How are my sweetie pees
I Said How The Fuck Are My Fucking Sweetie Pees
$LAYYYTER
untitled
macklin celebrini has autism
Doug Jones
Noah Kahan
The Bowery Presents
occasionally subtle
Cosmic Funnies

Discoholic 🪩
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
hello vonnie

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH
Xuebing Du
The Stonewall Inn
noise dept.

Andulka
seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Venezuela

seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
@dragongyrlwren
How are my sweetie pees
I Said How The Fuck Are My Fucking Sweetie Pees
Greater glider,
I'm fed up with "maybe later".
After 10 months of dedication, I finally finished! I confess I was hesitant to post it, since I'm not a professional, but I feel I achieved a good result. by TheresaZoe
WOW! It's so pretty! Amazing job!
Sibling abuse typically takes place between blood, foster, or step-siblings close in age. Usually, the victim and abuser live under the same
For this week's Off Topic Tuesday, I'm choosing a darker and less pleasant topic, but one that's important for me to raise awareness for: sibling abuse.
Sibling abuse is one of the most common forms of domestic violence, and it's also estimated to be the most under-reported due to how incredibly normalized and accepted it is. Despite how common, under-reported, and normalized sibling abuse is, it is equally as traumatic and damaging as parental abuse.
It's normal for siblings to argue, it's normal for siblings to tease each other, it's normal for siblings to have some rivalry. It is not normal / healthy sibling rivalry for one sibling to repeatedly harm and terrorize the other, especially when the sibling repeatedly doing the harming and terrorizing has some power dynamic tilted in their favor (such as being older, larger, stronger, etc.)
This is important to me because I am a survivor of sibling abuse. I have been completely non-contact with my siblings for over ten years now, and I have also spent those ten years in trauma therapy to try to recover from the things my siblings did to me and put me through. I feel very passionate about the cause of sibling abuse because all the while I was enduring abuse the adults around me dismissed it as "sibling rivalry" instead of helping or protecting me.
It's not normal sibling rivalry that I spent my childhood and adolescence covered in bruises from being assaulted by my older siblings (and couldn't fight back because they were bigger than me). It's not normal that as a teenager I couldn't sleep at night because I was so afraid of my older siblings, and ten years later I still need to take sleep aids at night because despite all the trauma therapy and being no-contact, that terror of my older siblings still lives within me which still makes it hard to sleep at night. Someone might have intervened earlier and taken the abuse seriously if it had been an adult, such as a parent, aunt, uncle, grandparent who was harming and terrorizing me. But because it was "just" my siblings no one really cared or intervened.
So here's what you can do: stop contributing to the idea that abusive behavior between siblings is in any way normal or acceptable. If it would be wrong for a parent, grandparent, aunt, uncle, etc to do it to a child, it's wrong for a sibling to do it. This is especially the case when power dynamics come into play, such as one sibling being older / bigger / stronger than the other sibling they're harming and/or terrorizing.
Not to say younger siblings never abuse older siblings, it is true that the majority of sibling abuse cases are an older sibling abusing a younger sibling, but if a younger sibling has some power dynamic or advantage tilted in their favor (such as the older sibling being disabled while the younger sibling is able bodied) a younger sibling can still abuse an older sibling.
If you are also a survivor of sibling abuse, I am so sorry. Your pain and trauma is legitimate. What happened to you is wrong and horrible, and wasn't just normal sibling rivalry. You deserve the same recognition as a survivor of abuse as anyone else.
Another thing you can do (as mentioned in the article) if you're a parent/guardian/caregiver and want to prevent sibling abuse: make sure you are teaching and enforcing boundaries from as young as possible.
This was definitely a major contributing factor in my case. I can't really say that the adults in my family really ever taught or enforced boundaries on my older siblings. Nobody taught or enforced to my older siblings that they actually need to respect words like "stop" "no" and "don't", so if someone smaller and weaker than them (such as a younger sibling) tried to use those words to them it was completely meaningless.
By the time we were teenagers and eventually young adults and their behavior had escalated into what was undeniably domestic violence, when the (older) adults in my family at this point *finally* started thinking "hmm, maybe we should tell the older kids to back off a little in how much they physically assault and verbally abuse (my name)" at this point it was essentially too late. They had been getting away with it for too long, and they couldn't suddenly learn to respect boundaries and the words "no" or "stop" as easily a younger kid might be able to.
Another thing the article mentions that I think is a good point is that preventing sibling abuse means making sure kids are getting age appropriate adult supervision, because kids not getting enough age appropriate supervision can be a risk factor for sibling abuse developing. Violent and inappropriate behavior should be nipped in the bud as soon as adults witness it, but that's not always possible if adults aren't present to witness it in the first place. Lack of age appropriate adult supervision can lead to violent and inappropriate behavior to continue without being properly addressed by an adult.
This is part of the reason many places will have laws about the minimum age kids can be left alone, and also laws on the minimum age a child is allowed to babysit or supervise younger children.
Another thing worth mentioning is preventing sibling abuse can be an important step in preventing other forms of abuse (parent on child abuse, intimate partner abuse, etc)
As mentioned I've been completely no-contact with my siblings for over a decade. However, I've still heard bits and pieces here and there about my siblings and how their adult relationships and marriages are going, and I've heard more than a few questionable and concerning things about how my siblings treat their partners.
To me I guess it just makes sense, if someone spends their formative years getting away with abusing their sibling, no one intervening or teaching them that it's wrong, what's to stop them from repeating that same behavior as an adult with their partners and/or children?
Sibling abuse of course is important to stop and prevent for the sake of the sibling they're abusing (trust me, I know), but preventing and stopping abusive behavior between siblings is also really important for the sake of their future partners and/or children.
I'm willing to bet that taking sibling abuse seriously and preventing it / nipping it in the bud would also reduce the amount of partner / spousal and child abuse too.
Bringing this back again for this week's Off Topic Tuesday because on another social media site I saw a few people I know sharing articles about how it's "cruel", "unfair", and "selfish" to only have one child instead of "giving" your child a sibling.
I've also seen similar rhetoric on Tumblr, people saying that it's abusive to intentionally have only one child because only children will inevitably become spoiled selfish weirdos with no social skills and it's all your fault for not having more than one kid.
There's a lot to unpack with this kind of rhetoric, but first and foremost, my siblings never made me feel less alone and always only made me feel more alone, even as a young child. My siblings were my first bullies before they evolved into my abusers over time.
I 100% would have had a happier and healthier childhood if I had grown up as an only child instead of being violently abused by my siblings. As an adult, I've been completely no-contact with my siblings for years now. They are not the lifelong friends that this kind of rhetoric guilt trips parents into believing they're depriving their kids of by only having one kid. I have only been happier and healthier the longer I'm completely no-contact with my siblings. I have a pretty good relationship with my cousins and my partner's siblings, and those relationships are more fulfilling and enriching to my life than my abusive siblings have ever been.
I think the other thing that really icks me out about this kind of rhetoric, that parents are obligated to "give" their children a sibling is: another human life isn't yours to give, even if they are your own child / sibling.
It feels like it's rooted in this really harmful and regressive mentality that parents "own" their children, rather than that child being an independent human life with its own will.
I also can't help but wonder if this mentality fuels sibling abuse. I know parents can mean well and think that maybe it helps with jealousy. My parents even told me that when my mom was pregnant with me they framed it to my older siblings like "we're doing this for you so that you can have a baby sibling" in order to try to reduce feelings of jealousy or resentment in my older siblings. However, when I think about it, I can't help but wonder if that fueled feelings of ownership and entitlement in my older siblings towards me. Is it possible that my siblings felt entitled to bully me as young kids then abuse me as older kids / young adults because, even if only subconsciously, a part of them felt like I was something our parents had given to them? That they somehow owned me the same as they owned any other toys or possessions our parents had gifted them?
Maybe that's a reach and I'm overthinking. Either way, the rhetoric of siblings being something parents "give" to their children, as if another human's life and will is yours to give in the first place, really rubs me the wrong way.
Bog monster has arrived
I think this is the single funniest artfight rule. Like....I guess?
WHO DID THIS
Rockwith Aleaf
This is perhaps my new favorite video
I would like to state for the record i’ve ignored this post the last 50 times i’ve seen it bc i thought it would be some hyper cutsie anime girl voice and i’m overjoyed to report it is instead Weapons Grade Miku complete with war horns that fuck
Reblog this photo of a käpylehmä to have a käpylehmä in your blog
It's a trick! If you reblog you get TWO käpylehmäs in your blog!
They're traditional Finnish toys, little cows made out of spruce cones, on their way to see the world from one tumblr blog to another
I felt inspired to do some myself… ok it’s more a „dog“ and a „tripod“ but i love them 🥰
I have left a cluster of käpylehmät in the woods
Wonder what happened to the dinosaurs? This is a baby Blue Heron.
this baby Blue Heron killed the dinosaurs.
all this “bottom rights” and “top rights” discourse…. u fools….. where is my support for switches!
support.nintendo.com
A lot of "climate change" is really just homeless drug addicts using our national forests and grasslands as free dumps and trap houses setting fires cause of mental illness or being retarded.
Along with a healthy dose of 'we know better than hundreds of years of forestry management and we're going to make our forests a tinderbox for Ecological Reasons' then beingnsurprised pikachu when the burn pile you built actually starts burning.
Kilroy Was Here!
He’s engraved in stone in the National World War II Memorial in Washington, DC – back in a small alcove where very few people have seen it. For the WWII generation, this will bring back memories. For younger folks, it’s a bit of trivia that is an intrinsic part of American history and legend.
Anyone born between 1913 to about 1950, is very familiar with Kilroy. No one knew why he was so well known….but everybody seemed to get into it. It was the fad of its time!
At the National World War II Memorial in Washington, DC
So who was Kilroy?
In 1946 the American Transit Association, through its radio program, “Speak to America,” sponsored a nationwide contest to find the real Kilroy….now a larger-than-life legend of just-ended World War II….offering a prize of a real trolley car to the person who could prove himself to be the genuine article.
Almost 40 men stepped forward to make that claim, but only James Kilroy from Halifax, Massachusetts, had credible and verifiable evidence of his identity.
“Kilroy” was a 46-year old shipyard worker during World War II (1941-1945) who worked as a quality assurance checker at the Fore River Shipyard in Quincy, Massachusetts (a major shipbuilder for the United States Navy for a century until the 1980s).
His job was to go around and check on the number of rivets completed. (Rivets held ships together before the advent of modern welding techniques.) Riveters were on piece work wages….so they got paid by the rivet. He would count a block of rivets and put a check mark in semi-waxed lumber chalk (similar to crayon), so the rivets wouldn’t be counted more than once.
A warship hull with rivets
When Kilroy went off duty, the riveters would surreptitiously erase the mark. Later, an off-shift inspector would come through and count the rivets a second time, resulting in double pay for the riveters!
One day Kilroy’s boss called him into his office. The foreman was upset about unusually high wages being “earned” by riveters, and asked him to investigate. It was then he realized what had been going on.
The tight spaces he had to crawl in to check the rivets didn’t lend themselves to lugging around a paint can and brush, so Kilroy decided to stick with the waxy chalk. He continued to put his check mark on each job he inspected, but added ”KILROY WAS HERE!“ in king-sized letters next to the check….and eventually added the sketch of the guy with the long nose peering over the fence….and that became part of the Kilroy message.
Kilroy’s original shipyard inspection “trademark” during World War II
Once he did that, the riveters stopped trying to wipe away his marks.
Ordinarily the rivets and chalk marks would have been covered up with paint. With World War II on in full swing, however, ships were leaving the Quincy Yard so fast that there wasn’t time to paint them. As a result, Kilroy’s inspection “trademark” was seen by thousands of servicemen who boarded the troopships the yard produced.
His message apparently rang a bell with the servicemen, because they picked it up and spread it all over the European and the Pacific war zones.
Before war’s end, “Kilroy” had been here, there, and everywhere on the long hauls to Berlin and Tokyo.
To the troops outbound in those ships, however, he was a complete mystery; all they knew for sure was that someone named Kilroy had “been there first.” As a joke, U.S. servicemen began placing the graffiti wherever they landed, claiming it was already there when they arrived.
As World War II wore on, the legend grew. Underwater demolition teams routinely sneaked ashore on Japanese-held islands in the Pacific to map the terrain for coming invasions by U.S. troops (and thus, presumably, were the first GI’s there). On one occasion, however, they reported seeing enemy troops painting over the Kilroy logo!
Kilroy became the U.S. super-GI who had always “already been” wherever GIs went. It became a challenge to place the logo in the most unlikely places imaginable. (It is said to now be atop Mt. Everest, the Statue of Liberty, the underside of the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, and even scrawled in the dust on the moon by the American astronauts who walked there between 1969 and 1972.
In 1945, as World War II was ending, an outhouse was built for the exclusive use of Allied leaders Harry Truman, Joseph Stalin, and Winston Churchill at the Potsdam Conference. It’s first occupant was Stalin, who emerged and asked his aide (in Russian), “Who is Kilroy?”
To help prove his authenticity in 1946, James Kilroy brought along officials from the shipyard and some of the riveters. He won the trolley car….which he attached to the Kilroy home and used to provide living quarters for six of the family’s nine children….thereby solving what had become an acute housing crisis for the Kilroys.
The new addition to the Kilroy family home.
* * * *
And the tradition continues into the 21st century…
In 2011 outside the now-late-Osama Bin Laden’s hideaway house in Abbottabad, Pakistan….shortly after the al-Qaida-terrorist was killed by U.S. Navy SEALs.
>>Note: The Kilroy graffiti on the southwest wall of the Bin Laden compound pictured above was real (not digitally altered with Microsoft Paint, as postulated by some). The entire compound was leveled in 2012 for redevelopment by a Pakistani company as an amusement park….and to avoid it becoming a shrine to Bin Laden’s nefarious memory.
* * * *
A personal note….
My Dad’s trademark signature on cards, letters and notes to my sisters and I for the first 50 or so years of our lives (until we lost him to cancer) was to add the image of “Kilroy” at the end. We kids never ceased to get a thrill out of this….even as we evolved into adulthood.
To this day, the “Kilroy” image brings back a vivid image of my awesome Dad into my head….and my heart!
Dad: This one’s for you!
A REAL Freddy Fazbear’s location is coming to the American Dream Mall in New Jersey in 2027!
“Freddy’s coming to Life”
Source