where would we be without them
The Allium Family

No title available
d e v o n
tumblr dot com
AnasAbdin
Keni

@theartofmadeline
hello vonnie
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

#extradirty

titsay

JVL
Today's Document
styofa doing anything
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
noise dept.
DEAR READER
🪼
Stranger Things
almost home
KIROKAZE
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from China

seen from Singapore
seen from Finland
seen from Russia

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@doctorluthien
where would we be without them
The Allium Family
It's crazy how humanity invented bicycles and decided to try it with one big wheel and one small wheel BEFORE they tried having two wheels the same size
This is not quite true, though it would be very funny if it was.
The classic "old bicycle" we're all thinking of, which looked like this:
Is actually a technological compromise developed in the early 1870s. The very first bicycle was invented in 1817 and it looked like this:
It had no pedals and the rider would push it along with their feet, the same way toddlers learn to ride bikes today.
In about 1864, a mechanic in france came up with the idea of adding pedals to the front wheel, making the first self-propelled bicycle.
This was a great improvement because it's a lot easier to move and a lot more fun than the Fisher Price version above. It was a big thing for about five years, but there were some drawbacks.
First, because the pedals were directly attached to the front wheel, you couldn't go very fast without moving your legs incredibly quickly, which takes a lot of effort. It also is kind of awkward to steer because your legs are in the way of the wheel.
The other issue was bumps. Roads were not very smooth in the 1870s, most of them were unpaved and full of ruts, potholes, and rocks. And at first there were no rubber tires, just wooden wheels with metal rims. Altogether this made for a very bumpy ride.
The big front wheel, which was made possible by the invention of wire spokes and solid rubber tires, solved all of these problems. A big wheel runs over bumps more easily: think of how rough it is to ride roller skates over bumps in a sidewalk that you would hardly notice on a bike. And the bigger the wheel, the faster you can move with one push of the pedals. Having the seat on top of the wheel, instead of behind, also makes steering less cumbersome.
There are of course drawbacks to this design, in particular being so high up makes it very easy to go over the handlebars if you crash, and more likely to hit your head or break your arm.
Two more inventions helped drive this comical beast into extinction and bring back a more balanced, and safer, bicycle.
The first was the pneumatic tire, which contains a cushion of air, and makes for a much softer ride compared to a solid tire or a metal one. The cushion effect eliminates the need for a big wheel to smooth out the bumps in the road.
The second invention was the sprocket and chain drive. This lets you put the pedals anywhere you want on the bike, and with a big gear at the pedals and a small one at the wheel, you can get more speed out of a small wheel.
The first modern bicycle to combine a sprocket and pneumatic tires was built in 1879. It was an instant hit, not just because it was much less dangerous, but because the low drag profile and the smooth pneumatic tires made for a faster ride, and the trendsetters in cycling, then as now, were the racing community. There have been plenty of innovations and modifications in the years since, from ten-speed gears to carbon fiber frames, but these are all variations on a theme. The basic form of the bicycle has not changed.
Happy riding.
Okay full disclosure I was high as a kite when I made this post, otherwise I might have fact-checked my joke before posting, but this is awesome. Thank you for the bicycle lore.
Beloved Bitches,
The "Grocery Shop like a Boss" post is making rounds again, and one of the bitchlings commented that they are moving out on their own for the first time so they were collecting ideas/recipes.
Which got me to wondering; do we have a "How to Preserve Your More Precious than Gold Grocery Haul" post floating around? And if not, should we start one?
We do not! And I agree--we should start one!!!
I'll start:
Tomatoes, carrots, and peppers can all be frozen without any preparation whatsoever. Just bag 'em and toss 'em in the freezer. So if you're worried you won't get to those vegetables before they go bad, freeze them for later recipes. They can then be used in a stirfry, curry, soup, chili, sauce, salsa, smoothie, whatever. And it's much easier, cheaper, and faster than canning.
WHO'S NEXT, BABIES? How are we preserving our grocery hauls?? This WILL become an official Bitches Get Riches World Heritage Post.
Cosmic Truths of Cheap Grocery Shopping: 12 Universal Rules to Save Money on Food, No Matter What You Buy or Where You Shop
Did we just help you out? Say thanks by joining our Patreon!
After I had the last of a batch of mushrooms go bad on me (just barely didn't eat them fast enough, so not too devastating at least!) it was recommended to me to slice and cook my next batch, and then freeze the cooked shrooms in olive oil! (Butter should also work, but not cooking oil - doesn't taste very good.) I have yet to try thawing them and using them for anything, so I can't speak fully to its effectiveness yet, but it seems promising! Don't freeze mushrooms raw though - their texture breaks down pretty bad and they get all slimy.
I have so many freezer hacks!
Souper cubes are worth it (off-brand is probably fine). Freezing food in neat portions that fit into your freezer like little legos is brilliant. I use the littlest ones to make tomato paste ice cubes (no can growing mold in the fridge), the half-cup trays for rice, and the 2-cup trays for anything that's a full meal on its own. The 1-cup trays get used for Everything. I freeze, remove, and put in freezer gallon bags with the air pressed out.
Rule of thumb: if it's already cooked soft and is good that way, it'll freeze. If it will be cooked soft (onions, garlic, peppers for stew) it can be frozen raw. If it is not good soft, undercook it slightly (pasta, for example) or skip it (asparagus gets bizarre).
Scrambled eggs freeze better with cottage cheese in them. The texture gets odd otherwise.
Tofu's texture totally changes when you freeze it to something chewier and meatier. Try it and see if you like it.
Ginger can be frozen whole and grated into a dish like parmesan. I keep some in my freezer drawer.
Pre-sliced bread defrosts so quickly and you really can just throw the whole loaf in there. I don't even have a toaster - it usually just comes up to room temp by the time I'm done cooking.
Rice freezes beautifully. I can't say it enough.
I think there’s a really odd gap in general supply chain knowledge in which people scapegoat AI as this new devastating environmental concern, when internet data centers have been an environmental problem before that. The internet already had the infrastructure to support it in 2017, before GPT-1 was released. Data centers are not a new problem. The internet already had a large physical presence, but people didn’t really think much of it until there were new AI-related developments (and then attribute all data centers to being related to generative AI? Where do people think YouTube videos are stored? The literal clouds in the sky?)
A Makeship plushie has a bigger carbon footprint than a thousand LLM queries but it is seen as an acceptable environmental impact, because it has been deemed socially acceptable to contract low wage factories in the Global South to make toys to sell to customers worldwide at a 3000% markup, with all the profits staying in the Global North. Not many people think of that environmental impact
Some time back I got annoyed by junk mail and did some back-of-the-envelope math, and assuming that both my math and my sources are right, 5 TWh/yr is used on JUST the production of paper that will be used as junk mail, not including printing, transport, or disposal. And that's JUST in the US as well.
ChatGPT's worldwide energy usage, when I looked it up, was 17 TWh/yr. That's not all AI but it is the biggest one. I think it's reasonable to say that if we extrapolate both of those out to their full worldwide industries, they'd come out pretty similarly in terms of energy being used. But junk mail is just The Way The World Is so nobody fights that hard against it.
Likewise, a lot of the energy and water usage comparisons people pick for AI are things people ALREADY had no context for. ChatGPT uses "ten times as much energy as a Google search" sounds scary if you don't have any context for how much energy a Google search takes. Sounds a lot less scary if you phrase it as "A ChatGPT query takes 1/10 as much energy as running your TV long enough to watch a single episode of a show" or "A ChatGPT query uses less than 1/1000 as much energy as a single dryer cycle".
And like, the "1-3 bottles of water per query" thing was already massively inflated by a game of fearmongering telephone where each person in the chain increased the number to make it scarier, but even if you deflate it to the actual number (500 ml for every 5-50 queries), then some other back-of-the-envelope math I did indicated that the Average American Household could switch to a lawn irrigation system that was 15% more efficient and save enough water to use ChatGPT for literally hundreds of queries per day and still be at a net decrease in water use.
All of which is to say, lawns suck, junk mail sucks, and the amount of effort that goes into solving a problem often seems to be significantly more based on the visibility and novelty of the problem than the severity.
Dr Glass had been idling in unmoving traffic for several minutes. The stream of traffic was unable to enter the roundabout, which was full of unyielding cars in an unbroken stream. Roadworks and other bewilderments had somehow combined to create a solid stream of traffic cutting off this entry to the roundabout, creating an immovable backlog. The phone map showed a solid red line creeping ever farther through the town as the queue of cars lengthened and froze up.
Dr Glass was only three cars back from the entry point. After pondering the problem in this unexpected pocket of leisure, he got out of the car.
The other drivers looked at him, astonished, censorious. Was this muppet just up and leaving his car? Abandoning a vehicle in congestion? Were they about to witness someone making their day WORSE?
Dr Glass walked to a pedestrian crossing, a few feet upstream, and pressed the button. He turned around and got back in his car.
Enlightenment, and a cautious hope, dawned on the faces of the other drivers in the queue.
The pedestrian sequence unrolled. The red light cut off the oncoming stream of traffic. The queue was freed. The roundabout was freed.
You don’t get “and then everybody clapped” in the British Isles, but you DO occasionally get a row of driver’s side thumbs-ups, and a large northern bloke hollering, “you CHEEKY bugger!” in approval.
whats everyones favorite cocktails. i totally adore a sex on the beach. no rum and coke okay i want your favorite gay ass colorful fruity tasting type of drink okay? okay. i trust you. i love you
Gotta tell you guys something wild in the Chinese fan sphere
So some fanartist drew a “sexy” (read: booby) version of a (cartoon) character who is traditionally very non-sexualised. Fans of the character got mad about it because it’s kind of groundbreaking how that character is written and portrayed and this art totally ignores the entire point of the character. They demanded the art be deleted. In response to that other people said, well what the fanartist did may be distateful but they have every right to draw what they’re into. The two sides fight for days and each starts a harassment campaign and even report their “opponents’” accounts.
So far so typical. But things eventually come to a head and they decide that this will be settled by votes - not through a poll. Through donations to a children’s education charity via each side’s portal. Whoever can get the highest amount of donation wins.
And that is how this charity received over 1 million in donations in three days lol. Oh btw the “freedom of expression” side won by a landslide (960k to 40k)
If only all fan wars could be settled this way. The world would be a better place.
he thinks he's being so smooth with his little face on my leg. i SEE you, villain
resurrected dead wife watching her own montage: wow I looked so hot in that
how many piercings do you have
0!!!!
1-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10+
15+
20+
nuance (put it in the comments)
Being a calm, gentle, non-reactive person is really hard work, which is probably why many people are none of these things. Personally I think it’s worth it but sometimes one does want to just roll around on the floor wailing at the top of one’s lungs
i can't hit the love button hard enough.
O. MY. GOD.
If you come across anyone who starts off with "Scientists don't want you to know..." you need to understand that they're lying. They're completely full of shit and working a grift.
Because they've never met or spoke with a scientist.
Scientists WANT YOU TO KNOW. Scientists want you to know SO MUCH. Scientists would be THRILLED to teach you EVERYTHING they know in EXPLICIT DETAIL. Scientists LOVE to share information and their findings and their theories. They don't want to hide anything, ever. They are SO HAPPY to share.
you, not me
wtf are borders anyway. like yeah u were born on this beautiful earth buuuuut 😊 u cant go here. or here either
A forever banger from da share zone