'Early Spring'. Josef Stoitzner. 1920.
Xuebing Du
Claire Keane
Game of Thrones Daily

#extradirty

JBB: An Artblog!

izzy's playlists!

Love Begins

★
sheepfilms
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

if i look back, i am lost
art blog(derogatory)
Today's Document

oozey mess

PR's Tumblrdome
Mike Driver
AnasAbdin
NASA
Not today Justin

⁂
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Africa
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@elusive-pimpernel
'Early Spring'. Josef Stoitzner. 1920.
Not me going off about that interview with Jacob Tierney on the hockey podcast again.
But I love how he says the show hooks you in with so much smut on the first couple of episodes, only to hit you with the emotional payoff in 5 and 6. Because it’s such great way to mirror the audience’s experience with what Shane and Ilya are going through.
The show really goes “were you paying attention to all that smut? Can you tell when they fell in love? Oh, you were distracted? You didn’t notice? Yeah, bitch, neither did they.” And I think that’s beautiful.
HEATED RIVALRY 1.05 / 1.06
HEATED RIVALRY 1.06
i saw a few autistic creators/ppl online say that they were disappointed in shane as autistic rep because it's not stated clearly in the show, and tbqh i kinda disagree. like hudson talks about it in an interview (i will link when i find it again why is he doing so many interviews i can't keep them straight damn), and basically says what i feel that like - as great as it would be for shane to canonically go to therapy and get a diagnosis, for a man his age ('91 liner) and in his social circle, that just is not happening. like if you spend a lot of time online in autism communities maybe it seems really straightforward, but honestly up until a few years ago (and still in many many circles), if you weren't diagnosed as a kid, you never ever got a diagnosis and no one would ever say to you "hey do you think you might be autistic" they would just classify you as a bit odd (or very odd mileage may vary). i personally think it is incredibly important that everyone behind the scenes agrees that shane is an autistic character, that he is actively being written/portrayed that way, and that they defend this choice when pressed, even if no one in the canon of the show ever says "shane hollander is an autistic man," because this very well could have been another sherlock or abed or god forbid sheldon like.
i think they are doing very realistic representation and i don't think they should be punished or critiqued for prioritising realism over "ideal representation"
The thing about the gay hockey show having a budget of 5 Canadian dollars and a dream is that they knew how to spend every cent.
They really went ‘do we need to hire child actors for this scene with Hayden’s children? Nah, just have someone yelling off-screen, it’ll be great.’ But also ‘you know what we do need, though? A top notch intimacy coordinator and a killer Russian dialect and culture consultant!’
And I don’t think anyone has ever been more right about anything in the history of humanity.
shane: mom…can you take three steps back please?
also shane at 4am in the morning:
#two bros chillin' in a hot tub on a couch insp. via @stammiviktor
- Shane: in the middle of the hardest conversation of his life
- Meanwhile, Ilya:
credit: suric4taaa (twitter)
I have...Svetlana. She loves me. And I love her.
Not like I love you.
The simple fact of the matter is that if you liked The Scarlet Pimpernel, you will LOVE The Sherwood Ring
The KXVO Pumpkin Dance (2006)
it's September it's halloween
they spent billions on this
went to go check myself
They may have fixed the answer to that question, but one thing they HAVEN'T fixed is the general "yes and" thing AI has going on.
Billions of dollars, people. Billions of dollars.
Note how they haven't fixed this, they are just covering it up now that it's going viral. Please remember that it is going to be just as batshit on topics where you don't know enough to easily see that it's wrong.
"Hallucinations" are a fundamental part of how these LLMs work. They're analyzing which words often appear next to each other, and assembling words in an approximate order based on what their training data observed, one word at a time. Because they're getting huge chunks of the internet as training data, that means they're getting all the good and all the bad, and despite the tech industry trying to tell us this is "intelligence", there is none of that behind what these algorithms output.
Let me put it this way.
If the training data included 100 messages about the date, and 50 of them were posted yesterday, and 50 of them were posted today, you'd expect to get close to half and half chances of the LLM outputting a response to "what's today's date" as yesterday or today. It doesn't have any ability to determine which it actually is besides the statistics. The algorithm is spitting out words one at a time, based on these statistical likelihoods, which means it will always have output errors, because each word has a small chance and those small chances add up over the course of a sentence, a paragraph, a page.
They can try to compensate some for this by programming the algorithm to do things like, say, weight the most recent information heavier than the older information. But, it also incorporates things like user responses to training data because there isn't enough training data in the world to get things right all the time, but the programmers are still pretending they can. If you see "today's date is [today's date]" and don't interact with that summary in a way the algorithm is looking for, it might weight that data lower because it's programmed to interpret that as "the answer was wrong", so the next user has a higher likelihood of the wrong answer.
We don't know all the little ways they've programmed these algorithms to respond to input, so it's impossible to say for sure, but at a guess: if you just close the tab it might interpret that as "good response" and if you linger, click on other links on the page, etc. to verify information, it might rate that as lower.
(Actually, that's my hypothesis as to why the results get so wildly wrong on some subjects, because people who know what to look for are looking for reliable sources instead of LLM outputs, so not interacting as if the output was correct, while the people who don't know what to look for are assuming it was correct and moving on with their days.)
OpenAI have admitted that they cannot train these wrong answers out of the algorithms, they are fundamental to how the systems work. They can weight data differently, but that's how Xitter's Grok declared itself MechaHitler when Musk got angry that it was occasionally telling the truth. The only way to make them happen less would be to allow the algorithms to say "I don't know" but right now, all their programming says that response is the same as a wrong response and they don't allow it. They literally weight "I don't know" on the same level as recognized wrong responses, which means in a way it gets weighted even lower than wrong responses because not all of those are caught, so algorithms will almost never admit to not knowing despite the fact that they don't know anything. And, regular and heavy users would absolutely start to revolt if the machine told them how often it doesn't have a clear heavily weighted answer.
You cannot trust ANYTHING these algorithms output as truth. You cannot let anyone you care about trust these algorithms. This is so vastly different from any prior technological revolution because they're trying to tell us these algorithms can do things they blatantly and absolutely cannot and it is destroying people's minds and ability to discern truth from fiction. The studies are starting to be published and they are not good news for the chatbots.
Even if you don't care about the real people whose work has been negatively impacted by generative algorithms, you should care that they're outputting garbage and they will never stop outputting garbage and you and I both deserve better than garbage.
For me, Aaron Tveit is the definitive Enjolras and I'm kinda obsessed with him XD But I'm curious what y'all think... Reblog for more results, please?
Note: Ramin Karimloo is from the 25th anniversary concert, sorry guys... I just randomly googled info since I don't really pay much attention to other Enjos... (seriously though, totally unrelated note, but Ramin's Phantom is absolutely amazing...)
Who is your favorite Enjolras?
Aaron Tveit (2012 film)
Ramin Karimloo (10th anniversary concert)
Joseph Quinn (BBC adaptation)
Michael Maguire (original Broadway cast)
Anthony Warlow (original Australian cast)
David Burt (original West End cast)
Combeferre-Enjolras (as in Killian Donnelly XD)
Kyle Scatliffe (2014 Broadway revival)
A different Enjolras (let me know in comments or tags!)
OP may I add :
DANIEL DIGES (Los Miserables 2010) He was not the first I ever saw but he just defines the role on stage for me! I know I'm not the only one so:
Daniel Diges?:D
DANIEL DIGES (LOS MIS) :D
A different Enjolras listed above (but it's cool we're all good)
a quiet moment of appreciation for lockwood fencing.
Wheel of Time S03E04: Moiraine Damodred and Rand Al'Thor