Going insane. Character ref sheets for IR animated series. There is something wrong with me
Bases under the read more

Origami Around
AnasAbdin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
art blog(derogatory)

Love Begins
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic đȘ©
Cosimo Galluzzi

JBB: An Artblog!
Game of Thrones Daily
we're not kids anymore.
NASA
I'd rather be in outer space đž
sheepfilms
No title available
ojovivo
Xuebing Du

JVL
Sade Olutola
will byers stan first human second
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Sweden
seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from Brazil

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Nepal
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@landaquarium
Going insane. Character ref sheets for IR animated series. There is something wrong with me
Bases under the read more
./seivarden_disdain
now feels like a good time to reiterate that Iranians have been martyred by america + israel already, both empires that possess nuclear weapons, and that Iran does not have nuclear weapons. so now is not the time to joke about america getting nuked-- any retaliation on Iran's part is justified and the only way we escape this situation, but Iran is not going to nuke us, because the entire premise that Iran has nukes is how america justified bombing them and also the exact same rhetoric we used against Iraq and how we killed my countrysmen when there was again no evidence of nuclear warfare. New York City is not going to get fucking nuked. go listen to a podcast or something
now ALSO feels like a good time to mention that israel has prioritized the killings of civilians, children, etc-- that has been its goal, america has defended and materially supported it. Iran has not been targeting civilians/settlers, it has in fact been targeting the people conducting this genocide. so you, some 20 year old in portland in a studio apartment, do not need to start doomspiralling about world war 3. world war 3 as a concept is our deflection of the fact that there are genocides and ethnic cleansings going on that do not materially hurt us in the imperial core. you are not going to be killed by Iran any more than america is already killing you and killing us. if you are afraid of retaliation, i understand, but now is not the time to start joking or seriously humoring the idea that some random people out in miami are going to get nuked by Iran. this self-effacing logic is demonstrative of american exceptionalism, and wholly unhelpful to the oppressed people of Palestine and Iran.
You want to call your House rep now and tell them Trump needs to be impeached immediately for defying a Supreme Court order (re: Kilmar Abrego Garcia), which functionally voids our constitution and means no one in America has rights anymore.
I am not exaggerating.
As of now, anybody can be disappeared, no due process, no recourse. Trump is openly disregarding a Supreme Court order and says heâll send US citizens to El Salvador.
This is not a drill.
Call your House rep and tell them they must impeach. Tell them if they cannot bring themselves to impeach, they must resign. A more open and shut case to impeach is not possible. Trump and his administration are saying openly, in public, that anybody can be kidnapped by ICE, even in error, and disappeared permanently.
Call your senators, too, and tell them to support impeachment (it goes to them once it passes a majority House vote).
Find your representatives. Learn how to find and connect with them. Stay informed about their bills, committees, and contributions.
"Hello, my name is _______ and I am a constituent from _______. My address is ________.
I am reaching out today to urge Representative ______ to call for the impeachment of President Trump due to his refusal to comply with the Supreme Court's April 10th decision regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was unlawfully deported and has been charged with no crime. As Justice Sotomayor stated, this inaction implies the government's ability to 'deport and incarcerate any person, including U.S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene.' This precedent is unconstitutional, highly illegal, and grounds for impeachment. Every individual, regardless of immigration status, must be guaranteed a right to due process.
Representative _____, I urge you to stand on the right side of history today by calling for President Trump's impeachment. This administration can not be allowed to continue unilaterally defying the checks and balances that are intrinsic to our government."
You can also find your representative and senators and their phone numbers on https://5calls.org/
Please don't be afraid of calling. Your job would just be to be a data point, not to sound perfect. Here's some info on why calling is effective.
the fundamental problem on this website is that if a homeless person tried to talk to most of yâall youâd be scared out of your minds
see because people are actually seeing this i feel like i need to make it abundantly clear what i mean by this: in the united states context, the majority of social problems are just disappeared. the mentally ill are often relegated to their homes, to asylums (these still exist), to hospitals. the disabled, fat, and disfigured likewise. people called âcriminalâ disappear into the criminal punishment system and often never emerge.
if you live in any city in america, however, there are homeless people. they are the social problem that cannot be disappeared so easily. drive along a freeway outbound from the urban center to the suburbs and look into the trees. youâll see tents, tarps, evidence of human habitation. walk through a downtown, even in coldest winter, and youâll see bottles that werenât there yesterday and clothes inexplicably abandoned. people tend to either not look at these things or to look at them and name them garbage. eyesore. they donât consider what it would be like to carry everything you own on your back. how little energy you would have for recycling or cleaning up after yourself if you had been kicked out of your shelter at 7am that morning and now had to find a nook to hide out in to escape a -5F windchill. maybe you can go to a local public library, but maybe you canât because you twitch or smell bad or talk to yourself and people only look at you out of the corner of their eye so they know what description to give the armed security guard at the front desk.
when iâm talking about looking at your unhoused neighbor, iâm talking about looking at them first. iâm talking about smiling and waving and maybe striking up a conversation. iâm talking about offering to grab lunch. iâm talking about indulging them even when they make you uncomfortable.
on memory care floors in hospitals you often encounter the problem of nurses who have been taught how to engage patients with memory issues but who do not give proper patient care because it makes them uncomfortable. they donât want to lie or play pretend or do anything that takes them out of their very rigidly defined reality. an old man wakes up and tries to get out of bed because itâs time to feed the cows. he wonders where his wife is. it would make his nurse uncomfortable to tell him that his wife knew he needed some rest so she went out to feed the cows, so they tell him that his wife died five years ago and he doesnât have his farm anymore. they break his heart rather than allow him to live in a better time for a little while longer.
back in december a man sat across from me on the train who was clearly struggling. i started a conversation with him about his art he was holding, which he told me were illustrated childrenâs books in a language he had always known. it was a syllabary i certainly didnât recognize, and the illustrations werenât anything iâve seen in childrenâs literature, but we were suddenly both artists on the train. i showed him my journal and he complimented the pasting job on some of my collages. then he started to talk about angels. about his angel specifically, who had died and left him behind on earth. he missed his angel so much that he planned to commit suicide before christmas. i talked to him about his angel, and about love and grief and pain, all of which we could share. he began to call me jesus. i could have told him he was wrong, that i wasnât even into the abrahamic religions, etc., and it would have broken his heart. instead i walked with him up from the train stationâand got him through the armed transit cops who tried to stop him because he didnât have a ticketâand gave him a picture of a loving savior, and a world that would be better for having him in it. instead of hugging some faggot, he ended up hugging a jesus that loved him. it was an odd situation. it made me a little uncomfortable. it may have been one of the few instances of kindness that he got that day. it may have been the first time in a while that someone who wasnât unhoused or working the bread line actually started a conversation with him.
imagine if no one ever looked at you. donât say some cute shit about âoh, i wish no one ever perceived me.â no you donât. you wish you could control peopleâs perception of you. but what if people werenât only not looking at you, but they already thought they knew you. youâre twitching so youâre on something. youâre staring at nothing so youâre dumb. youâre asking for money or food so youâre a leech on society. youâre talking to yourself so youâre dangerous. they donât look at you but they know you. so they donât speak to you bc they already know what theyâre gonna find.
two and a half weeks ago my mom was found dead on the streets of san antonio. sheâd been homeless there for about 12 years. iâd only just gotten stable enough to reach out to her. the woman i contacted at the day home she went to every month to get a haircut, her nails done, and to wash her clothes said she was doing well, that she was clean, that she was very polite, that she was smart. she had two dogs that sheâd cared enough about to have microchipped. their names are fin and sophia. having those dogs probably made it so she couldnât get permanent housing, because most housing programs for the homeless donât allow them to bring pets. a lot of people choose to keep their pets rather than give them up as a condition of securing housing.
in denver, colorado i once met an unhoused man who had a masterâs degree in geophysics. his thesis was on magnetic wells and their affects of satellite orbits. he was a birdwatcher.
when you refuse to look at homeless people, or the things they leave behind (often are forced to leave behind by cops), you are actively participating in the disappearance of a population. do you think you wouldnât lose part of yourself if safety concerns made you nocturnal? if every time you got enough stuff to set up a good camp some suburbanite called the cops on your tent? would you not talk to yourself if no one else was speaking to you?
a lot of talk goes into the problem how easy it is to become homeless. one medical bill, one missed paycheck and your life is imperiled. well, there are a lot of people who are stepped over every day who already live your worst case scenario, and the simple fact is that the majority of people in the u.s. are too scared of having an uncomfortable or even perhaps scary interaction with an unhoused person to look at them. but i need yâall to know that you are not special. it isnât just the dirtiest, most addicted, most mentally ill homeless people who are left to die on the streets alone. it is all homeless people. people who wonât leave behind beloved pets, people who couldnât survive in academia, people who think theyâre being gangstalked, people who have jobs, people who have families. if you are one missed paycheck from homelessness, youâre also one catastrophic tragedy, one spark that catches in the apartment on the other side of your building, one chance encounter with the drug that just wonât let you go. not one goddamn person on this earth is better than the unhoused person they step over on the way to get their morning coffee, and i hope to fuck yâall figure that out before you find yourselves disappeared too.
if you actually want to change the fucking world, maybe start with looking your neighbors in the eye.
at base i just think "women are more prone to mysticism and magical thinking due to their fundamental and irreconcilable soul differences from men, which is why astrology is inherently female-coded" is a much more overtly misogynistic thing to argue than "astrology is a noxious pseudoscience" could ever be
the point was that "people just hate astrology because they're misogynists" implicitly makes the former argument because astrology = women please stop explaining why astrology actually does = women in the notes
On International Womenâs Day, we honor Vietnamese revolutionary VĂ” Thá» TháșŻng. Here, she smiles after receiving a 20-year labor camp sentence from the US-backed South Vietnamese government. She told the judge: â20 years? Your government wonât last that long.â
VĂ” Thá» TháșŻng was released from prison less than 6 years after this picture was taken as part of the Paris Peace accords. The South Vietnamese government fell a couple of years later.
women and girls being told they need to shave is systemic violenceeeeeeee it's violent its teaching women to hate themselveeessssssss it exacerbates gender dysphoria in trans people and makes closeted trans kids feel even more pressured and scared to come out because its yet another convention they have to actively reject. transfems feel gender dysphoria over something as arbitrary as leg and arm hair transmascs feel uncomfortable not shaving even if it would mean "fitting into" how society expects them to express their gender it teaches young girls that their natural bodies are somehow wrong or ugly or unsightly it takes time and effort out of people's lives for no reasons it's an insidious and evil device to subjugate the bodies of women and people assigned female at birth. it's so insidious it's passed down from parent to child, mother to daughter. people are destroying themselves for NOTHING! and you may tell me "you're making a big deal out of something so arbitrary people just do it to feel comfortable etc etc" i promise you i could say even more and make an even bigger deal of it it's a huge part of a larger issue and it's a social construct and pressure that needs to be abolished and killed with fire. if you are like "well shaving makes me feel comfortable and confident" then think about how beautiful and liberated a world will be once people feel as free and comfortable and confident with NOT shaving as you currently feel and then think about how you are possibly complicit in a culture that is genuinely destroying women's self confidence and self image and self worth. I'm so serious about this
it disturbs me that a significant number of people think that the issue with sexual violence, gendered violence, and misogyny is sexual desire rather than dehumanization, so they are relentlessly suspicious of others' (and their own) desires while simultaneously never at all interrogating others' (and their own) dehumanizing beliefs about other people, both within and outside of sexual contexts
#and at the root you'll find the misunderstanding of sexual violence as a violent extension of sex. #when in reality sexual violence is a sexual extension of violence. and the distinction is important.
once again neil gaiman isn't a monster start getting into your head that the truth is more mundane and more horrifying because he's a regular man in a patriarchal world who has a lot of money so he thinks he's entitled to the bodies and the souls of the rest of us, he is the perfect example of someone in a position of power playing that role, recognizing this and not making this social issue into an individual issue of "one monster" is key for dismantling these structures, I also wish he was just a monster but unfortunately he's the result and the enforcer of a bigger system
People who peddle two state solution as if they actually believe in a free palestine are so insane like wym free palestine but Israel keeps a state on stolen land. What if things were exactly the same and we all just pretend theyâre not
Also I think a lot of people who have enough political understanding to know better intentionally pretend they think one state solution would entail something very different than the reality of it if you are versed in politics of decolonization particularly in regards to palestine you should understand that dissolving the state of Israel and giving land back would not entail exiling millions of people however thereâs so many people who essentially go âone state? So we just throw millions of Jewish people in the ocean???â And then plug their ears and pretend nobody has ever discussed this ever
re: this post but also slightly off topic, this is also why the SOGIESC (sexual orientation, gender identity & expression, and sexual characteristics) framework developed in the Global South as a legal framework to deal with sexual minority rights, stands in some ways in direct opposition to the LGBTQ+ framework of the West, which asserts that rights for minority groups flow from identity/inclusion within the minority group, forcing the obvious question of how the law determines identity (this is part of how transmedicalism emerges as an answer to the question âwho is really transgender?â and also likely informs community fights over who âreally countsâ as lgbtq). the framework of SOGIESC gets around this problem by resolving it entirely, instead insisting that because everyone has a gender identity and sexual orientation, everyone has a right to their given gender identity and sexual orientation, and any obstacle to realising these rights must be challenged and dismantled. empirically this bears out as well, given that global south countries, especially in Latin America, have some of the most progressive legislation on trans rights worldwide, with Argentina being the first country in the world to allow for legal gender transition without requiring medical documentation or proof of medical transition. We can see how different theories of state and legal power between LGBTQ+ vs SOGIESC emerge: a series of legal concessions granted to a narrowly-defined minority by a hegemonic, cis-heterosexual majority (LGBTQ+), versus the universal vision of sexual minorities whose rights are the rights of all people (SOGIESC).
and like obviously this is not a solution without problems (the +ESC was only added ten years after the original conception of SOGI, for example, an obvious oversight that was corrected - we may never escape the acronym wars), and as a framework that is fundamentally legal in both scope and design there is the obvious question of how law fits into a truly just socialist society (a historical and ongoing debate within various socialist states that I know much less about; Iâm also thinking about the âmission driftâ and mangling that âintersectionalityâ has dealt with over the years, also a concept that comes out of legal scholarship). but as an international legal standard it seems like an obvious critical response to the various problems of the LGBTQ+ framework, especially re: how the law determines who âactually countsâ as gay trans queer etc
"most gender affirming care is actually for cis ppl, isn't that hypocritical?" well they're affirming and reinforcing the societal structure of assigned gender so no actually. if they could they'd want you to get surgery to make you line up with your coercive gender assignment too, and very often they do, especially to kids.
"hahaha, can you believe that cis people are fine with minors getting surgery to further place them within the confines of a constructed sex binary that is violently enforced on every human being and to try and escape is an unpersonable transgression, but aren't ok with trans kids? that's so hypocritical đ€Ł"
why are people pretending that sex is the only axis upon which some people willingly enjoy things that hurt/scare them
BDSM is evil and irrational and nobody is actually into it. now if youâll excuse me i have to go eat sour candy advertised on the basis that it will hurt my mouth + get on a roller coaster to activate my flight or fight response + read a tragedy that makes me cry + watch a horror movie that will scare me + participate in combat sports for fun and entertainment
boxing is literally just self harm. oh, it isnât, you say?
why, because people can do what they want with their bodies? because everyone in the ring is consenting? because there are parameters and precautions to keep it from causing the same results as actual violence? because thereâs a technique and catharsis involved that some people really enjoy? because even âpsychologically healthyâ people participate in it? well do i have some news for you about sex!
There's a phenomenon in left-wing circles where initially reasonable statements and concepts get repeated ad nauseum until they not only lose their meaning but transform into deeply bigoted ideas.
The idea "there is no single white culture," is true because white is a concept created to describe the powerful position in Western societies. There are many different cultures, who's members are often white. But this idea became "white people have no culture" which is just not true, deeply dehumanizing, and harmful, especially to people who look white but experience marginalization because of their culture.
Another example might be cultural appropriation, which perhaps should be understood as a misrepresentation or exploitation of the cultural practices of another, especially where the person exploiting does so for personal gain, without acknowledgment. But now, people have basically transformed this into "when somebody does something from a culture they weren't raised in" or "when a particular race or ethnicity behaves in a way that's different from how they normally do" which promotes racial and cultural stereotypes and attempts to control the behaviors of people based on their race, ethnicity, and culture.
Adding to this, the sentiment that white people "have no culture" is based in the idea that culture is a deviation from whiteness. "Cultural" food, "cultural" dress, etc., is all shorthand for "things done by people who aren't white". To say that white people have no culture is to further other non-white people, making them the deviation from the "norm".
White people do have culture. Rich white people, poor white people, white people from Canada and the U.S. and Great Britain all have cultures that are different from one another. Claiming that they don't is a tool in the furthering of white supremacy and we (leftists) gotta knock it the fuck off.
what happens when people learn the buzzwords without unpacking the underlying ideology is that they take words designed to challenge the status quo that they don't understand & reinterpret them in the context of the white supremacist values they do understand.
im sorry rad fems sold you the lie that butches are only Non Threatening (TM) cis women with short hair who wear T-shirts and jeans with a carabiner, but the reality of the situation is a lot of butches are trans, genderqueer, physically imposing, big, male impersonators, hairy (especially including facial hair), sweaty, muscular, "ugly" and/or fat. some butches are into extreme body modification. some went bald. some are body builders. some are transfem butches who don't wanna overperform womanhood, take estrogen, or medically transition. some butches start testosterone strictly to feel more like a butch. some butches pass as cis men, and some need to do so in order to feel like their butch selves. soft butches are great, but that's not the "One Right Way" to be butch. the butches i'm attracted to would make a rad fem scream and cry and piss themselves on the floor.