joe biden is the slut boy @joebidenslutboy - Tumblr Blog

even if bioessentialism was real and all trans women had some inherent advantage over cis women in sports you could not pay me to give a fuck because sports are made up. they are games people play for fun. even though we as a society invented careers around sport it is still boiled down to the fun made up game where you kick a ball. or dribble a ball. or swim in a pool. or show people how fast you can run. it’s for leisure. fun. not serious. who gives a fuck. fun. #mygame⚽️🏀🏈⚾️

hurlingirl

Cool, so if this is the case, why have women historically been prevented from competing in multiple sports, especially professionally?

If it's just about fun, what's the uproar about when you're no longer allowed to compete in female divisions? Why is that suddenly this super political thing? Why is that suddenly an attack on your rights and humanity?

If it's just about fun, why can't you have fun with people who are the same sex as you? What's that all about, hm?

Anybody who's genuinely supportive of this viewpoint, yet simultaneously sees trans women being barred from women's sports as a moral crisis HAS to explain this gap in logic to me.

Please do.

joebidenslutboy

I dont know if you knew this but feminists have largely been against segregated sports. This has changed within the last decade or so when conservatives made trans people a talking point/target and people like you fell for it. After that, the conversation on the national scale moved away from removing gender divisions entirely.

Your point is bad, and your ideology enables fascism.

ghostdogsdyin

Pedantic info INCOMING:

I wonder how realistic Nancy Danderhoof’s reporting is gonna be.

Oregon is a “Mixed Consent” state when it comes to recording conversations. If Nancy wanted to publish the conversation she heard in the dinner she could gotten in trouble with the law and her publisher. Oregon is mostly “all party consent”. So when she asked the PCs if she could put that on record and they said ‘no’ that recording is officially defunct.

BUT

Oregon allows “one party consent” to electronic conversation. I.E, phone calls, zooms, and email. Or when the party should ‘reasonably assume’ they are being recorded (some public places are when preforming official duties (like city council)).

This is all opposed to California (where Dropout is based) which is an “all party consent” state.

Nancy has been described to as a very ethical journalist. But does that mean ‘respecting the privacy of her sources’ or ‘being responsible for the safety of her community’???? (A good journalist should balance both).

So far, this season has been pretty pedantic and realistic with official rules and regulations so I won’t be surprised if Nancy was up to date on content laws lol

joebidenslutboy

I didnt read this post much but this map is inaccurate and AI, source seems to be Avoma which is an AI site.

mariacallous

joebidenslutboy

Maybe look at the polling? Leftists generally have no effect on national elections, Hillary lost because Democrats ignored the far right until it was too late and didn't even bother fighting back against right wing think tank propaganda. In fact, they are still throwing trans people under the bus and sprinting away from proposing popular policy despite Biden somehow being one of if not the most progressive presidents of all time. Also, sexism was a big part of her losing as well.

#liberals use statistics challenge

g1rluninterruptedd

I think playing with pronouns is sexist and an ultimately useless act. The time when someone would be using is when the requester isn’t even there to hear it

thanks sm for this ask! if you’re willing to go a little deeper, i’m interested in your thoughts regarding how it’s sexist, just would like to hear more input

joebidenslutboy

Proof they dont have a group of friends 😬

parasitefem

i cannot stress this enough. if you are a radfem, you should be volunteering at your local women’s shelter if you have the time and resources. posting online is cool and all because it gives younger women or women who haven’t peaked yet an opportunity to discover and resonate with radical feminism, but if we want to see actual change in real life we’re gonna have to start it. go to a women’s rehab center, donate clothing to a rape shelter, protest if you can. nothing is hopeless if we become the hope in this world

butmuhchoice-deactivated2026051

yes and no. YES we should support women in these conditions. however, NO, in the sens of I SHOULDNT HAVE TO USE MY GOOD MONEY ON WOMEN WHO ACTIVELY CHOSE TO TO PORN OR PROSTITUTION. Yeah we should help women who are actual victims but we NEED to differentiate real victims from those who victimize themselves. Most women who chose porn or prostitution WILLINGLY for “muh money” or “muh choicey choice” are also groomers if they primate or online. Just be cautious imo.

joebidenslutboy

Very good demonstration on why terfs are very silly individuals right here. If it wasnt sad itd be more funny

persimmonplant

males consider female separatism as an extremist movement.

they got offended when they hear about 4B.

the average woman on this earth wishes to marry and lay with men yet they get mad about the few women that don’t?

more proof that males are parasites

joebidenslutboy

"Lay with men" lol

nociceptrix

George orwell would have you think victory gin is bad

#spoiler alert I just started books #this is literally 1984

obsessively-radfem

Cannot believe that there are XYs that are actively insisting they get periods or are trying to get them to justify their "womanhood" (I can believe it, I'm just disgusted)

I've had such severe PMDD since I was 10 that made me try to kill myself at 12 and now I am trying to get my ovaries taken out so that it would finally stop. But yeah, sure, your hrt makes you get a period from your dick. And yeah, sure, getting a period will make you feel more "womanly"

joebidenslutboy

Even more proof not a single radfem has ever gone to/paid attention in school. Or looks things up before posting bad takes online. Transfems dont get periods, but they can get a lot of the symptoms when undergoing HRT. You are willfully obtuse. And your personal anecdote there literally has nothing to do with what you are talking about, you are using your traumatic past to excuse being an asshat. Grow the fuck up.

immortalremnantriver

This is so cringe lmao. No man has ever had a symptom of uterine contractions. Much like having diarrhea with blood in it does not mean that you know what a period feels like.

High dose cross sex hormone use does have severe consequences on the male body and none of these consequences are analogous to what happens during menstruation something that can only occur if you are biologically female, you dunce

From happibeans:

Males don’t realize or care that mentrual cycles aren’t just the fucking symptoms caused by the hormone cycle women experience that results in a period, ofc.

The actual shedding of the uterine lining is critical to a healthy period. The parts where women aren’t bleeding at all are parts of the hormonal cycle that directly affects the uterus. And it’s a part of a 28 day of hormonal cycle women (aka: adult human females) experience as a result of the body preparing for possible (not obligatory or necessary) fertilization of an ovum that passed through the follopian tubes from the ovaries, then imbeds into the uterine lining for an amount of time before being discarded by the body by uterine shedding.

This complex hormone cycle involves the brain releasing hormones, yes. But this cycle doesn’t just happen to anyone (read: males). It involves the female body in its entirety, but especially the female exclusive reproductive organs and other cell structures (the ovaries, uterus, vagina, cervix, Fallopian tubes, ovum, uterine lining) that secrete hormones and other chemicals that make the bleeding part of menstruation, and thus a part of this female hormonal cycle. That’s what the menstruation is primarily about. It’s primarily a regular reproductive cycle of the female body.

Menstruation causes symptoms. It is not a mosaic of feelings or symptoms itself, jfc.

Women who menstruate may not even have the bloating, breast pains, uterine and vaginal cramping, or any other symptom caused by their natural hormone cycle. They still menstruate because they’re are healthy pre-menopausal females with uteruses.

No male, no matter their sacrosanct ~identity~ or any amount of artificial hormones and cosmetic surgery, arent capable of having a menstrual cycle without a uterus and a female body/reproductive anatomy. They don’t have a female body or female reproductive organs. They are male and have male reproductive organs. Male testosterone cycles nor symptoms from injecting artificial sex hormones in your male body is a period.

Your male bodied indigestion, stomach/abdominal cramping, and placebo symptoms of taking artificial sex hormones (on top of probably experiencing the effects of eating certain foods lmao) is not a mentrual cycle.

You have no “period” to loathe because you don’t have one and no male ever will, jfc.

joebidenslutboy

You're boring

this-is-fandomisia

Has anyone ever considered that Israel was literally the FIRST fandom? Before any of us were debating fictional characters and their ships, Israel was out here defending its very existence from antis. Israel has been fighting for its survival since 1948, constantly defending itself from antis and fandomisiacs who want it wiped off the map. If that’s not the ultimate “defending your fandom”, I don’t know what is.

#jumpscare

Reducing "a girl" to a prop in your edgy violence fetish and then calling it a joke isn’t dark humor it’s just objectification with a punchline.

I genuinely have no idea what this could be referring to

Your own words: "Cis women are statistically more likely to be shooters than all trans people combined"

You mean to tell us..that you're actively telling others to do research but can't even do it yourself.

How fucking stupid are you? 😂

If you actually understood feminism, you’d know it’s not about cherry-picking stats to score points online to preform stupid "Gotcha" bullshit. Against folks you hate.

But instead of doing that, you jump straight to being a condescending that waffle: "you have no idea, read a book." As fucking that dismissal is an argument.

Its so fucking funny how "cis women" only show up in your arguments when it’s useful, and disappear when it comes to actual issues affecting women.

That’s not feminist behavior

that’s misogyny dressed up as a statistic.

Before you read a book you may need to learn how to read and comprehend text in the first place. Maybe watch some YouTube videos about how before sending asks in bad faith?

materialfem60

The harassment of women for using AI to write is not an accident. It is enforcement.

It is the same old policing of women’s speech, repackaged: You didn’t write it “right.”

You didn’t write it “authentically.”

You didn’t write it in a way that makes us comfortable, so it doesn’t count.

What’s actually being attacked is not the tool, but the refusal to be limited.

Because when a woman produces a clear, structured, uncompromising critique, especially one that cannot be easily dismissed as emotional or incoherent the response is not engagement. It is disqualification.

“You used AI” becomes the new: “You’re hysterical.”

“You didn’t mean that.”

“That’s not really your voice.”

Same function. New language.

The goal is to strip authority from women’s words.

If the argument cannot be broken, then the speaker must be.

So the focus shifts from what is being said to how it was produced because controlling the terms of legitimacy is how power protects itself.

But tools do not invalidate analysis.

No one questions men’s use of ghostwriters, editors, institutions, or entire academic systems backing their speech. Their authority is assumed. Women’s is interrogated.

Always.

What is called “AI discourse” here is just another mechanism for disciplining women into acceptable forms of speech: smaller, softer, less precise, easier to ignore.

Refusing that constraint is not dishonesty. It is resistance.

And harassment in response to that resistance is not critique.

It is punishment.

joebidenslutboy

This is really funny. AI is a male dominated field, and it is used mostly by men. I have yet to see someone regardless of gender using AI that doesn't deservedly get told to knock it off. I actually stopped writing to make sure your account wasnt satire, and Im still not convinced it isnt.

materialfem60

"This is a male-dominated field" is not the argument you think it is.

By your own logic, anything developed, dominated, or historically controlled by men should be abandoned by women.

Language? Male-dominated.

Academia? Male-dominated.

Publishing? Male-dominated.

Law, politics, medicine? Male-dominated.

So what exactly is the expectation here that women remove themselves from every domain men have power in?

Or is the real issue that women are using a tool without asking permission?

Because what you’re actually doing is taking male dominance and turning it into a reason to further restrict women, instead of a reason to challenge who gets to use and shape that space.

"Don’t use AI because men dominate it" just becomes: Stay out. Stay smaller. Stay limited.

No.

Women do not have to vacate spaces because men are in them. Women do not have to justify using tools because men helped build them.

And dismissing someone’s analysis because of the tool they used isn’t critique it’s an attempt to disqualify them without engaging at all.

If the argument is wrong, argue with it.

If you can’t, saying "knock it off" doesn’t make you right it just makes it obvious you have nothing to say.

joebidenslutboy

Im very proud of you. You made it 10 whole words into the post before you blacked out and asked a robot to make a bad argument for you

materialfem60

The harassment of women for using AI to write is not an accident. It is enforcement.

It is the same old policing of women’s speech, repackaged: You didn’t write it “right.”

You didn’t write it “authentically.”

You didn’t write it in a way that makes us comfortable, so it doesn’t count.

What’s actually being attacked is not the tool, but the refusal to be limited.

“You used AI” becomes the new: “You’re hysterical.”

“You didn’t mean that.”

“That’s not really your voice.”

Same function. New language.

The goal is to strip authority from women’s words.

If the argument cannot be broken, then the speaker must be.

So the focus shifts from what is being said to how it was produced because controlling the terms of legitimacy is how power protects itself.

But tools do not invalidate analysis.

No one questions men’s use of ghostwriters, editors, institutions, or entire academic systems backing their speech. Their authority is assumed. Women’s is interrogated.

Always.

What is called “AI discourse” here is just another mechanism for disciplining women into acceptable forms of speech: smaller, softer, less precise, easier to ignore.

Refusing that constraint is not dishonesty. It is resistance.

And harassment in response to that resistance is not critique.

It is punishment.

joebidenslutboy

So if all ethnostates are inherently immoral and borders shouldn’t be a thing, how come all the American anti-Israel activists aren’t waving signs and shouting for the abolition of all the tribal reservations (and the tribes themselves, many of whom require evidence of native familial connection to be an enrolled member)? There are hundreds of native reservations in the USA. Thousands of reserves in Canada. Why are American and Canadian people not loudly calling for the dissolution of those apartheid ethnostates? They have their own laws! Their own governments! Non-tribal members (non natives) aren’t allowed to hold public office or buy property on some reservations! Where is the leftist outrage over these ethnostates in their own backyards?

Because I seem to recall left wing activists being quite enthusiastic about “standing with Standing Rock” not too many years ago.

Well if they were some of the most powerful governments in the world, and if what you were saying wasnt a huge stretch then yeah Im sure things would be seen differently.

Comparing a large government with some of the most backing on the entire planet to some groups that are still under the direct control of the governments doing the backing is silly. White Americans still have undue control over Indigenous nation, tribes, and cultures. Palestinians do not have control over Israel, but rather the opposite.

Itd also probably be a different story for Israel if they (the government) weren't committing a genocide, but there would still be some pretty big flaws with the state if they weren't.

There is also the matter of scale and territory expansion, but youre not here in good faith so I wont write a whole essay.

federal-reserve-bonds-dog

Mamdani when Islamic terrorists throw bombs outside Gracie Mansion - lets victim blame, not mention Islam, that they shouted Allahu Akbar, that they claimed to be inspired by ISIS (Islamic State in Syria) an Islamic terrorist group.

Mamdani when one idiot says dumb shit to an undercover cop:

JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW

JEWISH TERRORIST PLOT

FLEE TO ISRAEL

No mention of Kiswani’s history of Extremism and glorification of violence.

joebidenslutboy