Since Iâve decided to make a tiny R2D2 for my robotics class I spent the morning finding .wav files of the different sounds he makes but the original file names I knew would get confusing
so here I am sitting here psychoanalyzing and personifying as many of them as I can because okay yeah heâs beeping and chirping but what was he feeling
Sufjan Stevens is so many people. Compiling this list, and hopping from holiday jams to S&M-club electronica to acoustic musings on death, was a complete and utter joy. Letâs get into it! Pace yourself!
Please note: This list includes every officially released song which credits Sufjan Stevens as a primary artist. It excludes live recordings, remixes, demos, and covers. This is a real tragedy, because manâs done some great covers, but I had to draw a line somewhere. Check out âFree Man in Parisâ and âA Little Lost,â especially. Also excluded: the piano solos from the D-side of the vinyl edition of All Delighted People, his work with Sisyphus, and âMajesty Snowbird,â which never got an official release, quelle tragique. I should note, too, that Sufjan is co-credited on Planetarium with Bryce Dessner, Nico Muhly, and James McAlister. If Iâve missed anything, if you see any glaring omissions on this list, please let me know.
Please also note: My momâs dead and Iâm gay, so youâll notice some bias.
Maybe Iâm biased because I make my own clothes, but skirts are better than trousers because you can put bigger pockets in skirts. With trousers, youâre limited to the size of your leg but with skirts you can just fill it up and people will just assume youâre wearing a petticoat until they hear the crunch of the Dorito bags.
Just once Iâd like the see an historical heroine be asked if it bothers her that she has to wear skirts and have say, âNot really. I couldnât fit this in a waistcoat.â and just pull out a loaf of bread or something and start eating it right in front of the baffled male lead.
It would work great in the 1700s with those removable pockets, you could fit a couple of Italian loaves in there.
One way to look at the transfiguration of womenâs tied-on, capacious pockets of the mid-eighteenth century into the early nineteenth centuryâs tiny, hand-held reticule is to consider that this transformation occurred as the French Revolution, a time that violently challenged established notions of property, privacy, and propriety. Womenâs pockets were private spaces they carried into the public with increasing freedom, and during a revolutionary time, this freedom was very, very frightening. The less women could carry, the less freedom they had. Take away pockets happily hidden under garments, and you limit womenâs ability to navigate public spaces, to carry seditious (or merely amorous) writing, or to travel unaccompanied.
The whole article is FASCINATINGâand it points out that pockets have been an aspect of feminism from the beginning.
People arenât trying to take away my guns. They are trying to inject some freaking common sense into the equation.
âIâm a gun owner. I have two pistols, a rifle, a shotgunâŠand a (now-expired) concealed carry permit. Iâve been shooting since I was a kid.
I also support every single gun control measure out there.
Why? Well, because of a number of logical reasons:
1. I go to gun shows, and Iâve witnessed more illegal cash sales than I can count. People bring guns to sell to dealers at the show and end up selling them to buyers in the parking lot who are willing to pay cash. No background check, no bill of sale, no formal transfer of ownership. Yes, this is happening, people! It is a regular occurrence and illegal in many states.
2. Every time I go to the gun range, I witness someone doing something extremely dangerous with a gun.
Iâve been swept more than 20 times â this means someone has unintentionally pointed a gun at me. Iâve seen the wrong ammo used (ask my husband about the time he almost lost an eye). Iâve watched people shooting guns that they lack experience with or ones that they canât handle (take, for example, a child or a smaller adult shooting a Desert Eagle semiautomatic handgun), causing kickback that can injure them and cause them to flail their loaded gun in all directions. Iâve seen guns jam, and people continue to fire them to âclear the jam.â Iâve seen people continue to fire when the range is âcold.â All of these people consider themselves âresponsibleâ gun owners. Nope. And these arenât exceptions to the rule â every single time I go to the range, I see someone doing something reckless and potentially deadly.
3. Iâve seen people handle guns when they are drunk, tired, hungover, or angry. I would never think of doing these things. It is irresponsible, and again, potentially deadly.
4. A friend of my college boyfriend pointed a loaded gun in my face because he wanted to show me how cool his new toy was. I dropped to the ground. He forgot it was loaded. Heâs a high-ranking officer in the U.S. Navy.
5. The class you take to get a concealed carry permit in North Carolina is easy to pass. You sit through a two-day class, take a simple written test, get a background check and fingerprints through the sheriffâs office, and basically just have to prove that you can hit the broad side of a barn. Thatâs it.
6. The âhero mentalityâ is misguided and dangerous. Unless you have combat training, the âgood guy/gal with a gunâ is more likely to kill another civilian or get mistaken by cops as the shooter. Iâm a decent shot with a pistol. Iâm a great shot with my rifle. But in a life or death situation, where people are literally being murdered in front of me, itâs completely unrealistic to think that, even with all my training, I could do anything but add to the chaos.
7. The NRA is a terrorist organization. Yup, I said it. I used to be a member because they gave discounts on shooting-range time. I quit after one year because I couldnât stomach the thought that my money was funding them. Their magazine and mailers are filled with propaganda about people coming to take my guns when there is absolutely zero evidence at all to suggest that is ever going to happen. Their recent ads make me sick and ashamed that I ever supported them.
8. The home protection argument makes sense to me on some level. I had a friend who was killed during a home invasion, so I get it. But an AK-47 (and other assault weapons) is not an ideal weapon for personal defense, and it serves no purpose for âhome protection.â It was designed for military use. A a 12-gauge shotgun is a better, more realistic choice for home defense. Iâve never seen any peer-reviewed study/expert/article anywhere that can refute this. Bottom line: Assault-style weapons should never be in the hands of civilians. Period. And going back to point No. 7, in a home-protection or self-defense situation, youâre still more likely to injure yourself or have your own gun used against you.
These are my thoughts on the subject as an experienced, licensed, and trained gun owner. Iâm already a member of the Brady Campaign, Everytown for Gun Safety, and will be joining Moms Demand Action. I find it impossible to understand why other gun owners like myself donât support these groups. They arenât trying to take away my guns; they are trying to inject some freaking common sense into the equation â something we desperately need and that every gun owner should support.âÂ
and for the fucking record, conservatives, stop touting places like israel and switzerland as âgun utopias.â israel and switzerland both have harsh gun control laws, much harsher than the united states, and you can literally go to jail for simply misplacing your weapon (which could then be used by someone untrained).
Coming from a country where owning a gun is illegal, the concept of untrained civilians holding guns is really distopic
Like if anyone found out you were holding a gun, even an unloaded one, people would literally start running and panicking. They would think that youre a psycho
Coming from a deep red state where you see someone carrying in public every day, it is pretty distopic.
I see a guy with a pistol on his hip at the grocery store and I wonder what kind of worldview makes him think he needs to be strapped to buy cereal and frozen pizza. I think heâs a psycho, too.
Unpopular opinion: straight people using âpartnerâ to refer to their SO actually helps normalize the term so that lgbt folx can use it without automatically outing themselves to strangers. It also helps other straight ppl get comfortable with the fact that strangers arenât entitled to information about other peopleâs gender or sexuality.
I hear âpartnerâ and think âgayâ too. A girl at work used it for months and I just went with it. When she would say âheâ I even thought maybe he was trans*. Anyways, someone using partner makes me more comfortable and I came out to her. She was just an intelligent straight girl that liked the term and was knowledgeable in human sexuality so definitely someone I should have felt comfortable coming out too. Itâs a good sign of a straight person uses it IMO.
As a mental health clinician, this is actually my blanket term when discussing any romantic relationship. I agree it normalizes it, but I also think itâs a relatively safe term to use to describe most romantic relationships without making any assumptions about the personâs orientation or identity. I also use the word âpartneredâ when describing a monogamous relationship status.
The term âpartnerâ also removes the implied hierarchy of boyfriend/girlfriend vs husband/wife. This is relevant both to non-monogamous people, and unmarried individuals for whom the importance of their relationship isnât dictated by its legal status.Â
discoholicmusic
theartofmadeline
gummygunk
stormborns
janainaart
dailybridgerton
izzy806
jbbartram-illu
kaledo-art
