If this was a newer keyboard she'd be touching the copilot key right now. Chilling.
Claire Keane
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

blake kathryn

shark vs the universe
noise dept.
Monterey Bay Aquarium
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

#extradirty
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
No title available

Product Placement

izzy's playlists!
trying on a metaphor

Kiana Khansmith
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

No title available
Show & Tell

Andulka
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Poland

seen from Argentina
seen from Luxembourg
seen from Indonesia

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Germany

seen from Hungary
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Thailand

seen from T1
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Romania

seen from Malaysia
@chalicotheria
If this was a newer keyboard she'd be touching the copilot key right now. Chilling.
it really bothers me how trump has completely annihilated any expectations of decorum from elected officials
some of my favourite sign fails <3
remember how for a brief period back in the 2010s the message was that clothes/voice tone/mannerisms don't define you or hint at your sexuality at all and straight men could wear glitter eyeshadow and still be straight men and that it wasn't right to say "you look like a lesbian" to women who didn't wear makeup and preferred practical clothes? or did I hallucinate it all? because now there's this added layer of gender bullshit we have to contend with on top of it. calling others slurs and saying they're zesty & fruity was done by both homophobes and spicy straights who felt the need to reclaim those slurs, but now you just get called an egg if you fail to perform certain gender roles. girl brain boy brain crap. they're as obsessed with gender roles and stereotypes as their parents and grandparents.
"oh my god I didn't know this person was straight they dress/act/speak sooo gay" i'm going to kill you i'm gonna do it "or maybe their egg is about to crack" i swear to fucking god the only thing cracking here will be your skull
I mourn that time so often.
Seeing ppl call a male character from a very famous video game "effeminate" bc he has mannerism/is dramatic/has a voice slightly higher pitched/moved his hands when he talks? AND because he's "effeminate", he HAS to be gay despite being canonically bi and straight women are dumb for falling for him?
Seeing articles about ppl from the past and it's a gnc gay man who gets called a drag queen/crossdresser when he simply dresses like he wanted bc HE understood that clothes are not genderlocked? And it's a lesbian woman dressed like a man for personal safety who gets called a trans man with absolute confidence?
If the people who bring boomboxes into nature areas were playing acoustic folk music then at least I would understand their vision. The fact that it's always some kind of amplified dance music that could not be performed live in the wilderness without dragging in some generators is like... why would you ever think this is a good idea? Why would you ever want this? Being inconsiderate is bad enough, why do you have to be an aesthetic abomination on top of that?
I can appreciate the dance music in a populated area to be clear, but in the forest it absolutely clashes. Come on now!
looking for animal references on image searches has always kind of sucked but it's much worse after AI image generation technology has begun to actually past muster, which is why i always just go straight to inaturalist. can't recommend this highly enough. you get to both find out about niche species you've never even heard of and also see some really good photographs like this one
x
@animalphotorefs is a good source too and indie owned (idk how youd say it? like only a few people run it i think and they pay for hosting the website themselves just to be helpful)
*waves*
I love that folk have tagged me in multiple times!
Just wanted to note two things:
I have at least five times as many species in my files as online, so if there’s something you need and don’t see, you’re always welcome to ask. I can’t guarantee if he’ll have it or I can get it online quickly, but I will if I can.
Also, this site is just me! Totally a one-person, guaranteed AI free project.
maybe instead of making scientist barbies to get women into stem they could market science kits to girls…… just a thunk
Something about women expecting to be looked at (barbie as a woman who looks like she does science) while boys are expected to participate in the world (actually do science, no illusions or focus on the marketing the image of self)
Science kits are already marketed gender-neutrally for the most part. What do you want them to do? Make them pink?
I received many a science kit as a little girl. The thing that stopped me from becoming a scientist was the disrespectful behavior of the boys in science class (that is, exploiting my work but never believing I might have the right answer to a question). That isn’t a problem that can be solved with toys.
The science kits themselves may be gender neutral but the marketing like commercials or product placement isn’t. It’s true that toys aren’t the only solution to getting girls into STEM but it sure would have helped if people felt more comfortable gifting science kits to girls. Despite being into science and math since I was four, I only got a couple science kits from my mom. No extended families or friends gave me science kits.
What marketing and product placement of science kits are you seeing? I see science kits in the gift shops of museums and zoos, and the vibe is very SCIENCE IS FOR EVERYONE! I see science kits at my local Target on a shelf facing towards the main loop around the store where there are no particular gender markers. I did a google search for "science kits for kids" and the results had girls on the packaging exactly as often as boys- I counted. Maybe I'm in a liberal bubble, but it seems like the marketing for these things is very carefully gender neutral and it's hard for me to imagine a way to target it more towards girls without making it patronizing.
Just throwing it out there: this post is from 2023. In the past three years I have spent more time with friends who have kids and I have a niece on the way and now it is becoming clear to me that my 90s childhood really really isn't current or representative of how things are now. My impression from your blog is that you are also an adult. So consider: the adults who chose not to give you science kits are no longer the parents and aunties of current children. Millennials and older gen-z are the parents now. It's you and I and our peers who are in the position to give little girls science kits as parents or friends of parents or extended family. In my experience it seems like most millennials have their established opinions on whether girls should be encouraged in STEM, and the ones who don't explicitly support girls getting into STEM are not going to have their minds changed by mere marketing. But I could be wrong.
attention to all dashcon attendees
someone urinated into the ballpit while it was empty and posted it in the tag
stay out of the ballpit
there are people who think this is a joke
this is not a joke
please stay out of the ballpit for the safety of your health
Ancient scribes detailing horrible events
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you can’t not have servants in those times but many modern readers think “but I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servants” and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldn’t it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing you’ll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc he’s not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way
#okay but now what is the optimal way to be a good boss in this situation i genuinely wanna know#its easy to guess what makes a bad boss or a mid boss. but what is a good boss#specifically in such a highly structured hierarchal situation (via @rainbowroach)
HELLO you are asking questions that literature and poetry THROUGHOUT the middle ages has asked, and it is from this questioning that we derive things like the Codes of Chivalry (which is not "how to treat a noble lady really nice" but is actually "how to be an ethical person when you're rich and you own a horse" and includes such things as "don't run people over with your horse")
In fact I daresay you already know instinctively just from cultural osmosis what a good boss -- a good liege lord -- is and does based on the tropes that have survived to the current day and the kinds of things that get Hugely Praised in things like legends of King Arthur.
A good boss (liege lord) is:
Merciful. He is not having his peasants killed for things like poaching rabbits during a famine. In fact, he is working to mitigate famine. During times of individual hardship, he might negotiate with a peasant for a payment plan on their annual rent.
Patient. He is not impulsive, he does not lose his temper.
Prudent. He makes choices that are thoughtful, considered, conservative (in the sense of not needlessly risky--he's not investing his entire fortune in having everyone plant an unproven crop). He is making sure local infrastructure like roads and public buildings are maintained and kept in good nick.
Gentle. He doesn't haul off and slap a servant or a tenant for breaking a dish or making a mistake. He doesn't abuse animals, his wife or children, or his employees. He doesn't rape the servants.
Generous (both in money and in spirit). He is not extorting the peasants for an amount of rent that is beyond their means, he is not raising taxes every year to cover his own lavish lifestyle. He is paying his servants a living wage (or, if wages are low, he's giving them room/board/clothing to make up the difference). If someone in a tenant's family dies, the lord is sending a gift of condolence, or helping to pay for the funeral, or possibly even ATTENDING the funeral and speaking a few kind words about the deceased, ESPECIALLY if they were a really upstanding and important member of the community. If one of his tenants is gravely sick, the lord is sending a basket of food or paying for a doctor. He is giving charitably (generally this will be, like, a bequest to the church so that they can run a hospital or an orphanage or a school for the local village children).
Pious. This classically means "goes to church, submits with humility to God" but to me this quality is subtextually standing in for "maintaining an ongoing sense of Perspective that HE'S not god, that there are higher powers he is Accountable to, that he too can be Judged, etc, so that he doesn't end up going on a weird fucked up power trip"
Humble. One of the most admiring things you hear about a lord doing in literature and epic poetry is, "He ate off of wooden plates while his followers ate off of gold and silver." Humility isn't about being meek, it's just about not thinking so much of yourself that you turn your nose up and sneer at what "lesser" people do. In other words: Don't be a fucking diva. If your carriage gets stuck in the mud, climb out and help everybody else push, you're not gonna die from getting mud on your shoes.
Condescending. This word has changed wildly in meaning/tone over the last couple centuries -- it's now a rude thing to do (because we've done away with legal social hierarchies, so someone acting like they're lowering themselves to your level IS insulting), but in older times, a high-ranking person "condescending" to a servant was worthy of praise and admiration: it means they were setting aside rank and privilege to speak to them with the easygoing, friendly respect and compassion they'd give a peer. This is things like... Treats those beneath him with courtesy and respect (ie: listens soberly and attentively when one of his servants or tenants comes to complain about a problem). Having a sense of humor and kindness about it when the lord and a servant both come around a corner at the same time and run into each other and the servant gets knocked to the ground and starts babbling apologies--the condescending (positive) lord helps them to their feet with his own hands and cracks a joke to show them that it's ok (as opposed to just walking off without a word or insulting/scolding them). This is also things like trusting a farmer, woodcutter, or artisan to speak with expertise about their own livelihood and taking their advice into consideration if they tell the lord that one of his ideas won't work.
Good boundaries. The ethical liege lord knows that it's normal for the staff to probably be softly bitching about him in private (even with a really good boss, we all grumble from time to time). He's not eavesdropping on them, he's not going into the staff areas where they should reasonably expect to have a degree of privacy, etc.
Righteous and protective of "the weak". The "weak" here doesn't necessarily mean physically weak, this is often used in the sense of someone politically or socially weak, aka The Marginalized -- the poor, the disabled, women, children, the elderly, etc. If a lord sees someone like this being mistreated or abused, he's supposed to step in and put a stop to that.
Committed to reciprocity. In a highly hierarchical system like feudalism, every person (from the lowest peasant all the way up to the crown prince) legally OWES their liege lord certain things (taxes, labor, service, loyalty, etc). A good liege remembers and takes very seriously the idea that this should be a balanced and reciprocal relationship -- in other words, he owes something BACK. Feudalism is modeled very strongly on the family system: If children owe their parents obedience and service, then parents owe their children care and protection. This still applies when the "child" is a farmer and the "parent" is a local baron. Or when the "child" is a duke and the "parent" is the king.
Basically, we get so caught up in the aesthetics of nobility that we forget that it literally is a managerial position that comes with responsibilities that were... very similar back in the day to the same ones we have now. Humans have not changed all that much. At the end of the day, a really good boss in the 1400s versus in one from the 2020s displays most of the same qualities of personality, even if the details of execution are different.
The next question is, of course, "well, but this theoretical liege lord is HIGHLY idealized -- how often did that actually HAPPEN? Wasn't it more likely that everyone was exploited all the time?" and to that I say: Well, maybe. But again, I don't think humans have changed all that much. Just like the bosses of today, there's a SPECTRUM: A really really good boss is rare and precious and one that you tell stories about for years after you've left that job, but a truly, genuinely, homicidally nightmarish boss is also pretty rare. Most bosses are sort of meh -- they have their good moments, they have their shitty moments, but they're tolerable and you can get along with them well enough to do your job, and then you roll your eyes at them behind their back. Generally, humans don't take outright exploitation lying down. Being a bad boss in the historical period is how you get peasant uprisings and revolts, and you know that to be true because your parents raised you with that knowledge, so unless you are very stupid or inbred or an egomaniac, there is literal personal incentive to at minimum be a Tolerable liege lord. And that means hitting at least SOME of the above bullet points.
TL;DR: In the words of Honore de Balzac, "Everything I have just told you can be summarized by an old word: noblesse oblige!"
(for more discussions of the ethics of fealty and what it means to be a good boss when you are an exquisitely beautiful twink of a prince with a hot beefy bodyguard.... [fingerguns] read A Taste of Gold and Iron)
Admittedly I'm somewhat out of the loop, but I'm surprised that I haven't seen Republicans making ai videos of Mitch McConnell to "prove" he's alive. Is that a line they won't cross? Why is that a line they won't cross given all the other lines that they have crossed?
Hell, are they developing a full on Mitch McConnell AI character they're going to try to stick in his place in Congress? Would they try to replace Trump with a Trump AI if he died in office? Are we about to be in for the test run of that? I have concerns.
I don't think it's unreasonable for our public officials to be expected to prove they're alive and not in a coma to be able to retain their office.
If someone were, as a random example, say hospitalized for over two weeks with no explanation, I think that should automatically trigger a special election to replace them.
If you're still able to do your job, then prove it. And if you're not, then you're actively obstructing democracy by not stepping down.
Which is to say, that if a public official were to pass away or into a coma, and their handlers choose to obfuscate that fact, this should be seen as intentionally obstructing democracy.
And there should be, you know, consequences for the people who would do such a thing.
Baby sphinx trying to be like mama and waylaying travelers, but all its riddles are completely non-sensical like the ones a 1st grader would tell
let's be cryptic with mama
"Men should put the seat down when they're done peeing so that I don't fall into the toilet when I sit down to pee"
"Actually women should be putting the seat back up when they're done peeing as a courtesy so that I don't have to touch it and put the seat up before I pee"
Actually, both the seat AND lid should be down when no one is actively using the toilet, because this prevents things from accidentally falling into / accidentally being dropped into the toilet. Also having the lid down when you're flushing is important because it prevents the toilet from spraying out bacteria.
It's called "toilet plume" or "fecal plume." Here's a video of it.
It also prevents your cats and dogs from drinking out of the toilet.
it really bugs me that people don’t close the lid before they flush. 99% of bathrooms have either a towel or a toothbrush within range of toilet spray!
is anyone else annoyed that "ai" encompasses both chatgpt and tools we train to do repetitive tedious work for us. and by the ripple effect of articles like "scientists develop ai to detect cancer early" that make people argue for the merit of chatgpt or become anti-medicine. and by the general state of the world and society