans men everywhere, I have noticed that sometimes we seem to enter into the project of transition with the following assumption: “I’m going to transition into something bad, that will make my life actively worse, make finding community more challenging, abandoning the moral project of being a woman, but there’s nothing to be done about it, so here goes.” This leads to, among other things, Glumness and Bad Affect, neither of which make suitable bedfellows for the Joy of Embodiment or Autonomy. I wonder sometimes if at least part of what that assumption does for us is protect us from having to defend our choices on the grounds of desire – Obviously I don’t want to be a man, I simply have to be, and must resign myself to being the least worst type of man possible. Sorry! Sorry. I’m trying to delete it.”
— Daniel Mallory Ortberg, (excerpt from ‘Everybody’s Talkin’ (At Me)’ via The Shatner Chatter)
Solar Witch ☀️
A very curious octopus.
Watch this and be blessed
“Why he smoosh my head??? Wait smoosh my head again.”
!!! A friend!!!
BABY
That rabbit/hare post is messing me up. I’d thought they were synonyms. Their development and social behavior are all different. They can’t even interbreed. They don’t have the same number of chromosomes. Dogs, wolves, jackals, and coyotes can mate with each other and have fertile offspring but rabbits and hares cant even make infertile ones bc they just die in the womb. Wack.
These
are more genetically compatible than These
and that’s why morphology-based phylogeny has Issues
@aviculor
The problem is perspective. People always think dogs are the ‘standard’ animal, the metric to use for whether or not two organisms “look like” they’re related. When in fact they’re a massive outlier due to the fact that we fucked up this lineage of wolf beyond recognition with selective breeding. It’s why people always say “breed” when they mean “species”, especially when talking about groups like lizards which can’t even be defined cladistically since some of them are closer to snakes than each other. To say nothing of fish.
I once read an article that emphasized there is no such thing as a fish. Sharks and rays, lamprey, lobe-finned fish like lungfish and coelacanth, bichir and sturgeon, and of course the multiple infraclasses of more “modern” fish groups are all only very distantly related to one another. They’ve maintained semi-similar body structures only because there are limited ways to efficiently move through water as a vertebrate.
This
And this
Are more distantly related from one another than you and I are from a lungfish
Which is absolutely fuckin wild.
Not only that, but all of us air-breathing land vertebrates, all the lizards and chickens and people and frogs, are closer to one another than those three “fish” are to one another as well.
these
are genetically closer than these
and…
these
are genetically closer than these
and my personal favorite, it really fucks with people…
these
are more genetically similar than these
COOL.
I would be the worst spy of all time because on one hand I overshare like hell, but on the other hand I also have THE shittiest memory so it’s really a lose/lose scenario for everyone involved.
guy interrogating me: What’s the passcode?
me: Ah fuck. I think it might be 792.....4?
me: Actually no I think it starts with a 2.
me:
me: Yeah I usually just rely on muscle memory for it. Do you think you could get a keypad in here? That might be faster.
guy interrogating me: who do you work for?!
me: Okay, so this is super embarrassing. I know he told me his name when we first met but I forgot and at this point it would be weird if I asked him for his name again, right? So I just kind of go with “sir” whenever I have to talk to him. It might be David though. He looks like a David.
me, after being extracted: bad news guys, I totally blew Dave’s cover.
my boss: Wait, what?
me: Yeah, like they had knives and shit and it was kind of stressful so I just told them that my contact’s name was David Johnson. Really sorry about that.
boss: We don’t have a David Johnson working for us. Are you thinking of James?
me:
me: Good news, guys, I did not blow James’ cover!
Enemy 1: So, how did the interrogation go?
Enemy 2: We got nothing. All they did was ramble on about their childhood trauma for two hours.
Enemy 1: Hmm. maybe lower the dose of the truth serum next time.
Enemy 2: We didn’t use truth serum.
oh hey it’s august 20 happy birthday to adam young, warlock dowling, and greasy johnson!
wait lmao that means it’s antichristmas
From @pawsofoz: “When you’re the last foster kitten, you get extra spoiled! #fosterkitten #adopted” #catsofinstagram [source: https://ift.tt/2OOzc8I ]
My boyfriend is trying to explain cricket to me again. “He’s only got two balls to make 48 runs”, he says. The camera focuses on a man. Underneath him it says LEFT ARM FAST MEDIUM. A ball flies into the stands and presumably fractures someone’s skull. “There’s a free six”, my boyfriend says. 348 SIXES says the screen. A child in the audience waves a sign referencing Weet-Bix
The first time he showed me this I assumed he was pranking me
if people haven’t been exposed to cricket before, here is the experience. The person who likes cricket turns on a radio with an air of happy expectation. “We’ll just catch up with the cricket,” they say.
An elderly British man with an accent - you can picture exactly what he looks like and what he is wearing, somehow, and you know that he will explain the important concept of Yorkshire to you at length if you make eye contact - is saying “And w’ four snickets t’ wicket, Umbleby dives under the covers and romps home for a sticky bicket.”
There is a deep and satisfied silence. Weather happens over the radio. This lasts for three minutes.
A gentle young gentleman with an Indian accent, whose perfect and beautiful clear voice makes him sound like a poet sipping from a cup of honeyed drink always, says mildly “Of course we cannot forget that when Pakistan last had the biscuit under the covers, they were thrown out of bed. In 1957, I believe.”
You mouth “what the fucking fuck.”
A morally ambiguous villain from a superhero movie says off-microphone, “Crumbs everywhere.”
Apparently continuing a previous conversation, the villain asks, “Do seagulls eat tacos?”
“I’m sure someone will tell us eventually,” the poet says. His voice is so beautiful that it should be familiar; he should be the only announcer on the radio, the only reader of audiobooks.
The villain says with sudden interest, “Oh, a leg over straight and under the covers, Peterson and Singh are rumping along with a straight fine leg and good pumping action. Thanks to his powerful thighs, Peterson is an excellent legspinner, apart from being rude on Twitter.”
The man from Yorkshire roars potently, like a bull seeing another bull. There might be words in his roar, but otherwise it is primal and sizzling.
“That isn’t straight,” the poet says. “It’s silly.”
“What the fucking fuck,” you say out loud at this point.
“Shh,” says the person who likes cricket. They listen, tensely. Something in the distance makes a very small “thwack,” like a baby dropping an egg.
“Was that a doosra or a googly?” the villain asks.
“IT’S A WRONG ‘UN,” roars the Yorkshireman in his wrath. A powerful insult has been offered. They begin to scuffle.
“With that double doozy, Crumpet is baffled for three turns, Agarwal is deep in the biscuit tin and Padgett has gone to the shops undercover,” the poet says quickly, to cover the action while his companions are busy. The villain is being throttled, in a friendly companionable way.
An intern apparently brings a message scrawled on a scrap of paper like a courier sprinting across a battlefield. “Reddy has rolled a nat 20,” the poet says with barely contained excitement. “Australia is both a continent and an island. But we’re running out of time!”
“Is that true?” You ask suddenly.
“Shh!” Says the person who likes cricket. “It’s a test match.”
“About Australia.”
“We won’t know THAT until the third DAY.”
A distant “pock” noise. The sound of thirty people saying “tsk,” sorrowfully.
“And the baby’s dropped the egg. Four legs over or we’re done for, as long as it doesn’t rain.”
The villain might be dead? You begin to find yourself emotionally invested.
There are mild distant cheers. “Oh, and with twelve sticky wickets t’ over and t’ seagull’s exploded,” the man from the North says as if all of his dreams have come true. “What a beautiful day.” Your person who likes cricket relaxes. It is tea break.
The villain, apparently alive, describes the best hat in the audience as “like a funnel made of dove-colored net, but backwards, with flies trapped in it.”
This is every bit as good as that time in Australia in 1975, they all agree, drinking their tea and eating home-made cakes sent in by the fans. The poet comments favorably on the icing and sugar-preserved violets. The Yorkshire man discourses on the nature of sponge. The villain clatters his cup too hard on his saucer. To cover his embarrassment, the poet begins scrolling through Twitter on his phone, reading aloud the best memes in his enchanting milky voice. Then, with joy, he reads an @ from an ornithologist at the University of Reading: seagulls do eat tacos! A reference is cited; the poet reads it aloud. Everyone cheers.
You are honestly - against your will - kind of into it! but also: weirdly enraged.
“Was that … it?” you ask, deeming it safe to interrupt.
“No,” says the person who likes cricket, “This is second tea break on the first day. We won’t know where we really are until lunch tomorrow.”
And - because you cannot stop them - you have to accept this; if cricket teaches you anything, it is this gentle and radical acceptance.
Last night - and I hate that I know this - I need you to understand that I hate that I know this - there was a World Cup, in which England beat New Zealand, even though they really shouldn’t have. This was important because nobody has ever won the World Cup ever, or something, and it was also at The Spiritual Home Of Cricket (which is where souls go since the Pope abolished Limbo - it’s a kind of waiting room in London) and also because it was on free TV, and also, ALSO, Wimbledon was also happening, which was totally relevant somehow.
After spending a day fucking around, from what I absorbed grudgingly, New Zealand was winning, until a sort of slow-motion trainwreck of improbable miracles performed by England.
So the effect was of the usual gibberish for about 8 hours, and then, at the very end, suddenly, without explanation, the crowd began singing “We Will Rock You” in freaky menacing unison, which is what happens when England does???? something??????
And I was like: “but quoi the fuck? you guys have been LOSING all DAY” and the commentators began to just go “ASLKJASHJSALHDKJHF” at top speed, and Dr Glass goes, worshipfully, “I don’t even know what’s happening!”
During this, several people went on strike and hid in cow corner.
and then, a commentator said, without irony, in the tones of a man defying all the gods in the pantheon, clutching his belief to his heart like the armor of righteousness: “I defy anyone to tell me that cricket is boring after THIS.”
SIR.
SIR, I HAVE A DELIVERY OF DEFIANCE FOR YOU.
IT IS ACTUALLY JUST A GIANT EMPTY PVC TUBE THAT I DELIVER OVER YOUR HEAD.
YOU ARE TRAPPED, NOW, SIR.
STAY IN THE TUBE OF DEFIANCE.
YOU ARE DEFIED.
SIGN HERE.
So it was suddenly a tie, because somebody had thrown a ball at an England player, who was looking the other way at the time (because, like, obviously it would be ridiculous to be expecting somebody to throw a ball in your general direction at a ball game! especially when you are hiding in cow corner, that’s illegal)
and it bounced off his bat, which counts as him hitting it, and got on a bus bound for Cardiff, to join the Extinction Rebellion blockade, which scores 200 points obviously, plus an extra 17.5 points for demonstrating social responsibility! which meant that England was suddenly tied with New Zealand and the game was over. BUT YOU CAN’T HAVE A TIE FOR THE WORLD CUP, obviously, you can have it for all of the others but not THE WORLD CUP! so they played another game and had another tie, and when that happens, the oldest player on the field calls their dad and has him count up all the technicalities, and so England won on a technicality.
This decision-making process, on the radio, has all the gripping drama of a bunch of men standing around a burst water pipe - you know, how you have the one guy wearing a hard hat down in the hole, staring sadly at the burst water pipe and maybe patting it with a shovel, and five other men in various jazzy costumes all staring at him soberly and commenting on it, and another man to drive the truck? And they all discuss it, at about 0.25 of regular human speed, until 4:46 pm, when they eventually reach a consensus of maybe doing something about it, after they see what the Boss says. And meanwhile in this scenario there is a crowd standing respectfully on the sidelines, just absolutely roaring for blood and doing stomp-CLAP-stomp-stomp-CLAP, just completely fuckin’ ravenous about the methodology being deployed here. That was the process of winning the game.
And the reaction, which everyone must suffer through today, if they are trapped on these islands with these people, includes stuff like this BBC coverage:
You couldn’t write it, because it was a plotline too twisted to make dramatic sense, too confusing, too remote from what has gone before.
We’re OK with spaceships and child wizards because they have been imagined before. Plenty had dreamed of England winning the World Cup. That’s where logic waved farewell.
And - not to criticize the BBC for being unimaginative - this is where you gotta sit them gently down, and tell them - because nobody else will! - that logic waved farewell to you guys a long time ago.
GET INTO THE FUCKING PLASTIC TUBE.
Nyx, goddess of the night.
Zack Pinsent is a young tailor who dresses like a Regency gentleman, every day.
The Brighton tailor whose identity became his business
Zack MacLeod Pinsent dresses as a Regency gentleman every day, saying that the clothing is a “huge confidence builder”.
He ceremoniously burned his last pair of jeans when he was 14-years-old and hasn’t looked back since.
His passion for historical outfits has led him to take up a career in tailoring, making clothes in period styles at his workshop in Brighton, East Sussex.
He now has clients overseas and has recently returned from a business trip to New York.
Video journalists: Adam Paylor and Ben Moore
Slideshow…
m’dandy
idol let’s just say that
I want this man to make my wardrobe for the rest of my life.
@captainlordauditor the fact that i saw this post and then was like “damn you’d get a kick out of this” and then realized it was on my feed cuz you reblogged it
honestly…..my life goals are to be this man but about 50 to 100 years after the time period he does.
He also does Shakespearean acting and historical drag.
sometimes people try to tell me that scientists are paragons of rationality and I have to break it to them that I have yet to work in a lab that didn’t have at least one weird secret shrine in it
new guy: why is all of the equipment in this room covered in toys?
me: dONn’t touch those
new guy:
me: they need the toys to function. if they don’t all have toys they get jealous.
new guy:
new guy:
me: when something breaks just take the wizard and wave it around for a while. they seem to like that.
Science is rational, scientists are human.
In Taiwan we have a special brand of snacks named 乖乖 (literally means “well behaved” but in a casual way like when one’s compliment a child or a pet of being good) that has green package.
It has become the lucky charm in the IT industry because engineers believe it will make machine acting good (like the name of the snack) and stay in green light (like the color of the snack’s package) when a 乖乖 is put on top of a server.
It is the only food allowed in a server room and the biggest semicondoctor company in Taiwan (which is also the biggest worldwide) even commissioned the snack factory to make a customized version with blessing on the package.
This is how a server room is blessed by 乖乖. You put at least one on top of each server. It’s important that the engineers change them before the expire date because legend says the snack looses it’s power after expire date.
You’ll hear engineers swearing up and down that their server room crushed down the one time they forgot to change the snack. Or some newbie ate the forbidden snack put on top of their server and caused a disastrous crush down.
The 乖乖 religion later spread to all people who want their machine to act nice. In the lab we put 乖乖 on ultra-low freezer (you really don’t want it to drop dead along with your 2 years’ worth of sample/data), mass spectrometer etc.
When Taiwan’s about to launch the first self made satellite in 2017, the develop team even put 乖乖 around the satellite model to prey for a successful launch (it did). This shit is real.
I have got to show this to my mother.
Who one time had to go rip a university department a new one because the dumbasses had named their server ‘Kali’ and then wondered why data was being randomly destroyed. She made them build a little shrine on top and everyone had to bring a small offering. The data destruction stopped.
That shrine was still there when she left 3 years later. They told her they didn’t dare move anything because every time someone took something away, data mysteriously disappeared. She explained again that Kali is called ‘the Destroyer’ for a reason, contributed to the shrine, and left. As far as she knows, the shrine stayed there until the server was replaced.
I am glad Neil Gaiman confirmed that Crowley was presenting as female during the crucifixion scene
Because I have seen people argue that his Nanny outfit was transphobic, and I happen to think that’s a bad take. It would have been transphobic if the joke had been, “Ha ha, a man in a dress,” but instead the joke was, “Ha ha, demonic Mary Poppins.” But, you know, even though I think it’s a bad take, I can kind of understand where it’s coming from. We’ve been so socialized to think the joke is going to be, “Ha ha, a man in a dress,” that it’s difficult to put a man in a dress without the joke sort of popping up, if that makes any sense, whether the creator meant it or not.
But, if Crowley was presenting as female at the crucifixion scene, that’s a different angle. Because nobody is drawing any attention to his presentation, and the only jokes going on have nothing to do with how he’s presenting himself. (In fact, that scene is appropriately grim, overall. The biggest joke is a very dark one about how of course preaching a message of love and peace will get you horrifically murdered by the government.) Crowley’s presentation is just … there.
And if you ask me, that changes the context of the Mary Poppins bit a little bit, too. Presenting as female is not something that Crowley did one time, for a disguise. Presenting as female is just something he does every now and then.
I wish we’d seen a little more of it. Another historical segment, closer to our own time, when “female presentation” looks a bit more like we’re used to seeing and the issue isn’t confused by everyone wearing robes. But even so, I’m glad to have it there and even more glad to have it confirmed.
I bet that post-canon Crowley sometimes dresses up in a black dress to go to the opera with Aziraphale. Probably with high heels that could kill a man and very snake-themed jewelry.
Yes, oh yes. He’s wearing women’s jeans in the modern scenes too and that is a tiny detail that just gets to me, because it’s such a secret queer move: wear one forbidden thing, the least noticeable, as a comfort, a small assertion of yourself, if just to yourself. At the crucifixion he’d have an easier time staying close dressed as a woman, since they allowed the female disciples to follow along, and as Nanny he had the perfect excuse to dress up, but any other time it could have brought him trouble, and not the properly hellish kind. It would have been a self-assertion of a very human, personal kind.
I think the less it matters if he draws attention to himself, the more he’ll try on more feminine elements. He was always so frightened of being watched. His outfits were dramatic, but they were the kind of dramatic that told you not to mess with him. I think the new vulnerability and safety he feels with Aziraphale would help, and so would the knowledge that no one’s going to check up on him, no one needs intimidating, and he isn’t anyone’s secret agent. There’s no agenda any more, no secrets to defend or forbidden softness to armor up; he’s just Crowley.
I can’t locate it again, but I remember seeing a post saying that his glasses in the modern era are three hundred dollar women’s sunglasses. (Of which he evidently owns … well, as many as he wants, I suppose, he can warp reality after all.) So, yes, there’s also stealthy self-assertion to look for.
Oh yeah, I remember seeing that too! I’d forgotten. His hair is always just on that fine line between fashionable and femme too.
Thanks @aredhel-of-doylkien none of us remember our sources but we all remember that Crowley is That Snake when it comes to accessories I guess
I am also solidly convinced that the waistcoat he wears in the 2012 scenes is a woman’s waistcoat. I’m aware that men’s waistcoats can have different cuts and styles, but (at least to my uneducated eye) Crowley’s waistcoat specifically looks like it was tailored to cinch in above the hips, and to accommodate breasts.
AAAAAH I suspect I’m the last person to notice this, but check it out – they’re wearing the same outfit. Trousers, waistcoat, shirt, jacket, neckwear. They’re just doing it in *completely different ways*. How cool! It’s kind of interesting – Crowley’s riding the edge of femme/is femme if you know exactly what to look for, but reads as just cool slinky dude to us. Aziraphale is dressed out of time, fussy and unfashionable, and reads as gayer than a tree full of monkeys on nitrous oxide. His femme characteristics are all personality-based: he’s soft, he’s kind and gentle (with an asterisk, that’s a meta for another day), the general cultural link between presenting gay and being femme. Aziraphale’s genderfuckery is how he approaches the world; Crowley’s is how he visually presents. I feel like there’s more here to dig into, but I’m not quite grasping it right now.
Nothing to worry about, just mutant fruit flies invented by a neural network
People send me the weirdest ideas.
I knew that fruit flies are a mainstay of research labs, but I had never given them much thought until Prof. Greg Neely emailed me to point out how weird the names of mutant fruit flies are. There’s a strain of mutants called “Out Cold” where the fly loses motor coordination below a certain temperature, and another nicknamed “Moonwalker” that walks backwards. Could a neural network learn how to invent new names and mutations?
The problem was I didn’t have a big list of examples to train a neural net on - there just aren’t that many quirky ones. So I turned to a strategy I’ve used in the past: prompting a general-purpose neural net called GPT-2. GPT-2′s training examples were huge chunks of text from the internet - maybe it had seen enough on the internet that it could figure out what I was asking it for? I prompted GPT-2 with a short list of example fruit fly mutants, and asked it to add to the list. The smallest GPT-2, the 117 million parameter model I sampled via Max Woolf’s GPT-2-small interface, wasn’t quite up to the task - it would drift into song lyrics or conversations or lists of vampires. The next-largest version of GPT-2, however, the 345 million parameter model I sampled via talktotransformer.com, often got the hang of it. I’m particularly impressed at how the names seem to match their attributes, even if the attributes are a bit far-fetched.
Macho Man: Likes to punch.
Soap-Sucking Insects: a gene that causes the fruit flies to be attracted to soaps which smell funny.
Tornado: A fly that can take a huge amount of damage during turbulence.
Chocolate Eye: The fly that drinks and stumbles when eating candy.
Jungle Fire: Any of several genes that makes the flies more prone to fires.
They get weirder. A lot weirder.
Jingle Bells: Does not speak but sings.
The Last Emperor: Has a huge black mustache.
Unicorn Faced: A gene that prevents flies from developing fruit fly traits.
Grigk: A gene that makes the fruit fly think it has been turned into a gorilla.
Frogman: The fruit fly that makes a nuisance of itself when you try to do anything dirty.
Lover-Possum-Worm: A gene that affects mating habits of fruit flies.
The Brain-less Fly: The fly that has no brain.
I’m with the Cheddar: The fly that has no brain. But the flies aren’t with the Cheddar!
Pork and Cheddar: The flies where the hair was replaced by the brains of those who ate Pork and Cheddar.
Some of the fly mutants are rather terrifying. I think you might need to fill out a special form to be allowed to use these mutants.
Linda: Is able to communicate through vibrations.
Zebra: Gives off sparks when he moves.
Lana: Her eyes are covered by a large, purple cloud.
Nerd Rage: Has two eyeballs, but is pretty much invincible.
Chocolate Corn Cone: Has six heads. It’s made out of chocolate and corn (in addition to the brains from its victims).
Lemondogs: The fruit flies from the American Southwest who were responsible for killing the dinosaurs and driving scientists crazy years earlier. As a consequence they evolved into the same kind of insect that scientists now recognize today as the Lommy Beetle, the “mammal-sized flea” from the Southwest.
The Worm: Gives birth to worms and can fly. Wormholes between worlds and hyperspace allow the worm to travel to and from one world and return to the home (and body) of another.
These are some of the subtler mutants. Takes careful experimentation to figure out which one you have. At least you can be pretty sure it’s not Chocolate Corn Cone.
Maggie’s Kiss: A fly that doesn’t even
In a Perfect World: A fruit fly that’s never met and never will be.
I’ma Be Here Now: Causes people to be happy even when they’re still alive.
The Cat that Kicked the Can: Is a good boy.
Cute Silly: A fly that is cute and lovable when it is stressed.
Gripping Burden: Stays alive even if it doesn’t move much.
Bonus content: more flies!
in the brief period of my life where I worked on Drosophila, I kept having improbably high numbers of maggieskiss mutants