imagine a goat with a hat
STOP-
what hat did you give the goat what is the instinctual hat you gave to this goat
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

shark vs the universe
macklin celebrini has autism
ojovivo
šŖ¼

bliss lane

blake kathryn
Fai_Ryy
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
The Bowery Presents
official daine visual archive
No title available

gracie abrams
Today's Document
Mike Driver
Monterey Bay Aquarium

No title available
will byers stan first human second

@theartofmadeline
seen from United States
seen from Portugal
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Finland

seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Switzerland
@mezereons
imagine a goat with a hat
STOP-
what hat did you give the goat what is the instinctual hat you gave to this goat
Iām literally on shift as a nurse at the hospital (but also on my 15 min break #responsibleblogger) rotating a post in my head Iāve been thinking about for a while entitled āOkay But Like IS Marta From Knives Out A Good Nurse??ā And i really do hope that post finds its way out of me and onto the page, but christ the mental draft of it is so long. Maybe I can just get away with posting the conclusion: no sheās not, and yes she is, and also itās complicated in ways that have almost no real life parallels. Surely no supporting evidence necessary.
Because while there is overlap between the definition of Good Nurse vs Good Person, nursing has a professional code of conduct. Thereās patient autonomy and safety, thereās duty of care, thereās equitable and impartial treatment, etc. So the question is: by the yardstick of our profession is she upholding the standard of care?
(And lemme sneak back here and add this to provide some context for the rest of this post. Martaās situation is affected by class, money, power, immigration, concern for loved ones, character dynamics, the concerns of the plot, Benoit Blancās whole dealābut this post isnāt about any of that. This post is just about the theoretical Best Nursing Action. This post is a case study in your third semester Patient Safety class. This post exists in the same perfect world that NCLEX questions exist in.)
By the professional standards of nursing, when she gives the medication without checking the label, she fails at doing a universal safety check that can have catastrophic consequences. Letās ignore the fact that the meds were maliciously switched (weāll get to that, itās a real fuckin wrench in everything). The fact is that she should have verified that she had the right medication rather than go by routine. Med error is so so easy in part because passing meds can become so routine. Especially in home health. You lose the fear of fucking up, you donāt check something bc youāve done it a hundred times before, oops something goes wrong.
Additionally, she fails to assess her patient. Harlan is not showing any signs of morphine overdose. (I also want to be clear as Iām saying all this: if I thought I had given someone 100x their morphine dose and then lost the narcan, my asshole would have fallen out so hard you would have heard a clunk when it hit the floor. I like to think I wouldnāt let the dramatic old man rope me into an elaborate coverup, but like. He was very convincing. Anywayā)
Most importantly, she does not admit her error. Every single person in healthcare will make a mistake. If you are lucky, it doesnāt cause any harm. If you arenāt lucky, you think about what you did for the rest of your life. Sometimes youāre lucky and you still think of what you did for the rest of your life. Whatās important is not keeping mistakes secret. It doesnāt help the patient harmed by the mistake to pretend there isnāt a problem or that you donāt know what the problem is. And on a larger scale, it doesnāt let the system know what happened, how the mistake happened, and what we can do to stop it. Marta doesnāt tell anyone what happened, largely in part bc Harlan is fucking wild and so hyped to die dramatically, but still for the point of nursing argument: she conceals her mistake.
And that causes about every problem in the film. Because if sheād been like āHarlan, this is insane, I am calling an ambulanceā (and to her creditāshe did try to call an ambulance. That crazy bitch Harlan ruined that plan) then the med switch up would have been caught because he would have been fine. So much of the situation was out of Martaās controlāliterally, malicious interference with the medication and hiding the reversal agent, like whatās she supposed to do about thatābut after the error happened, she engaged in a cover up.
And the moment in which Marta is a by the books Good Nurse is when she performs CPR and calls 911 to save someone she believes is blackmailing her and is the only person who knows Harlanās death is her fault. She is providing care to someone in need regardless of her personal situation. She is owning up to what she did to prevent further harm. In a world in which Harlan was dying from a med error, she provides the family closure regarding his traumatic suicide. Being a Good Nurse means owning up to your mistakes, even if it is too late to save the patient, because we canāt find ways to address problems we donāt know exist.
But like to get back to the murder of it all, her failure to check the medication DID prevent a catastrophic med error. Like yeah she fuckin t gave the right med! She did know it by touch! And on one hand, thatās kinda bullshit, but on the other hand, I know what dilaudid feels like when I draw it up. I know what Ativan looks like in a syringe. And to be clear I would not give anything on a purely vibes based premise, but with experience you do get a nursing sense thatās difficult to articulate. Itās knowing someone has a fever from the doorway of their room, or that someone has a GI bleed from the faint smell of their poop, or that someone is in the early stages of sepsis from a glance at their respirations, or that someoneās getting delirious from just a passing comment they make. Intuition is not a consistent safety system, and also it is an invaluable asset. Sometimes you just know something isnāt right. That cannot be the entire basis of your practice. But it helps!
Marta knew the med was right because sheād drawn it up a hundred times before. Thatās horrible safety practices, but also she was right. If sheād done the med check correctly by verifying the label on the vial, then she would have killed Harlan. So in this sense, ignoring protocol and going by pure intuition resulted in the correct decision in the context of unknown but extraordinary circumstances (Chris Evans). So like. Not sure exactly what the takeaway there is. I think mainly just murder is wrong.
And also just generally speakingāstepping back from the murder of it all once againāHarlan clearly liked her. Marta and Harlan had good therapeutic rapport, by which I mean they enjoyed each otherās company which was probably Harlanās chief need. Like medications, treatments, those are all good, but so is talking to patients like theyāre people and making them feel comfortable. I mean, she did that so good she got millions of dollars and a mansion. Girl knocked it out of the park.
So is she a Good Nurse? Iād say overall yeah. While at times throughout the movie, she is more concerned with being a Good Daughter or a Person Who Isnāt In Jail, the overall impression is a compassionate person who is normally competent at her job, tries to save others despite her personal situation, and takes responsibility for her mistakes. I think thatās why she rings true as a character who is a nurse, even if you could quibble with the exact medical details.
But like. To be clear. 1) Holy shit you should read the labels on your drugs. And 2) do not let a man with a knife throne take charge of your emergency response.
This is what I would do if I was Count Binface and I actually won:
Resign from office on the grounds that I only ran for the bants, triggering a further by-election
Immediately announce my candidacy for the by-election.
Sleeping poorly is so embarrassing... sorry im grumpy I stayed up past my bedtime. Like a toddler
hey do people know about this painting??? because it hangs in the art gallery in my city and it makes me a little insane every time i see it
anyway it's called the victory of faith (1891) and it's by saint george hare
**actually, i'm editing this to add a closeup of their faces too:
London mutuals what is there to do thatās cheap and not alcohol based?
bongs at croydon
thereās a bloke at clappham common who will suck your dick for Ā£4.50 hell even play with your balls for an extra quid
I have 0 desire to meet you let alone give you money
Ā£3.50?
Do you prefer eating organic food?
Do you prefer eating organic food?
Yes
No
filthy, filthy read
1. Does Ebert make a moral judgment on the fannish obsessions he describes here?
Yes. Obviously. He characterizes these fans as self-absorbed, socially deficient, intellectually incurious, emotionally dependent on formula, and āexcruciatingly boring.ā That is not neutral description. It is a negative judgment about their character and the way they live.
2. Does Ebert imply that a depth of knowledge about a fannish subject is inherently bad on its own?
Not quite. His stated objection is to people using expertise as a display of devotion, a source of status, or a substitute for broader interests and spontaneous social interaction.
I would argue that the rest of the review makes his position a little more clear, though.
3. Does Ebert state that this pattern of behavior is a quality of all fans?
No. He says āa lot of fans,ā āextreme fandom,ā and āsuch people.ā He is identifying a type of fan, not making a literal universal claim.
4. Did the reader see a mildly critical opinion containing the word āfandomā and immediately succumb to an emotional reaction rather than fully read and engage with the passage?
Calling people socially inept, intellectually empty, self-absorbed, and excruciatingly boring is not āmildly critical.ā It is openly contemptuous.
A person can understand the passage perfectly well and still object to it. Disagreement is not evidence of failed reading comprehension, no matter how many condescending bullet points one wraps around the accusation.
5. Did the reader see the words āsocially ineptā and immediately assume this refers solely to autistic people? Why or why not?
āSocially ineptā does not mean āautistic,ā and Ebert does not explicitly mention autism.
But the behaviors he associates with social deficiency overlap heavily with stereotypes about autistic people: intense specialist interests, encyclopedic knowledge, reliance on predictable conversational scripts, and difficulty improvising socially.
The word āsolelyā is doing dishonest work here. The relevant question is not whether the description refers exclusively to autistic people. It is whether Ebert treats traits commonly associated with autistic people as evidence that someone is socially or intellectually defective.
6. Is the job of a cultural critic to ālet people enjoy things?ā
No. Critics are allowed to criticize fandom, fan culture, consumer identity, nostalgia, and the social uses people make of art.
Readers are equally allowed to criticize the criticās assumptions, generalizations, and contempt. āA criticās job is not to let people enjoy thingsā does not mean every hostile remark made by a critic is therefore insightful.
There is also a rather important contextual omission here. Ebert did not write this as a general essay about fandom in the age of twitter, harassment campaigns, shipping discourse, or whatever present-day fandom behavior the quotation is now being aimed at.
He wrote it in his February 4, 2009 review of Fanboys, a road comedy set in 1998. So this is a late-2000s review discussing a particular stereotype of 1990s fandom. The film follows a group of friends who plan to break into Skywalker Ranch so that their terminally ill friend can see The Phantom Menace before he dies. Ebertās argument is that the movie identifies too closely with its heroes and should have mocked them more. The rest of the review makes his position much less ambiguous. He calls their fandom āan idiotic lifestyle,ā describes them as ātragically hurtling into a cultural dead end,ā dismisses their knowledge as having āno purpose other than being mastered,ā and ends with a joke about their mothers cleaning up after them.
there are places in the world today that are experiencing 40°C for the first time in recorded history. of course there's no way to know whether chucking billionaires into volcanos will appease the sun god but i feel we're doing the scientific method a disservice if we don't at least try
You have to read all the books in your bedroom before you can leave. How long will you be trapped?
There's no books in there, I can leave immediately
Less than a day
1-3 days
4-6 days
1-3 weeks
4-7 weeks
2-3 months
4-6 months
7-11 months
1-2 years
3 years or more
Results
You can't die from hunger or thirst or lack of medication etc.
It doesn't matter which books you've already read. You have to read them all, starting from now.
Physical books only - if you have an e-reader in there you don't have to read your entire digital library.
You inspired me to make my own summer reading challenge (and get some stickers for incentive)!
oh I LOVE this. the categories are amazing
itās weird that professional letters are supposed to start with ādear.ā i donāt even call my mom that
my darling hiring manager. my springtime rose. if hired i will bring a strong work ethic to this position
im curious about a specific generational divide
regardless of you being queer or not, did your parents ever gave you the "if you turn out to be gay it would be fine" talk, before you ever had the chance to say anything on your own about that?
gen z, yes
gen z, no
millenial, yes
millenial, no
gen x, yes
gen X, no
baby boomer, yes
baby boomer, no
because it happened to me and im wondering if this was a product of the ongoing cultural change around gay issues. before i ever had the chance to say to my parents "i am this" my mom was already sitting me aside to tell me "if there is anything you want to tell me, i want you to know ill accept you no matter what"
Dahling you simply must read this book! Itās all about this devious little caterpillar who simply gorges himself on all manner of divine things
The hanged man
Reflecting
something uniquely embarrassing about people who big up how varied and highbrow their taste in film and, because they know themselves to be Very Good at watching all types of things, they can only really conceptualize anything they don't immediately gel with as some sort of non art and fans as people who would wake up to this lack of artistic merit in a sort of allegory of the cave way if they were exposed to Real Films