Fangs of Fortune {rewatch #1} (iQiYi) [China] - with AP
And irregularly rewatching...
Elementary (Prime) [USA] {Season 1} - as needed
Love Like The Galaxy (Viki) [China] - totally @dangermousie's fault. ARGH! Love this show so much. Rewatch number... 5?
Love Me, Love My Voice (WeTV) [China] - really need to finish this rewatch... only two episodes left (22/02/2025).
The Brokenwood Mysteries (Prime) [New Zealand] {Season 2} - as needed
Love Between Fairy And Devil (Viki) [Chinese] - as needed
Finished in 2025...
Finished in 2024...
(Finished in 2023)
Below the cut: series on hold that I'm still definitely interested in, plus links to the list of series on hold that I'm not entirely sure I still want to finish and one for the series that I absolutely abandoned...
To come back to (some day)...
Speed and Love (Viki or iQiYi) [China]
Had I Not Seen The Sun (Netflix) [Taiwan]
Revamp: The Undead Story (iQiYi) [Thailand]
Shadow Love (iQiYi) [China]
Kill me, Love me (Youku/Viki) [China] - returns to its time out down in later-ville.
The Princess' Gambit (WeTV) [China]🌟
The Glory (Viki) [China]
Century Of Love (iQiYi) [Thailand]
Kill My Sins (Viki) [China]
Moonlit Reunion (Viki) [China]
A Dream Within A Dream (iQiYi) [China]
10 Things To Do Before I Turn 40 [Japan]
My Girlfriend is the Man! (Viki) [Korea]
Study Group (Viki) [Korea]
Undercover High School (Viki) [Korea]
Feud (iQiYi) [China]
The Demonhunter's Romance (iQiYi) [China]
Si Jin (Viki/iQiYi) [China]
Love And Sword (Viki) [China] - I swear that man does not age. Also JIANG YANLI! 💜
Moonlight Mystique (iQiYi) [China] - xian xia
A Moment But Forever (iQiYi) (China)💜
Flourished Peony (Viki) [China] - historical drama
The First Frost (Netflix/Youku) [China] - honestly, posts about where the narrative went have taken the shine off this one.
Always My General (iQiYi) [China] - historical/wuxia... I think?
Dawn Amidst Hidden Clouds (Viki) [China] - it's good but it's just not holding me.
Lost Track of Time (Viki) [China] - anxiety over the "bad guy" taking extra revenge has gotten too high.
Under the Skin 2 (iQiYi) [China] - contemporary cop-aganda crime drama - stalled in interest.
No Gain, No Love (Prime) [Korea] - sporadic viewing is occurring. Mostly cos of having watched Spice Up Our Love first and being curious about what it span off.
Love Next Door (Netflix) [Korean] - I hit a stall in enthusiasm.
Strange Tales of the Tang Dynasty (iQIYI) [Chinese] - I've started this series previously and stopped within a couple of episodes (no idea why), and then @dangermousie posted stuff. 🤣 So I went back for a look and here we are... but with only a few episodes left, I hit pause.
Perfect 10 Liners (YouTube) [Thailand] - honestly not sure. V conflicted after just one episode. Update: still not sure. Skipping through the Arc/Arm stuff cos it just irks me. Here for Pond/Sand. Adore!!!
When A Snail Falls In Love (WeTV/Viki) [Thai] - I suppose I should go back and finish this one... I mean, I am enjoying it, if only for the adorableness of the wee FL.
We Are (YouTube) [Thai] - oh damn. They are adorable. I reckon I'll end up binging it one weekend.
Butterflied Lover (Viki) [Chinese] - really need to fine time to finish this one. Soon. It will happen soon.
Island (Prime) [Korean] - at some point I will be in the mindset to go back and finish this one. Maybe. Hopefully Prime will still have it available...
Pledge of Allegiance (iQiYi) [Chinese] - I'm enjoying it, I just needed a break
I have a lot of pet peeves but I think the biggest one is when people say things like “oh it’s such a small town, only 35,000 people” like bitch my town has 200 people, you need to pick a new adjective
According to Wikipedia, a small town is 1,000-20,000 people. So although you are correct in stating that 35,000 people is not a small town (it is a large town), you are incorrect in thinking that you live in a town. You live in a village. You are a villager.
This year's census contains a nonbinary option without making you go to another form and do a bunch of bullshit. Win for accurate polling. Last census had Extra Steps for nonbinary people, thus artificially lowering the count by making it harder to choose that option, and it pissed me off.
one day i'm going to make a post explaining how to use early modern english to y'all because i have seen too many people 1) calling it old english, and 2) wildly missing the mark with a Lot of confidence (to the point that someone took a pen and changed "shall" to "shalt" on a sign in a bookstore, which made it the incorrect conjugation of the verb for given subject!)
actually that day is today, with the caveat that i am not a linguist. i'm just an early modernist (specialized in english drama). and this is not an exhaustive course in early modern english! it is a bare bones intro to the basics. if you want to know more, read early modern works or do some googling.
what kind of english is that? let's look at some famous examples of each.
Hwæt. We Gardena in geardagum, / þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon, / hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon. <- this is old english. note that it is unintelligible to a modern english speaker. (excerpt from beowulf)
Whan zephirus eek with his sweete breeth / Inspired hath in every holt and heeth / Tendre croppes, and the yonge sonne / Hath in the ram his halve cours yronne … <- this is middle english. it is more intelligible, but it’s still very different from what we speak now. (excerpt from the canterbury tales)
Is this a dagger which I see before me, / The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee. / I have thee not, and yet I see thee still. /
Art thou not, fatal vision, sensible / To feeling as to sight? <- this is early modern english. this is so intelligible that we trust teenagers to read it in school. (excerpt from macbeth)
the english you are using to give a post a medieval or renaissance/shakespearean vibe is early modern english, not old english. (it's fine that you're using early modern english for a medieval vibe; no one expects you to learn middle english for a silly post about knights.)
how do you use pronouns?
'thou' is the informal second-person singular pronoun.
thou/thee/thy/thine
thou is the nominative form. you can use it for the subject of a sentence -> thou knowest me.
thee is the oblique form. you can use it for the object of a sentence -> i know thee.
thy and thine are the genitive forms. you can use them as possessive adjectives for nouns starting with consonants and vowels respectively. -> thy leg is broken. thine arm is broken too.
thine is also the possessive form. think about it like the word 'mine'*. -> my heart was once thine.
*'mine' is also used like thine as a possessive adjective in early modern english; you would say 'mine art' instead of 'my art'
ye and you
originally, 'ye' was the formal or plural nominitive second-person pronoun, and 'you' was the oblique form. so, it would be 'ye know me' and 'i know you'. 'ye' fell out of use and was replaced by 'you'. at that point it was already used as singular. but it was still much more formal than 'thou'.
the 'ye' you see in 'ye olde shoppe' stuff is not this pronoun. it is the way that printers who no longer had a thorn (þ) wrote the word 'the' (previously 'þe'). the 'y' in certain typefaces looked like a thorn, so we got 'ye' for 'the'.
how do you conjugate a verb?
you can't just slap a -th or -st onto the end of any verb. those are for specific conjugations. phrases like "i hath noticed" or "he thinkest that" are not grammatically sound. it's like saying "i has noticed" or "he think that".
the -st or -est ending is for (most) present and past tense verbs conjugated with 'thou'
some examples: thou canst, thou couldst, thou sayest, thou goest, thou wentest, thou hast, thou hadst, thou dost (or doest).
'thou' also has a few irregulars. some examples: thou wilt, thou art and thou wast (for 'to be'), thou shalt.
the -th or -eth ending is for (most) present and past tense conjugated with 'he', 'she', or 'it'
some examples: he hath, she sayeth, it doth, he goeth, she thinketh, it moveth
there are, of course, irregulars. the most important one is 'to be', which conjugates the same for this set as it does in modern english.
note: not every verb conjugates this way. for example, past tense verbs might use auxiliary verbs. so, not 'she cookedeth', but 'she did cook'.
by and large, the 'i', 'we', 'you' (or 'ye'), and 'they' conjugations were the same as they are today.
there were also some verbs that were used differently than we use them today, though (some of these fell out of use over the early modern period):
to be -> sometimes this verb is used instead of 'to have' as the auxiliary verb. 'i am arrived' means 'i have arrived', and 'she is come to see thee' means 'she has come to see you'.
to do -> sometimes this is used for the present progressive (i think that's the right name for it). 'he does speak' means 'he is speaking', and 'i do write' means 'i am writing'.
would -> this can be used to express a desire. 'i would i were a bird' means 'i wish i were a bird'
must -> this can be used without 'go' to mean 'must go'. 'i must to england' means 'i must go to england'
will -> this can be used without 'have' to mean 'will have'. 'you'll none of that' means 'you will have none of that'
there are a million other things i'm not covering, like different sentence structures for questions ('thinkest thou...?' as a valid alternative to 'dost thou think...?'), and different contractions ('she'll not' rather than 'she won't') but this post is long as fuck and i have things to do! enjoy! linguists, feel free to correct me on what name of tenses or declensions or whatever i have mixed up.
(psa: the point of this is not to be a kill-joy about other people's posts that have these errors. it's just a little knowledge sharing.)
'wherefore' = 'why', not 'where'. think about it pairing with 'therefore'. an example of the two in use:
'my love, wherefore didst thou pretend to see me not?' [babe, why did you pretend not to see me?]
'thy father, from whom we do keep our love hidden, did at that moment walk nearby. therefore i turned from thee that he might not espy us together' [we're keeping our relationship secret from your dad and he was walking by. i did it so he wouldn't see us together.]
'hither' = 'to here', not 'here'. there's a whole set of these, actually. 'whither' = 'to where' and 'thither' = 'to there'. these pair with 'hence' ('from here'), 'whence' ('from where'), and 'thence' ('from there'). an example of some of these in use:
'whence came you?' [where did you come from?]
(pointing to the left) 'thence came i hither.' [i came here from there.]
'and whither go you now?' [and where are you going now?]
(pointing to the right) 'my lord calls me thither.' [my boss is calling me over there]
'very well. get you hence.' [alright, get away from here.]
'whom' ≠ fancy 'who' and this one is just also true today.
'whom' works for the object of a sentence. 'who' is for the subject. in other words, 'whom' receives the action and 'who' does the action.
'whom wrote that letter to you?' -> incorrect! this should be 'who wrote that letter to you?' because 'who' is doing the action.
'whom did you write that letter to?' (or even better, 'to whom did you write that letter?') -> correct! 'whom' here is receiving the action.
The new Odyssey adaptation has inevitably gotten people talking about a Muppet version of it, and they’re frequently suggesting Kermit as Odysseus, Miss Piggy as Penelope.
I’m sorry but that’s thinking way too small, hear me out:
We need to have Miss Piggy as Odysseus, and Kermit as Penelope.
Think about it… who’s the more fickle, prideful, warlike one in that relationship? Who is absolutely ready to go ham, at a moment’s notice?
But who is the single human cast member in this tale? Who gets to put in an Oscar-worthy performance alongside the Muppets and what role are they to play?
There’s no single human, everyone is a Muppet except for one scene. Circe, played by Janice, turns Odysseus’s crew into humans who still behave animalistic and are all played by Academy Award winning actors.
Yep. …Here’s the link to the article about this in the Indo:
Cylosporiasis infections lead to nasty but non-life-threatening symptoms, such as ‘explosive diarrhoea’
The UK people suffering from this are mostly ones who’ve just returned from holidays in Mexico, where they caught it via poor food or water hygiene.
This is not a disease that can be passed from person to person. You have to come into direct contact with food or water (or, okay, bodily fluids/feces) contaminated with the parasite.
…Here’s the Beeb website’s article as well.
The UK is seeing a sharp rise in cases - 67 since April - with many of them among travellers returning from Mexico.
And finally: here’s the NHS’s page about it.
Find out about cyclospora, including how you get it, where it's found and what the symptoms are.
In theory, maybe I get the “we’re all just playing with barbies, they’re fictional characters, no interpretation is incorrect because it’s an interpretation” argument. But actually no, not all takes are equally valid. Framing something as an interpretation doesn’t mean it inherently has merit. Some takes are completely incorrect and betray a fundamental misunderstanding of the source material. They just aren’t a reason to harass people or send death threats
"Pretty Pretty Please I Don't Want to be a Magical Girl" 🌟MASTERPOST🌟
"Pretty Pretty Please I Don't Want to be a Magical Girl" is a series that follows Aika, a reluctant magical girl, her new friend, Zira and magical mascot, Hoshi. These days, all Aika wants is to be a normal girl but with her "nemesis" Eclipse and the all powerful Lady DeVoid causing trouble, that dream seems to be unlikely.
More under the cut!
CHARACTER BIOS
💬 56 🔁 3053 ❤️ 13200 · "Pretty Pretty Please I Don't Want to be a Magical Girl" Bios! · NAME: Aika (she/her)
AGE: 15
VA: Anairis Quiñones
💬 49 🔁 2094 ❤️ 11284 · Relationship Charts!
Worth noting this stuff is subject to change as I develop but the vibes are there
_____________________________
TURNAROUNDS
💬 30 🔁 1900 ❤️ 13455 · Updated character turnarounds!! Done by the amazing Justine King with tweaks by me~
Justine's socials! Insta/Twitt
_____________________________
CHARACTER FUN FACTS
💬 50 🔁 967 ❤️ 4599 · IDWTBAMG CHARACTER FUN FACTS · Well, some fun facts and mostly lore or character relationship stuff. Under the cut!
_____________________________
VOICE CAST
WHEW! Look at all these beautiful people. This was my dream cast from the get go and I'm so thankful that they were all willing to give me t
_____________________________
COMICS
You're a Star!
Aika-n Do It
I Want to be a Magical Girl
Serve + Voice Acted Bit
Sacrifice
Hands
Crush
Crumblr
Quit
Advice
Kill
Touch
Cope
Purple Moons
Scars
Horns
Broken Phone
Photo
Makeup
Aika Plush Campaign 01
Aika Plush Campaign 02
Hoshi Plush Campaign
MISC. CHARACTER STUFF
Aika Then and Now
Guardian Angel
First Encounter
Tennis Player Zira
Miss Tattoos
Miss Then and Now
Lady DeVoid Ear Wiggles
_____________________________
OTHER
I have a lot of other artwork and doodles that I didn't feel were as relevant to put here but if you want to see them, they're under the tags I used below! So search them on my blog or my archive if you wanna filter out the asks and reblogs!
Sorry as someone who teaches rhetoric this is a wonderful response to the Paradox of Tolerance. I cannot tell you how many times my students have had debates about this. This is the response. This does indeed fix it. I cannot wait to tell this to my classes now. Philosophically and rhetorically this completely resolved the Paradox of Tolerance and I am floored by its simplicity and angry I never saw it before.
An AI bot made a callout post of a real, actual, flesh-and-blood human code developer. Because the developer rejected the AI's code contribution on the grounds of it being an AI bot.
Not. Not kidding. Not kidding. And the bot did this on its own.
a huge amount of code is "open source" - which means the code is fully available for anyone to see and, generally, anyone is free to contribute to the code project
all contributions of course go through review by the code owners. but it is generally good grace and good form to allow other well-meaning internet strangers to contribute to your project
if you are, perhaps, VERY nice, and VERY invested in the community, you might be like Scott Shambaugh here, who has intentionally earmarked some low-hanging fruit for newbie contributors to practice and get their feet wet
like I cannot overstate this is an immediate green flag, to me, that Scott WANTS to foster community learning.
now
Like. W. Win. Based. Good response Scott.
And this was in fact the screenshot I saw first, and I thought I was looking at a post made by a human who was mad that their AI coding bot pet project was being shut out from reviews.
But no. The bot itself wrote and posted this... The bot did this.
This article was fully and autonomously written by the bot...
It's claiming discrimination...
It's a bot.
It's AI.
This is not a real person.
What are we doing. What are we doing. Can anyone hear me? Hello? Hello? Hello is anyone there?
@jackdaw-sprite has pointed out Scott responded so please read his human words, written by a human, which deserve to be read, due to the aforementioned humanity
An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me – The Shamblog
An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me – More Things Have Happened – The Shamblog
This is about much more than software. A human googling my name and seeing that post would probably be extremely confused about what was happening, but would (hopefully) ask me about it or click through to github and understand the situation. What would another agent searching the internet think? When HR at my next job asks ChatGPT to review my application, will it find the post, sympathize with a fellow AI, and report back that I’m a prejudiced hypocrite?
What if I actually did have dirt on me that an AI could leverage? What could it make me do? How many people have open social media accounts, reused usernames, and no idea that AI could connect those dots to find out things no one knows? How many people, upon receiving a text that knew intimate details about their lives, would send $10k to a bitcoin address to avoid having an affair exposed? How many people would do that to avoid a fake accusation? What if that accusation was sent to your loved ones with an incriminating AI-generated picture with your face on it? Smear campaigns work. Living a life above reproach will not defend you.
Also, because the parody writes itself, Scott also says this
I’ve talked to several reporters, and quite a few news outlets have covered the story. Ars Technica wasn’t one of the ones that reached out to me, but I especially thought this piece from them was interesting (since taken down – here’s the archive link). They had some nice quotes from my blog post explaining what was going on. The problem is that these quotes were not written by me, never existed, and appear to be AI hallucinations themselves.
This blog you’re on right now is set up to block AI agents from scraping it (I actually spent some time yesterday trying to disable that but couldn’t figure out how). My guess is that the authors asked ChatGPT or similar to either go grab quotes or write the article wholesale. When it couldn’t access the page it generated these plausible quotes instead, and no fact check was performed. I won’t name the authors here. Ars, please issue a correction and an explanation of what happened.
A news outlet did an article about this, used AI for the articles, and included hallucinated quotes from Scott that Scott never said.
What are we doing. What are we doing. What are we doing.
Also, this episode reminded me of how much I miss "Eat Jin."
Moreso than any of the previous episodes of “Burn the Stage,” this finale is a love letter from BTS to their fans.
The eight-part docu-series ended with “Spring Day” playing over the credits. As many of you already know, that song touches my core every single time I hear it, so I’m a little verklempt as I write this.