★
The Bowery Presents

PR's Tumblrdome
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Sade Olutola
ojovivo
The Stonewall Inn
No title available
cherry valley forever
official daine visual archive
Monterey Bay Aquarium
🪼

roma★

@theartofmadeline
No title available
Claire Keane
EXPECTATIONS
The Bright Sessions

No title available

Product Placement

seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from India
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Maldives
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Philippines

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Singapore
@jacobsescalator
this line read wont leave my fucking brain i cant take it
fuck it really has like almost the exact cadence
THEIR REACTIONS ARE SO GREAT THIS IS THE BEST PRANK
"what did you think you were here for?"
Dwarf fortress: extremely detailed and elaborate world simulator Also Dwarf fortress:
My beautiful tamed brachiosaurus
As a European, I knew Americans have been asking for walkable cities but i had no idea it was literally this hostile
WHERE DO YOU WALK YOUR DOGS!?!
lol yeah
Its to the point where most Americans can’t conceive of a walkable community because everywhere is like this and several generations have now grown up in a world like this. There’s hardly anyone that can conceive of a world that isn’t like this. Most people either cave in and get a car or end up isolated. I live in a city that’s mostly walkable by North American standards and I still end up walking in the dirt on the edge of a stroad a lot of the time.
And don't forget, we can't get decent public transportation either.
#you guys should be suing for breach of human or constitutional or whatever rights
god someone with a law degree please make the argument that this is a breach of all three of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"
Shout out to the (many) times I got called an elitist gatekeeper for saying that the only real way to fully understand a work of fiction is to experience it firsthand and that summaries and reviews are not a replacement for that
Me, reading the first 80% of the post: What do you mean, "experience it firsthand"? How am I supposed to join the Hunger Games or go the Odyssey?
Me, reading the final clause of the post: Oh, you literally meant that people have to read the book/listen to the audiobook in order to fully understand it. And people got mad. Oh dear.
And this doesn't mean you need to read / watch / listen to absolutely everything! (not that that's remotely possible)
It's perfectly reasonable that I have decided, based on ambient cultural information, that Ready Player One will not be my jam and I'm not going to read it. What that means, though, is that I have very little information about Ready Player One. I am not an authority on Ready Player One. If there's a discussion of the character development or worldbuilding or plot structure in Ready Player One, I can listen, but I can't really contribute, because I have not read it and thus am missing quite a lot of information about it.
There are more things in the world that I am not an authority on than there are things that I am an authority on, and that's okay! I should just be honest with myself and others about it.
What kind of Millennial™️ are you?
Avocado toast millennial
I am bird watcher now.
I ran a marathon for fun?
Yes, I am currently working on five fiber art projects…
Other millennial stereotype that I will write in the tags.
I am unfortunately not part of the greatest generation aka here for the result
Please share!
Sweater Weather is Coming ... the Embrace Octopus Sweater is call your name ... Get The Knit Pattern Designed By Maia E. Sirnes: 👉 https://knithacker.com/2013/08/embrace-octopus-sweater-pattern-by-maia-e-sirnes/ 🐙
SCIENTISTS ANNOUNCE DISCOVERY OF NEANDERTHAL BISECTED BY DEVIL BLADE
A new study published on neanderthal remains discovered in Iberia in 2024 appears to confirm a controversial idea: that devil blade technology was not unique to Homo sapiens.
The 59,000 year old remains likely represent a male of about 25 years of age. Isotopic analysis of his teeth from a previous study suggests a diet largely composed of freshwater fish and mollusks, and the intact parts of his skeleton reveal signs of healed fractures to his left arm and temple. Most significantly, his remains were found in vertically bisected halves deposited on their sides about a meter apart.
“When I first saw the photos from the excavation, all I could do was just say, wow, wow,” says Chunt Sanders, principal author of the study. "The fact that this man's body was cut this way was already striking, you know, as far as we know, this type of damage could only be performed with a devil blade, which itself made this a huge find. But it was the level of mastery that really struck me. It wasn't just a clean cut, it was a perfect one. I don't think even the best 30-year adept could split a human body from skull to groin so evenly, with so little fragmentation. This is the work of a true master."
While it may never be known whether the remains represent a devil bladesman who died in combat with a fellow wielder, the fine detail of preservation gives some clues to this neanderthal's last moments.
“Based on the positioning of the remains, we believe this individual was bisected by the blade wielder and continued to walk for a moment before his body slid apart in two pieces, probably spraying blood everywhere,” Sanders says. “His halves were then rapidly covered by silt, which allowed for this remarkable state of preservation.”
The fossil halves are in a near complete state of articulation and conserve granular levels of detail, allowing for microscopic analysis of the cut bones to be performed. The results are consistent with typical devil blade shear patterns, though further study will be necessary to estimate the exact size and weight of the blade.
The age of devil blade technology is heavily disputed. “We know behaviorally modern humans have used devil blades for at least 30,000 years, as evidenced by the Devil Blade Sorcerer of Chauvet,” Sanders says, referring to cave art depicting a composite bison-human figure decapitating a mammoth with a sword the length of their body. “...But it’s an open question when exactly we first developed the use. The evidence we have from upper paleolithic rock art shows that highly sophisticated techniques were already in practice at this time. The first human adoption of the devil blade likely occurred much, much earlier.”
Highly controversial evidence of early devil blade technology dates as far back as 350,000 years ago, with the finding of a fossilized antelope carcass in present-day Kenya that some claim suggests human butchery with a much finer, stronger blade edge than could have been produced with a Sangoan industry hand axe, though studies have been inconclusive due to the fossil's heavily eroded condition. Definitive evidence of devil blade technology only begins to appear on the archeological record much more recently, well into human behavioral modernity, yet the uniform global distribution of devil blade use in the upper paleolithic suggests potential for Homo sapiens acquisition of the tool occurring prior to dispersal from Africa.
Also debated is whether Homo sapiens had a monopoly on devil blade technology, or whether this tool is one we shared with neanderthals. Some eagle carcasses associated with neanderthal camps have been claimed to suggest butchery by devil blade to harvest wing and tail feathers, with some paleoanthropologists further speculating that the preferential use of such a physically taxing tool over equally capable flint tools may indicate a religious rite. More conservative takes dismiss the concept of neanderthal devil blade usage altogether due to a much more scattered and inconclusive record of the technology in neanderthals than in contemporaneous humans, with most unambiguous finds of devil blade butchery of possible neanderthal provenance occurring at sites Homo sapiens also occupied.
The exact origin of devil blade technology, and whether its usage was exclusive to Homo sapiens, has been a subject of heated debate. This finding sheds some light on the matter.
“The notion that neanderthals were too ‘primitive’ to use the devil blade is dead in the water. The notion of, “oh, maybe they had devil blades, but they were probably just using simple beginner techniques they could copy from watching training duels between young Homo sapiens”, is dead," Sanders says. "This is strong evidence of mastery by neanderthals independently of Homo sapiens, long before our species settled the Iberian interior.”
Sanders is confident that further discoveries - and re-examination of previous evidence of paleolithic devil blade technology - will shed more light on the deep history of the practice, and the role it played in the lives of neanderthals. She's also hopeful that this finding will mark a shift in popular perception of our closest relatives.
“I think we want there to be something more than our DNA that makes us human, that separates us from every other species. We say, art makes us unique, self-adornment makes us unique, language makes us unique, devil blade technology makes us unique-and then we find evidence that, nope, neanderthals probably had these things too! We've come a long way from early portrayals of neanderthals as brutish simpletons, but there's still a long way to go, and so much to learn,” Sanders says. “These people lived in very tough conditions as small bands of foragers, and yet here there is evidence that at least some neanderthal groups had members wholly dedicated to learning the devil blade, a costly process which would have removed wielders from the subsistence labor pool entirely. That's a big deal. Here, 59,000 years ago, some devil blade master invested a lifetime into careful tutelage of a student, and that student achieved sufficient mastery of the blade to bisect another person into even halves. There’s nothing more human than that.”
for context: the video
"Learn the fundamentals first" seems like really sound universal advice, and as a former classical musician, I can vouch for it. You will have a more solid foundation for increasing complexity if you put in the time to study in a structured way. If you don't, you'll have a lot of shit to fix later.
As a former music teacher, I can also say that "learn the fundamentals first" is the death knell for a vast percentage of beginners, especially adult learners.
I've run into this with drawing several times, where some well-meaning artist has lectured me on needing to study anatomy properly or not use shortcuts like CSP brushes. And oh, believe me, I know. I know exactly how to learn an artistic discipline in a structured way. I just...don't want to!
The thing is, I'm not aiming to be a professional artist. I want to draw my gay little anime guys. I would undoubtedly improve at art much faster if I approached every gay little anime guy drawing as a study exercise. But I would also have quit drawing a decade ago if I couldn't just let myself enjoy drawing imperfect fucked-up little guys with whatever shortcuts I needed to body myself across the finish line.
With my adult piano students, my approach was always "What's your goal?" If their goal was to learn exactly one Elton John songbook to play at parties, then...that's what we did. We'd put tape on the keys to label the notes, and just fuckin go for it. Learning exactly one Elton John songbook is a good and noble musical goal, full stop.
Some of my students needed and enjoyed a more structured approach to learning; if they wanted to be able to play classical music, then yes, scales were going to have to enter the equation at some point. And yet others would learn the Elton John songbook, catch their white whale, and realize they wanted to explore more of the ocean. The scales were still there for them to learn!
Often the choice isn't between "learn art well" and "learn art imperfectly" - the choice is between "learn art imperfectly" and "don't do art at all." To which I say, learn imperfectly! Or, what the hell, don't 'learn' art. Just do, and enjoy the doing of it.
You have official permission from your local pretentious classical music snob: fuck the fundamentals. You can always unfuck them later (but only if you want to).
Blossoming Chestnut Branches, May, 1890. Vincent van Gogh. Oil on canvas.