imagine bridgerton if eloise had a gun

Andulka
Xuebing Du

Product Placement

Janaina Medeiros

izzy's playlists!

@theartofmadeline
No title available

Kaledo Art

ellievsbear

★
NASA
cherry valley forever
d e v o n
sheepfilms
trying on a metaphor
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON

JVL
Keni

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

seen from Gabon

seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@glintglimmergleam
imagine bridgerton if eloise had a gun
me: im disabled and have limits
the smartest most intelligent guy in the world with the most hugest dick ever like so big, like the biggest dick ever, man and also soooo intelligent and thoughtful and just so so intelligent: have you tried pushing yourself?
from my own experience and also from what i hear from others, the issue seems to stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of how i know my limits. i know because i have discovered and tested them. i push them sometimes, carefully. and occasionally i get ok results or at least nothing bad happens. but sometimes something does happen, so i MUST respect my limits.
but when i talk about disability to abled people, they assume its just a bad attitude. like ive defaulted to a "i cant" attitude. and that stems from a fundamental mistrust of disabled people, and the cultural grift of acting like bad things can only exist in the mind. yes i know this is old news. anyways.
how do we know in the books that john is indigenous? can you say more about how his indigeneity is important to his story?
hello! so there is a word of god post on race (doesn't mention John but mentions that Gideon is "mixed Maori"), BUT I frankly don't think word of god statements are worth any weight without actual in-text support (see: the "dumbledore is gay" situation). SO!
Specific evidence that John Gaius is Maori, as revealed in Nona the Ninth:
When he is listing his education, John mentions having gone to Dilworth School (John 20:8). Dilworth is an all boys boarding school in Auckland and accepts students based on financial need instead of academic or sporting achievements. Demographics appear to be about 70% low income Maori boys, indicating that it is highly likely that John is Maori
John reports that P- said he looked like a "Maori-TV pink panther" (John 15:23) when his eyes turned gold. Maori TV is a TV station that is focused primarily on Maori culture & language revitalization, with presumably all or mostly Maori hosts, and tbh I don't see why P- would say this unless John was himself Maori
John uses a te reo Māori phrase ("kia kaha, kia māia") (John 5:20) when he is saying goodbye to the corpses in the cryo lab before the power is shut off. Though it is possible he said this as a non-Maori kiwi, but in combination with the previous two points of evidence I think this all very strongly points to him being Maori
He also renames his daughter Kiriona Gaia, "Kiriona" being just literally the name "Gideon" in te reo Māori
TLT is not a series that hands you anything on a silver platter but to ME this is all pretty solid proof
Why is this relevant to The Locked Tomb?
In Nona the Ninth, we learn that before he completed apotheosis and ate the solar system, John was basically trying to save the earth from capitalism-caused climate change. Climate justice and the rights of indigenous people over their own land are deeply tied together, in the same way that climate catastrophe and capitalism/ imperialism/ colonialism are linked. disclaimer that this is NOT my area of study and others have definitely said it better; this is just the basic gist as I understand it, but on quick search I found some sources here and here if you want to do some reading.
TLT is not a series that hands you anything on a silver platter, but i don't think it is a stretch to see John as an indigenous man trying to save the earth and getting ignored and shut down at every turn by primarily western colonial powers (PanEuro, the USA) who declare him a terrorist and then as a reader thematically connecting that to the experience of indigenous climate activists IRL
there are absolutely TLT meta posts that have discussed this before me; tumblr search is nonfunctional and I have been looking for an hour and a half and cannot find anything specific even though i KNOW i reblogged multiple posts about this in the first few weeks following NTN's release. sad & I am sorry
I think that by the time the books take place, John is 10k years removed from the cultural context he grew up in, with the Nine Houses having become a genocidal colonial power in their own right (with more parallels to be made between John's forever war for the resources of literal life energy and like, oil wars), but I also think that John Gaius is a fictional character who can represent and symbolize multiple different things in service of telling a story. (not to mention the potential thematic parallels being made to how oppressed people sometimes are pressed into replicating the power dynamics of their oppressors and continuing the cycle--now that is a tumblr post i KNOW i read last year and definitely cannot find right now, once again sad & I am sorry)
How Radical Was John Gaius, Really is a forum thread that was locked by the moderators after 234534645674564 pages of heated debate
actually if i were a second son who didn't want to inherit the title, marrying a mermaid would be a great way for the privy council and the church to cut me the fuck out of the line of succession on grounds of Being Fucking Weird
Rewatching the original "The Little Mermaid" animated movie while working on something else... I can't quite recall at the moment (early into it atm) if this movie ever establishes Eric as the heir of the throne of his kingdom.
I think it'd be really funny if Eric was actually a younger brother. So, like, maybe he's a duke, actually, but he still gets the title of Prince. Travels the sea a lot, unlike a more landlocked heir. Hanging out at this summer seaside palace while the rest of the family is elsewhere for some reason.
Like, imagine Eric's parents and older brother and maybe sister-in-law and niblings getting that letter at the end of this movie. Nearly drowned. Miraculously washed ashore. Fell in love with a mysterious voice and then a mute girl. Got enchanted by a shape-shifting sea witch and nearly married her. Killed the sea witch after she turned into a giant. Married the aforementioned girl who turned out to be the beloved youngest daughter of the mythical King Triton instead and have now established a strong alliance with the merpeople. Wild summer! Wish you were here!
(via @owl-librarian)
Yahhh I have to build Rome. Yup it’s due tomorrow.. noo I haven’t started yet haha is that bad?
It is taking all my energy not to reblog someone being Incorrect about the cottagecore narrative of Little House on the Prairie. You can tell who's only read one book in the series (or seen the 1970s tv show) bc Laura Ingalls Wilder's life as portrayed in her novels was far messier and far more conflicted about homesteading libertarianism than some people make it seem.
The Ingallses moved around a LOT as a kid. Laura lived in at least 4 states/territories/unceded Native land. And during that time, they often lived with or very near other white settlers. The isolated self-sustaining farm...that was a dream that her Pa never achieved. Turns out you need to be part of a society to survive.
Also, her books are themselves fictionalized - the events of Little House on the Prairie are probably almost entirely made up (her family did live on unceded land in that region but when she was probably too young to have vivid memories) and Little House in the Big Woods is an amalgamation of two times in her life when her family lived in Wisconsin. Their value is in material history more than authentic biography (accurate biographies do exist! and The First Four Years is much more grounded in reality! but not the other books) - most kids first encounter detailed descriptions of pioneer life through them, and her memories of food preparation or house building are more historically accurate than the plots. This is relevant because The Actual Ingallses are even more intertwined with society than their book selves - at one point they all lived and worked in a hotel! The version of the story we see in her novels is itself romanticized and starry-eyed about Homestead Farming, even with its complexities.
For sure! I think most people probably remember the small details like the pig bladder balloon during hog butchering or one candy cane at Christmas more than the plot itself: the aesthetic impression of it all.
But you don't even have to learn how much of the true story Laura invented/changed to see the non-romantic reality of homesteading. The material hardship and the challenges (if not all of them, like the death of her baby brother) and the family strife are all there in the novels. She made a lot of stuff simpler but even the simple version as presented is depressing if you take a step back from the hazy fireplace glow.
Minoan fresco from the Aktotiri settlement, Thira, Greece
ALSO Laura's family was not only never breaking even, they were extremely poor. Laura Ingalls Wilder spent her teenage years sewing men's shirts for money in the summers (as an employee of a seamstress) and teaching school in the winters, once she finished high school herself.
They needed all her cash bc Pa couldn't earn enough from the farm or odd jobs, she had no brothers, and they had to pay tuition for her disabled elder sister Mary to go to the college for the blind.
Laura's life sucked ass actually! Well-told with much nostalgia and racism but not something anyone with common sense would actually want for themselves in a world where minimum wage and penicillin exist.
It is taking all my energy not to reblog someone being Incorrect about the cottagecore narrative of Little House on the Prairie. You can tell who's only read one book in the series (or seen the 1970s tv show) bc Laura Ingalls Wilder's life as portrayed in her novels was far messier and far more conflicted about homesteading libertarianism than some people make it seem.
The Ingallses moved around a LOT as a kid. Laura lived in at least 4 states/territories/unceded Native land. And during that time, they often lived with or very near other white settlers. The isolated self-sustaining farm...that was a dream that her Pa never achieved. Turns out you need to be part of a society to survive.
bucky has a disability??
he doesn’t have an arm.
happy almost ten years to my all-time favorite disability post on this braincell forsaken website
How long have you been on Tumblr?
Over 16 years (before 2010) (toddlers in the dawn of the ant colony)
16 to 14 years (2010-2012) (livejournal and Myspace refugees)
13 to 11 years (2013-2015) (you used to follow thebootydiaries)
10 to 8 years (2016-2018) (era of Russian bot conspiracy)
7 to 3.5 years (2019-2022) (post sex ban to Goncharov)
3.5 years or less (2023–2026) (Twitter refugee)
Rebagel for science pls.
what if I become the pretentious version of Guy Whose Life Goal Is To Visit Every Baseball Stadium In The Country and do that but for art museums...
This is, of course, separate from all the serious concerns about public history but just, specifically, for me, my personal connection to the issue is that I fucking love a woke museum and I especially love when an older institutional museum goes super woke. How the Philadelphia Museum of Art displays 17th century silver now fucking rules. It rules! And it’s a smaller museum but considering how woke it is with the budget and material it’s working with, the Virginia Museum of History and Culture punches way above its weight. Making museums less woke harms me in particular by taking away my fun.
This is more subtly woke, but the Met Museum in NYC has also changed up parts of 1300-1800 European painting for the better. They've added some contemporanous Mesoamerican art and some European Modern art next to key holdings in that department to disrupt the traditional narrative about art history and it really changes the game.
btw thank you to everyone who left a reply or sent me a DM about the terrifying antisemitic misogyny of the platner campaign.
i don't have it in me to reply more on main at the moment but i appreciate the comments and glad not to be alone in my sadness and worry.