remember to thank your friends for everything but especially for being alive
i mean it. go thank one of them today. don't ever take the human connections you have for granted. cherish them while they're here
Misplaced Lens Cap
Xuebing Du
No title available

No title available
taylor price

No title available
todays bird
h
$LAYYYTER
No title available

Product Placement

ellievsbear
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

pixel skylines

JBB: An Artblog!
NASA

Love Begins

oozey mess
cherry valley forever
we're not kids anymore.

seen from T1
seen from T1
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Ireland

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@jackaxed
remember to thank your friends for everything but especially for being alive
i mean it. go thank one of them today. don't ever take the human connections you have for granted. cherish them while they're here
The owner gave me permission to share photos... but look! Look at this little French Bulldog!
A nose! Minimal facial wrinkles! Breathes quietly! *delighted gasp*
She's all grown up and going to be spayed soon
Still has fantastic knees and ankles and nose and a face and breathes silently and her legs are under her body and I bet that, because she's about to be spayed due to her heart murmur, she has no hemivertebrae just to continue to make her otherwise the most physically sound frenchie I've ever seen. And her owner isn't letting her get fat.
And I give no fucks that she isn't a breed standard color. And don't come at me with "waaah, well bred frenchies harglebargle!!!" Those don't exist here, okay? They barely exist *anywhere*. 99.999999999999999% of frenchies are not show line dogs. At this point I'm more like to encounter an honest to the gods unicorn than this mythical well bred frenchie in person
it's interesting to me to see like. within queer communities the thing where if you said "things are really fucking stressful and awful for us right now and it's giving us a lot of really terrible feelings that don't have an outlet" ppl are like "yes, true" and then if you're like "it's far easier and safer to vent that frustration and fear on accessible members of your own community than it is to try to vent it on the people who are actually in power" they would be like "yes, true" and if you said "it feels better to justify venting that frustration and fear and anger if you can frame it in head as very important and righteous, rather than admitting that it's a coping mechanism being utilized by a fallible human being undergoing very difficult circumstances" they'd say "yes that's also true"
but if you're like "this is relevant to your own current behavior" with the implication that the intracommunity thing they're currently big mad about is actually not as important and righteous as they're casting it in their head, it's like "no no. not MY behavior. mine is rational and I am correct. the issue I am fighting with other queer people about like rats in a sack IS actually the most important issue to be addressing right now"
and like
this is stuff I have to constantly watch out for in my own behavior! it is absolutely absolutely a thing, and absolutely something we ALL deal with and are capable of engaging in. it's ramped up in intensity the last year or two and I don't think that is a coincidence. I wish we were more capable of this level of analysis of this stuff without getting defensive.
and like, again, it isn't like it's evil. I don't think it's GOOD to do, but as I said, it's the completely understandable behavior of a human being under considerable stress. we need to cut ourselves a break in order to be able to be honest about what we are doing sometimes.
Congrats(?) - you have discovered that not everyone has metacognition, or the ability to think about their own thoughts and look at them (somewhat) objectively. It’s really frustrating for people who do have good metacognition, especially because people who don’t have it just think you’re crazy. 🤪
IS THAT THE WORD FOR THAT
I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue.
On April 21st, the left screen moved first.
I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug.
At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy.
On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me.
At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire.
Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83.
I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags.
My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports.
The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026:
Reviewed.
That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one.
Let me show you my flags.
March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it.
March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it.
April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it.
April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it.
April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it.
That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one.
The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March.
Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012.
Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence.
Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets.
The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade.
I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email.
The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action.
One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared.
One account is a coincidence. But there were six.
Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000.
My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger.
March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes.
The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event.
The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting."
Then the White House sent the email again.
I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread.
I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated.
But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed.
Zero prosecutions.
As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations.
I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations.
The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still.
In my field, we call this price discovery.
I've been harassed in MANY different ways on here (from ostensibly left-wing people who are reeeeallly just looking for the thrill of leading their friends on a cyberbully adventure, to nazis, to people who spam rape-threats from multiple accounts), and the solution for all of them is the same: just ignore it.
even if it sucks, even if they're saying things you want to refute, even if you think refuting will help things because Everyone Will Understand if You Just Speak Clearly Enough. even if you want to vent publicly because you think you deserve that much, acknowledging them is almost always the wrong move. you're just pouring gas and making sure that those couple little sparks turn into a fire. and all of them love to see you upset, not just the nazis threatening rape. sucks when it's your own, but hey, hurt people hurt people!
engaging is bad for a few different reasons. the first is that these people feed on attention. reply publicly, and that will give someone enough juice to make a new account every few days for a year plus, sending you paragraphs of insults mixed with strange accusations. whereas if you'd ignored them, maybe that obsessive phase would've only lasted a couple weeks. genuinely, you can create your own stalkers by reacting.
the second is that by engaging publicly, you're platforming them. even if you just post literal puppies and rainbows, there will be people hate-following who are pissed off about how many notes your latest puppies and rainbows photo got (because if you got more notes than them, it's punching up). they will see you engaging with harassment and go, hey, I can do that too! and that's how you get harasser mitosis.
platforming also has another problem. most people are good, but by the sheer quantity of people you'll be exposed to online, some will be malicious. if you are refuting something incorrect ("I never killed that man because I wasn't even in Florida on that day!") they will go right to the original slander ("they killed that man in Florida"), copy/paste, and spread it. or they will forgo the copy/pasting and just let it mutate in their memory so that it's a whole new thing by the time they spread it ("they killed several men and women in Florida, and also California").
currently, I'm in the 'block everyone who could potentially hate-follow and harass me' phase, but there is also some danger to that, because people see blocking as you acknowledging them, which (depending on the person) might be enough gasoline to rev them up. but it does at least provide some barrier, because making new accounts to block evade takes a modicum of energy, and if they're continually starved of further interactions, that energy will eventually fade.
anyway, those are my cool strats! if you start gaining any sort of online numbers, you can do this to keep yourself a little bit sane and healthy. good luck!
i don't want healing and moving on if we get through this. i want retribution. reparations. land back. feed the hungry, house the homeless, healthcare. invest in renewables, but also. retribution.
#are reparations like... not a part of healing and moving on?#ok ok I know that people tell you to move on when what they actually mean is stop talking about how hurt you are. but like.#would actual healing not involve the perpetrator identifying and acknowledging the problem and then working towards#changing behaviors restoring respect repairing relationships and accepting consequences#so as not to end up perpetuating the same harms again?
I am separating them because historically, in the United States, when the damage done by conservatism and white supremacy is rightfully brought up and there is a desire to address the structural and social aspects that cause said harm, those in power try to get out of actual progressive action by being like "don't we need to heal? Why do we need to be divisive? we need to move on" every. time. (We see this a lot with Covid and during the Biden era for example. Despite the fact that immune compromised people are still at huge risk and we don't yet understand the consequences of long Covid or repeated infections, a majority of the nation has decided to just 'live their lives').
Those that benefit from the imperial machine do not want to hear that they've caused damage even if they are aware of it peripherally. They'll claim that 'they can't take the blame for their ancestors' while sitting prettily in the privilege afforded them by those same ancestors (I'm saying this as a white person myself, doesn't matter which way you slice it, even my Spanish-Argentine ancestors are colonists).
The continuation of this nation, founded on genocide, relies on white people putting their heads in the sand. White supremacy does not consider reparations "healing". White supremacy in its most mild form is uncomfortable talking about privilege. White supremacy in a more extreme form considers reparations (and Land Back for that matter) violence against 'them'. So many of the issues in this country, such as our lack of healthcare or our car dependent suburbia is because white people can not stand the idea of Black and Indigenous people having wealth or benefit.
True equality feels like inequality when you are used to blindly relying on the disenfranchisement and suffering of others to succeed. Actual healing in this country is going to be very very uncomfortable for a lot of people, at least that's my opinion.
(Vocabulary for this post
TNR= the Trap Neuter and Release of feral cats.
Eradication = the mass euthanasia of feral cats. )
Something that irks me is when people are like "wow so and so supports TNR yikes" on a post from someone who rescues cats or works with cats. LIke what are you doing personally to help the feral cat problem that puts you in the position to be on that high horse? Are you putting in the time euthanizing or finding community cats homes?
TNR has its problems and honestly I dont agree with it personally but that doesnt mean I would shame or unfollow people who are doing rescue because of it. TNR people are pretty much the ONLY lay people who are boots on the ground working with feral cat populations spending their own time and money getting these cats help. If those cats have to be outside because euthanizing them would upset the community then its better for them to sterilized, vaccinated, and wormed then for them to just not be because it hurts your feelings. Yeah it sucks these cats are decimating native animals it sucks they lead such short lives but unless a lot of stuff changes fundamentally for how we treat cats TNR is currently a necessary evil especially in areas with dense feral populations where eradication would encourage more breeding and disease spread.
TNR people who do personally help with eradication efforts actually put themselves in real danger due to potential retaliation from the public so if someone is online and talks about TNR you can't assume then never help with it because its dangerous to talk about on platforms that have thousands of eyes on you.
So I happened across this little tidbit
...
There's one person working at the CDC right now with clinical experience with rabies. One.
I'm sure with the rise in anti-vaccine sentiment, especially regarding the rabies vaccine, this won't have any potentially dangerous repercussions...
Pausing testing is bad news, yes. Because then we don't get federal-level rabies prevalence data.
This isn't solely down to anti-vaxxer sentiment, though. This is the same type of intentional gutting of public health that this administration is famous for and that does end up endangering human health. Individual states and municipalities still require rabies vaccination for domestic animals and will issue fines if you don't get your pets vaccinated. But a pre-exposure rabies vaccine isn't typically given to human beings unless they are intentionally placing themselves in an environment where the risk of contracting rabies is higher (e.g., a scientist studying bats or a wildlife rehabilitation specialist).
Human rabies vaccination is typically post-exposure prophylaxis (a series of shots after suspected exposure to the virus). What pausing rabies surveillance does is blind us to current and future rabies outbreaks in animal populations, which then raises the likelihood of increased rabies exposure in humans.
This fucking sucks but the advice remains the same: if you are bitten by ANY feral or wild animal, go get rabies prophylaxis. I had a friend who was bitten by a feral kitten. I still told her to get rabies shots, which she did. Because once you start showing symptoms, you are already dead. Don't fuck around with rabies.
As a registered veterinary technician, my anti-vaccine comment was about domestic cats and dogs. Which is why I was sarcastically saying that that growing sentiment and now this lack of testing surely won't have any repercussions.
It's the rabies vaccine legally required for dogs and cats? Yes.
Are there communities online that make fake rabies certificates that I've seen people admit to using? Yes.
Are some counties/cities so backed up and understaffed that there are people who have never received something telling them to license their dog and people use that as an excuse to not get the rabies vaccine? Yes.
Do people have outdoor cats that they simply never take to the vet? Yes.
Do many breeders tell people to delay or even avoid the rabies vaccine entirely? Yes.
Are there people who refuse to vaccinate that vet clinics will still see their pets? Yes. And since I'm the only rabies vaccinated tech at my work I get to handle these animals yaaaaay
My bad! Haha yes and as a former public health person my focus was on people. Thank you for the veterinary perspective; jfc it's absolutely horrifying that there are people who are resistant to pet vaccines. I had heard whispers, but it's both interesting and terrifying to get it from the (metaphorical) horse's mouth. Thank you for the knowledge drop; truly and sincerely. I didn't know the extent of it! And I'm so sorry you are the one having to deal with unvaccinated pets and their irresponsible shithead owners. You're doing awesome work and I didn't mean to minimize the threat.
(My own 2 [indoor with catio access] cats are regular vet visitors and are up to date on all their shots, rabies included, plus flea/tick/mosquito protection!)
I think most people aren't aware of the (rapidly growing) extent to which anti-vax rhetoric has invaded pet care. It's extremely disheartening, and I'm terrified of how it's going to trickle over into *your* area of expertise...
An unvaccinated dog gets bit by something and owners don't notice and this dog, in the early stages, goes to... a dog park, or a family gathering and bites/licks people/dogs and now we've got mass rabies outbreaks.
It was extra brought to my mind because my cataract surgeon, after I brought up that I'm a vet tech, said that he actually had done a corneal tissue transplant from the *same donor* as that guy who recently died from rabies from his donor kidney. My surgeon was contacted by (you guessed it) the CDC and he had to call the corneal transplant recipient, have him come in the next day for an emergency removal and then the recipient had to go get post-exposure treatment.
I don't know which aspect I hate more, every idiot pet owner that's going to get their pet killed by not having proof of rabies vaccine when their pet bit someone, or the possibility that somebody will get bit by a rabid animal whose owner subsequently produces a fake certificate assuring that the animal has been vaccinated and therefore cannot have rabies, meaning the person who's just been bitten by a rabid animal will likely not get the post-exposure treatment, and die of rabies.
Once, many years ago, a family member once was bitten by a local, usually-friendly indoor-outdoor cat, and I was very pleasantly surprised to find out that the owners had actually vaccinated him. Thankfully, this was years before the antivax rot got prevalent, because the family member in question of course took the proof of rabies vaccine as sufficient reason to not get the postexposure shots. Nowadays, I would be extremely wary of just trusting that, because it could have been faked (and you DON'T fuck around with rabies), but you'd probably run into your health insurance bitching about paying for the shots when you weren't electing to (posthumously!) test the animal.
They really do so much more damage than the immediate local effects.
Question: Are there ANY adverse health effects for an animal getting vaccinated for rabies more than once?
The reason I ask is because I'd like to get cats in the future and I'd hate to choose a cat off Petfinder or something only for the foster to lie to me about the animal being vaccinated. Knowing there's animal anti-vaxxers out there makes me want to take any animal into the vet to get shots just to be sure, and IDK if it's safe for the animal to get double vaccinated since I'm not a vet.
Unless they're outright allergic to it, no. There's no real issue for it.
Every animal that came in to my shelter was vaccinated on either intake day or the day after. If they were old enough, this included a rabies vaccine.
We had no vaccine history on any stray. They could have been vaccinated the day before for all we knew, but the risk of disease in a shelter environment took all precedent. And I did not see any negative reactions.
People still tend to lump JK Rowling in with the category of ~problematic artists~ and I need everyone to understand that is not the problem with her. She is not comparable to anyone who wrote a piece of fiction you hate, or someone who made rude comments in 2015 and has since learned better.
She is far more like Elon Musk. She is a radicalized person with an extreme amount of social and financial power, and for YEARS she has been using that power to try to influence her government into hurting vulnerable people, on purpose. And she has succeeded. THAT is the problem with her, and THAT is why spending money on her books is so dangerous, not because her books aged badly.
Critiquing her work is fine, of course (I personally was never a fan so I really don’t care) but you NEED to understand that fiction is not the main issue here. And I truly think acting like she’s the same as the rest of any giant list of ~problematic creators of the week~ waters down how dangerous she is.
i have to reblog this again because i go insane when people act like the problem with her is "its cringe for adults to like kids media" or like "the books sucked anyways" like those are completely irrelevant and try to shift the blame and focus from the active harm. even the fact the books also have bioessentialism and antisemitism is a whole different conversation
like the problem with the mm hockey romance genre (and this one isn’t on reid or tierney this is the problem as a whole) is that it takes the bad apples approach to all of it because obviously things like racism and homophobia are problems but to admit they are deep-rooted systemic problems instead of individual makes it kind of impossible to resolve. so it’s easy to write about there being a couple of guys who suck. but when you have to deal with the fact that this is what men’s sports are like, yes ALL of them, yes ALL the men involved to some level, because this is what western notions of masculinity are based in, it makes it not a romantic fantasy but instead some sort of medium dot com thinkpiece. ultimately the issue to me is that sports romance novels are written for an audience that likes sports, which then precludes any real criticism of sports. and as i have said before the ideal mm sports romance novel is written by someone who hates men’s professional sports and not in a “flawed institution but noble intentions” kind of way.
my personal take on this is that it's not even about the sports of it all, it's kind of baked in to romance as a whole. romance as a genre is really interested in recuperating institutions. specifically marriage! Romance Novels, as a genre, are about the fantasy of marriage as being able to meet women's sexual, emotional, and material needs. instead of, you know, being historically kind of a miserable saw trap where women have to trade their bodily autonomy and emotional lives for material wellbeing. and you can take this all the way back to Austen, but I'd argue that this is still pretty foundational to the modern romance genre. this is why billionaire is so popular, what if you had access to unlimited wealth AND incredible dick AND the guy was nice to you. the dream.
obviously we now live in an age where women don't have to be married to a man to have access to money, but the HEA expectation of romance novels is very much formed by this tie between romantic partnership and material wellbeing. no one ends a romance novel homeless, you know? the fantasy is that this institution can work. don't worry about patriarchy as a set of material and psychic conditions. this marriage is good and good marriage is possible.
so sports, in sports romance, are just another institution to recuperate. the structures are fine, don't worry about the structures! romance novels are, i think, fundamentally about a fantasy of navigating difficult social conditions in a personally satisfying way. and so that shows up in whatever the setting is, but I think it's a fundamental characteristic of the genre.
whatsy is extremely and wholly correct. i'm gonna add another thing to the pile, which is that repetition is necessary for recuperation. in order to convert the constitutive harm of structures/institutions into social narratives that can obscure their own second-order effects, you need to tell the story over and over again. sports is violence as entertainment; romance is marriage as entertainment. much of their overlapping* utility is that they are easy to consume, comfortingly predictable, and infinitely available. one romance novel can't flip marriage from the aforementioned patriarchal saw trap into the key to individual freedom *and* safety *and* happiness. a couple hundred thousand released into the cultural id...
with this repetition, the narrative fantasy (like gender, like genre) becomes a stable place you visit: sports is somewhere you can go where merit wins; romance is somewhere you can go where love saves somebody. what's striking about the rise of m/m sports romance in particular is that it raises the stakes of that fantasy even further--there is now somewhere you can go where THREE saw traps (marriage, violence, homophobia) become the conditions of happiness. i don't think it's a coincidence that as material conditions worsen, the escape fantasy becomes...more and more fantastic.
one more thing--much of sports romance's fantasy occurs via a specific elision of racism, particularly antiblackness. (sports in general does this much more transparently!) not a coincidence that hockey's the overwhelmingly white big 4 sport and also the locus of western** sports romance, particularly m/m sports romance. not a coincidence that the gays became repeatably consumable as desiring, deserving romantic subjects within the romance genre writ large before black people have. look at these goodreads shelf counts, and keep in mind that college-educated black women read more than everybody else, demographically:
romance as a genre is run by white women. consciously or not, the marriage fantasy these white women write over and over again protects whiteness more than it protects straightness. along this axis, the fantasy actually functions identically to the institution instead of transforming it. as the repetition of stories shows us, there's a hierarchy of which social conditions are onscreen, navigable such that 'marriage is good and a good marriage is possible', and which social conditions don't serve most creators' stakes in the marriage fantasy at all.
*for doing-my-real-job-today purposes i'm skipping some other very relevant overlaps between sports & romance--libidinal imaginaries, economies of ability and desirability, the temporal bound of a championship or a wedding, etc--but somebody else run w the ball pls
**i would really like to read some comparative scholarship on race overall in western romance and BL, if anybody has recs.
what if instead of that other thing, it had been Animorphs that captured the global attention. like I’m talking blockbuster films with graphic CGI morphing sequences, people lining up at midnight dressed as bears and gorillas, 20-something-year-olds with Andalite and Hork Bajir tattoos, people talking about what their fighting morph would be as a first date question, an Animorphs World with a life size yeerk pool, people chanting ‘Tobias!’ everytime a redtail hawk flies by, and K. A. Applegate’s pleasant and progressive voice getting boosted as it deserves to be
I read one of these when I was a kid and LOVED it, but could never find another - it didn’t have very good saturation in small-town South Africa.
I should check where I can get some now, I’m going to be spending a lot of time on planes in the near future and feel the need to load up my eReader with a good series that isn’t romance.
Apparently they are all available for free online. And not in the usual ahoy-there 🏴☠️ way things are available for free online, because apparently the author has given her blessing? Or she gave it her blessing several years ago during an AMA.
I’ve had a bit of a google and can’t find any statements contradicting that AMA.
This is the link to the reddit post I found with the books compiled into different formats - I use epub and so far the epub versions look great, but there are also pdf and mobi versions.
I’d like to say I’m going to be strong and not devour them all before I leave for Iceland next week, but I’m 36 years old and know myself well enough to know that yeah, I’m probably gonna read them all before I even get on the plane.
I'm convinced some equestrians secretly hate their horses and are only in this sport to dominate and hurt another creature
Behold: The Brittany Pozzi Combo Twist Snaffle Bit
I don’t think horse people think they hate their horses. I think they love what their horses can do for them and they say things like “oh he likes his twisted wire bit! He’s so happy and relaxed in it!” Except their definition of happy and relaxed is *compliant*.
It’s a really messed up cognitive dissonance. And that’s not even getting into how equestrian sport is the playground of millionaires and billionaires and how much that level of wealth destroys your sense of empathy and compassion.
It's incredible how all of the censorship on the modern internet doesn't actually seem to be making society kinder or more wholesome hmm maybe there's a lesson in this
Striped Hyena (Hyaena hyaena), mother with pup, family Hyaenidae, Gujarat, India
Photograph by Asis Ray
very irritating how often i see people anthropomorphize nonhuman animals (especially wild animals) on this site and online at large but very disappointing that when someone says 'hey don't project human emotions onto that bird/dog/bear/deer etc.' a bunch of other people are like 'exactly. animals don't care' and then go on to describe nonhuman animals as incapable of sentience, compassion, or thought. perhaps there's a secret option about how nonhuman animals think and feel that's neither 'they think and feel exactly as humans do' nor 'they don't think or feel anything.' but idk i'm just some guy.
I'm seeing warnings about scammers trying to commission artists but the "reference sheet" for their character they want commissioned isn't an image but a .vbs file ("visual basic script"), and will run a script when you open it, probably to yoink your account(s), but I haven't seen this from anyone who's actually clicked it yet. Just be careful and never open a file like that, 'cause people suck.
For reference (heh)
At a glance, file name checks out. But!! Do not open a .vbs file!!!
Hey trans Korean American horror creator being displaced to an entirely new state with my roommate in August/September if I can’t find a job immediately when I get there I’m going to be in a lot of trouble. I’ll have more specifics soon but you can help me prepare by visiting these pages.
Become a supporter of Withkindereyes today!
Cartoon horror stories