I post / reblog about Pokemon and Gloomhaven sometimes, with the tags #pokemon and #gloomhaven respectively
taylor price
Keni
Show & Tell

pixel skylines

izzy's playlists!
$LAYYYTER
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Color Me Curious
One Nice Bug Per Day
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Today's Document
almost home
NASA

Love Begins

bliss lane
No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
YOU ARE THE REASON
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from France
seen from Brazil

seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United States

seen from Romania
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Germany
@jumping-cat-girls
I post / reblog about Pokemon and Gloomhaven sometimes, with the tags #pokemon and #gloomhaven respectively
All right y'all... The day has finally come... Where I must ask for help, myself 😭🙏🏾
This is NOT mandatory, and of course there are causes that need much more help. So don't feel pressured! But if you happen to have a little to spare, I am getting tooth surgery this Friday and they charged me 2k upfront 😭 and then when I asked if it could be split, they told me I ran the risk of my jaw shifting if so 😭 but I have been in pain with these back molars for months and I've been stalling to pay for other things, so... I gotta just take the L but. Anything helps 🙏🏾 Much appreciated if you do 🙏🏾
on sisters
this is a statement from victryena, a trans woman of color who was mass harassed by (mostly) white trans women on twitter for reposting a protest sign saying "white trans people are oppressors too". the sign itself was a response to septembersister, a black trans woman and refugee in canada, having her speech suppressed at the vancouver transgender march protest. here is her full speech, made later. i am platforming them because they need to be heard, and the content of their words is urgently relevant to the current state of transfeminist discourse.
Transcription, since it's too long for alt text:
Trans people of color are underrepresented and outnumbered. When we stand up and make ourselves visible, we put ourselves at risk of disproportionate scrutiny and harassment, not just from transphobes and bad actors, but also from those within our own community. When we want to make ourselves heard, we're told that now is not the time. We're told it's stirring up drama, in-fighting, and bad optics. Even how, and when, we express our grievances is policed. When we use provocation, it's inflammatory and lacks nuance. When we use satire, it's offensive and unproductive. When we share our personal experiences, it's the oppression olympics. When we share statistics, it's sowing division. When we clarify ourselves, it's back-pedaling. When we defend ourselves, it's doubling down. When we criticize too harshly, we're asked to placate. When we don't criticize hard enough, we're ignored outright. When it's said by a large platform, it's engagement baiting and fed posting. When it's said by a small platform, it's buried and forgotten. When it's said by a SWer, it invites shame and disparagement. And when we're lucky enough to survive beyond all of the compounding systemic barriers placed upon us (before, during, and after transition), we're seen as the example and not the exception. It's suffocating, disillusioning, and isolating. Even within a community that claims to include and support us, we have no voice. Acknowledging the intersectionality of trans people of color, especially those who are black and indigenous, is not something new within progressive spaces. And it does not take anything away from the very real experiences of white trans individuals. But it also does not absolve them from, or grant them immunity to, the same racial prejudices and biases held (subconsciously or otherwise) if they were cis. Having a marginalized gender identity does not come with the awareness of marginalized racial identities. White hegemony and oppression do not disappear when recontextualized within a transgender space, just like they don't within queer spaces more broadly. It still exists including through unexamined racial privilege and how that shapes behaviors and attitudes, and how trans white voices dominate discourse and dictate the overarching priorities of the trans community while excluding, dismissing, sidelining, and being blind to, trans bipoc perspectives. And that was made very clear from the responses throughout this entire discourse, including the same familiar displays of white fragility and conservative talking points used when confronting racial inequality more generally. To me, and all the other trans bipoc, who read every defensive reaction, deflection, straw man, dismissal, bad faith interpretation, condescending interjection, anecdotal fallacy, pedantic argument, disparaging comment, accusation, and personal attack. Every "well actually", "not all white people", "all lives matter", and "we have bigger problems". Only for those same people to inevitably virtue-signal about how their peers need to do better when one of them is outed for racism (if at all). The irony and hypocrisy has not been lost on us.
This isn't a call to action for the greater society to solve all the issues that every trans person experiences, nor is it the business of anyone outside of the trans community. It's a conversation for the trans community specifically and a direct call to action for white individuals (across all gender identities) within the trans community to take a moment of self-reflection and to have a willingness to listen with an intention to learn. Why should those in power care about the struggles of trans people as a whole when they themselves are not directly impacted and have larger problems to address? How can trans bipoc be expected to wait until the broader trans issues have been solved to finally have a voice? Especially when our own white trans peers disparage and deprioritize our grievances in much the same way? Why is the consideration of trans bipoc experiences sidelined as a secondary goal to the broader effort of transgender liberation instead of being seen as an integral and interwoven part of it? In the US, the women's suffrage movement failed to maintain intersectionality and abandoned racial equality in order to secure the white vote first. There's no need for straw man arguments when an actual equivalent example already exists. Acknowledging and platforming the most vulnerable within an already marginalized group is not a means of division, but rather an explicit act of solidarity. It's not just about not oppressing those among us with less privilege, but uplifting them with the privileges we do have so we are all empowered to fight together. None of us will be heard until we are all heard. And none of us will be free until we are all free. The trans rally sign that read "white trans people are oppressors too" wasn't even mine (mine said "trans joy"… lol…), but I understood the subtext (and context) enough to take it in good faith, and to advocate for the very real sentiment behind it. Is the semantics and optics around how we define and confront racial prejudices and systems of oppression within our own community really that much more important than the act of actually addressing it? Let's not wait until another white trans person gets outed for racism, or for another trans person of color to get dogpiled by their white peers into silence, to have this conversation again. Trans lives matters include trans bipoc lives. Trans bipoc rights are also trans rights.
Ok finally the rupture and repair post!!!
Rupture & repair is the most important thing to be able to do in a relationship, imo. Ruptures are not always one person acting in a way that directly causes harm to another person (they can also involve more than one person; we all have experiences of friend groups rupturing;) more frequently they are patterns of unaddressed hurt that build up over the course of a relationship when communication is poor and conversations about harm and disconnect are focused on saving face and avoiding the feeling of guilt. This is very hard to train yourself out of, in my experience, particularly when one has relational trauma. Conflict can feel like the absolute end of the world, and admitting that anything you did might have hurt someone you care about is like putting your hand on a hot stove. It's easy to respond reactively and defensively when having conversations that involve conflict, disagreement, frustration, or anger. Or even when someone is simply giving you the information "this thing you did hurt me," because when you are relationally traumatized (most people are to some degree imo) that feels like an attack. And "feels like" is not meant to be dismissive here -- the way our nervous systems respond to perceived threats is VERY real and physiological. That's what makes these patterns so hard to change. Often this means that one needs some degree of stability and safety in order to do this with the least amount of pain, but I have found ways to hack the way I think about it which allow me to reframe how I experience receiving this information, and I think this might be useful to others as well.
Most people want to have genuine, trusting and positive connections with their friends & loved ones. Most people do not want to have dysfunctional and conflict-filled relationships wherein nothing can ever be productively discussed. Assume your goal is that you want to hurt the people in your life the least amount possible, and be able to respond to the hurts that do inevitably occur in such a way that it does not weaken the relationship. You also want the other person to do the same; you want this to go both ways. You want to feel safe being able to talk to the people in your life about the impact their behavior has had on you without getting attacked or guilt tripped or punished.
In order to repair (and ultimately reduce!) interpersonal harm you cause, you have to know when it happens and what specific behavior has caused it. The only way to get this information is directly from the people who have experienced the harm, which necessitates those people being comfortable giving you that information. When people do not feel comfortable giving you that information in the moment in a way that allows for correction and repair, you are likely to only find out about the ways in which you are harming people when those people leave. In general, we don't want the people in our lives who we care about to leave. Therefore it is beneficial to proactively try to ensure that the people in our lives are comfortable coming to us with this information. If you are successful doing this, it has the knock-on benefit of modelling for others that these conversations are not scary, and in fact build trust and intimacy when done with care.
So, how do we create a relational atmosphere which lets the people we care about know that we can be trusted not to punish them when they share this information with us? This is the tricky part! It involves a lot of trial and error, and of course our own behavior is not the only factor; most people with relational trauma will feel an aversion to being honest with someone who has hurt them simply based on past experiences, and this often will be true regardless of who they are interacting with. I pretty much only interact with fairly profoundly traumatized people, so this part is important for me to keep in mind. I don't just want to make the experience of sharing this information feel safe, I want it to feel rewarding. I want to behave in ways that encourage it. Again, there is the knock-on effect of modelling this behavior for others: responding gracefully and productively to conflicts shows other people how that can be done, and shows that the results are preferable to trying to make every conflict into a Dominance Battle, which encourages them to try to do the same. If you get two people who are both genuinely trying to do this with one another, you can really speedrun the process of unlearning conflict trauma! So my first piece of advice is: buddy up! Find people who you trust who want to practice this with you.
That all said, here is my personal process, which is geared towards asynchronous communication but which has some utility for phone or in person convos as well:
1. Upon receipt of information, monitor my body. Typically receiving information that my behavior has hurt someone will trigger some pretty Big Bad Feelings; I have learned to identify the specific physiological reactions my nervous system triggers when this happen (for me it's usually a feeling of like, my chest feeling "empty" often combined with that sinking in the gut, I frequently feel a weird "disconnect" behind my eyes, my heart rate picks up and my breathing becomes tighter, etc.)
2. If the aforementioned things happen, take a moment to close my eyes and breathe deeply a few times.
3. Immediately thank the other person for telling me and let them know I need a little bit of time to think about what they have told me before responding. It helps me to have a script for this ahead of time so that I don't accidentally inject my statement with any of my Big Bad Feelings.
4. Having disengaged for the time being, I do all the stuff I usually do to put my nervous system back into parasympathetic mode: have a snack, listen to calming music/sing, curl up with a comfy blanket, ask my partner to hold me (coregulation is sooooo. helpful.)
5. Often I will brainstorm about the situation with my partner or another trusted friend. It's important to do this in a way that isn't just bad faith sniping about the worst possible framing of what the other person is telling you or reacting to, because that can be very tempting, especially when you haven't practiced this a lot. I usually go with, "here's a brief description of what I thought I was doing/saying and the context. Here is how the other person received it. Here is how I am feeling about that and some of my theories as to why those feelings are coming up right now." Talking things through with someone is only helpful if that person is willing to challenge you/won't feel pressured to "take your side"! Its very important to have that kind of person in your life.
6. Speaking of taking sides: I consciously remind myself, repeatedly, that this is not a battle. There aren't sides. My goal is preserving and strengthening my relationship with this person. My goal is responding in such a way that they do not regret providing me with the information they have given me.
7. I usually draft some thoughts in a notes doc and periodically update it over the course of a day or two while I process the situation. Important to keep the other person informed about how this is going so they do not feel they're being ignored -- I will usually say something like "hey just checking in, I'm still thinking about what you said earlier and I really want to make sure I take the time I need to respond with the care it deserves" and give them a rough ETA for when I think I'll be able to do that.
8. I edit/polish my response and send it. Responses can be apologies or not; sometimes the other person is not asking for one, sometimes the context is such that one is not required, but it's smart to read up on how to apologize well and apply those techniques to your reply, even if it is not technically an apology. It's possible to come to the conclusion that you did not Behave Badly and still say "I'm really really sorry that my words hurt you," or "I really regret how that interaction went," etc, and it's important to follow it up with a description of what you think happened wherein you restate and validate their experience of the interaction or behavior. Its important too to stay curious in the reply: "I think in the future it would be better if I handled situations like this in this other way, what do you think?" and so on. This step is more vague than the others bc it truly depends on the situation/context/other person. If I have genuinely Behaved Badly vs a miscommunication (and this is one of the things I reflect on when I am Taking Time: to me, having Behaved Badly means I have acted out of step with my values in a way that I want to globally correct. Miscommunications etc mean I want to correct my behavior *with this person* going forward, because I have been given information about how they are receiving my behavior that shows me that it is not effective in maintaining trust. The distinction is important bc it determines what work I do internally) then I will be specific about that: "that was really inconsiderate of me, I prioritized my own comfort over being fair to you about your experience, because it was easier for me," etc. With miscommunications it will often look more like "I was trying to say x, but it's clear I didn't do that successfully; thank you so much for telling me that so I can adjust how I do things in the future and I'm very sorry I hurt you." <- even with miscommunications wherein you have not actually acted counter to your own values, it is important not to do the Bad Apology "sorry you felt that way" thing!!! Bad Behavior vs Miscommunication is a distinction I find helpful to make FOR ME in my own head. It's not one that needs to be expressed to the other person.
9. Ideally, in this response you're also modelling how you want the other person to approach this discussion: thoughtfully and with care and curiosity for your feelings and experiences. Don't be defensive about behavior you don't want to defend. Keep in mind that this is not a personal attack and you're not under threat. This is a chance to prove to someone that they can trust you. It is an opportunity.
10. None of this addresses that sometimes people with relational trauma will object to your behavior and demand apologies and behavior change as a power play or attempt at coercive control. Those situations are tricky and responding to them depends a whole lot on your relationship with that person. Remember that the point of a response/apology is not to grovel and fawn; it is to repair. This makes it important to keep in mind your own boundaries. Sometimes people in my life who are also working on healing relational trauma will share information like "seeing you say x made me feel y" and they're referring to, like, behavior wherein I assert my right to do something like "express frustration," and in those cases I will usually say "it makes a lot of sense that you'd feel that way; here is where I'm coming from when I make statements like that" and then express curiosity about where the feelings are coming from. These situations aren't the same as someone saying "the way you treated me hurt me," but they're ways you can troubleshoot trauma responses with friends with similar experiences without anyone feeling Bad for their reactions, if that makes sense. I hope it does, I know a lot of this is kind of vague.
Crucially: you can't be saying any of this to placate the other person. You have to actually synthesize the information they give you and apply it to interactions and behavior going forward. This is the part that ultimately proves you are trustworthy.
Something that's also helped me get better at this is practicing how to let people know they have hurt ME in a way that's kind and productive! Often I can shape those sorts of statements in such a way that encourages a thoughtful rather than defensive response (reiterating that I understand why they behaved a certain way while not downplaying the impact it had on me, saying that I know it might be tough information to hear & that I understand if they need to take some time to process it, etc.) which also gives them a model for approaching me about any harm I might do them in the future. It's collaborative!
That's all I can think of rn. If anyone wishes to add thoughts or expand on anything based on their own experiences please feel free to do so; obviously this account is based only on my own, but I really hope it provides at least some framework for how people might consider approaching these things in their own lives.
I have, hm, ritualized? a few parts of this interaction in ways that are helpful to me. These conversations are hard and scary for everybody involved. They get less hard and less scary as you get more practice and build trust and unwind your relational trauma, but they're never fun. These are some things I do to help the conversation go as well as it can.
Be kind to yourself: no matter which side of the conversation you're on, you are going to have a better time if you're not hungry, thirsty, sweaty, tired, uncomfortable, overwhelmed, in a hurry. This is a conversation that deserves your best work, because it is work. If you're the person requesting repair, start the conversation when you're fed, watered, rested, etc. If you're receiving the request for repair and now isn't a good time, it's ok to say so! Like Pip said, communicate a timeline, but just because someone brought something up, that does not obligate you to produce a meaningful response right away.
Be kind to the other person: The other person is going to do better if they are also not hungry, thirsty, sweaty, tired, uncomfortable, overwhelmed, in a hurry. This is mostly for when you're initiating: try to do it at a time when the other person is likely to be fed, watered, etc. Don't spring a tricky conversation on someone who's about to leave for work, or when dinner is four hours late, or right before bed.
Try not to let things fester: Bring stuff up as soon as you reasonably can, while still being kind (see above) to yourself and the other person. Respond to stuff as soon as you reasonably can, while still being kind. I'm struggling to define "as soon as reasonable" in a concise way - too soon would be while you're still activated, if you haven't given yourself time to sit with your feelings, if you don't yet know what you need to communicate. But once you know there's something you need to talk about, even if you haven't nailed down every last detail, try not to wait much longer - a few days is fine, a few weeks is really pushing it. I know it's scary. The longer you wait, the more time you have to build the whole thing up. How much it hurt, how bad you feel, your fears about the conversation, all of it. Plus, it's more time for everyone's memory to fade, which makes it difficult to talk about the actual events vs feelings and intentions. It's really hard to get (or give!) a satisfying explanation or apology for an interaction that one doesn't really remember.
Ease into it: It can be really hard to find a conversational opening for "hey that sucked," and there's basically never a time when hearing that out of the blue is fun. You can ask to schedule it, or just ask if now's a good time to talk. Hey, can we find some time to talk about something that's been bothering me? Would Thursday work for you? Hey, do you have a minute to talk about the way things went at the party last week? It's been on my mind. Get specific enough that the other person doesn't think you're about to dump them, without actually getting into the meat of the issue. Here is the shape of the thing I would like to talk about.
Be appreciative. These conversations are hard and scary. In my ideal rupture/repair conversations, everybody says thank you and you're welcome at the end. "Thank you for telling me what's up, I know it's hard." "Thank you for listening, I really appreciate it."
Practice: Same as you would for a job interview. Get a willing partner, invent a ridiculous problem, and have a scary conversation about it. Trade roles, practice both sides.
For me, it is helpful to take these conversations outside, to a chill neutral space like a quiet park or neighborhood walk. Homes are intimate places with a lot of layers and memories.
Whenever i get told that trans women need to stop infighting, i think about how a former transmasc friend told me - after i was sexually harassed by a man twice my age - that "at least we know you're hot and pass," and it was brushed off as "gender-affirming misogyny."
Would the same attitudes be held if i made jokes about "gender-affirming misandry"? Well, uh, no. These went over very poorly.
remember! when someone vents about racism instead of using their post to confess your sins you can simply☝️ Shut The Fuck Up
I bet you’re getting the shit booped out of you
yeh…
I DIDNT MEAN TO ADD CHILCHUCK
hi any life advice for 21yo
Don't date thirty-year-olds until you are at least 25.
Having a glass of water for every glass of alcohol will give you a 50% reduction in hangover viciousness.
Bad people will use your willingness to be quiet as a weapon against you. If someone's being awful to you and trusting you'll be quiet to keep from making waves, surprise them.
There is no physical object in the world that is worth as much as your honor.
Honor is not the same as dignity. Retaining one sometimes means leaving the other aside.
Don't have any sex you don't want to have; have as much as you want of the sex that you do, whether that's a lot, a little, or none at all. Nothing you can do to your own body is immoral, unless you're doing it as an act of self-punishment.
Food is morally neutral. You do not have to earn the right to eat calories. Fat and sugar keep your brain from eating itself.
Learning to sit still and breathe--in, in, in, hold, hold, hold, out, out, out, out, out, out--can give you five feet of clear space around yourself in a maelstrom.
Find out how to make three good meals: A comfort meal you can make for just yourself relatively easily, a fancy meal you can use to wow a date, and a meal you can feed a bunch of people. All the other cooking can come later, but you can build a community on those three meals.
If you ever get to the point that things are so bleak you can see no other way forward but to die, make any other choice. If that means leaving everything you own and being a beach bum, or quitting your career, or taking up or leaving a religion, or deciding to bicycle across the country, so be it; living means more chances, dying means everything stops and you don't get to see any more interesting things. As you have not yet seen all the things that can interest you, it is better to live.
Sighs loudly and dramatically in a way that suggests I desire attention
My gf loves playing with my dick in bed because it's "like a little fidget toy"
Normal sized fidget toy
if you open your wallet upside-down while boarding a bus it will release all your money/bank cards/IDs/driving licence etc. this can be handy if you are trying to rid yourself of all worldly possessions
relatedly: probably no one has made greater contributions to Posting than dr roberta bobby
with complete sincerity: this might be the best post ever made
some of my faves from personal dr roberta bobby preservation efforts archive:
I wish every pickme TMRA transfem a very "wake up and get out of there, they will turn on you the second they can and try to drive you into complete isolation and then suicide. None of the people who claimed to care will lift a finger to help you because they feel no moral obligation to help a transfem"
Please look at how many of us speak from experience. I used to think the same things you did. That TME trans people wouldn't hurt me if I was nicer to them. That there was a chance at weeding out their transmisogyny if I could just prove I was a friend. That I wouldn't be permanently isolated in those spaces until they found a reason to try and drive me to suicide. But it wasn't the case, because these people are hellbent on hating you and me. Get out of there. Your sisters are waiting for you.
I hope you understand that transfeminist spaces won't be perfect. Especially if you're racialized or disabled. It will still sometimes be difficult to find your safe people if you are multiply marginalized. Transfeminist spaces aren't utopian by any means. But from the perspective of this Black disabled transfem? Transfeminist spaces are still a hell of a lot safer than TMRA spaces. You'll find racism and ableism everywhere, but most transfeminists actually try to acknowledge and unlearn it. It's better here.
queerness in the global north really has become a white gated community and it both saddens and terrifies me immensely
the fact that transmisogyny is so deep and ever present that no one can even comprehend why trans women are so willing to go to bat for the "social undesirables". and are just frothing at the mouth to ruin her life when she does so
I'm hungover as shit and not wording this well. someone who's read more theory than me please help me say what I'm trying to say
ill do it. ill rip the bandaid off and say the dirty word
I have my own thoughts about "pedophile liberation" that I've been trying to examine and reify since this whole bullshit started, but there are two base assumptions that have literally always been clear to me and it blows my MIND that other queer people aren't reading the obvious fucking writing on the wall
1) paraphilias exist. people have them. our psychological framework to categorize and understand them is racist and ableist and sexist and transmisogynistic, but whatever you want to call them and however you want to analyze them, people are going to have them. they aren't going away
2) as soon as you have designated a group as "okay to kill", any person can be killed by being labelled as part of that group. rights disintegrate and ESPECIALLY rights for those that the social and political hegemony take issue with
the writing on the wall is in big red text you motherfuckers. get your heads out of your own asses or go join the fucking nazis
tme queers when the girls who have been called degenerate freaks their entire life go to bat for the other groups who have also been called degenerate freaks
incredible incredible tags prev thank you
Thank you for your partecipation.
I keep getting in trouble for referring to my spouse as 'my woman.' That's who she is to me--wanch ngatharam, and I'm pam nungantam, her man. Apparently that bit of paleo-misogyny loses something in translation for the metro middle-class people I'm attempting to mingle with lately, so I've had to alter my language and start saying 'my spouse.' The problem lies in the cultural baggage that comes with the possessive form in English grammar, and with the language of property law. In our Aboriginal communities, when people first meet you they will often ask, 'Who own you?' This doesn't signify a property relation--it is all about what groups, pairs and lands you belong to in your relationships, which are governed collectively. Belonging and ownership means something completely different from possession in our world. It means being in relation to family and community and place. Your belongings are not your property, but your connections. This worldview is not very compatible with the political economies, legal systems and marketplaces we must interact with to survive.
Tyson Yunkaporta, Right Story, Wrong Story