whatever go my artfight profile
An art gifting game
YOU ARE THE REASON
No title available

Kiana Khansmith
hello vonnie

gracie abrams

if i look back, i am lost

blake kathryn
Fai_Ryy
Sade Olutola
Cosimo Galluzzi

ellievsbear
macklin celebrini has autism
d e v o n

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
EXPECTATIONS
taylor price
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
I'd rather be in outer space šø

ā

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Syria

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Denmark

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Sri Lanka
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Russia
@flxwer-thing
whatever go my artfight profile
An art gifting game
Finally got a clear shot of noonoo carrying her spring, it's her favourite toy
noonooā¦.
hydra
putting carbonated water in my super soaker and spraying it at dogs (they absorb the bubbling nature of the liquid and begin to ascend into the sky) (thousands watch in awe) (no one does anything) (the sight is, in essence, divine)
woahhhh a floor beef clover it must be my yucky day
please vote for tylenol to have her face on a beer can $1 for 1 vote and the donation goes to the baltimore animal rescue and care shelter
TYLENOL HAS MADE IT INTO THE TOP TEN LETS FUCKING GO
VOTE NOW SO WE CAN SEE TYLENOL'S FACE ON BEER CANS IN THE DITCHES BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD!!!
If you all will allow me a moment to analyze the competition as it exists, there's something interesting going on with the numbers.
As we all know, thanks to the support of the good people of Tumblr, Tylenol has experienced a meteoric rise to second place. Even though her competition is stiff, I believe in Tylenol's ability to go the distance.
But let's take a look at the competition:
Elmer seems to be a lovely boy. I have no qualms with Elmer, and think he would look fantastic on a beer can. But what about Elmer's campaigns? Who is the power behind the throne here, and how have they managed to find such breakout success on this competition?
A handful of wealthy donors are trying to buy this competition.
At the end of the day, all donations are good donations here. This is a charity event so every penny earned is going to help animals in need. But it's not lost on me that Elmer's current ranking is thanks entirely to a few individuals with the financial means to put their thumbs on the scale.
Tylenol's donors, comparatively, are small and numerous, mostly $1-10 donations from many passionate believers in what she stands for (autism and pain relief I think).
Overall, the donations tell a very different story than what the base ranking shows you. Elmer is held aloft by just 24 donors and bolstered by a few wealthy patrons, whereas Tylenol has won the hearts of literally hundreds of people. Even the current third place, Abby, owes her ranking to numerous small contributions rather than one or two large ones.
Tylenol is the people's princess.
Tylenol is the people's princess
Marketing committee at the brewery said 'we want a bulldog'. So they're trying to make sure it happens and didn't think anyone would notice or care because charity. Andlike... it's not important at the end of the day, but what I'm saying is, we can force them to spend more money by throwing more donations at Tylenol :) so it's kinda win/win
TYLENOL HAS PULLED INTO THE LEAD!! 4 DAYS LEFT TO DONATE AND VOTE!!
someone tell OP i did it, i spent about 3 hours on it
Hey yall. I lost my job a few days ago and my phone service is suspended. Could I get some help paying my bill? Thanks in advance to anyone able to donate and share š§”
$app: $sourvoice
ppal: sourvoice
vnmo: sourvoice
100/170
just 70 dollars to go!! thank you all so much, please keep sharing!!!
Ok, loves, so we've all got the message that joking about suicide is bad for your mental health. Now we need to get on "joking that the planet/all of humanity has no future is bad for societal health/encouraging resistance to bad shit."
As someone who works in conservation I can confirm this is true. Stop it. Joking that we donāt have a future or that humans are too stupid to educate really is harmful to conservation.
We were so enthralled by this leaf on our walk back from dinner last night
Good news: if youāre currently laying around and not producing anything, you are a credit to your species.
Itās recently been found that even hive insects rest. Bees will play with colorful toys. Ants sleep for about 1 minute but they do it so frequently it amounts to a few hours per day. Even trees take breaks.
The only things that work without rest are machines; literally everything that lives requires rest.
EVERYTHING THAT LIVES REQUIRES REST. STOP JUDGING YOURSELF FOR NOT BEING A ROBOT.
robots require very frequent breaks! welding machines generally have it programmed in that they canāt run so long they melt themselves. ive overseen two different manufacturing robots now and each of them were fragile, finicky idiots that require constant maintenance and repair. they pause in between moves, in between jobs. youāre always keeping an eye on programming errors, on coolant levels, on heat. youāre always pulling bits of scrap out of joints, sweeping up debris, washing off nozzles and untangling hoses. and even then it snaps a chain and takes a whole morningās vacation.
even robots need downtime.
my landlord (well. his agent) is trying to take me to court for rent arrears (girl serve me a formal notice then we'll really talk š ) but he was all like "I will make you pay the court fees even if you've paid off arrears by the time of the hearing" like buddy that is... not how anything at all works actually
helpp hellppp we are the flamingo twins and we just fucking FELL OVER
Me when I catch myself thinking "I wonder what it's like to be chosen by somebody" but then I remember my best friend chooses to be my best friend and my mutuals choose to follow me and the minimum wage employee chooses to give me sincere kindness that I remember years later because I was going through a hard time and it meant a lot
okay, i am deeply sorry, i know a lot of you on this website are not a big fan of kids and children in general but PRETTY PLEASE can we just NOT normalize the āi donāt like/i hate children but i donāt wanna hurt themā? because, thatās not fucking possible, okay? thatās two views you can NOT simultaneously hold.
because, letās talk for real, the problem isnāt just direct violence ā itās the dehumanization of children, which feeds prejudice against childhood, childism, and adultism. this logic IS NOT neutral, and itās one of the most sophisticated ways prejudice gets perpetuated.
ānot liking/hating childrenā reinforces the idea that theyāre annoying, dramatic, inconvenient... less human ā and therefore easier to discard, silence, or sacrifice for adult comfort.
elisabeth young-bruehl defines childism as prejudice against children as a social group, comparable to racism, sexism, and homophobia. it functions like any other -ism: an ideology that legitimizes treating a group as property, as inferior, or as available for exploitation. she also shows that childism isnāt limited to extreme cases of violence ā it shows up in a whole range of practices that arenāt in childrenās best interest: neglect, underfunding of schools, the abusive use of medication on childrenā¦
saying āi donāt like/i hate childrenā isnāt an innocent preference or just a phrase ā itās literally the biased expression of a worldview that dehumanizes and diminishes this group. thatās exactly what childism is.
young-bruehl emphasizes that adults who practice childism āall rely upon a societal prejudice against children to justify themselves and legitimate their behavior.ā [p.1] a lot of people may not consciously āhateā children or raise a hand to hit them ā but the prejudice allows them to tolerate structures that harm children on a massive scale (child poverty, incarceration, violence, abuse, exploitation, neglect, etc.).
rebecca adami uses the concept of childism to analyze adult resistance to actually implementing childrenās rights: prejudice against children gets translated into laws, policies, and practices that deny basic freedoms and normalize their subordination. just like a racist can say āi donāt want to see black people getting hurtā while supporting policies that harm them ā an adult who āhates childrenā is, in practice, feeding the cultural climate that makes violence against children thinkable, justifiable, or dismissed.
adami also shows that childism helps us understand how children are exposed to āprejudices, negative attitudes and discriminatory structures in societyā ā and how this connects to the weak implementation of the un convention on the rights of the child.
the old idea that āchildren are just mini adultsā has been challenged by childhood sociology, and children are now recognized as rights-bearing subjects who deserve to be heard and respected in their choices.
claiming itās āfine to dislike and/or hate childrenā means refusing them that status ā putting them back in the position of nuisance, of ānoisy things,ā of objects. which is exactly what critical theory identifies as the core of adultism and childism.
madeline lane-mckinley argues we live in a world that is ādeeply against children,ā where theyāre treated as extensions of the family, the state, or capital ā not as autonomous people. she also talks about āadult supremacyā and proposes a politics of solidarity with children, understanding them as comrades in the fight for a better future.
lane-mckinley also points out that the figure of the child has historically been weaponized in service of white supremacy, empire, and political projects that decide which children deserve protection ā and which ones can be abandoned to poverty, war, forced migration.
in other words, discourses of hatred and contempt for children participate in the symbolic economy that makes some childrenās lives more exposed to violence.
and finally ā in ethical and political terms, there is no way to separate āhatingā (or ādislikingā) children from passive participation in structures that authorize harm against them.
the only position thatās coherent with childrenās rights and with critiques of childism is to let go of that hatred and commit to recognition, listening, and active solidarity.
so yeah. thereās no neutral ground here.
climbs out of the port of liverpool and crawls around the city like a little bug