
titsay
Not today Justin
occasionally subtle
KIROKAZE
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
cherry valley forever

Product Placement

JBB: An Artblog!
macklin celebrini has autism
dirt enthusiast
noise dept.

Andulka
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Game of Thrones Daily
h
Peter Solarz
DEAR READER
art blog(derogatory)
RMH
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from Brazil

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States
@malinameli
I'll stop saying faggot when gay men stop saying "bitch" and "cunt" because they think their love of men somehow gives them proximity to women
Women owe exactly nothing to gay men. Women feminists were their number one ally while the patriarchy oppressed them and the minute gender ideology became a serious threat to women's sex-based rights and it was their turn to repay women in a big way they immediately sided with men who like to wear dresses. They have never supported women because they're men, that's it. It's never more complicated than that.
A Feminist Guide to Gay Male Misogyny
What is gay male misogyny? What distinguishes it as gay male? Why do gay men do it? What does it do to others when we do it? What does it do to ourselves when we do it? And what can we do about it?
A talk by John Stoltenberg on April 19, 2013, at Wake Forest University for a symposium titled "Rewriting Homosexuality."
a very important lesson I learned from western leftists recently is apparently that if women in afghanistan were nicer and cared about men’s mental health more then the taliban would give them their full human rights back
surely nothing could go wrong if we encourage teenage girls to burden themselves with the task of deradicalizing their hitlerite porn addicted male peers. we all know that telling women and girls to prioritize the feelings of people who hate them over own safety is all that’s needed to make young men stop idolizing the tate brothers
They will ALWAYS somehow make it women's fault
it's so funny that the TQ+ is adamantly against the LGB forming our own groups and spaces despite hating us so fucking much because like it makes it so obvious that the only reason they don't want that is because without us, they're just a group of heterosexual perverts and weirdos with zero foundation to stand on and no gay people to validate the "transbians" and "gay" transmen.
100% accurate and the more lesbian, gay and bisexual people realise this the more apparent the forced teaming becomes.
this is what peaked me, going on “queer dating apps” and seeing it was completely fine for TQ+s to post “trans for trans” “no cis” “die cis scum” etc, but it was ban-able offence to post “cis lesbian for cis lesbian” or “biological female for biological female”. So uncanny and sad and infuriating to see pervy delusional heterosexual people calling themselves queer and using all sorts of made-up gender language for themselves, ousting actual homosexuals from spaces we had to make for ourselves to try and find one another.
remember this case? they lost today.
Australian Human Rights Commission says Peel hotel’s right to refuse heterosexual people was granted to help gay men achieve equality
Never forget the tumblr community except for radfems largely dismissed claims against Gaiman because the source was too "TERFY". Like let that go down in history and never be forgotten since y'all love to obsess over the "right side of history" so goddamn much.
“Idk guys it’s probably not true I mean you have to consider what the right wing media are doing to push this.”
Word for word that’s what some of you evil people were saying. And everyone wonders why female victims don’t come out more often.
Yes. Keep your fucking hands to yourself. I’m not feeling bad for any man that decides to sexually assault a woman. And people want you to believe that misogyny doesn’t exist. I think we should actually make men as afraid of us as we are of them. Make them afraid to assault us.
Free her.
'is sexual assault worthy of a death sentence?'
Yes. Always.
If he didn’t want to die maybe he shouldn’t have asked for it by assaulting her first.
by enigmatriz
It's very interesting to listen to history lectures that first say that there was no slavery at a certain period of time, and then follow it up with something like: "women didn't have the right to marry at their free will, property was passed down from father to son..." and so on.
you are absolutely sure that there was no slavery, right?
And then they'll insist that it wasn't slavery because 'slaves lacked legal personhood,' but talk about how women couldn't own property, join professional guilds, initiate litigation, vote, or maintain their citizenship upon marriage because 'their men did it on their behalf.'
and didn't even have their own names at some points (not even a first name)
Once married, women in England were literally legally subsumed into their husband’s identity - only changed by the Married Women’s Property Act
The enslavement of women isn't even *acknowledged* as slavery. And it's still going on in some parts of the world. Forced marriage, forced labour in the home, dowry paid for the woman or girl (so effectively chattel slavery), forced reproduction, sexual enslavement to husbands. No human rights. Etc.
i would believe genderists if they could give a satisfactory answer to “what is a woman?” in the same way i would believe christians if they could give a satisfactory answer to “why does evil exist?” (epicurean paradox) but we all know neither is gonna happen
the similarities are uncanny
I’m sincerely confused about why being a “terf” has become the most dangerous form of evil. Why aren’t we focusing our energy on criticizing–I don’t know–straight white males, for example? A group of women making blog posts critiquing the violent hierarchy of gender is somehow more of a threat to society than men who actually rape people, profit off of misogynistic institutions,…and actually commit acts of violence against transwomen?
There’s now a post circulating saying that “terfs are worse than neo-Nazis.” Not only is this disgustingly anti-semitic and racist, but just incredibly…nonsensical to me. Basically: females who engage in activism for other females are bigger abominations than white supremacists whose movement is centered on killing people. I feel like I’m in an upside-down universe.
Even if you are opposed to radical feminism and proudly celebrate gender, what would possess you to demonize radfems over the raping, murdering men whose oppression of us is the very reason we need feminism in the first place?
Why aren’t we focusing our energy on criticizing–I don’t know–straight white males, for example?
Because straight white males make up the majority of prominent transwomen.
1st rule of misogyny: Women are responsible for what men do. 2nd rule of misogyny: Women saying no to men is a hate crime. 3rd rule of misogyny: Women speaking for themselves are exclusionary and selfish. 4th rule of misogyny: Women’s opinions are violence against men thus male violence against women is justified. 5th rule of misogyny: Women and Feminism must be useful to men or they are worthless. 6th rule of misogyny: Women who go around being female AT men by menstruating and breast feeding babies deserve punishment. 7th rule of misogyny: Women should always be grateful to men for everything. 8th rule of misogyny: Men are whatever men say they are and women are whatever men say they are. 9th rule of misogyny: Men always know the “real reasons” for everything women do and say.
PEOPLE’S MARCH???? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?? THIS IS WHY THE LEFT STAYS LOSING BYE
The Women’s March of 2016 was the highest-profile protest of Donald Trump’s first inauguration, but just eight years later, the word “women”
women are straight up not allowed to focus on advocating against the specific form of oppression they face as women. When women attempt to band together on this shared issue, we are instantly demonized for not also talking about 8,500 other societal issues instead, then shoved aside and steamrolled.
That said, there are plenty of other sources to share about this that are not blatant hyper-conservative pro-trump nonsense mongers. I initially reblogged without reading the whole article and wowie. Talk about missing the point.
Guys, as much as I love discussing books and literature I don't think it's sensible to talk if it's "okay" to still like NG's works or not 🥴 Don't y'all think it'd be better to, who knows, focus on the victims? For now? Maybe? Perhaps? Just a thought.
So help me god if I ever seen anyone so much a breathe something about Gaiman’s supposed autism or good omen’s cancellation again I am turning off your internet. This shit i why the first victims who came out only felt like they could go on a fucking radfem TERF podcast of all places. You disgusting ghouls need to keep your whining to the group chats and shut the fuck up. Fandom is progressive this fandom is activism that and it’s about david tenant getting railed more than it is helping real flesh and blood victims of SA fuck all of you
'only felt like they could go'
Way to virtue signal by low-key shaming the victims for going to the only place that would tell their story.
There aren't any others. His publishers, family, and colleagues have been doing damage control for him for years. That's why there's a sudden deluge of information now that the dam's been broken. He's a Cosby equivalent, an open secret in the industry.
Maybe it's more productive to ask why a 'radfem TERF' podcast was the only place willing to listen to and center women.
Yeah it's time to be real. Radfems were the only ones who would listen. We broke this story when no one else would. Same with with that sex trafficking ring. It took six months and ten years respectively for everyone else to catch up.
What else are we right about that you aren't listening to because you decided we are persona non grata because we don't make excuses for men?
"gender roles are stupid" and "I'm afab, but I'm not a woman because I don't fit a certain image of womanhood" are two statements that cannot coexist unless you possess religious levels of cognitive dissonance
you are a bad person if you didn't believe the gaiman allegations the first time.
victims shouldn't have to appeal to your sense of morality for you to believe them. there will never be a "perfect" victim.
if you don't like the term "cisgender" being used for you, why?
• it's more like a slur
• it's female erasure
• it's an insult
• it's an insult sometimes, but if it just means what they say it means, I'm fine with it
• other
• im cis and I don't care if somebody calls me cis
• I'm trans/see results
if you don't like the term "cisgender" being used for you, why?
it's more like a slur
it's female erasure
it's an insult
it's an insult sometimes, but if it just means what they say it means, I'm fine
other
im cis and I don't care if somebody calls me cis
I'm trans/see results
other: because the term literally means that your internal gender identity 'matches' your physical sex, which is a fundamentally sexist and essentialist concept
I dont identify with my oppression, I'm recognizing I am by definition and adult human female
it's like insisting to atheists that we absolutely do have souls
It's also creating an artificial dichotomy that automatically positions anyone who is "not cis" above those who "are". If you're "just" a cis woman then you aren't an authority on the female experience because you can't speak to the trans experience as well.