Me if u even care, etc.
cherry valley forever
Game of Thrones Daily
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium
RMH

izzy's playlists!
Cosimo Galluzzi
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

★
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
hello vonnie

gracie abrams

bliss lane
No title available
almost home
will byers stan first human second
Cosmic Funnies
One Nice Bug Per Day
$LAYYYTER
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from France
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada
@friendshapedhole
Me if u even care, etc.
People doing Platner campaign autopsies and going "This proves that a rich boy can't just pretend to be a hick," no I'm sorry, in addition to that not being what killed his campaign, a rich kid can and does easily get a GOP house seat with strategic use of an oversized pickup truck and a pair or work boots.
remember: worst case scenario you die, and hell is real, and you go there
It's just not a given that when people say that "they" are responsible for this or that in politics, they are referring to Jewish people. Not even on a subconscious level. I think many simply have a vague sense that there are forces more powerful than them exerting some control over the world, they attribute this to human agency, but they terminate their line of thought before doing any investigation. So the exercise of this agency just becomes the influence of "them."
Reacting to this epistemic vice — which is basically a lack of inquisitiveness — by assuming that it's an instance of antisemitism on reflex instead of on the basis of reasons is just a different kind of vice. This vice, I suspect, derives from overweighting the probability of facing a certain kind of threat so much that it penetrates one's perceptions, combined with the feeling of accomplishment over mapping the sources of that threat. Where the first sort of person wants the satisfaction of explanation without the labor of investigating, the second sort of person is driven by fear into a systematic misapprehension of the dangers around them.
I highly recommend watching this testimony from Aliya Rahman, the disabled woman who was dragged out of her car and kidnapped by ICE on her way to a doctor appointment in Minneapolis a few weeks ago.
Truly my worst nightmare.
Transcript of Aliya Rahman's speech:
Thank you members, for taking the time to be here today, and thank you staff for making this happen.
My name is Aliya Rahman, and I am a resident of South Minneapolis. I am a Bangladeshi American born in Northern Wisconsin. And I’m a disabled person with autism and a traumatic brain injury.
Not all autistic brains do this, but mine fixates on sounds, numbers, and patterns. And while what the world saw happen to me exactly three weeks ago today on video was a terrible violation it is still nothing compared to the horrific practices I saw inside the Whipple center.
So I am here today with a duty to the people who have not had the privilege of coming home, and I offer this data because these practices must end now.
On January 13th on the way to my 39th appointment at Hennepin County’s traumatic brain injury center, I encountered a traffic jam caused by ICE vehicles and no signs indicating how to get around it. I had not wanted to pull in to a blocked, chaotic intersection, but verbally agreed to do so and rolled down my window after an agent yelled, “Move! I will break your f-ing window!”
His first instruction.
Agents on all sides of my vehicle yelled conflicting threats and instructions that I could not process while watching for pedestrians.
Then, the glass of the passenger side window flew across my face.
I yelled, “I’m disabled!” at the hands grabbing at me and an agent said, “Too late.”
I felt immersed in a pattern, and I thought of Jenoah Donald, an autistic black man killed by the police during a traffic stop in 2021.
I remembered mister Silverio Villegas González, who was killed by ICE in his vehicle last year.
An agent pulled a large combat knife in front of my face, which I thought was for cutting me, and later learned was used to cut off my seat belt. Shooting pain went through my head, neck, and wrists when I hit the ground face first and people leaned on my back.
I felt the pattern, and I thought of mister George Floyd, who was killed four blocks away.
I was carried face down through the street by my cuffed arms and legs while yelling that I had a brain injury and was disabled. I now cannot lift my arms normally.
I was never asked for ID.
Never told I was under arrest.
Never read my rights.
And never charged with a crime.
Approaching the Whipple center, I saw black and brown bodies shackled together, chained together, being marched by yelling agents outdoors. I continued to hear the word “bodies”, because that is how agents referred to us:
“We’re bringing in a body.”
“They’re bringing in bodies 7, 8 at a time, where do I put ‘em?”
“We can’t use that room, there’s already a body in there.”
You have no reason to believe you will make it out alive if you’re already being called a body.
Agents repeatedly had to stop and ask how to do tasks. I received no medical screening, phone call, or access to a lawyer. I was denied a communication navigator when my speech began to slur. Agents laughed as I tried to immobilize my own neck. I asked for my cane and was told no, pulled up by my arms and prodded forward in leg irons by agents laughing and saying, “Walk! You can do it, walk.”
Agents did not know if the facility had a wheelchair.
When I was finally placed in one to be taken to interrogation an agent taunted, “You were driving, right? So your legs do work.”
I pleaded for emergency medical care for over an hour after my vision had become blurry, my heart rate went through the roof, and the pain in my neck and head became unbearable.
It was denied.
When I became unable to speak my cellmate pleaded for me.
The last sounds I remember before I blacked out on the cell floor were my cellmate banging on the door, pleading for a medic, and a voice outside saying, “We don’t wanna step on ICE’s toes.”
When I opened my eyes at Hennepin County’s emergency room, I learned I was brought there to be treated for assault.
The impacts of DHS detention on my physical, mental and financial well-being and safety have been very severe, but I do not deserve more humane treatment than anyone else, US citizen or not. And I am here today with a strong spirit and a duty to the many people who haven’t had the privilege to tell their stories or see their loved ones come home. I am extremely distressed by the pattern that violence from law enforcement has been happening to black and indigenous communities for centuries, and to DHS survivors for over 20 years.
We call ourselves a civilized nation, but we lack rules and accountability around what a person claiming to be law enforcement is permitted to do to another human being.
I am not afraid, and I’m not afraid to keep working on this problem even after ICE is gone. Thank you for your time.
The thing about wildfires is sometimes they actually are started by arsonists but it kinda doesn’t matter in the grand scheme because wildfires will always eventually ignite naturally anyway. There’s a million accidental and even completely non-human sources of ignition.
So it’s of course idiotic for right-wing conspiracy theorists to act as if a destructive wildfire is being caused intentionally by deep state actors for some nefarious purpose (real estate, population control, whatever) because any arsonist-ignited wildfire would likely happen naturally anyway within a few years.
But it’s also not strictly speaking relevant if people say “this is caused by climate change, not arsonists” because it occasionally is both. The landscape is extra flammable because of climate change, but the source of ignition in any particular case may in fact be an arsonist.
Climate change is what makes the difference between an arsonist starting a fire that burns an acre or two, and an arsonist starting a fire that spreads to a hundred thousand acres.
"Whether someone understands it or not, these are the consequences of the political views they're espousing" is a pretty important analysis tool for online movements because quite honestly, over half of everyone engaging in politics online have no foundations for the stuff they're saying and are just saying whatever makes them feel like a member of an in-group.
If your in-group is "the left" you're very much not immune to this. In fact, trying to do left-wing politics without even trying to build a foundational political understanding is a great way to end up as a neo-nazi with a tumblr accent rather than an effective left-wing advocate.
i think maybe "sapphic yearning" is a kind of false consciousness that justifies one's own continued immiseration
unfortunate truth of reality is that oftentimes 15 year olds will say/do/believe some stupid bullshit because they are 15 but telling them that they believe that because they are 15 is probably the most counterproductive thing in the entire universe
The Eightfold AI lawsuit exposed what happens when companies treat employment decisions like ad targeting — and why the fix requires enginee
a bit more context
if i could give one piece of advice to newly transitioning trans men, it's that it's 100% possible to find a community of people (including women!) who don't treat you as a threat, and the people trying to convince you otherwise are not your friends
Remember when Toronto mayor Rob Ford was caught on video smoking crack with a bunch of Bloods and even posed for pics with them and then refused to step down as mayor
I honestly think this is the funniest pic in the history of political scandals
I never knew he was smoking crack with Bloods. Gangs are wild in Canada. There’s like a bunch of branches of American biker gangs in Canada (like Hells Angels and Mongols) that have way more power in Canada than any biker gang does in America.
One of my relatives from my maternal grandmother’s massive white trash farm poor family was a member of the hell’s angels and (apparently) got out by joining the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which to be honest feels like a lateral move at best. Hashtag maple syrup, amirite?
That’s a very “I was afraid of going to prison so I had myself committed to a mental institution” type of move.
I think it's silly when people try to frame "in many religions the question of If All That is *real* is actually not very important and the question of 'belief in god' is a very protestant thing" as evidence of those other religions being like. cooler. Only american protestants care if The Divine is literally real and does things?? and this is supposed to make me respect the other religions *more*? I can understand being careful wrt polytheism or non-lord-of-creation type gods, and yeah being religious/spiritual ≠ believing in a specific god or gods, but "we have a bunch of personal and social restrictions and norms and rituals based on some shit that may or not be real idk, what i care about is enforcing rules and norms" is not a position I can respect easily...
It's silly at the best of times, and when it's framed as "our religion is tolerant enough to accommodate atheism, so you can't ever really leave or be an ex-member" it's downright pernicious
I think a lot of religious communities have it both ways, where the majority are chill and relaxed about whether it's real but they implicitly rely on a subgroup of freaks who take it all very seriously, and if those freaks ever stopped then the whole thing starts to unravel, but the important thing is feeling more sophisticated than the serious freaks and the atheists.
"My position on astrology is a bit like my being a secular Jew: I appreciate the tradition, I find it meaningful, and though I don’t actually consult my horoscope or abstain from pork, though I don’t actually believe, I think it has a lot to teach us . . . But you can only hold this kind of position if there’s someone else to do the work of believing for you. A secular Jew needs the black-hatted frummers who keep every one of the commandments. An ironic astrologist needs the person who believes that lumps of matter in outer space really do control his life. Once, such people existed. Until the eighteenth century, the London Bills of Mortality would frequently list a cause of death as “planet.” This meant that a man had died without apparent cause, but the reason was clear. He had fallen under the influence of an evil star. A planet had killed this man, as directly as if a trillion tons of livid space-rock had come screaming out of the sky to conk him on the head. This is what it means to believe in astrology: accepting that at any moment, the mathematically preordained rhythms of the heavens might simply decide to kill you" - Sam Kriss, How To Believe In Astrology
explicitly relying on the subgroup of freaks occasionally!
Why is aestheticism so strongly associated historically with homosexuality, idk, it makes sense, like in order to decide to have a homosexual lifestyle in a social context where this is not normative you have to believe that love is more important than social cohesion; or that pleasure is, or self-expression is, or something like that. You need to be elevating some specific non-religious principle above prudence and the maintenance of the social order and family ties and so on.
I think it’s because gay guys have women’s souls.
“This also means grooming,” Hegseth continued. “If you want a beard, you can join the special forces. If not, then shave.”
bit odd that he's "ending the war on warriors" by banning beards (?) unless you're in the special forces, I've heard rumblings that grooming requirements are code for anti-black initiatives specifically? bizarre
It’s a quirk of American anti-discrimination law. In the 80s there was a lawsuit against Dominos Pizza for firing a black driver who wouldn’t shave his beard because he’d get razor burn, and the court ruled that employers having shaving requirements can (sometimes) be considered racial discrimination since black people are somewhat more prone to razor burn than white people, because of their hair texture.
In the military you can petition for an exemption from shaving requirements and apparently it’s easier to get one if you’re black. And Hegseth considers this unacceptable wokeness because he’s an incurious moron.
so he wants black soldiers to transition instead? curious!
It's not razor burn, it's Pseudofolliculitis Barbae. If you have really curly or dense hair, you might not be able to shave without your whole face breaking out into ingrown hairs.
Oh I thought those were the same thing. But I looked it up and apparently razor burn is a different less severe condition. You’re correct, it’s about pseudofolliculitis barbae.
isnt it maddening how one day ur 9 and u go to middle school and cub scouts and all the kids are cursing and making dirty jokes and drawing dicks and repeating offensive shit they got from watching south park and family guy on their bedroom tv after their parents have gone to bed (on the same channel that shows kids cartoons during the day) and playing horrifically violent games on newgrounds and a handful of the kids u know have straight up told u they do coke, then next thing u know ur an adult and the ppl around u expect u to act like even the slightest exposure to potentially objectionable content or depictions of the human body will instantly and irreversibly shatter any childs fragile innocent mind
and theyre like "prove to me this wont traumatize my children!" and even the ppl who agree w u go "well u see, in other cultures, and in the ancient past, and if u look at this study-" but like. my source is every child whos ever grown up at any point in human history. open ur eyes. we have never been able to stop kids from seeing and repeating adult stuff and we never will, and its always just been fine
"Boys pure in mind and heart, almost children, are fond of talking in school among themselves, and even aloud, of things, pictures, and images of which even soldiers would sometimes hesitate to speak." - Tolstoy, The Brothers Karamazov
I've said before that Trump has made comedy very challenging as it reduces late night hosts to gesticulating wordlessly at the latest clip of Trump saying something inane or illegal or outlandishly deranged to the point that it's beyond interesting critique, and it's also eliminated the option of pretending to take it seriously like old school Colbert because that's just not credible, so news cycle driven comedy dries up.
comedy thrives on the unexpected, and while Trump's excesses are often shocking they are rarely surprising, so all you can do is bond over being strapped into this ride for the duration.
I enjoyed watching I Love Boosters and was looking at Boots Riley's earlier movie Sorry To Bother You and found this detail interesting:
Riley has said that the film offers a radical class analysis of capitalism, rather than a specific analysis of the U.S. under the presidency of Donald Trump as some had opined; he wrote the initial screenplay during Barack Obama's presidency, and the target was never any specific elected official or movement, but "the puppetmasters behind the puppets". While most of the final script remained the same, minimal changes were made to avoid appearing to critique Trump specifically, including removing a line where a character says "WorryFree is making America great again", which was written before Trump used the line in his 2016 presidential campaign.
I think that's the key: take the focus (and ideally the oxygen) away from Trump towards issues that predate him and will still be around long after he's gone to the celebrity golf tournament in the sky, then find something entertaining, surprising, and funny to say about them!