LGBT is the full Acronym

If you wanna be included in LGBT, you easily can do it by being lesbian, gay, bi, or trans. Inclus don’t be stupid here.

[sweetestexclusbian]

@leclecarchie is a lesbophobic transmisogynist + rbs suggestive art of minors and straight up draws sexual harassment relating to minors + rbs aged up ship art of minors

lets get the lesbophobia out of the way because in the grand scheme of things, it's relatively minor in comparison to the other two things (note: im a lesbian and i am in no way dismissing her casual lesbophobia but i feel like the nsfw art of minors, which is a federal crime in the us, is worse)

op posted the following comic

the reason this is lesbophobic is because the literal only portrayal of lesbians in this comic is when one is being a bitch to a main character! who then proceeds to act in a predatory way to the character's only trans girl by isolating her from her friends and touching her in an overly familiar manner. this plays directly into the stereotype that lesbians are mean, bitchy exclusionists ("i dont trust people who have the lesbian flag as their avatar because they're usually aphobes") and predatory!

she "apologized" for this post, before deleting the apology, wherein the only thing she said was that she didnt realize she was stereotyping lesbians and planned to keep the panel as a part of the comic. thereafter she deleted the comic altogether.

in the notes of the original post, lots of people posted anti-lesbian sentiments, showing exactly why this rhetoric is harmful and dangerous as shown below, just in case anyone wants to tell me this isn't lesbophobic

and before anyone wants to say these comments aren't about lesbians specifically. i ask you, who in that comic was portrayed as an "exclusionist" and what demographic of the lgbt community faces the most "(x flag) is an aphobic dogwhistle" nonsense.

moving onto the heavier claims:

here is a post where she's reblogged art of 2 minors, laying in bed, shirtless with bitemarks all over them. these people are teenagers and she is 23.

here is a post where she's reblogged aged up art of minors.

here is a post where she's drawn "genderbends" of my hero academia characters, only for one of the boys to blow their skirts up so their underwear is visible.

similar suggestive themes are found within her own comic. the "transcendent" comic she draws features a trans girl; in one comic, the character in question (olive) goes to the beach where she sees a few high school girls where the following happens:

olive is also in middle school, so there are a few problems wrong with this comic.

a high school boy is ogling a 12-13 year old girl, which is predatory and

the high school girls then attack this child for their boyfriends ogling her and then blame her for their boyfriends' predatory behavior. in a later panel in this same comic, olive CELEBRATES this.

again, op is 23 and has no business drawing minors in this manner.

she's also cis and the main protagonist of her comic is a trans girl, except she's every single transmisogynistic stereotype possible.

olive's birthname is oliver and now she goes by olive

there's a recurring theme of people treating olive in an overly sexual manner (boys looking up her skirt, discussing what cup size she'll get while on hormones, being sexualized) and repeatedly olive is (weirdly) shown as being HAPPY about these things

let me be clear: these things are stereotypes and they're harmful and they're transmisogynistic. op, as a cis woman, has no right to portray a trans GIRL (olive is a CHILD she is in MIDDLE SCHOOL so she is 11-13) in this manner. it is creepy, it is invasive, it is transmisogynistic and wholly and entirely inappropriate.

please do not support her or her comics or her artwork. there are plenty of artists out there on tumblr who deserve your support, and she is not one of them, thank you for your time.

[terrawr-deactivated20230408]

So, with the the whole inclu/exclu thing. Are you an exclusionist? And of what specifically

being ace/aro doesn’t make you lgbt because the lgbt community is built to combat oppression for being sga and/or not cis. you can be straight and cis and aro/ace therefor it does not make you lgbt by default, those of us who are aro/ace have our own community to face our own struggles. there’s no need for us to be inherently considered lgbt when our issues are ultimately different and are not on the same scale, and cishet aro/aces should not be taking advantage of resources not made for them because they don’t face those issues on a systemic scale like homelessness, joblessness, adoption discrimination, so on and so forth. basically, as a nonbinary lesbian and as an ace person, i don’t think the communities share the same goals and i don’t think being aro/ace makes you inherently lgbt, and that people who are aro/ace can and definitely do still oppress lgbt people if they’re cishet. if that makes me exclusionist then 🤷 i just don’t want to be around my oppressors and have my oppressors take advantage of the oppressed’s resources just because they don’t want to fuck

[terrawr-deactivated20230408]

and to add to this, the argument that “cishet society doesn’t treat them [cishet aces] fairly” also means nothing to me because so do a lot of other cishets. interracial/couples of color, disabled people, working wives and stay at home dads, kinksters, literally so many other cishets who do anything nontraditional are all considered weird and outcast from “cishet society,” but that doesn’t make all poc, disabled people, people who have different views on sex and when/how it should be practiced, and any nontraditional person lgbt. same goes for aro/ace cishets. if you’re not same gender attracted and/or trans, you’re not an inherent member of the community built for sga and trans people. it’s simple as that.

[terrawr-deactivated20230408]

wow. an acecourse ask that’s gotten over 100 notes with exactly 0 brainrot in the notes. how did i get so lucky

[cowardly-bisexual]

no offense but i think telling people who are trying to figure out their sexual orientation to "really think about it" and "analyse their felings" is unhelpful and unhealthy

when i was trying to figure out if it was gay or bi or asexual or what sitting on the internet and obsessing over my feelings didn't help me at all, it just drove me crazy

i needed to go out there, fall in love, experience things, hook up with people, give myself time. sitting at home and trying to figure out if what i felt for men/women/whoever is sexual attraction was useless. taking off the pressure to find my label and letting myself just be was so much more liberating and allowed me to actually experience things that made realising i was bi extremely easy.

figuring out your sexual orientation shouldn't be this stressful intellectual puzzle, it should be a case of you living your life and then going from there

and when i say give yourself time i don't mean like two months. some people don't start experiencing falling for people and dating and having sex until they're in their twenties. some people come out in their thirties or later. this shit takes time. be kind to yourself. don't let internet checklists ruin your mental health. live your life and you'll figure it out when the time is right.

[lgbtisallyouneed]

Not that validity means anything, but if it did demisexuality would not be it

[lgbtisallyouneed]

Being called an aphobe really does make me feel fearless.

[coolestfinch]

Not the OG! Demisexual anon, but as someone who identifies as demi, the thing is I do feel sexual attraction, but only after I know a person/there's an emotional connection. So I'm in this weird liminal space of not being ace, but also not experiencing sexual attraction outside of specific situations. It's really not a personal preference, as I literally can't feel attraction w/o connection.

and that’s ok! but i don’t see the need for a label for that. i suppose it’s not inherently wrong, but it does lead to people thinking that demisexuality is an orientation and somehow makes someone lgbt which, yes, i’ve seen before. this is slightly unrelated to the definition itself but the demi flag is. really fuckin nasty as well

[lgbtisallyouneed]

Tbh I think it’s weird that we imply that being just straight or gay or bi ever implied you experience sexual attraction ‘outside of specific situations’. When I say I’m gay I don’t mean I’m constantly lusting for sex with people of the same gender, I mean that in the circumstances when I want to be with a partner, I want those partners to be the same sex as me. Demisexuality has no distinguishing line whatsoever from sexuality, so I think it’s just used in a (sometimes internalized) homophobic attempt to dodge the question of whether someone is gay, bi, or straight.

[bloodraven55]

aesthetic attraction is wild bc it’s like “yes i’m asexual but i’m also very gay and women are extremely hot”

[bloodraven55]

so basically to summarise

[lgbtisallyouneed]

The over sexualization of sexuality should be a crime because then you get people like “ahh that woman is just SO sexy to me, but this isn’t sexual attraction because we aren’t immediately imagining boning.” Like... honey. You’re sexually attracted attracted to women, just fess to it already.

[thorndykes-deactivated20161204]

please stop reblogging sylvia plath poetry 

[thorndykes-deactivated20161204]

For ppl asking why she’s an anti black, anti Semite. She has used the n word and compared her depression to the holocaust

[transwolvie]

Even not counting her poetry her private journals are full of disgusting, overblown antisemitism. She didn’t just use Jewish people for her metaphors, she outright hated them irl and yet decided to use their suffering for her own gain

[foulserpent]

here’s a source with some quotes

[meta-hemeralism-blog]

okay, I’m Jewish and I appreciate this sentiment. and if someone wants to cut out Sylvia Plath, go for it, I get it.

But. by this logic we’d also need to stop reblogging TS Eliot, Oscar Wilde, and Shakespeare quotes. Virginia Woolf wrote anti-semetic things in her private journals, too. If you only want to read classic poets who liked Jews and black people, that’s fine, but like. good luck? Sylvia Plath isn’t an exception.

idk. Tumblr’s attitude of “consume nothing problematic” just doesn’t work if you’re part of a group that most culture-creators over the last few centuries have hated by default. For people actually in those groups, it’s not like the only two choices are 1) worship authors who hate you or 2) completely cut the majority of literature out of your life. You learn to read critically and acknowledge flaws where you find them.

anyway, as a Jewish woman, I would much rather see a version of this post that said “please read Sylvia Plath poetry critically because she’s anti black and antisemetic” than just “stop reblogging Sylvia Plath poetry.”

IMO, reblog Sylvia Plath all you want, just not unthinkingly.

[theroguefeminist]

I’m reblogging this now because I’m seeing anti-Virginia Woolf discourse lately due to the antisemitism in her journals and like… as a Jewish person who loves Virginia Woolf’s writing and an English teacher who knows that pretty much every writer of the classics is Problematic just…chill pls

[benevolent-atrophy]

The point isn’t to never consume media that isn’t ideologically pure. That’s never the point. Were that the goal, we would NEVER be able to consume any media. Nothing is ever ideologically pure, especially as time goes on and our social consciousness expands.

We should be telling people instead, “Be critical as you read this person’s work. They held bigoted views. Understand how that is reflected in their work, and be mindful of it. Be critical, be thoughtful”

Compelling others to not engage with something at ALL on ideological grounds is in the same vein as burning books. We should be compelling others to be critical and mindful, not narrow and willfully ignorant.

[unihex]

the fact that aphobia is the punchline of so many jokes by non-ace people is….bear with me….aphobia

[butchneto]

This post was annoying and bad so it’s mine now. Fellow gays what was your first major video game crush. Mine was Tifa

[butchneto]

I’m so tired of this asexual centric oppression fantasy all over my dash. The lgbt community isn’t so much a community as a terrified political alliance trying desperately not die or be assaulted for our gender or who we love. You showed up in our hypervisible house. Stole our terminology and cry aphobia when anyone suggests you might not belong in this alliance being homophobic and inserting yourselves into conversations.

[momfriendace]

tag yourself i’m “inserting yourself into conversations” as you do exactly that to this post lmao

[butchneto]

This is the entire ace community trying to paint aphobia as a real oppression

[cottagesmasher]

@ asexual men, you’re oppressed under misogyny, sexism and their subsets

[butchneto]

they’re oppressed by toxic masulinity and wait for it’s roots in being misogynistic. shut up.

[cottagesmasher]

Are you….. saying men are oppressed by their own misogynist behavior?????????????

????????????????????

[lgbtisallyouneed]

It’s reasonable to be aware that there are many, many men the patriarchy also hurts deeply. Just because the guy on top has his foot on our throats doesn’t mean some men aren’t also getting kicked by the system. Plenty of boys and men are punished for or expected to be ashamed of their inherently feminine traits, it’s not like that’s good for them. Power structures are never unilateral, there are always nuanced dynamics in play.

[exyclusionist]

alright so i know that anonymous-asexual (luna) is kind of a big meme right now toothpaste hair haha and all but i’ve seen several people kinda address this and i just wanna go more into detail about why they’re a hazardous person who is playing into a lot of themes typical in the kink community, particularly in relation to pedophilia. they have a lot of issues with perpetuating homophobia and transphobia as well, but i’m not going to address any of that here. this might be kinda long and pretty triggering so i’m putting it under a readmore. i will put in-text warnings for the link sources but none of them will be censored, and although everything i link to is only going to be explicit in an imagined context or in words rather than in any images posted, i still urge you to tread carefully. i’m going to mention things like pedophilia, cp/grooming, kinks/fetishes, and particularly vore so please be careful when reading.

Keep reading

[greed-the-dorkalicious]

Wait what happened to Thomas Sanders???

Basically, Thomas Sanders (who, btw, is gay) used to be basically the celebrated Unproblematic Fav Uwu of Tumblr and Vine. Everyone loved him, everyone praised him for being inclusive and positive, making fun and unique vines that were appropriate and enjoyable for any age group.

Then one day he got an aphobic ask (I honestly don’t remember what this was even in response to, I think it was some really innocent one-off “I hope asexuals have a good day” type of post or something like that, idek), to which he wrote a long and sincere response that basically summed up to “Hey, that’s not a nice attitude to have, please take a moment to think about how other people must feel and why it’s so important to you to shut them down”

Within literal hours (and this is something I witnessed myself, I was online when it all went down), a smear campaign against him had started. Suddenly even people who had previously been huge fans of him were shit-talking him left and right, declaring him cringey, and grasping at straws to make “callout posts” for him. One popular argument I remember hearing was- And I shit you not, I am not making this up- He was a “pedophile” because he made videos for a family demographic and has a young-looking face, but was 29 or whatever and therefore “pretending to be a kid” or whatever the fuck. He even, gasp, made vines about high school, despite not being a high schooler himself! (Dan Green voice) That’s called “acting”, children!

His popularity never really recovered, and these days he’s mostly considered “cringey” by a large portion of the internet due to the main demographic most of his fans fall into, because you know it’s hip and cool to shame young girls and queer kids for the things that bring them joy.

So yeah, TL;DR used to be pretty well liked by the majority of Tumblr with nobody really having anything bad to say about him, expressed support for aspecs one day, immediately fell victim to exclusionist harrassment and is now at best considered just a cringey teenage girl thing.

[mintedwitcher]

Also part of the “pedophile” smear campaign included:

1. He has tags for not quite safe for work selfies on his blog (#nsfw and #tsbutt) (not nudes or even lewds, just pictures including his clothed butt.)

2. He accepts nsfw fanart from fans, but ONLY if the artist is 18+

3. There was ONE time where an underage artist submitted a nsfw art piece and Thomas posted it, because said artist removed their age from their bio, so Thomas had no idea it was made by a minor. He deleted the post as soon as this information came to light.

But exclusionists took all of this, mashed it with their “oh but he’s so childish, he acts like a kid even though he’s nearly 30, he must be hiding something!” And ran so far with it that Thomas Sanders severely suffered for it. Even his fans got shit for liking him. A lot abandoned him out of fear that a similar campaign would start against them.

So yeah. Fuck exclusionists, honestly.

[freak-priest]

He got smeared for videos he made With high schoolers as well, high schoolers from a drama club from his old high school, whom he was asked back to help out by his own teachers. Which is commonplace, and not sketchy in the slightest. He made wholesome, age-appropriate content and STILL got “cancelled” because exclusionists can’t handle it when good queer people who don’t share their dumb views are successful.

[inclusionist-mantha]

Reblogging again for the latest addition!

[lgbtisallyouneed]

Sorry but does any of this actually have to do with exclusionism in any way, or are you just associating tha two because you don’t like exclus and you want them to take the fall for cancel culture going too far and canceling people who did nothing wrong? Plenty of inclus also decided he was bad with no evidence. The “ask” is gone so there’s no evidence anymore. Just going on canceling people with no real reason some more.

[maskysgirlfriendmoved-deactivat]

yall gotta be nicer about m/f  bc sometimes u guys like the blandest gay sutff ive ever seen in my life

[maskysgirlfriendmoved-deactivat]

gonna add onto this you all gotta stop acting like m/f is just cishet when bisexual people exist and straight trans people exist.

[skeleton-bat]

Also when Pan, ace,and aro people exist

[joongus]

bro cishet ace and aro people are still cishet and, thus, still bland

but like what do i expect from someone who unironically has “hearts before parts” in their bio

[skeleton-bat]

Hm, attraction to no one=het? Yup makes sense to me (sarcasm)

Also yeah I’m trans you can ask about it if you like cause that’s in my bio as well. But you won’t. You just like to nit pick and feel superior

[joongus]

trans ppl r still capable of spreading transphobic and biphobic rhetoric

and if they’re attracted to no one, they wouldn’t date people and wouldn’t be in a ship. if ur a cishet ace or a cishet aro you’re still a cishet!

also it’s just annoying to take a point that was meant for bi and trans ppl (who often have their het relationships scrutinized as traitors to the lgbt community) and tack on ace/aro people when that. doesn’t impact someone being cishet or not (i’m not criticizing the addition of pan)

[skeleton-bat]

And a trans person is capable of personal reclaimation what’s your point?

A ship? You mean the fictional ship?

You’re not yet if you’re ace or aro because you’re not attracted to the opposite sex in either of those cases

The original still exists you can easily go to it and reblog it if you want.

No matter how much you whine and complain ace and aro people arn’t het.

[joongus]

if you’re a biromantic asexual. you’re bi

if you’re a heteroromantic asexual. you’re het.

unless bi and gay ace/aro ppl aren’t bi or gay? but they are! and straight ace/aro ppl are straight! that’s how that works!

being trans doesn’t absolve you of the intense biphobia and homophobia in the pan “hearts not parts” rhetoric but go off ig

[skeleton-bat]

You are also ace and/aro that label doesn’t magically not exist or go away.

Apparently it was started by the bi community though it doesn’t really matter and why you decided to bring up Pan is anyone’s guess.

also people who are under the oppression can reclaim it for themselves which is what I as a trans person am doing for my personal self. Or do you think people can’t personally reclaim things? Do you think I’m forcing others to reclaim it? Am I saying it’s completely free from all harmful history? Or am I a trans person saying your know what I’m gonna take this back for my own self’?

Again you’re just nit picking because I’m ace and aro and am an inclusionist and you just can’t stand those people for being not straight on the basis of attraction.

[skeleton-bat]

Oh now I see why you brought up Pan people

[joongus]

i mean— pansexuality has its own problems inherent in its rhetoric, especially with transphobia and biphobia. bisexuality has always meant attraction to all genders— but pan ppl are still lgbt because they have sga, regardless of the problems that exist in the community.

literally asking anyone why they id as pan but not bi always comes to either a trivial answer like “i like the flag better” or a biphobic one like “i’m attracted to nonbinary/trans people”

the amount of biphobia i experienced from pan people who praised themselves as being “more inclusive and accepting” than bi ppl was. disgusting. i had several people ask why i didn’t id as pan and saying pan was the modern replacement for bi which was outdated as a term. and this isn’t a few assholes. it’s a problem inherent in the rhetoric, which deliberately ignores the true meaning of bisexuality.

[skeleton-bat]

Did you like, just forget what op stated. Here I’ll put a screen shot just in case

So tell me again how lgbt is just for same gender attracted people?

[criticallyalexandrite]

Ace excluses keep shooting themselves in the foot in proving they’re not biphobic with the “LGBT is just SGA” argument huh

[joongus]

bro if you’re bi, you experience sga. that’s literally. part of being bi. if you’re “bi” but you’re only attracted to other genders (keeping in mind you cannot tell at a first glance that someone is nonbinary), you’re literally a biphobic het who fetishizes nonbinary people.

[rollforhealing-a]

hey can you not speak over bi people???? especially non binary bi people???? as a non binary bisexual person it’s kinda invalidating when people date me but still label themselves as straight or gay, because I do not fit within the gender binary. I’ve had partners realize they were bi and/or pan when we discussed this and it was way more validating/less dysphoric when they came out as bi or pan. it also helped them out.

like. gender is weird. sexuality is weird. if you can handle the concept of people identifying outside of the binary gender mold, you can handle people identifying outside of LGB or having different definitions as to what qualifies for those labels.

if you can’t handle that? and you continue to speak over bisexuals despite not being a bisexual? then you’re kinda a biphobe

[joongus]

i identified as bisexual for years until very recently because i thought you couldn’t be nonbinary AND a lesbian. and then i had people tell me you couldn’t be nonbinary and bi because bi was inherently binary. as if being pan was the only option when i insisted “no i’m bi. i’m bi”

gay ppl date nonbinary people all the time. straight people also date nonbinary people (though i see this less often).

all i’m saying is that bisexuality implies same gender attraction. if you say you’re bi, it implies you’re attracted to all genders. bisexuality has ALWAYS included all genders and will continue and saying that you can be bi without same gender attraction is biphobic and transphobic because it erases the entire meaning and history of the term

[rollforhealing-a]

It’s great that you realized that you could be nonbinary and a lesbian, and stopped identifying as bisexual. That’s awesome. But it still doesn’t give you the right to insert yourself into bisexual community discussions or talk over bisexuals! I’m sure if a bi wlw who used to id as a lesbian was doing the same thing to you, you’d say she was being lesbophobic. And you’d be right.

The bisexual community (which you are not a part of) defines bisexuality as being attracted to two or more genders. Notice how that doesn’t include same gender attraction (which is a mormon conversion therapy term)? Pansexuality is attraction to all genders. Is there some overlap? Absolutely! Does that make pansexuality invalid? Nope! 

Also, thanks for explaining bi history to me and telling me what a big ‘ol biphobe and transphobe I am (not). It’s not like I don’t know our own history or have done tons of research on it because I’m an activist in the bi community both online and offline. It’s not like I haven’t written essay after essay about the history of the bisexual community, the definition of bisexual, the overlap between the bi/pan community, and biphobia from non-bisexual/pansexual folks who continue to think it’s their place to define our terms for us and speak over us, inserting themselves into our intracommunity conversations that they have no place in. 

All in all, this argument is pointless. You are not bisexual. You cannot speak for us or over us. Our community has decided to welcome pansexuals with loving, open arms and support them because we are stronger together. I’m sorry you don’t like that, but to be fair I don’t really like non-bisexuals speaking over me and acting like they have authority over the community I work hard to protect and help. 

[joongus]

it’s not like i haven’t been a bisexual activist for years. it’s not like i haven’t been deeply involved in the community and the history. it’s not like i haven’t experienced biphobia and transphobia before directly from pan rhetoric.

it’s not like the bi community was a major part of my life up until a year and a half ago when i realized “huh. if i don’t really like men, just women and nonbinary people, i’m probably a lesbian. i’m not just bi with a preference”

Since the writing of the bisexual manifesto, bi has meant ALL genders. Pansexuality is a redundant label.

claiming that bisexuality DOESNT require you to be attracted to all genders, and you can be bi without sga or attraction to the “opposite” gender confuses and twists things more, leaving gay people less likely to discover themselves. if you’re a woman attracted to other women and nonbinary people but not men? you’re literally a lesbian! because you can’t read who’s nonbinary at a first glance. and if you fall for someone only AFTER they say they’re nonbinary, that’s transphobic!

bisexuality is also defined as “attraction to the same and other genders” which implies. 1) sga and 2) attraction to all genders

saying that bisexuality is only attraction to some genders literally fuels the biphobic rhetoric pan people use to claim that pansexuality is a more inclusive, “better” term than bisexuality

[gracklesong]

I get so tired every time I see an asexual education piece that insinuates everyone who’s not ace is a-ok with, and totally not confused and alienated by, the depiction of sex, romance and sexuality in popular media, including pornography, and also never questions if said media depictions are distorted by patriarchy, capitalism, homophobia, racism, etc.

[cumaeansibyl]

given how many cishet people have expressed their confusion and alienation to me, it might be beneficial to ask whether anyone actually relates to depictions of sexuality and romance in popular media

[heterophobiclesbean]

I had an ace friend in high school who was very outspoken about how ace she was and told me she didnt want to hear about my crush on a girl because she was “so ace” (I literally just said she was pretty and I liked making her laugh but apparently that’s too NSFW to talk about at age 17) and one time I told her I had a gay blog and she asked what was on it and I said “gay stuff” and she said “like porn?” and now shes in college and has a crusty ugly boyfriend who refuses to use they/them pronouns because “they is plural.” They met at a MOGAI club that formed because her schools LGBT club said demisexuals werent LGBT and mogais got mad and anyway they bonded because they were both “aroace” but now they’re dating and fucking and I know that because she used to tell me all the time she was on birth control for hormones but didnt need it for contraceptive purposes and then she stopped saying that and I made a joke about how she doesnt need contraceptives anyway and she looked uncomfortable and didnt laugh.

So anyway when yall talk about how “queer” aces are and how they can “relate” to LGBT people I think about my friend who told me she didnt want to hear me even mention my first gay crush because she admitted she was going to “act weird” about it, told me that she equates the word gay with porn and sex, and is literally just a regular run of the mill heterosexual but threw a fit over the fact that her schools LGBT club didnt think cishets were LGBT despite the fact that she is, by her own account, cis heteroromantic heterosexual

[theasexualdiscourser-blog]

You wanna hear how bad ace discourse can get in real life? I have(or… Had) two gay dads. I’m adopted. When I was 15 I came out as het ace, not yet knowing I was pan. My dads didn’t have a problem with it, one of them said I might be too “young” to know, but that I could identify with whatever I wanted. Casual aphobia hurts. Then I said “Now I can go with you to pride parades and LGBT events!!” Their facial expressions changed. “You’re not LGBT. Being asexual doesn’t make you LGBT” one of them said. I was so hurt. “Yes it does!” I said. They began yelling. At each other. At me. “Our child is an inclusionist! What are we supposed to do?!” “Don’t worry, honey. She’ll come around. We’ll just have to educate her.” I didn’t come around. So they threw me out of the place I’d lived for the past fifteen years. For being an ace inclusionist. This is how this mess affects real people. I am disgusted.

[wifipasswords-deactivated201908]

I am screaming I love fake posts on this site SO MUCH

[beyonslayed]

I’m the dads

[lgbtisallyouneed]

You can tell it’s fake because on what planet do gay dads with kids not already take them to family friendly pride events to flex about the awesome family they made in spite of homophobic laws and norms trying to stop them?

[demisexualmeansnormal]

Ace Tumblr: We NEVER pressure people into identifying as Asexual!!

Also Ace Tumblr: [this shit]

parody text by Toria, via Facebook

[rentalgoose]

Wow didn’t realize you hated rape victims but way to go, piece of shit.

[eperclepsy]

my buddy it’s satire it doesn’t reflect op’s actual views

[demisexualmeansnormal]

Right?

I actually care about victims of sexual violence to heal and to be healthy. On the other hand, there’s a weird anti-recovery current running through the ace community, and that actually isn’t healthy.

[anacephobiaproject]

[handwritten in red and purple: “Don’t use “allo” it’s really freaking weird for u to assume about others sexual attraction levels.”]

This is an example of hate.

[youcanthurtmetheseshadesaregucci]

gay person: when you reduce to me to nothing but a label saying that i participate in sexual relations, despite you knowing nothing about me, i feel incredibly uncomfortable and disrespected

this asshat: THIS IS ACEPHOBIA!!! GAY PEOPLE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH SEXUAL HARRADMENT FROM ACES!!! THIS IS AN ACE HATE CRIME!!!