❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Doug Jones
#extradirty
Origami Around
Misplaced Lens Cap
Xuebing Du
noise dept.
macklin celebrini has autism
ojovivo
tannertan36
gracie abrams
Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
if i look back, i am lost
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Love Begins
Mike Driver
official daine visual archive
hello vonnie
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from Poland
seen from Portugal
seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
@maghan92-blog
I am so blessed to have herd this woman speak tonight! For those of you that don't recognize her she is Abby Johnson. A former Planned Parenthood director. She is doing a world of good for workers who feel trapped in the abortion industry. Take a minute and look her and her story up! Awesome woman!
Preserve Life and Religious Liberty
OK everyone, this is REALLY important. If we get 100,000 signatures on this petition, the White House has to respond to it. We have 30 days to collect these signatures. We are petitioning the Obama administration to uphold the Constitutionand our right to religious freedom, and we are declaring that we WILL NOT COMPLY with Obamacare as it forces us to go against our beliefs and pay for abortion and abortion-inducing drugs.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/preserve-life-and-religious-liberty/fxNLP7jy
Someone asked us:
Is promiscuity a bad thing?
Unfortunately some “promiscuous” women are judged in a negative way by society. But “promiscuous” men are more accepted in society, which is totally unfair.
Why do I keep putting “promiscuous” in quotes? Because there’s no standard...
"Since the number of sexual partners you’ve had doesn’t say anything about your character, your morals, or your personality – or about anything at all really– there’s nothing bad or unhealthy about having a big number of sexual partners" - Planned Parenthood Did they really just say that? Since when? and what is big? I am blown away! Planned Parenthood encouraging teens to sleep around. No matter what!
Exactly.
photomgraphy:
Notice the “choice” aka human life, baby, is missing in this photo. You can not ignore that the “CHOICE” is to KILL a human.
^ Notice the deliberate “choice” to prove the point of my post you’ve ticked:
Emotive Language [x]
Misrepresentation of Science [x]
It’s a shame I didn’t have “irrelevant use of bold” and “capitalisation instead of a valid argument” as a categories you would’ve cleaned up. Potential life is not a baby or a human being and no amount of “is so” word play and twisting the facts will ever change that.
So then tell me what is potential life? Where did you come from? You came from a blob of cells and are still a blob of cells? So I can still abort you? Because from the moment of conception that "clump of cells" is who you are with its own DNA. So tell me when does life begin? because if not at conception then never. So murder should just be legal.
Notice the "choice" aka human life, baby, is missing in this photo. You can not ignore that the "CHOICE" is to KILL a human.
Use your noggin! Abortion is Murder.
If you don’t think a girl is mature enough to have an abortion what in your fucking mind makes you think she’s mature enough to give birth
Psst, it’s not actually about her maturity. It never was. It’s about finding an excuse to force her to give birth. It’s about taking her rights away so that some old, white man can tuck his rich ass in at night thinking he did something profoundly brave and righteous that day.
both of you know nothing about being pro life. It is fighting for the rights of another person no one will ever hear. Both of you and all alike are anti life. Pro-murder. its a person. And yes if her body says she is mature enough to get pregnant, then her body says she is mature enough to give birth to the child she can conceive. MAN says that she should not have to and provide her with the option to murder her child.
Tell me Wendy, when did you last go to medical school?
Abortion is not a “vagina business” it’s the legal murder of human beings. For the last dang time, no one cares about women’s vaginas-abortion ends a human life, Wendy, and yes it is a business that is set on making money, not doing what is best for women.
1) Go to a pro choice blog. 2) Find a post about a woman that chose life. (in a bad situation maybe)
If you find one, you might have just discovered the Holy Grail. Minstrels will write songs.
If not? Well what did you expect? A pro choice blog to acknowledge women…
If there wasn’t one on my blog before (I’m sure there was somewhere), there is now!
By the way, if anyone needs pregnancy help, visit OptionLine or call 800-712-HELP.
A fetus capable of forming coherent sentences in English before it even exits the womb. How accurate!
If anyone needs pregnancy help, and would prefer said help to NOT spread false information about pregnancy and abortions, visit www.plannedparenthood.com to locate a health center nearest you.
…it’s an illustration.
OptionLine does not spread false information. Planned Parenthood has been demonstrated to do so. Multiple times.
It’s emotional manipulation. Your movement wants to manipulate women because it can’t convince them with facts or logic. You have to resort to drawing talking fetuses, passing off infants as fetuses, etc. in order to convince women to listen to you. Need I say more?
Planned Parenthood does not spread false information. They provide full, comprehensive information about abortion, adoption, and parenting. They want each pregnant person to make the choice that’s best for themself, while crisis pregnancy centers want pregnant people to make the decision that the crisis pregnancy center wants.
Where has Planned Parenthood been demonstrated to spread false information? The burden of proof is on you. And crisis pregnancy centers have actually been proven to mislead and manipulate women with false information and more emotional manipulation (see links 1, 2, 3).
Wow.
I wish I had the time and energy to refute all of this, but I just plain don’t. Anyone else who might have the applicable sources more readily available (I know which ones I’d use but I’d have to go find them again) want to take this?
The links you posted are not trust worthy, the first on you made went to a supposed "us house of representatives" book, but the page it cam from is a ".com" not ".gov" which is where it should come from so anyone could have slapped that together.
The second link has no grounds to say that post abortive syndrome is not real of is false. The government cant say so because they wont put research into something that would take money away from them. Its real but no one will fund the studies on it.
And the third is a pro-choice document, so of course they are going to say all negative facts are false, with no backing. Show me proof that there is no link between abortion and breast cancer and ill believe you!
By the way... Susan G, Colman dons't support planned parenthood for any ole reason.... they make sure there is a way to make money.
I have a question about 40 Days for Life.
I keep seeing people who are participating saying, “we’ve saved X amount of babies so far!”
How do you keep a tally of that? Like.. is it just the number of women you’ve scared away from abortion…
Did you also tell Katelyn about the risks associated with bringing a baby to term? How the risks to her can, in some occasions, with no warning and with no previous risk factor, result in the death, disability or permanent illness for her or her unborn? Did you list for her the number of reasons not to bring a child to term? (Mental illness, unstable relationship, family disapproval, social stigma, etc.)
Did you warn Katelyn about the financial implications of (a) her pregnancy or (b) bringing up a child? Did you tell her about her labour? And how it could last anywhere from 2 hours to 48 hours depending on her body? Did you tell her about the pain and discomfort involved in bringing a baby to term and then the agony involved in delivering it successfully?
Did you tell Katelyn about her “natural duty” towards the clump of underdeveloped cells invading her body? (If the body got its way, we would never be allowed to become pregnant) How being a mother to a screaming, irrational “baby” is so natural and easy that any woman would happily give up their lives for sleepness nights, back ache, heart ache, sore tender breasts, etc?
Did you highlight to her that in fact all things considered, it might be better for her as a person, taking a wholistic approach to her and her care, to abort this baby, and either try again when things seem easier or make sure never to get pregnant again.
Pregnancy has been the same for many many years and some how you think that women don't know what comes along with pregnancy?
The risk factors are not the same for everyone but generally on the average most pregnancies are normal. The only reason our maternal mortality rate is so high is because of the involvement of the insurance companies, the drugs they pump into women, the way the birthing process is done for women in hospitals, and the amount of c-sections that are being performed. C-sections are not safe. THEY ARE A TRULY INVASIVE MAJOR SURGERY! They cause scar tissue to grow onto organs in the body and can cause multiple complications.
This birthing process is nothing terrible like you say! The mother receives the most endorphins she will ever receive at the moment of giving birth. That is if she chooses what is truly holistic which is a natural birth. natural births with low risk pregnancies are a fraction of the cost of having a baby in a hospital and also do not require drugs of any sort. In the hospital they put you in the most uncomfortable position possible (your back) and pump you full of meds that they don't even know what they do when mixed. The woman should be standing or squatting or on her knees, she should be able to move around and be comfortable. So if you want to talk about this horid birth process, offer people a different, much cheeper, and much more comfortable, way to have a child. Cheep and non horrible!
Want to learn more about natural birth and why its much safer and less expensive? watch this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvljyvU_ZGE
You can’t put the rights of the embryo before the rights of the mother. It doesn’t work that way,...
Anti-Abortion & Pro-Life Ask Me Why: Right to Life at Every Stage of Development
You were that life at one point, put your self in that child's shoes. If you were a result of rape and your mother decided you didn't deserve to live simply because it was too hard to think about how you were a result of something so horrible... could you say you deserve to not live, that simply because you are a gift from a traumatic experience that your life has no meaning now?
As far as the couple with a child that could not live long outside the womb or that would have deformities... who are you to play the maker and say that that baby needs to be terminated. There are plenty stories like this every day where women are told their baby will not live long or will be deformed or whatever it may be... and they recognize that those nine months and 3 days or three minutes is the time their child was meant to live. The one duty of a mother is to protect her child not end his or her life too short.
The same reason these people are so upset about pro-lifers using these comparisons is the very reason we use them: personhood. We have a duty to use the tools that history has given us to educate future generations about the bloodshed that has already destroyed the lives of over 52,000,000 innocent American baby boys and girls.
Dred Scott declared that human persons with black skin were not actually human persons, but only 3/5 human. Adolf Hitler and the Nazis decided that human persons who were of Jewish heritage were not actually human persons, but some kind of pest or rodent that needed exterminating. Roe v. Wade pronounced that human persons who were in the first nine months of their human development were not human persons unless their mother decided they were.
How can we not have learned our lessons about trying to redefine personhood? How is it that we still have audacity to play God and strip away personhood rights from another group of people, this time simply because of their age? www.standtrue.com
Reducing the genocide, persecution, and slavery of born, sentient persons to a pregnant person exerting bodily autonomy is grossly offensive. There are several places talking about how offensive this is. You’re racist, sexist, and cissexist. Congrats.
Okay, I think you make an interesting point, it hasn’t come along yet, there for she is not sentient yet, you’re correct, and that’s a reflection of the passage of time (and lack thereof), and time is reflected in our age. They aren’t sentient yet but that's because they aren’t old enough to have developed sentience. To deny them their right to life for that reason would make us guilty of age discrimination. Do you think we have human rights based on our age or based on being human?
Just wanted to say I really admire your courage in posting about pro-life issues. :) I'm also a very strong pro-lifer and feminist and while I generally find it pretty easy to talk about feminist things on tumblr, I'm always too scared to post anything pro-life. (Just looking at all the hatred and vitriol from pro-choicers in the pro-life tag is kinda scary...)
I just don’t see what these women could possibly find to defend about killing their unborn children. It’s a bit scary sometimes, and it has lost me followers, but I put the right of an innocent human’s life before anyone’s bodily autonomy, no matter what. I think a little internet hate is a small price to pay if it saves lives.
So happy to see things like this! Peoples responses to this have been all about how can we value a fetus more than we value the woman who is living. BUT the truth is they are both alive and are both equal.
If we want equal rights we have to think of every living person as equal. Their size level of development, environment , and level of dependance has nothing to do with the state of their undeniable human nature! They are just as important as the mother. People should realize pro-lifers/ anti-abortion people are trying to protect both mother and Child!
Congrats to the two people talking here for standing up for what is right!
If a fetus isn't a human, then what is it?
A velociraptor.
You still can not give legitimate real true answers. Thats because you do not know what your talking about.
We will never abandon children conceived in rape. They are worthy of our protection just as much any other human being. Stop saying that they are less valuable than other children.
