helpful grammar tip! farther is for physical distance, further is for metaphorical distance, and father is for emotional distance!

gracie abrams
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
The Bowery Presents
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Interview Vampire Daily
Sade Olutola
hello vonnie

#extradirty

No title available
almost home
No title available

Kiana Khansmith

bliss lane
Game of Thrones Daily

Product Placement
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Today's Document
No title available
No title available
Mike Driver
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Venezuela

seen from Singapore

seen from Australia
seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
seen from India

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from United States
@iflostpleasereturntoally
helpful grammar tip! farther is for physical distance, further is for metaphorical distance, and father is for emotional distance!
i had a moment today while watching a whiny shitlord complain about the injustice of new sci-fi media having more female leads, i suddenly felt the strangest sense of dĂ©jĂ vu. i couldnât pintpoint it at first but then out of nowhere, it fucking dawned on me
This is the single greatest meme in the history of the Internet everyone can stop making memes now we donât need any more ever again
HELL WORLD OH MY GOD
FBI is really just straight up developing Trojan horse apps now
#direct action (via @cursedexe )
Hasan Shares His Valentines Day Plans | Marie Kondo Sparks Joy With Hasan Minhaj
This is so relatable and SO heartwarming
Ah the tranquility of having blocked all the shitheads alreadyđ
What are you talking about? I only use violence as an appropriate response.
The single best piece of writing advice I ever got was from a professor teaching a playwriting class, who told us that in every scene, especially scenes that were just dialogue, every character should want something. Making every character in a scene have a goal is an easy way to avoid dialogue thatâs just exposition, and to make sure your dialogue drives the plot forward and/or reveals characterization.Â
It doesnât have to be complicated or super weightyâas long as the characters have a goal, there will be tension in the scene even if the goals are small. Character X wants to borrow a pen, and character Y wants to make a good impression on character X. X wants to insult Y until they go away, and Y wants to annoy X by pretending not to notice the insults. X wants Y to give them the last slice of pizza, and Y is super full but still doesnât want X to have it. No matter what your characterâs goal is, it will reveal something about who that character is to the reader, and the conflict between your charactersâ goals will give the scene momentum.
When pet owners talk about their pets itâs guaranteed to fall under one of two categories:
Rover is the sweetest kindest force in my life, my closest ally, my best friend, the family member who molded me as a person who I would absolutely lay down my life for. Please let me show you photos of this perfection incarnate.
Socks is on double secret baby probation now and sheâs gated in the living room because she wont stop sneaking out and trying to eat all the towels in the house, like the bastard idiot child she is.
I would like to clarify this is not a âwhich type of pet owner are youâ post. There is no choosing. Pet owners are both of these, all the time, forever. Itâs a matter of which one is the conversation topic of the day, and the outcome depends entirely upon how recently their pet tried to eat plastic
Tag you pets who is the sweet child that loves you, and who is the idiot bastard child that eats towels.
I just opened up a check in the mail, went to the ATM & found 20$ đ Iâm not passing these shits up NO more on my mama!
Even if I do not receive money or good news, I did smile at seeing this smiling Buddha.
Note to vacationing non-Americans: while itâs true that America doesnât always have the best food culture, the food in our restaurants is really not representative of what most of us eat at home. The portions at Cheesecake Factory or IHOP are meant to be indulgent, not just âwhat Americans are used to.â
If you eat at a regular American household, during a regular meal where theyâre not going out of their way to impress guests, you probably will not be served twelve pounds of chocolate-covered cream cheese. Please bear this in mind before writing yet another âomg I canât believe American foodâ post.
Also, most American restaurant portions are 100% intended as two mealsâ worth of food. Some of my older Irish relatives still struggle with the idea that itâs not just not rude to eat half your meal and take the rest home, itâs expected. (Apparently this is somewhat of an American custom.)
Until youâre hitting the âfancy restaurantâ tier (the kind of place you go for a celebration or an anniversary date), a dinner out should generally also be lunch for the next day. Leftovers are very much the norm.
From the little time Iâve spent in Canada, this seems to be the case up there as well.
the portions in family restaurants (as opposed to haute cuisine types) are designed so that no one goes away hungry.
volume IS very much a part of the american hospitality tradition, and Nobody Leaves Hungry is important. but you have to recognize that itâs not how we cook for ourselves, itâs how we welcome guests and strengthen community ties.
so in order to give you a celebratory experience and make you feel welcomed, family restaurants make the portions big enough that even if youâre a teenage boy celebrating a hard win on the basketball court, youâre still going to be comfortably full when you leave.
of course, that means that for your average person with a sit-down job, who ate a decent lunch that day, itâs twice as much as they want or more. thatâs ok. as mentioned above, taking home leftovers is absolutely encouraged. that, too, is part of american hospitality tradition; itâs meant to invoke fond memories of grandma loading you down with covered dishes so you can have hearty celebration food all week. pot luck church basement get-togethers where the whole town makes sure everybody has enough. that sort of thing. itâs about sharing. itâs about celebrating Plenty.
itâs not about pigging out until you get huge. treating it that way is pretty disrespectful of our culture. and you know, contrary to what the world thinks, we do have one.
I feel like Iâve been waiting for a post like this for yearsâŠ
Just remember. There is no such thing as a fake geek girl. There are only fake geek boys. Science fiction was invented by a woman.
Specifically a teenage girl. You know, someone who would be a part of the demographic that some of these boys are violently rejecting.
Isaac Asimov.
yo mary shelley wrote frankenstein in 1818 and isaac asimov was born in 1920 so you kinda get my point
If you want to push it back even further Margaret Cavendish, the duchess of Newcastle (1623-1673) wrote The Blazing World in 1666, about a young woman who discovers a Utopian world that can only be accessed via the North Pole - oft credited as one of the first scifi novels
Women have always been at the forefront of literature, the first novel (what we would consider a novel in modern terms)Â was written by a woman (Lady Muraskaiâs the Tale of Genji in the early 1000s) take your snide âIsaac Asimovâ reblogs and stick it
even in terms of male scifi authors, asimov was predated by Jules Verne, HG Wells, George Orwell, you could have even cited Poe or Jonathan Swift has a case but Asimov?
PbbBFFTTBBBTBTTBBTBTTT so desperate to discredit the idea of Mary Shelly as the mother of modern science fiction you didnât even do a frickin google search For Shame
And if you want to go back even further, the first named, identified author in history was Enheduanna of Akkad, a Sumerian high priestess.
Blogging this tweet because this explains SO MUCH about the mindset of pretty much all the folks Iâve known whoâre against single-payer, itâs not even funnyâŠ
ThisâŠ.
This never occurred to me. Not once. That Americans are against Health Care because they think it actually costs tens of thousands of dollars for a broken arm, hundreds of thousands for a complicated birth, millions for cancer treatment.
Because theyâve never known anything different. The idea that a broken arm is only a couple hundred bucks; a complicated birth a couple thousand; cancer treatment only tens of thousands; all easily covered by existing tax structures.
This explains a lot. Â And itâs a good example of what I was talking about in my post on scarcity being used to prop up ableism â always question the idea that a resource is genuinely scarce. Â Even if it seems obvious that it is, quite often thatâs the result of careful manipulation and misconceptions that youâre not even aware of. Â
And never think youâre too smart to be fooled by that kind of thing, it doesnât work like that. Â Similarly, donât think people who are fooled by something are stupid. Â Nobody can have all the information about everything, and nobody has the time and energy to investigate and put together conscious conclusions about every piece of information theyâre given. Â It doesnât take being stupid, or even just gullible, to believe something like this.
I currently live in a country without free medical care and still, itâs enormously cheap compared to the USA. An American expat wrote a piece for our English language paper about how she paid more for parking at the hospital than giving birth to her baby thatâs pretty interesting:
https://grapevine.is/mag/articles/2016/01/06/healthcare-in-iceland-vs-the-us-weve-got-it-so-good/
Yesterday I had to go to the hospital cause I injured my eye, Iâm frankly dreading what the bill is going to be, but what made me balk was being told in the pharmacy that my insurance was denied for the antibiotic eye drops and itâd be over $100 out of pocket. So I didnât get my eyedrops.
Iâve had these same drops before living in the UK. They cost me seven GBP.
Itâs the exact same drug, same steroid, same strain of antibiotic. But somehow the US gets away with charging $100 for a generic non brand version of a drug which is easy to create and widely used. Itâs downright robbery, but also a form of eugenics through poverty and class warfare. You keep the poor poor by making sure basic necessities remain unattainable and then you make it seem like the norm so no one fights it.
The rest of the world is not like this.
Eat the rich. Resist.
Itâs downright robbery, but also a form of eugenics through poverty and class warfare.
THIS. THISTHISTHIS. THIS IS WHAT I KEEP TRYING TO TELL PEOPLE.
My blood pressure medication (Candesartan) costs between $40-$125 USD for 30 tablets in the US. Here in Germany, 98 tablets costs me 5 Euro.
Flower lover
If you scroll pass this you donât got ten dollars
Need my $10
Guys i literally just got tipped $10 at work