imagine bridgerton if eloise had a gun
almost home
trying on a metaphor

shark vs the universe
taylor price
Cosmic Funnies
art blog(derogatory)
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
official daine visual archive

tannertan36
Not today Justin

No title available

PR's Tumblrdome

roma★
Three Goblin Art

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
EXPECTATIONS

ellievsbear
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
occasionally subtle

seen from Russia
seen from France

seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Brazil
seen from Germany

seen from Australia
@glintglimmergleam
imagine bridgerton if eloise had a gun
you know when you write a line and it just. HITS.
then you're sitting there all smug about it but also like: where the hell did that come from and how do i do it again?
Over the weekend I had a few more thoughts about Little House on the Prairie as children's fiction vs as white settler cultural touchstone. I continue to think the novels are more narratively complex than people remember them to be. They are racist, yes, but in an odd sort of way that I think is genuinely trying to be progressive with its take on settler colonialism. (And failing, of course.)
I'd hash the thoughts out but probably it would mean rereading the books, and at the moment I'm very busy writing murder mystery fic for British detectives, so.
Please imagine what I would have said for now lol.
Anyway, a lotta ink has been spilled about the lie of Ballerina Farm/Hannah Neeleman and her JetBlue-heir husband pretending that a small farm is financially viable without significant outside income. She sells that pioneer myth by actually selling something called bone broth hot cocoa at $46 a bag. (Gross.)
But in all the outrage about Neeleman, I haven't seen anyone compare her to the original tradwife liar, Laura Ingalls Wilder.
I'm not referring to the Little House on the Prairie children's book series, which were actually pretty open about how poor the Ingalls family was and how many times they almost died through illness/extreme weather/starvation on that homestead stolen from Native Americans. Those novels include plenty of nostalgia and manifest destiny and libertarianism, but Ma Ingalls clearly hates being out on the homestead isolated from their neighbors. That's not trad-wife content. Maybe trad-child content.
No, long before Wilder published her first children's book in 1932, she had a regular column in papers like the Missouri Ruralist and Farmer's Week in the 1910s/20s, where she would write 500-word pieces such as:
"The March of Progress"
"Classed as Illiterates"
"The Wanton Destruction of Trees"
"Kinfolks or Mere Relations?"
"Let's Not Depend on Experts"
"When Proverbs Quarrel"
"The Hidden Cost of Getting What We Want"
"Don't Call on The Government All of the Time"
"The Armor of a Smile"
Those are all real essay titles -- I've read them; you can too -- and the content is exactly what you'd expect: folksy, gently humorous, self-effacing, lite-Christian inspirational, suspicious of city life, glorifying backbreaking physical labor, full of housekeeping tips. Any single one of them could be easily repurposed into a Ballerina Farm IG caption or a TikTok voiceover with a quick edit: nothing new under the sun.
And just like Neeleman lies by omission about how their farm books are balanced, Wilder lied by omission about her own account books. Her husband Almanzo Wilder was partially paralyzed by diphtheria after their marriage and couldn't physically manage a farm alone. Caroline Fraser notes that Almanzo's parents (themselves wealthy farmers) had to pay off the mortgage on the Missouri farm or Laura and Almanzo would not have kept the property. Even with that financial help, they had a lot of rough years and it was Laura's side hustles -- selling eggs, clerking, writing columns lying about the rewarding joy of farming -- that kept them afloat. Eventually she started publishing full-length novels and their success finally put them in the black.
I don't expect every modern cottagecore critic to memorize the biographies of historical farmfluencers like Wilder. I do want an acknowledgement that social media is a new vehicle for a very old phenomenon. Tradwife farming content is part of the foundational myth of USAmerican culture, not late-stage capitalism brainrot or whatever. We have always been like this, and canceling Ballerina Farm or deleting TikTok off your phone won't solve it. We've got to address Christian patriarchal settler-colonialism at the root.
"You cannot misgender me in a way that matters."
Every time I see that quote I think of this
fiction analysis questions:
does the setting cohere?
do the characters have dignity?
do all the metaphors add to the meaning?
both human writers and LLMs struggle with this
anyway i keep circling back to this idea of a character's dignity, rather than their agency.
i'm not totally sure what i mean by it yet, but i do know that seemingly woke fiction (trad published or fanfic) that uses all the latest progressive phrases but fridges women and stereotypes people of color is not writing those characters with respect.
every human being is the protagonist of their own story, is worthy of being a hero. you don't have to focus on the NPCs when you write white men kissing, but you should believe that the others are equally capable of leading their own romance.
like yeah i love to read sad men kissing but where in the rules does it say that the women in their lives HAVE to be disposed of?
why can't we have the kissing and interesting women?
you know, if we brought back the bechdel test for fan fic, entire fandom ecosystems would collapse
still thinking about this post on the migratory desire of the yaoi lovers, always seeking to get their latest fix in a new canon. the desire transforms native ecosystems, an invasive species of kink. and the female characters are most likely to be weeded out.
you know, if we brought back the bechdel test for fan fic, entire fandom ecosystems would collapse
should I continue rewatching Lewis in order and stay with s2e4, or skip ahead 2 seasons for the infamous Hathaway's Childhood Trauma/Backstory episode for fic purposes?
I think Jonathan Bailey's in the s4 ep btw. A cameo.
OK for real I want to know what my audience for this trans lady euphoria fix-it fic is. If it's only @tobermoriansass and me (and maybe @fursasaida?) that's cool, i just want to know.
Are you interested in reading my redo of the Lewis episode "Life Born of Fire?"
Yes, and I have watched Lewis
Yes, I have not watched Lewis but I'm interested in your take on gender euphoria
Yes, I have not watched Lewis but I read your writing regardless of canon
Not my thing, sorry
last night's excerpt if you missed it. this is a dour detective show! preserving the murder case and the canon religious angst but Now With Better Gender.
Embarassing realization today that James Hathaway might not actually be Catholic in the show. He might actually just be typical Church of England -- certainly poor gay Will McEwan is, bc Will was going to prayer groups led by an Oxford don, and they're all Anglican. Will's funeral is Anglican too.
The show says James was once in seminary, was serious being a priest, and he also read theology at Cambridge first: that could be either C of E or the Catholics. They never mention the saints or anything particularly Catholic in his mien. It's not as if the Catholics have a monopoly on internalized homophobia.
I think fanon reads James as Catholic -- to the extent they reference religion at all -- and I combined that with projecting Sebastian Flyte from Brideshead Revisited onto him. Also Catholicism is more interesting!
Urgh. @fursasaida my resident Hathaway scholar -- thoughts?
“There is a cyborg hierarchy. They like us best with bionic arms and legs. They like us Deaf with hearing aids, though they prefer cochlear implants. It would be an affront to ask the Hearing to learn sign language. Instead they wish for us to lose our language, abandon our culture, and consider ourselves cured. They like exoskeletons, which none of us use. They don’t count as cyborgs those of us who wear pacemakers or go to dialysis. Nor do they count those of us kept alive by machines, those of us made ambulatory by wheelchairs, those of us on biologics or antidepressants. They want us shiny and metallic and in their image.”
― Alice Wong, Disability Visibility: First-Person Stories from the Twenty-first Century