the chase
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Doug Jones
YOU ARE THE REASON
Fai_Ryy
Color Me Curious
No title available
No title available

@theartofmadeline

Discoholic 🪩
Monterey Bay Aquarium
KIROKAZE

bliss lane
No title available

#extradirty
todays bird

if i look back, i am lost

Product Placement
hello vonnie
Misplaced Lens Cap
No title available
seen from Syria

seen from Philippines

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from Singapore

seen from Syria
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Colombia
seen from Denmark

seen from Germany
@justheretolurk003
the chase
thinking about michaela losing her person, one of the few people she had in her corner, someone that knew her fully and loved her wholeheartedly. thinking about michaela making her grief smaller to make space for francesca’s. thinking about michaela realizing she accidentally fell in love. thinking about michaela forcing herself to run away from the love of her life after she begged her to stay bc she wouldn’t betray the memory of her person. thinking about michaela being utterly alone.
some more iwtv pieces!
(second two img’s from 2024)
You can only reblog this today.
I missed my chance last year. Not gonna let it happen again
Made a Cara account! Not entirely sure what I'll post yet, I'll probably lurk for a while until I figure out how to promote myself because I'm primarily a writer and the app is very much for artists, but I'm thoroughly enjoying all the beautiful art and the blessed silence that comes with the absence of vertical video.
For context for anyone who's not in the know: Meta/Instagram recently started collecting EVERYONE'S data on EVERYTHING (posts, comments, captions, hashtags, etc. maybe even DMs but idk about that) and scraping it for their AI. In certain parts of the EU you could opt out of this if you could prove that your data has been found in the AI generated images, but if you were a smaller account that couldn't prove this or you lived in the US, Meta said "you have no data privacy rights, sorry not sorry, we'll steal your face, your art, and your identity."
Understandably, a lot of artists replied with "Fuck This, it's been impossible to get visibility here since you introduced Reels and started making the algorithm pay-to-play" and fled in droves to a new app called Cara. It's made by artists for artists, has a strict no-AI policy, and built-in integrations with Glaze, which is a program to protect your work from scrapers. At first sounded too good to be true, but then I reconsidered the sunk-cost-fallacy and decided to give it a shot.
I'm going to document my experience and experimentations and thoughts and hopefully turn this into a coherent blog post for future reference in a couple weeks but here's my initial reactions as someone who is Primarily a Writer and a Self Taught Hobby Artist that dabbles in both traditional and digital medium
oh my god the lack of ai and ads is so nice but the thing that gets me. that really gets me. is that there's NO VERTICAL VIDEO FORMAT. No reels. No stories. Just posts. It's so quiet. I finally have peace. I can think clearly. It's like the fog has lifted.
There's two different layouts for the home page - an algorithm YOU CAN CONTROL which lets you choose percentages of people you follow, posts from the network of mutual's mutuals, and posts selected from the app as a whole. I think it's something like 60/30/10 as the default but you can change those if you want. There's also a toggle to only view people you follow. I love this feature so much. A customizable algorithm is really nice to discover new people when you're brand new to an app and the choice to tune it when you want is so novel and refreshing. (this is something I saw on desktop, so you may have to change it on your computer to see it reflected in the app)
On your page there's also two different view: Portfolio and Timeline. Portfolio is like an Artstation profile of the work that you post, curated to show off your best pieces. Timeline works exactly like a tumblr blog - you can repost (reblog) other people's work, make text posts, share doodles, etc.
Overall the vibe is still very Professional :TM: All the work I'm seeing in my feed is gorgeous, finished/rendered pieces maybe accompanied by progress shots. The big popular names in the Art Industry get all the attention and likes, and everyone else is just kind of... there. I've only had it for a day so I'm still trying to find my mutuals. I'm sure it'll become more casual over time but everyone is still trying to put their best foot first.
Because it seems like a place for professionals to connect - I think there is a place for Writers on this platform. Even if you aren't an artist yourself, I still think it's valuable to have an account just to lurk, collect inspiration and art styles from artists you like, and find people to commission for book covers, illustrations, character art, and more. If you post little doodles of your OCs, that could be fun. I just don't think it's the right place to market your book.
The platform blew up from 40K users to 650K users and the poor dev team is struggling under the workload and financial burden of running the site. They're going to have to monetize it at some point, and with that comes enshittification so I'm not holding my breath it'll stay untainted forever, but I'm hoping that when they do monetize it, it'll be through a subscription-based platform or getting large corporate sponsors to become like a LinkedIn for Artists
So far I have one post up, which is the full cover art for "First Flight of Spring" (one of my Ko-Fi stories). It's the first place that hasn't compressed this monster file which is super nice, so if you want to check that out, I guess you can follow me. And if you're on Cara, drop your information in the comments! I'd love to find other users!
🖋️ Fantasy Writer 🎨 Hoarder of Many Hobbies 🌱 Plant Lady Check linktree for my blog, mailing list, kofi, and socials
That artist is the founder of Cara by the way (https://cara.app/zemotion/all).
Cara is the only art platform I have found that not only prohibits AI art from being uploaded on the site, but also offers their users to Glaze their art (which protects them from ai mimicry). They are also working on implementing Nightshade, which actively poisons ai training.
I have used Cara for a couple of months now, and I hope more people check it out. It's really nice. 💚
We need these kinds of places for artists, and it's also FREE (despite the staff paying out of their own pockets to keep it running).
reblogging this as I was just complaining about the rampant AI usage on pinterest yesterday lol
Even if you're not an artist, I highly recommend signing up just to lurk because it's been such a lovely wholesome experience free of the noise and brainrot that comes with the ads and reels on instagram. As a writer I think it has a niche for connecting authors with cover designers and illustrators. I'm documenting my experience in this thread if anyone wants to follow along!
no one:
jacob anderson:
does anybody hear that ominous bell tolling?😂
Tuira Kayapó brandished her machete in the face of a government official who was trying to convince indigenous leaders to accept a mega-dam project in the Amazon, 1989
“Electricity won’t give us food. We need the rivers to flow freely. Don’t talk to us about relieving our ‘poverty’ – we are the richest people in Brazil. We are Indians.”
part of kayapó’s speech during this event
also! she’s still alive! that sort of thing is always worth pointing out to show that we really aren’t too far removed from events like this! here’s a 2019 photo of her:
Sadly since I queued this she has since passed away. Rest In Power 🙌
the odyssey of recollection
the odyssey of recollection
this is the level of beauty you would only find in the most prestigious paintings of history
“But if you forget to reblog Madame Zeroni, you and your family will be cursed for always and eternity.”
Claudia’s lack of remorse for killing Lestat, and why it’s radical
CW: discussion of misogyny and anti-Black racism
Original thread on twitter
The fact that Claudia, in amc iwtv and the iwtv book, not only does not feel remorse for killing Lestat, but refuses to, is one of my favourite aspects of her character, and what makes her such a groundbreaking and definitive character in the gothic genre.
In general in media, women characters and Black characters, particularly those who are morally grey, are often denounced as unlikeable or unworthy of empathy for their actions by audiences and fandoms. Meanwhile, men and white characters are given the space to be villainous and still remain likeable, even redeemable. In gothic horror, women are often fainting damsels in distress, perpetually virtuous victims, or the evil femme fatale. Femme fatales have power that they wield through their sexuality primarily. Any violence they commit or intellect they possess is defined by their use of seduction to enact their goals.
Claudia in all versions of iwtv is something different. She is a woman, in a little girls body, who is allowed to be cruel and violent, without the narrative attempting to make her more likeable and palatable through remorse.
A common way to make audiences feel sympathy for a morally grey character is through portraying their remorse for their crimes. While this adds nuance to their character, it makes them more palatable by showing audiences that they are not truly evil, and are capable of repentance. In iwtv, Louis and Lestat for into this archetype, haunted by their mistakes and wrongdoings, overwhelmed by guilt, desperate for redemption.
Women are also demanded to feel remorseful for not behaving as women ought to. An evergreen example is Lady Macbeth. While wielding power through her manipulation of Macbeth, she is brought down a peg by her overwhelming guilt and psychosis, until she commits suicide, effectively punishing herself for her crimes.
Claudia is not held to this standard. The narrative does not force her to regret killing Lestat, feel remorse, or beg for his forgiveness. Claudia’s decision to kill Lestat puts herself first. Her goal is to gain an independent life for herself with Louis, away from Lestats abuse and tyranny. The only way for them to escape and gain the freedom to be their own people is to kill Lestat. In the show, Lestat had already committed violence when they considered leaving him. In my opinion, in both the show and the book, Lestat in this state in NOLA would never let Louis and Claudia leave him. The narrative makes it clear that Claudia’s actions are necessary. She kills her abusive father to secure her own future, and to help her other father escape from his abusive partner.
Furthermore, Claudia’s murder of Lestat is her act of revenge him turning her, trapping her in the body of a child forever. In this sense, reclaims some of the power that was stolen from her during her turning, breaking apart the family she was supposed to bring back together. (Further nuance is added to this in Merrick, but that’s another conversation I will have at some point.)
Claudias act of murder is achieved through her intellect. She outsmarts Lestat herself, tricking him with an extensive plan that preys on his ego and cruelty. The fact she doesn’t use her sexuality, or seduce anybody, sets her apart from the femme fatale, allowing her to be a new type of gothic woman. She is allowed to revel in her violence and enjoy her victory, no concern being given to making her appear “palatable.” In fact, she delights in being unpalatable.
At this point in the story, many women characters would be forced to feel guilt/experience mental illness in order to make them more palatable to audiences. Claudia doesn’t do this. She never regrets her decision to kill Lestat. She knows that her actions were essential to saving herself and Louis and creating their life in Paris. It is Louis, a man, who experiences the Lady Macbeth guilt and remorse that women are forced to. He hallucinates lestat, and is wracked by guilt and regret for killing the love of his life. Claudia by contrast is the holding him together.
The show adds even more nuance to this idea through Claudia’s Blackness. When Lestat, a white man, expresses his remorse and shame for his abuse of Louis at the extremely racist show trial/ lynching, the audience (in the show and irl) are overcome. He is given empathy and understanding for admitting his wrongdoing. He is not on show trial for his crimes, awaiting execution for also breaking the great laws; the audience have forgiven him
But Claudia is aware that as a Black woman, in the body of a teenage girl, she is not afforded this grace, by the play audience, by the false narrative pushed by the play script, or historically by general audiences.
The narrative asks why should Claudia feel remorse, when that remorse will not bring her the empathy of white audiences, or save her life? Why should she feel remorse for doing what was essential for her freedom and survival? Why should she feel remorse for choosing herself, the way every man around her has done for their entire lives?
Claudia never apologizes to Lestat, expresses remorse, or begs for her life. For this, she is punished and found guilty by the play audience, Armand and the coven utilising their racism, misogyny, and victim blaming to first dehumanise Claudia, then lynch her. Obviously, Claudia’s murder occurs so that Anne Rice and the show can explore the key themes of parental grief and child loss, but within the story it is a punishment for not being the perfect victim.
None of this negates Claudia’s love for Lestat. Claudia would much rather have Lestat be a loving, supportive father to her, than be forced to kill him. But that was not the situation Lestat put her in. The narrative makes it clear that this is Lestat’s fault, not Claudia’s. Lestat admires her for having the strength to kill her abusive father, because when he was in this situation, he couldn’t do it.
Claudia never backs down. The trial may punish her, but the narrative supports her actions. Rather than apologising to Lestat in her final moments, she look into his she’s, asking her father why he isn’t helping her. She doesn’t beg for his forgiveness or repent; she reminds us and Lestat that he was the one who failed her.
Claudia is a rare character who is not concerned about appearing palatable or moral to anybody. She is confident in her reasoning and unshakable in her beliefs. Not stubborn, but brave. This is why Claudia has been such an important and influential figure in gothic horror since 1976, and her show iteration continues to highlight the double standards applied to women characters, particularly Black women.
(And why she’s one of my favourite characters of all time :) )
(I originally posted this as a thread on twitter, but I’m reposting here to keep all my analysis together, and the format is better. I also wrote this before reading Merrick, so didn’t include the information it provides. This is more iwtv and og iwtv book focused.)
BEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS! 👏
The sad thing is, there's TWO times that Claudia IS remorseful towards Lestat. The tragedy's that both times, it gets her NOWHERE:
1x5 Apology
AMC!Claudia's diaries before she returns to 1132 are full of remorse:
She ADMITS she was a handful, and that she's "ready for whatever Lestat has to say." The entry literally OPENS with her linking her running away with what LESTAT did to piss her off in the first place. She wasn't ready to go back home cuz she had a feeling Lestat was finna be on some bullsh*t, and he ain't never proved her wrong:
2x07 Remorse
Delainey Hayles said Claudia died being unsure if Lestat really GAF about her at all, when she saw his expression as she burned:
Like, it's all well and good that Lestat was horrified seeing his daughter die--but that doesn't change the FACT that she still died as he stood there NOT saving her--
--esp. since she died as a direct result of the Trial HE participated in. She doesn't KNOW a lot: why he was there, why he couldn't save her, why he withheld so much--etc. NONE of it matters. Too little too late; she IS being lynched in that racist AF Trial; she DID need love & support; and she didn't get it. 🤷♂️ So why TF SHOULD she be remorseful, AMEN! 👏😤
The Trial pmo way more than 1x5 ever could, because AMC!Lestat is proven to be demonstrably more cognizant of what he's doing & saying than book!Lestat was. Even if AMC confirms that he was starved & tortured before the Trial to force his compliance, he's still powerful enough to mindrape the homophobic soldier, teleporting himself back & forth all over the Theatre; cracking jokes, going off script WITHOUT the coven Mind Fogging him to force him to STFU; and enthralling the entire audience to say "Banishment." Using all his energy to say BANISHMENT is what had him all weak & wobbly--he was fine BEFORE that though.
So I'll never forgive Rolin Jones for his weak AF excuse about wanting Lestat's damage to be more "psychological" than physical, cuz for all intents & purposes Lestat LOOKED fine! He looked like he had a ton of agency--and Sam Reid even suggests as much. but book!Lestat was a sobbing remorseful apologetic WRECK the WHOLE time.
book!Lestat was hella confused, "caged, wounded, desperate;" and that instilled far more sympathy in me than I was able to muster for him on the show; when he was the same plucky a-hole he always was--EXCEPT for when he went offscript to finally apologize to Louis. He's still the same racially insensitive a-hole he always is, too (x x x).
So even if ghost!Claudia comes back and asks Lestat point blank why he didn't save her, any excuse he gives isn't gonna change the fact that he CHOSE. He went in there KNOWING that if push came to shove, the one he'd move heaven & hell to safe was NOT Claudia, it was Louis. Sure, he loved Claudia and was sad to see her go, but no one can ever say Lestat loved Claudia more than he loved Louis. And she KNOWS this. On top of that, she also knows that Lestat's love still won't STOP him from doing truly effed up things--he still said HORRIBLE things to her in 1x5 - 1x7 & 2x7, and ofc look what he did to Louis. Where was HIS remorse when it mattered?
EXACTLY. book!Lestat begs LOUIS to kill his father for him; he can't bring himself to do it, even after harassing & verbally abusing the man for pages on end. He's MISERABLE having the Marquis live with them in NOLA, but he's immobilized by his own indecision, Hamlet style; cuz he DOES love his father, even knowing what a p.o.s. he is. But he also wants to finally be FREE of him; and most interestingly, Lestat REFUSES to bind himself to his father the way he bound himself to his mother, y turning the marquis into a vampire so that the old man could just eff off on his own. Lestat KNOWS the Marquis has to die, even if he lacks the gumption to see it thru.
I am SO curious what AMC will do with their dynamic, since AMC!Louis' not even born yet at the time the Marquis ends up alone. Cuz we've already seen that AMC!Lestat DOES have what it takes to get incredibly violent even towards those he loves. If he can drop Louis from the sky, can he kill his own father? Or will the Marquis just be killed by the mob? (Even better: will GARIELLE kill him?)
And again, it's important to note that Lestat never ONCE apologizes to Claudia during the Trial. He doesn't even address the wrongs he's done to her--Charlie's name is never brought up. Claudia busting him in all his lies about Antoinette are never brought up. Claudia calling him Massa is never brought up. Lestat losing his ish when she beat him at chess is never brought up. Lestat apologizes TO LOUIS for Dropping him from the sky, but where is his apology to Claudia for not making her feel like she was loved enough by him? Up his own arse, that's where.
Lestat complimented her when it served to compliment HIMSELF; his narcissism, vanity & ego: "I see the best of MY vampiric self in her." When she acts like ME, that's when I'm proud of her. When LOUIS coddled her, that's when I hated how she was being raised. But when she did anything on HER OWN, with her own autonomy & agency, I lost my ish as her "defect caught up with her" and drove me crazy omg she was such an inconvenience sometimes; "she should never have been made."
Daggone lovesick Louis literally saved Lestat's life--AMC!Claudia should've stabbed him over & over and had him nommed on by alligators in the swamp, just like she did in the book.