Art Nouveau Hydrangea Plique a Jour Pendant

No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

roma★
One Nice Bug Per Day

Discoholic 🪩
Keni
Show & Tell
Cosmic Funnies
will byers stan first human second
Claire Keane
$LAYYYTER

ellievsbear
The Bowery Presents
No title available

izzy's playlists!

oozey mess
noise dept.
trying on a metaphor
Mike Driver

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malta

seen from South Korea

seen from Spain

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Greece
seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands
@mathi-arts-things
Art Nouveau Hydrangea Plique a Jour Pendant
"I Drivhuset" (1980) by Susanne Ussing — Sculpture installed at Ordrupgaardsamlingen
Arab women from Egypt
Egyptian vintage postcard
The LGBTQI+ Human rights fraternity in Uganda is celebrating a rare but significant legal victory following the decision by authorities to w
“Today, we celebrate an important victory: Wendy and Diana are finally free. We extend our deepest gratitude to everyone who stood in solidarity, raised their voices, advocated, and supported Wendy and Diana throughout this journey. Your unwavering support made a difference,” SMUG said in a post on X.
July 20, 2026
men just love to run their fucking mouth about what women do or do not want without even once considering consulting any actual women on the matter
Nike’s viral track kit is just one part of the story.
(cnn) — When Olympian Tess Howard put on her new uniform for Great Britain’s women’s field hockey team in 2021, she
The Norwegian women’s beach handball team has been fined after players opted to wear shorts instead of bikini bottoms during a European cham
Female athletes are breaking with their sports' apparel conventions -- if not regulations -- to prioritize their comfort during competitions
Sports Commentary Historically, women in sports have not garnered the same respect as men, though they perform the same tasks and play the s
Pole vaulter Holly Bradshaw refused to wear the customary bikini bottoms and crop tops favored by the majority of female athletes.
According to Women in Sport, 78 percent of girls avoid participating in sports while on their period. 78 percent. CEO of Women in Sport, St
also this is part of a disturbing but sadly not uncommon attitude that progress = women (specifically women most of the time) showing more skin. because not showing skin is "following irrational religious modesty mandates" like the man on twitter says
somehow being progressive and secular automatically means putting women's bodies on display (although of course these people would shame women showing that much skin because they chose to). gee, I wonder why...
(to be clear, religious concealing clothing should also be respected as long as it's voluntary!)
If it were really about how clothing that is not painted on sparingly is detrimental to athleticism:
Men gymnasts would wear singlets cut up to their hipbones, no shorts (vault and floor) or long pants (rings, pommel horse, high bar, parallel bars).
Men swimmers would wear the same itty-bitty Speedos that the men divers do, instead of the knee-length britches or full-body suits.
Men track and field athletes would wear bikinis instead of shorts and shirts.
Men beach volleyball players would wear banana hammocks.
And, on the flip side, you know when a sport takes its uniforms seriously when the gendered differences actually do something. Fencing kits are designed to protect you from your opponent's sword, so they're pretty standardized. Except: men fencers (should*) wear athletic cups, while women fencers wear body armor that comes in two forms, which all of the clubs that I've ever fenced with called either "Barbie chests" or "Xena pads." (For the record, I preferred the Xena pads.)**
And not only that . . . men fencers also have the choice of wearing body armor on their chests. Not all of them do (certainly not as many as wear cups down below), but when they do, we of course called them "Ken chests."
*Undergraduate men fencers can be as stupid as any other undergraduate. Once the foilists and the épée players realize that the crotch is a legitimate target area in those weapons and that their women opponents might be short enough that landing hits there is very convenient, most of them wise up and submit to the reality of wearing a cup.
**When I fenced in college, meets had officials who were required to "check" the women to see if we were in fact wearing our Barbie chests or our Xena pads. I once got "checked" so thoroughly that I had to tell the official to either back off or buy me dinner first. I don't know if the meets had officials to grope the men to see if they were wearing cups. Since it's ostensibly a safety measure, I'd just call for gender equality here. Either everyone gets groped "for safety" or you trust the fencers and no one gets groped.
Art by Yinka Shonibare
1-2. How to Blow Up Two Heads at Once (Ladies) 3-4. The Age of Enlightenment: Adam Smith 5-6. The Age of Enlightenment: Gabrielle Emile le Tonnelier de Breteuil, Marquise de Chatelet
shonibare is an absolutely fantastic disabled british-nigerian artist who combines african textiles with european colonial fashion and props to specifically question and critique the eurocentric history of african exploitation, and the way european wealth was extracted from african people and land. tumblr hates reblogs with links but i highly encourage everyone to look up his wikipedia and personal website. ive seen some of his pieces in galleries and they’re life sized, gorgeous, and incredibly haunting.
2004, Scramble For Africa
yesterday & today i've been thinking a lot about what it means to take children & teens seriously as knowledge creators. because of course people jump to the "oh so you want me to ask a 5 year old why the sky is blue act like the answer is true"
well no. but we should still be asking 5 year olds why the sky is blue. not just as a precursor to telling them the Right Answer but to encourage them to critically examine the things we take for granted every day. even if they don't know the correct answer immediately, whatever their answer is will tell you a lot about how they view the world. and it gets you as an older person in the practice of asking younger people for information instead of just assuming you have it all and they have none. and then if you ask them a question that you don't know the answer to, and they don't know the answer either, then you get to experience that process of discovery together.
this is something i need to work on. i answer a lot of "why" questions from the kids but i don't ask them many.
and then it extends to creative endeavors too. i'm a classically trained pianist & flautist and i really like that i got that experience growing up. it was one of the main ways that i got to enjoy being really good at something at a young age. but it took me a good 5 years of being absolutely miserable in piano lessons before i learned to enjoy it at all. and that was because of LABOR ALIENATION fuck ok i'm putting it all together now. i didn't get to choose what genre to play, what pieces to play, or how much to practice. my job was to reproduce The Greats with whatever little personality flair i could manage to add without bastardizing the work. i learned a lot of music theory but it was mostly so i could understand the pieces i was playing, not so i could use it to create my own work. nobody gave a shit about that.
i know i'm probably just reinventing the suzuki method or whatever but god how different would it have been if i'd been taught how to use music theory as building blocks to interpret my own experience, to create my own work. to have that as the central purpose of music education from the beginning, and then add education about historical movements & artists as a way to further inspire new creations. instead of acting like music composition is a right you have to earn.
what if we treated children's creations seriously as a body of work instead of as practice for the Real Thing. what then.
i have a friend doing piano lessons who is working on the exams before ABRSM exams (so shes rlly good at piano basically) and she absolutely hates it. her opinion of composition is that it is a task in her exams, that she has to "prepare" for composition.
on the other hand a family friend who is like 10 is encouraged to write his own songs and rlly finds joy in piano. he wrote this rlly lovely song that isnt the most expressive, beautiful thing ever, sure, but it's rlly lovely. and his family encourages it.
thats the thing i love about jazz. you are supposed to take the thing and make it your own. everything i play contains my soul
you got it exactly lmfao this post is based on my experience prepping for ABRSM too! and i LOVE playing jazz piano for the same reason. so exciting & spontaneous & beautiful. playing with a jazz band was such a magical feeling and it was also really hard to get used to after 10+ years of rote learning. i'm really glad your family friend is getting to do that, that's so special :')
My brother and I have been talking a lot about music (he is a guitarist and I don't play anything) and my friends that played music when i was in highschool made it sound like the most complicated torture labyrinth in the world, but apparently people can and do learn to play by just. picking up an instrument and messing with it until it makes neat sounds.
OKAY UNFORTUNATELY I NO LONGER HAVE ACCESS TO THE SOURCE FOR THIS
But it's stuck with me since the 1990s.
My mom studied English special education in college. And I saw a pair of pictures in one of her textbooks that haunts me to this day.
The text was discussing putting certain preconceptions on kids, and how telling kids they're "doing it wrong" stunts mental and emotional development and imagination. And the pair of images were a pair of drawings by a four-year-old boy. One showed a picture of a parrot with its wings held out like arms. It was an incredibly impressive picture for a four-year-old. It still would have been decently impressive if he'd been eight. I mean, the fact that I could identify it as a parrot should speak volumes.
His teacher told him that's not how you draw birds in flight and showed him the "m" figure that often gets used to indicate far-off birds.
The second photo was a Dr. Seussian tree (he got that there was a brown trunk and green stuff on top) with a bunch of m's.
There was a noticeable difference in quality between the first and second pictures. It was not a positive change. Unable to draw birds as he saw them, he lost interest.
I was seven or eight years old. And it was still so noticeable I, at that age, could see the difference.
It has haunted me ever since. I can't help but wonder if his teacher might have turned him off a path to becoming an artist or ornithologist. He was clearly passionate about birds, to put that much time and effort and detail--imperfect as it was!--into his parrot. And he clearly loved to draw, until he was told he was doing it wrong.
Ask kids what they think! Encourage their curiosity! They are learning! An answer you get right on the first try with no background is just a lucky guess! Let them be wrong! It's a step they have to take before they're right!
And for fuck's sake, before you speak, ask yourself if the kid is actually doing it wrong, or if it's you Being An Adult and bowing to conformity. We don't need to lose more parrots.
Not getting a ton of reporting in US news, but the Trump administration is going after donors to Palestine, including going as far as international extradition under the guide of "counterterrorism"
Article link:
Extradition request for James ‘Fergie’ Chambers sparks concerns that US government is conflating humanitarian aid with terrorism
Instead of Leaving This Hate Comment You Could Read This Book!
People Without History Are Dust
Queerness remains one of the most stigmatized and overlooked aspects of Holocaust history, often erased due to the lingering homophobia of survivors. People Without History Are Dust challenges this silence, weaving together compelling stories of German, Dutch, Czech, and Polish Jewish Holocaust victims and survivors - including Anne Frank, Molly Applebaum, Margot Heuman, and Gad Beck - whose experiences help illuminate the hidden history of queerness in a time of genocide.
Drawing on extensive archival research, this groundbreaking book uncovers the lives of those who were doubly marginalized, not only persecuted as Jews but also as queer individuals. In doing so, it confronts the ways in which history has excluded or minimized their experiences, urging us to question normative accounts of the Holocaust.
By shedding light on these long-overlooked stories, People Without History Are Dust deepens our understanding of identity, survival, and memory, reminding us why an inclusive and complex approach to history is essential - not just for the sake of the past, but in service to the present and the future as well.
*Affiliate link above*
@qelshapie I hope you don't mind me answering this question.
Imagine ID: #no but fr wtf is those tags in that screenshot
The tags in question are "#gee I wonder why Jewish victims didn't talk about being persecuted for being queer #maybe because being Jewish was the more pressing issue"
I am going to start assuming you're asking in good faith and not writing off Jews talking about the Holocaust.
Being Jewish was the more pressing issue. The Nazis were going after Jews and Roma. The reason gay people were targeted was because the Nazis believed Jews wanted to destroy the nuclear family and had created queers to destabilize families. Does that make a lick of sense? No, but nothing about Nazism does. Queer people died because of antisemitism.
Furthermore, queer people could hide. Hiding isn't a privilege, but it did allow people to survive the Holocaust without being put in a camp. There were plenty of closeted German men who never saw a death camp because they never dated a man. Hiding being Jewish, though, was a different matter.
It does not matter how observant you were. Your ethnicity, which was Jewish, was written on your birth certificate. You were listed as Jewish in census records. That's how Nazis knew who to round up. It's why the resistance blew up records offices. There were people who converted out of Judaism who were still marked because they had Jewish blood. They still lost rights. Your best bet to avoid this was to shed your identity and move to a different town but a) it's hard to leave your family behind, b) it looked suspicious if you move suddenly, and c) no one knew how bad it would get for Jews. So people didn't shed their birth identity, and they died. It doesn't matter if they were Orthodox or fully assimilated; they were murdered for having Jewish genes.
Being Jewish was seen as a genetic disease. The Nazis wiped out whole families because everyone has Jewish DNA. Meanwhile, being queer was a moral failing. If you were caught with another man, your wife and children weren't going to the camps. Just you.
I've spoken about the difference in how queer people and Jews were treated during the Holocaust here.
Ultimately, the deaths of queers was a side project. It was a fun little detour, rounding up people who might destabilize Germany, but it wasn't the goal. And to make that point, please consult this graph:
I don't know how to do an image ID for graphs. But the graph shows the Jewish death toll at 6 million, non-Jewish Polish death toll at 3 million, disabled and Romani deaths at least than a million each, and gay arrests are barely visible. There are no exact numbers given.
Please note that the other columns are deaths. That tiny orange blip? That's ARRESTS.
Being Jewish was far, far more pressing than being queer. The tags are absolutely correct.
Okay, I will admit that I am not as well-educated as I could be on the stories of individual Holocaust victims and survivors, so I can't speak about Molly Applebaum, Margot Heuman, and Gad Beck, but including Anne Frank there is a perfect demonstration of how disingenuous that original post is
Anne Frank was not persecuted for being Queer. She was persecuted - and murdered - for being Jewish
Anne Frank, by today's standards, may well be considered Queer, to the delight of everyone who thinks discussions of the Holocaust are a matter of representation, but she never got to determine that, because
Anne Frank was murdered for being Jewish
You could, if you don't think a child being murdered for being Jewish is tragic enough, argue that it's a tragedy that she never got to fully explore that part of herself, but that's about as far as you can go.
And this is in fact exactly what the tags in the screenshot seem to be talking about - Anne Frank did not talk about being persecuted for being Queer because being Jewish was the more pressing issue.
The book summary in the original post does not explicitly make the claim that Anne Frank was murdered for being Queer, but the wording (such as "the hidden history of Queerness in a time of genocide") certainly carries that suggestion, and that suggestion is an ahistorical one.
Preserving @jadwigaspeaks' tags:
#also ''question normative accounts of the Holocaust'' is a phrase that is not *inherently* a dogwhistle -#the idea that goyische civilians didn't participate in or know about the genocide happening around them is a normative account to question#- this is *already* a post that essentially accuses jews of lying about the holocaust for their own ends#so forgive me for withholding the benefit of the doubt#holocaust universalisation#holocaust tw#antisemitism#historical revisionism
drawing people i see in the city (69/?)
the replacement of websites with apps sounds so backwards when you actually describe it. like hmm you have to download an entire program onto your device each time you want access to a portal, where it takes up storage indefinitely. somebody should invent an app where you can "browse" any portal just by typing in its address... 🥴
I watched the live action version of "Can You Feel the Love Tonight" on Youtube and I was not ready for the utter lack of emotions from the CGI animals.
Nala looking concerned about Simba hiding something about his past, a comparison:
Also, in CGI this song called "Can You Feel the Love Tonight" does not take place at night.
As an older queer, allow me to say: the walls of the closet are load-bearing. It is our job as a community to stand in front of that door and tell everyone who wants to peek inside to fuck off.
There are so many reasons a person may choose not to come out and there is no reason a person would owe the public or a stranger that information. Certainly it's not owed simply because someone is famous.
We have fought for decades to make it safer for people to be open and authentic about themselves, but we are not yet there. And even if we were, the closet would still be something we need to maintain for those who are not ready to reveal that part of themselves.
May we never become so obsessed with representation that we forget the sanctity of privacy.
people who are awake before 7 and don’t seem to realize “being awake before 7” is not a universal human trait stress me out lol
I am not capable of polite & cognizant speech until a quarter coffee-pot past 11 at least, please do not try to make me Be Places or Do Things at 7-8am, I will die 😭
I'm only awake before 7 if either A: work requires it, or B: I'm up that late.
all times before 10am are imaginary.
Hunterian Museum, London
[louder than everyone] MAN I THINK IT DEPENDS!