Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941), poem 85 from âThe Gardenerâ, 1914 Translated by the author from the original Bengali. New York: The Macmillan Company.
It is an hundred years hence now. Go open your doors.

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
No title available

Product Placement

pixel skylines

blake kathryn

ellievsbear
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Kaledo Art

Discoholic đȘ©
wallacepolsom
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
DEAR READER

Kiana Khansmith
Today's Document

tannertan36
Jules of Nature
I'd rather be in outer space đž
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Poland
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Canada
@katduza
Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941), poem 85 from âThe Gardenerâ, 1914 Translated by the author from the original Bengali. New York: The Macmillan Company.
It is an hundred years hence now. Go open your doors.
I like when Pheidole ants do the thing with the head
I was curious about how accurate this is and am pleased to report it is extremely accurate
I just googled this and⊠yes, itâs absolutely real.
And there are so many articles and videos and discussions. Like, the scientific community is buzzing about this.
So much research will have to be redone because the data was absolutely compromised, off by orders of magnitude, by using standard lab gloves.
The world is probably not horrifically contaminated by microplastics. Sterile laboratories, however, are contaminated by latex and nitrile gloves.
Thank God someone bothered to check.
>I just googled this and⊠yes, itâs absolutely real.
Sources beyond dude just trust me, for the skeptics.
Scientists may have been unknowingly inflating microplastics pollution estimates, and the surprising source could be their own lab gloves. A
https://www.technologynetworks.com/applied-sciences/news/scientists-lab-gloves-may-be-causing-an-overestimation-of-microplastics-411138
Nitrile and latex gloves that scientists wear while they are measuring microplastics may lead to a potential overestimation of the tiny poll
Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics - Phys.org (itâs a pdf)
Researchers discovered a standard piece of lab equipment has added thousands of microplastic âfalse positivesâ per each square-millimeter un
Ordinary Lab Gloves May Have Skewed Microplastic Data: That doesnât mean microplastics arenât a problem, though
That should be enough
https://www.gofundme.com/f/give-a-peaceful-death-to-our-childhood-pet?attribution_id=sl%3A1d3dd965-c643-4aed-bc05-39cf3e8e8c91&lang=en_GB&ts=1776159645&utm_campaign=man_ss_icons&utm_medium=customer&utm_source=copy_link&utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e0_tv0&fbclid=IwdGRjcARTA9FjbGNrBFMDv2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHtIozyiLObwmb5Q6Jnhh8jrs_q4ls3yQwDBJ86lgHlesu7x2GQRq6DcMm6TK_aem_MFS3wg0Hx09vP5pn7GVPAA
https://gofund.me/607f26655
how many tons of cement would we need to fill in Silicon Valley, hypothetically speaking
enough that if you poured it all at once, the exothermic curing reaction would also succeed in melting it
so we do it very slowly then
no, you misunderstand, thatâs the point. if we pour it quickly, the core of the concrete mass will become molten, along with everything trapped within. we wonât just be burying silicon valley. weâll be melting it. we will erase it from history, so no foolish future civilization will ever have to face the grim possibility of accidentally unearthing it.
tens of thousands of years from now, when the molten core of concrete, metal, glass, and horrible tech industry culture solidifies into an unrecognizable mass, we will be able to safely mine it to reclaim the metals, which will have conveniently sorted themselves by density.
we need visionaries like yourself in public office
NASA took a pic of the dark side of the moon fyi
Yeah, isnât that a cool picture? Itâs the one someone showed me to point out what color the moon really is compared to the Earth! They both have the same amount of sunlight on them here.
The moonâs not white! Itâs concrete-gray! It only looks so shiny when compared to the void of space!
I love learning things I didnât expect to learn. Like when I learned that itâs called the âdark sideâ of the moon because itâs the side we donât see, not because sunlight never hits it.
she's mooning us
*a horse silently spawns next to you*
Boop!
Magnificent Kroshka
An actual news source:
This April, Baltimore saw five homicides.
Long before the introduction of color film, a Russian chemist and photographer named Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky used an innovative technique. He took three individual black and white photos, each through a colored filter (red, green, and blue), to create fully colored, high-quality pictures. The photo of this woman, taken by him, is around 107 years old!
No wait I looked this guy up and this shitâs amazing
Itâs so incredibly humanizing to see people from the very distant past in such authentic color
And like. look at these landscape shots!! Theyâre so vivid!! Even aside from the historical value, these are just legitimately beautiful photographs
âŠTHEYâRE CALLED T-SHIRTS BECAUSE THEY RESEMBLE THE LETTER T
also they were originally a form of underwear and I think thatâs nifty!
GAUD THIS HAS LONG BEEN COMMON KNOLEDGE
I donât know what the fuck counts as common knowledge!!! for years I thought everyone knew that lobsters have teeth in their stomachs & blood can be used as an egg substitute. my perspective is slightly skewy!
How much blood contitutes one egg?
Œ cup of blood can be substituted for one medium sized egg
There are 37.2 trillion cells in the human body and this post put all of my cells in attack mode
does it have to be wet blood? because dried blood is more shelf stable
i actually have a similar question regarding the infamous âvirgin blood.â honestly, the dry stuff is just so much easier to work with
my thought process is that if milk can be powdered, blood probably can be too seeing as mammal milk is just filtered blood
#breast milk is actually called white blood by some people
milk is mostly made out of white blood cells, we should absolutely just refer to it as White Blood
Do I Need To Pull Out The Perpetual Lactation Story?
âŠyeeeeees? yes.
This is a summary of a branch of medieval theology.
As we all know, women are responsible for original sin, as a result of which mankind was cast from the Garden of Eden and women were cursed with painful childbirth. In addition women have periods, which are the sign of original sin.
Problem: The Virgin Mary was perfect. Canât have been cursed with original sin. No periods.
Question: Where does the blood go?
For all our wonderful theories about spontaneous generation and phlogiston, we do believe in some form of conservation of matter. If women have all this extra blood all the time, you canât just have one wandering around with it building up inside her. Itâs gotta go somewhere!
Well, we figured it out in the end. You see, as we all know not least from reading the above post, milk is just boiled blood. So for Mary, the blood just sort of condensed and she was in a state of perpetual lactation.
This led to things like a particular saint (itâs Bernard) having a vision of the Madonna appearing before him and squirting her breast milk into his mouth, to apply either wisdom or a cure for an eye infection, which has delightfully been depicted in several works of art.
may i change my answer
MOTHER MARYâS MIRACLE MILKERS
The True Meaning of Judgment: What Jesus Actually Taught
Far too often, thereâs confusion around what Jesus truly meant when He taught not to judge others. To understand His message, itâs essential to distinguish between types of judgmentânot all are equal, and not all are condemned.
There are judgments that are necessary, objective, and morally neutralâwhat we might call discernment or truth-based observation. These are made in order to accurately describe a situation or a personâs actions in light of evident facts. For instance, if someone openly embraces hateful ideologiesâsay, living in a home filled with Nazi paraphernalia and promoting hostility toward Jews or African Americansâit is not âjudgmentalâ in the Christian sense to call that person racist. That is an objective assessment grounded in observable truth, not a personal condemnation born of malice. A just society relies on such clarity to function.
However, Jesusâ teachings go deeper than simply warning against calling wrong âwrong.â What He truly condemns is judgment as condescension towards anyone sufferingâthe kind that dehumanizes or dismisses someone for their actions, regardless of the suffering or desperation that may have motivated them. This is the critical distinction.
For example, a person who steals food to survive, or lies to secure shelter or safety, may be breaking social or legal codesâbut their actions are driven by basic survival, not evil intent. To punish such a person instead of helping them is not justice; it is cruelty. Jesusâ message is a call to empathetic discernmentâto look beyond the act and understand the human story behind it.
We must resist the urge to judge people harshly when their wrongdoing stems from deep need or suffering. Their actions should be seen not as an opportunity to condemn, but as an invitation to extend help and healing. In contrast, choosing punishment over compassion, especially within a broken system such as the prison industrial complex, only perpetuates cycles of suffering.
In short, you are not violating Jesusâ teaching by objectively identifying hate, racism, or injustice when it's clearly present. But you are judging in the way Jesus warned against when you write off the struggling, the poor, or the desperateâthose who may behave in ways you donât approve of simply because they are trying to survive.
To refrain from that kind of judgment is to walk in the shoes of another, to understand their pain, and to reflect Christâs own compassion. When you choose mercy over condemnation, youâre aligning yourself with the heart of Jesusâ message: love over law, empathy over exclusion, healing over punishment.
If thereâs a silver lining to judging others in casual and social conversations, itâs that it offers a rare glimpse into yourselfâa mirror revealing what you may be unconsciously projecting. We constantly perceive ourselves in others. When you find yourself labeling someone as insensitive, inconsiderate, or selfish, those are not just criticisms of another personâthey're prompts for self-reflection. More often than not, the very traits we condemn are reflections of unresolved parts of our own character.
This is where the deeper wisdom of Jesus' teachings comes into play. When you judge someone, pause and ask yourself: Is this a quality I, too, possess? If the answer is yes, then the next step is not further condemnationâbut forgiveness. Forgive the other person for what you accused them of, not because they were innocent, but because they became a mirror to help you recognize something within yourself. This is the essence of Jesusâ prayer: âForgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.â
In everyday conversation, this self-projection is often casually acknowledged through phrases like âyouâre projecting,â âlook in the mirror,â or âpot calling the kettle black.â These statements, while sometimes said mockingly, are actually spiritual cuesâflags from the universe urging you to engage in honest introspection. Instead of reacting defensively (as the ego tends to do), try receiving such moments with humility. They may be revealing truths about yourself that you've yet to fully face.
If, during an argument, you call someone selfish and later realize you were acting selfishly too, donât linger in guilt. Forgive them, ask your Heavenly Father to forgive you, and move toward reconciliation. Extend grace: a kind word, a high five, a hugâsomething to restore peace and harmony.
Interestingly, the original translation of the Lordâs Prayer uses the word âdebtsâ rather than âtrespasses.â This suggests a transactional mindsetâas if others "owe" us for their offenses. But the spiritual invitation here is to release all those perceived debts. No one owes you anything. Let it go. And ask your Father to forgive your debts, as you have forgiven theirs.
This process is sacred: recognizing projection, extending forgiveness, and asking the Holy Spirit for help to overcome the very faults you've identified in others. When you do this sincerely, the universeâaligned with divine willâbegins to rearrange itself in support of your transformation. That is the quiet power of grace at work within you.
In Summary,
Many Christians misunderstand what Jesus meant when he spoke against judgment. Simply making an accurate, objective, or descriptive statement about someone is not what Jesus condemned. For instance, identifying someone as a racist based on their actions is not inherently judgmental in the way Jesus warned against. However, labeling someone as "annoying," "useless," "lazy," or hurling insults like âa-holeâ are examples of the kind of condemnation Jesus cautioned his followers to avoid. These are not neutral observationsâthey are judgments on a personâs worth or character, often rooted in ego, contempt, or malice.
The problem lies not just in the act of making a judgment, but in the spirit behind it. Words like âjudgmentâ have drifted in meaning over time, and this linguistic shift has led to confusion about the original teachings. In true Christianity, saying someone is a thief after theyâve been caught stealing is a factual statement. But accusing people who receive public assistance of being âleechesâ or âcrooksâ is a moral condemnationâa projection of superiority, which is exactly the kind of judgment Jesus opposed.
Even calling someone a âsweetheartâ while technically being a judgmentâit is a statement about characterâbut one offered in love. Thus, it is not judgment alone that is discouraged, but the tone, intent, and spirit in which such judgments are made. Jesus did not forbid discernment, but he did forbid condemnation.
This is especially relevant when discussing marginalized communities. The judgment and rejection of the gay community by many who claim to follow Christ is a public and persistent betrayal of his core teaching: âJudge not, lest ye be judged.â To declare someone evil, broken, or wrong simply for who they are is to step into the very role Jesus warned againstâusurping the authority of God and dispensing condemnation in His name.
Using Scripture to justify hatred, exclusion, or violence is not only a misuse of the textâit is a rejection of the Spirit of God, who is love. Jesus never taught hatred. He never endorsed anger or violence. His way was mercy, compassion, and radical love. Homophobia and other forms of bigotry are not born of righteousnessâthey are byproducts of fear and ignorance.
Those we consider âdifferentâ or âabnormalâ are not tests of our theologyâthey are tests of our love. They reveal whether we truly follow Jesus or merely use his name. To follow Christ is to bless, not curse; to love, not condemn. Any other path is a denial of the very heart of his message.
Source: The True Meaning of Judgment: What Jesus Actually Taught
When Everything Everywhere All at Once said âThe only thing I do know is that we have to be kind. Please, be kind, especially when we donât know whatâs going on"Â
When the Good Place said âWhy choose to be good every day when there is no guaranteed reward now or in the afterlife⊠I argue that we choose to be good because of our bonds with other people and our innate desire to treat them with dignity. Simply put, we are not in this alone.âÂ
When Jean-Paul Sartre said ââHell is other peopleâ is only one side of the coin. The other side, which no one seems to mention, is also âHeaven is each otherâ. Hell is separateness, uncommunicability, self-centeredness, lust for power, for riches, for fame. Heaven on the other hand is very simple, and very hard: caring about your fellow beings.â
Love that weâve elevated the conversation to such a degree that, if youâre going to be grimdark nihilistic in fiction, you need to argue philosophically against 4 seasons of The Good Place.
From the comments and other reblogs:
When Kurt Vonnegut said, âHello babies. Welcome to Earth. Itâs hot in the summer and cold in the winter. Itâs round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, youâve got a hundred years here. Thereâs only one rule that I know of, babiesâGod damn it, youâve got to be kind.â
i donât think people understand how much of life is grief. not just people dying, but losing the version of yourself you thought youâd become. grieving the city you had to leave. the friends you lost not in argument, but in silence. the summer that will never come back. the feeling that maybe you peaked at 12 when you were reading books under the covers and believing in forever