being asked what i want for my birthday and suddenly I'm a minimalist who has never had a material want in my whole life

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
hello vonnie

Product Placement

#extradirty

Love Begins
untitled

oozey mess

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
sheepfilms
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Today's Document
Not today Justin
KIROKAZE
EXPECTATIONS
RMH

PR's Tumblrdome
NASA

Kiana Khansmith

titsay
The Stonewall Inn
seen from Bolivia
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from Panama
seen from Brazil
seen from France
seen from Russia
seen from Germany

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
@cranberrysconesandherbaltea
being asked what i want for my birthday and suddenly I'm a minimalist who has never had a material want in my whole life
re-read the books of your childhood. there are fragments of your soul scattered through them.
i just wanna do nothinggggg 😭😭😭😭😭 which is like what im already doing but i wanna do it in a way that doesnt actively ruin my life 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Welcome to my escape room. *places an affectionate cat on your lap*
Cats understand "naughty". In fact I think they're the only animal who understands it. Dogs know "good" and "bad" but not Naughty. Same with theft. Cats know what theft is. They know when they are thieving and you can see it on their faces. Squirrels are thieves but they don't know that. They know "take" and "have" but they don't comprehend what it is to steal. Nor do raccoons or coyotes or any species of rodent. They may participate in theft but they are ignorant of the weight of what they do, the full meaning of it. Cats know what crime is and they do it on purpose.
Magic terrariums 🔮
Tip jar | Wallpapers | Prints | Twitter | Bluesky
“everybody makes mistakes” well i’m not allowed. if i make a mistake i’ll be killed
person (non-practicing)
sorry I can’t hang out tonight. yeah I’m busy freaking out over things that might not even happen. yeah it’s gonna take a while
Duckies on the way to gay <3
happy pride :)
He eat a nemon
Water Jellyfish 💧⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅💧
mummies? genus of the zombie family. the two are not taxonomically exclusive groups, educate yourself
Also skeletons by that logic.
A lot of people make this mistake actually! ‘Skeleton’ can refer to any individual member of the family Zombie that has shed its fleshy exoskeleton. It’s just an unlife cycle stage, but because of its distinct appearance we refer to it by a separate common name (similar to how a ‘black panther’ is just a colour variant of leopards and jaguars, not a separate species).
Okay, so I think this is a point of confusion.
The term “zombie” is both a technical term, referring to a family, and a common name, referring to a genus.
The family Zombie is a broad, overarching group that includes the genus that many people call zombie (Ghoulus, not to be confused with Ghouli, the unrelated genus of the Ghala family which also includes bogeymen and some ghosts*) as well as the Mummy genus (Pyrima), the spore-zombie genus (Fungan) and a few others.
The colloquial term “Zombie” is the common term for the genus Ghoulus, which is in the family Zombie and includes Ghoulus romero (the walking zombie), Ghoulus snydera (the running zombie), and Ghoulus smithi (the vampiric zombie, also called the legendary zombie).
Interestingly, there are several things called “zombies” that are neither Ghoulus nor Zombie, including the dancing zombie (Jacksoni thrillera), which is more closely related to (although not currently actually in the same family as) clowns.
*Note: the ghosts in the Ghala family are not true ghosts. True ghosts are in the order Spectere, which is entirely unrelated to Ghouli, Ghoulus, Pyrima, and Fungan. Ghala “ghosts” are given the common name ghost because of their superficial similarity to true ghosts.
Important note: sometimes you’ll see people claiming that zombies are domesticated! They are not! Some zombies can be tamed (like Ghoulus romero), but zombies are wild animals and might hurt you if you approach them! Leave them alone and don’t feed them!
are there any domestic ghosts?
this is a great question! here’s the answer:
the closest to a domesticated ghost we have is the house ghost, Phantome domus (sometimes classified as a distinct subspecies Phantome domus domesticus).
P. domus is interesting because it’s like housecats – they are technically domesticated (scans have shown that the fight-or-flight response, like in domesticated animals, is weaker in P. domus than in related species like P. majestica, the manor ghost, or P. more, the cemetary ghost), but evidence suggests that it’s a naturalistic co-evolution rather than an intentional domestication process like with sheep or dogs.
If a house ghost takes up residence in your home, they are completely safe unless treated in an inhumane way. There is a stereotype of house ghosts that they are dangerous or volatile, but this is usually due to confusion with other species, especially the common poltergeist (Sellaruptor vulgaris) or vengeance spirit (Phantome odium).
Ghostbusters remake but they’re biologists running a catch and release program
I love scientifically explained fantasy. It is so much fun exploring the fantasy world in terms of biological phenomena.
he is encouraging you to take life one step at a time
If one more person says simon snow should lose his wings i’m gonna lose my goddamn mind: a meta
Alright you guys, I’ve had ENOUGH. Simon cannot lose his wings unless you want him to break up with Baz, and this is why.
Keep reading
I have found these meta posts today and I am LIVING FOR THEM.
So many thoughts swirling through my head (warning—excitable word salad ahead) but I want to say I really love the themes and metaphors addressed here. I read Wayward Son at breakneck pace and I’m listening to the audiobook currently, which is allowing me to appreciate so much more of the nuance, poetry, imagery, and depth of it—but it’s also slapping me in the face with how much of this was foreshadowed in Carry On. (I’ll have to go through and document that whole insight in another post.)
To chime in on some of the issues raised in this meta post by @adamarks.
First a few random thoughts:
1. Rainbow’s dedication in Carry On is about wings—and it is telling. “For Laddie and Rosey—May you fight your own battles and forge your own wings.”
That’s a very positive view of wings. And I don’t think the narrative is leading us to the conclusion of Simon forcibly removing those manifestations of his magic, power, love. He is still magic. Even if he actively can’t cast spells or do magic—his wings are magic, so he is a magical being. So perhaps he gets magic back in the future. Or harnesses the power of the residual magic in him. Or learns to accept who he is, that he believes he is a magical being in his own mind. But I agree that Simon’s wings are tied to his love for Baz—the way they manifest when his emotions are heightened parallels his old magic but in Wayward Son it is almost always in relation to Baz—when he’s comfortable and flying free, when he’s protective/in defense of Baz, when he’s jealous and possessive, when he’s being soft with Baz.
2. The symbol of Wales is a dragon. Simon is part Welsh, from the Mage. To me this somehow further delineates his lineage and the association with dragons. It may just be coincidence but it seems like more to me.
3. Simon’s wings could be spelled away the previous times he created them but the dragon wings and tail he manifests on the night the Humdrum attacks Baz in the forest can’t be—no spell works on them and even the loss of Simon’s magic leaves them unaffected. Simon mentions he was thinking of the dragon when he created the dragon wings and tail—that harks back to the first time he shared magic with Baz.
Simon’s magic burns everyone but Baz. But Baz is a fire mage-he says it himself—“I come from a long line of fire magicians—two long lines, the Grimms and the Pitches. I’m brilliant with fire. As long as I don’t get too close. No … The cruel joke of it is that Simon Snow smells like smoke.”
Simon is very aware of that aspect of Baz—the relation to fire. “It’s always fire with Baz”—Simon says in Carry On. He brings it up over and over—to the Dryad later on-“Pitch is the House of Fire.”
Baz has an affinity for fire. He describes Simon’s magic in terms of fire when Simon shares his magic in the room: “The discomfort goes away, even though the licking, flaming feeling gets stronger. This I know what to do with: This is fire.”
And he does know what to do with it.
Simon’s magic has never felt this controlled—Baz was able to exert a control on it Simon can’t. A fire mage’s control.
Even the “Ladybird” spell for getting the dragon to leave is layered in fire imagery.
The fire imagery returns when Baz is drained by the Humdrum and Simon shares his magic again: “And then Simon filled me up again with fire.” Simon’s magic doesn’t burn him like it burns Penny—Rainbow has gone on record to say it shows the compatibility of their magic.
And speaking of the “Ladybird” spell imagery brings us to:
4. Baz is PROTECTIVE of dragons. We see that in the “Ladybird” scene. He doesn’t want the dragon hurt or killed—he knows it’s being used/controlled and he wants to let it be free, unharmed (do we know someone else who is being used/controlled? Hmm). And Baz is extremely protective of Simon—in the forest after the Humdrum attack, in the tower with the Mage, in the aftermath of those events, in every situation in Wayward Son. Simon’s safety is of paramount importance in Wayward Son. The way Baz behaves in encounter after encounter, only serves to reinforce that. I’ve seen some people comment that it’s out of character but I disagree—Baz is not going to risk danger to Simon from magical beings/situations if he can talk his way out of it without a confrontation. He knows how Simon is in dangerous, confrontational situations and he’d like to avoid those at all costs. He’s willing to do whatever it takes—talk his way out of it, allow goat creatures to feel him up, get shot full of buckshot, brave a den of vampires, trust unreliable allies—but he abandons that and basically rips the jaw off a vampire when he thinks Simon is dead/severely injured. Just as he attacked the Mage in the tower. He throws all caution to the wind and exposes himself unflinchingly to danger and death when it comes to this, when he can’t protect Simon anymore—that’s when he unleashes.
The wings and tail are Simon’s residual magic. They were created by his magic and stayed, even when he gave it all away. To me that signifies they are an integral part of him. And the manifestation that he still is magic. And that they are very tied in/representative of his love for Baz is a truly intriguing and compelling argument. I hadn’t thought of this interpretation but I’m desperate to reread the book with that idea in my head. It really makes a lot of sense.
Final thought goes back to the epilogue of Carry On and how Baz feels when Simon considers the option of Dr. Wellbelove taking care of his wings and tail: “Let’s not do anything hasty”—Baz about Simon’s wings being removed.
Sorry for the scattered word vomit of this. I had a lot of thoughts but won’t claim they were coherent!!
5. I was reminded of one more dragon reference (thanks to @vkelleyart inktober for today) —the room Simon is assigned at Pitch manor has a DRAGON over the door. “There’s a dragon painted on the archway around the door, and its face is charmed to glow and follow you in the dark.”
Hi. I’m back to this BECAUSE I CANNOT LET THIS GO. Chatting with @fabulous-book-dragon about Simon reminded me of my other idea regarding Simon and his wings and his magic.
6. Simon’s parents were both powerful mages so he should theoretically have inherent magic of his own that’s not the freaky mad power that the Mage saddled him with. The water spirit told him he gave back more: “You put it back. And morrre.” So in theory, Simon has some amount of native magic of his own, likely buried under that superhero magic that manifested in Carry On. He may have given some of that away too but perhaps he still has some—so low level he can’t really perceive it or access it right now, with his current mind set, trauma and all that’s gone on. But he’s still got his wings—a physical manifestation of his love for Baz, as we’ve discussed. What if his magic—his own residual, untapped magic—is tied to the wings and tail? The dragon parts of him? That it’s where his magic resides? And cutting them off would be doubly devastating—it’s his love for Baz and the other thing he loved so dearly before he realized he loved Baz—his magic, inextricably tied into his deep love for Baz.
Yes, I can’t stop thinking about this.