@limemacaron - Tumblr Blog

bluntbliss-deactivated20260429

I need the 19 year old girlies telling women to go 4B to understand that unless you actually organize yourselves and make this a national movement, you're literally asking random women to give up their love life for literally no reason at all.

Also I've seen a lot of bios with something in the lines of "het partnered women DNI" and it makes me laugh so hard because, again, I'm literally almost double your age and if you think I don't have good enough criteria to know who tf I'm dating, then I'll laugh even harder.

Sure, young girls are hypersexualized and will date any loser, but.... that's kind of a part of life too, people fuck up, especially teens and young adults, I know you girlies have a superiority complex and know you're just so much better than the girls who socialize with men, but trust me, you're literally not helping anybody here, I have no clue how tf you're supposed to help other women and make feminist literature if you don't talk to women from all walks of life.

This childish cancel culture is so tiring istg.

"no i won't talk to you because boys have cooties!!!"

like girls please for the love of god, that's exactly what you're saying LMAO

vintage-bentley

“If you don’t think I don’t have good enough criteria to know who tf I’m dating, then I’ll laugh even harder.”

This is exactly why so many of us are frustrated with feminists who date men. Because you have this idea that you hold some special knowledge to find a Good Man™️, implying that women who end up with abusive and dangerous men just aren’t as smart as you are.

How can you assure a woman who’s experienced domestic abuse that it wasn’t her fault, because no woman can ever predict if a man will end up being abusive…but then turn around and say “well I have good criteria for the men I date, so I’ll be fine”. Did she not have good enough criteria? Was she too stupid to see red flags? Is she just “hypersexualised and will date any loser” as you said in your post? But you’re better than her, you’ll make a good choice. You’ll find the nicest guy ever who’s super duper feminist and will never lay a hand on you. All those women who ended up unlucky just didn’t have your superior abuse screening skills.

Also, if you think that 4B is about getting women to “give up their love life for literally no reason at all”, you don’t understand the 4B movement and haven’t been listening to feminists. There’s many reasons feminists give for 4B, including but not limited to: there’s really no “love life” to be had in the first place because men are misogynistic, you can never know what man will make you breakfast in bed vs which man will kill you in a fit of rage, you can never know for sure which men are laughing at their friend’s rape jokes or simply staying quiet, and men have spent thousands of years treating women like domestic servants and have not yet unlearned this so a truly equal heterosexual relationship free of this power dynamic is nearly impossible.

It’s not just “boys have cooties”. It’s “men are dangerous to women, and get even more dangerous when they’re romantically/sexually partnered with women. Women and girls should, as a class, refrain from putting themselves in dangerous relationships with them until they—men and boys—work together as a class to stop being a danger to women and girls”.

I agree with you though that feminists shouldn’t just shut het partnered women out, and should be welcoming women from all walks of life. However I do understand the frustration many feminists have with women who claim to support radical feminism but can’t grasp the basic concept of “yes all men” because their Jakey is special.

finnishrogue

I don't know how to really phrase this but... if finding a decent man requires you to be experienced, smart, older and extremely strict with your criteria, doesn't that fucking PROVE the point of 4B?

Because last time I checked, it takes me almost zero effort to find perfectly healthy, sane, friendly and empathetic women to date. They just fucking walk to me every day. Probably one in every three woman would be fine for me to marry (assuming they liked me too), and even then I would exclude the other two only because of inherent interest/value/personality differences, not because there was anything wrong with them otherwise.

But I am supposed to use every single brain cell, observation skill, communicative tool and bit of wisdom stored in me to find a dude that is not a loser?

So heterosexual partnership is only reserved for extremely intelligent and mature women who have the patience and the skills to sift through countless of men?

That would inherently mean most women aren't going to find one, and that's not because most women are stupid or immature, but because THEY WILL QUICKLY RUN OUT OF GOOD MEN.

If only around 1% of straight men are worth dating then trying to be oh-so-clever to find one of those is NOT going to solve the fact that 99% of straight women will be left dating losers. If they choose to stay alone instead, you, out of ANYONE else, should understand why. You went through the lot and ditched them all, didn't you?

So why are you still placing the responsibility on women's shoulders, instead of telling men to grow the fuck up?

fisewalafel

lmao look at this Bad Woman being mocked and humiliated by liberal men. thank god that i, a Morally Good Woman with Correct Opinions, will never be in her place!

g1rluninterruptedd

“the rich elite” and it’s just rich men abusing their power. ppl gave taylor swift more shit for a private jet than elon musk for being in the epstein files.

the issue is men. “rich people” and it’s majority males. “criminals” and it’s males. i’m not understanding how people aren’t recognizing this.

“people are so evil” and it’s just a dude

unidentifiedflyingwoman

So there’s this video on YouTube called “actors aren’t allowed to be ugly anymore” or smth and the male author goes on about how in the past you could see balding guys, guys with wrinkles/big noses/dad bods acting as protagonists in the movies and how that’s not a thing anymore and yada yada. And what got me is that his examples of male actors “looking normal” were unattractive men, like really below average dudes, but his scarce examples of actresses “looking normal” where such mesmerising beauties as Cher, Laura Dern and Mia Farrow… like he couldn’t find a single unattractive or even just ordinary woman!

And I remembered how when I was really into old movies as a teen and I religiously watched every piece with Audrey Hepburn in it and I got my flabbers completely gasted when such a breathtaking actress would be paired with the most ugly looking old dudes you could find on the planet earth.

It’s like women were never allowed ugliness even in the slightest and now, since we’re contributing to at least half of the movies’ and shows’ revenues men are outraged we want to see male characters who are at the very least not revolting - I would prefer not to see them at all, but that’s a completely different story. Like even now you see people thirst over this old pedro guy and the wonky chef from “the bear” but the moment a woman’s jaw is slightly too square or a nose not perfectly straight she’s labelled a 6/10.

CRAZY WORK!!!!

11thfempachi

if Japan has no haters im dead

11thfempachi

- remove women from power using chinese philosophy as an excuse

- use said chinese philosophy to raise a class of military that are allowed to exploit the lower classes, are known for raping children and women

- isolate the country to let military brew in nationalist propaganda and allow it to massacre civilians for practicing foreign culture e. g. Christianity

- when forced to open borders, quickly start to imitate America and shit on the chinese who gave you half of your culture without ever even colonising you, invade Korea who also played a tremendous role in creating Japanese culture, over an almost 1000 beef and portray them as inferior for some reason

- side with nazis and lead dozens of massacres, brutally rape and torture women, children, sometimes men, exploit civilians for work in inhumane conditions even in axis counties like Thailand (also kill one of my ancestors but yknow. in the grand scheme of things)

- after losing the war, jump on America's dick and pour all the money you have left into economics instead of constantly expanding military force and ignoring the lower class's needs

- market yourself as a country of technology and progress and paint the same military class that was the driving force behind pre-meiji eras most war crimes as noble warriors defending their daimyos honor

- turn the proto-feminist lolita movement of women infantilising themselves as a response to conservative demand to 'mature' i. e. stop enjoying your hobbies and become a man's kitchen slave, into a racist pedophilic stereotype-fetish and demand grown women to be sexy children even at work place

- "wowww nihongo is living in 3000 and their waifus are so kawaii!!! i wish i was Japanese😭😭😭"

11thfempachi

"lets experience legendary Japanese hospitality☺" im sure you will white lady from Louisiana. bring your black compatriot or a Filipino into the room

we-have-black-marble-at-home

if you bring up false accusations whenever a woman is discussing rape or pedophilia, i'm immediately assuming you did something

xxriverdaughterxx

you ever think about how the world has 'too many people' because men created a system of abusing nature to maximize primitive resource accumulation and need to keep women in sexual slavery to birth enough babies to keep the current accumulation going?

and how any time women are given greater freedom to choose, birth rates across the population fall to replacement level? which is inherently sustainable?

and in some places, birth rates are falling BELOW replacement level, which is even MORE sustainable considering the outsized resource use of people in the same places????

and how we are part of a system, and even when we aren't trying, we act in a way that balances it??? how it is men who are the problem!!??

idkkkk it just kinda seems so obvious that when we refuse to birth 12 children, we are threatening the foundation of patriarchy and capitalism by creating a sustainable future. and the fact of that should be enough to snap any woman out of blindly supporting men.

veritablevent

women have to live with the constant awareness of the possibility of getting raped even in the most innocuous of situations, and people still have the audacity to present this awareness as drama and fearmongering. if you help out an elderly man with getting his groceries into the house and he rapes you, you are the dummy for not thinking it through. but if an elderly man invites you into his house on the pretense of needing help with the groceries and you refuse, you are a paranoid (and heartless!) bitch. schrödinger's rapists: every man could be one, but also no man is, so how dare you think about it.

rabidwolf2point0

Don't believe me? Let me walk you through it.

Everyone read this and internalize it now

bigandlong

If you see this on your dashboard, reblog this, NO MATTER WHAT and all your dreams and wishes will come true.

jae-felidae

Oh hey! Haven’t seen this in forever! Didn’t reblog it when it came across me before, not gonna skip it this time, I need some good vibes.

radriotgrrrl-deactivated2025050

it’s so interesting to me that when a woman is clearly being satirical or joking people take her seriously ’cause for them it’s obvious that women are stupid or shallow.