a heem heem………………………………sshasagjkrhf………… ouhg……..
My husband found it necessary to get the thing for me and I love it.
Be sure to remember Sad™’s birthday next August.
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
art blog(derogatory)
Game of Thrones Daily

tannertan36
Mike Driver
almost home
Claire Keane

titsay
will byers stan first human second
No title available
No title available

JBB: An Artblog!
todays bird
RMH

shark vs the universe
Cosmic Funnies

★
sheepfilms
Stranger Things
styofa doing anything

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@mr-joespooky
a heem heem………………………………sshasagjkrhf………… ouhg……..
My husband found it necessary to get the thing for me and I love it.
Be sure to remember Sad™’s birthday next August.
Call the nurse burn the church et cetera et cetera
Damn dude, are you a fitted sheet? Cuz you’re complicated as fuck and really hard to figure out, but I desperately need you on this fucking mattress.
“source?” i can feel it in me bones
> you encounter a group of coelacanth.
archivist gerard au luvs
elias: could you try being more... subtle about your powers
gerard, already tattooing every joint on his body: can’t hear you old fart
it’s so hard to imagine gerard sitting around reading statements because you know that boy would be out and about doing weird shit with his beholding powers and taking statements direct from subject constantly
gerard, having tied up another avatar: statement taken direct from subject, 20th april, 2020. blaze it. statement begins.
the strange and charming transsexuals and i saw you from across the bar and we were wondering if you wanted to go to the creekbed to look for brachiopod fossils together
Velvet Worm by Thomas J Astle
Velvet worms are a group of soft-bodied, many-legged panarthropods that prey upon smaller animals such as insects, which they catch by squirting an adhesive slime. There are approximately 200 species of velvet worm described.
Slipper lobsters go seriously hard. No fr they’re so swag and full of merriment
What if I was a slipper lobster and you were an isopod and we were best friends and ate a carcass
today’s isopod is Armadillidium vulgare “Orange Vigor,” an orange mutation of the common pillbug or roly-poly.
they still show yellow scrawls and varying shades of base color, like the wild gray form, with males tending to be dark and patternless and females brighter and with more markings.
Just a tangerine
anything is a trans allegory if you’re not a little bitch about it
people always take descartes out of context. so few know the full quote is "come on and slam, i think therefore i am"
moleskine = bad
IT’S SO BAD AND I HATE IT
moleskine makes people hate pens and is probably a huge part of why so many people give up on good pens.
to folks who might not know, moleskine is extremely famous AND infamous. they are hardcover notebooks with elastic enclosures. they are expensive, and sold everywhere from pharmacies to bookstores, and does collaborations with a variety of brands including james bond and pokemon. moleskine has tried to establish itself as a luxury notebook, which it technically is.
as long as you do not write in it.
moleskine paper is wholeheartedly shit. it is complete fucking garbage. you might wonder, what makes good paper? well the first thing is how well it can be written on. good paper can handle ink well. good ink handling means clear, solid lines without any feathering (fuzzy spreading), not bleeding through the page, and not ghosting. basically, you want paper that can do crisp lines with a variety of different inks and be used on both sides.
moleskine does not do that. anything more than a ballpoint or pencil will look fuzzy and gross and bleed right through the fucking page. the paper is shit. and that makes people think their pen is shit. and ballpoint pens can be seen on the other side of the page.
common knowledge is that fountain pens, rollerball pens, gel pens, felt pens, and more work better on good paper. good meaning good with ink. but when many people think good paper without knowing any better, they will reach for a moleskine notebook. because moleskine is expensive and advertises itself as good and is widely available. so people try out actually good writing implements on this shit paper, see how bad it works, and then blame the pen.
fountain pens, gel pens, and rollerball require much less pressure than ballpoint pens. they are ergonomic. easier on joints, easier for chronic pain. and moleskine makes people give up on them. nobody wants shitty bleeding feathered lines.
in the united states, our ideas of good paper and good stationery in general are extremely warped. so much of this is because paper here fucking sucks. a lot of paper performs like moleskine. there is shit paper at all price ranges. but you can pick up caliber brand paper (the ones that say made in vietnam) from cvs and have infinitely better performance for pennies. even though it looks low quality, caliber paper (vietnam) can even handle calligraphy ink clearly. bad paper makes people hate good pens and bad pens make people hate writing.
another thing really important to mention, a lot of people think thick paper is always better. this is extremely wrong. in terms of being able to handle a wide variety of inks clearly and cleanly, some of the best paper in the world is tissue thin (tomoe river).
do not buy moleskine. even if the stand is right there. they have some of the worst paper you can get at that price point. expensive paper is not always good paper, good pens need good paper, moleskine paper makes good pens seem awful, and moleskine is something you should only give to someone you loathe.
THIS.
God Moleskine is such a frustrating product, and as an aspiring stationer, I hate that it’s so popular in North America. They’re beautifully constructed, yes, but god the 70gsm paper that they use is SUCH GARBAGE when it comes to inks wetter than a ballpoint pen. They do offer heavier paper - 100-200gsm weight - but only in extremely expensive, large, or difficult to find products.
Leuchtturm 1917 produces great sketching books and, if you get their 120gsm notebooks, they hold up to inks fantastically. Their standard notebooks come in 80gsm paper, and that does hold up to fountain pen ink much better than Moleskine, but while you do get much less feathering and bleeding, there is still some bleedthrough with wetter pens.
Now, if you want the finest fountain pen paper I’ve found in a notebook format, you want Maruman’s Mnemosyne 183. It’s also an 80gsm paper, but it’s treated and laid in such a way that there’s no feathering or bleeding, even with a very wet fountain pen.
That said though, honestly the best notebook I have, in terms of accessibility, expense, and quality of paper, is a Brandz United notebook that I got for my birthday a few years back. It’s not anything special, in terms of paper weight - I can’t find anything concrete, but it feels like 80gsm to me - but it barely feathers and you need to really saturate the page for it to bleed through.
Also, if you’re looking for loose paper, I highly recommend Tomoe River’s paper - so fine and thin you can practically see through it, but it holds ink like a sponge, doesn’t bleed, has no feathering, and is smooth as glass. For correspondence, though, I am a fan of G. Lalo’s Pur Vélin, which is a 125gsm 50% cotton and 50% wood pulp paper. It’s absolutely beautiful and has just enough grain to it that there’s a super pleasant tactile feedback when you’re writing.
And if you want to go a lil’ bit fancy with gorgeous designs (and I mean GORGEOUS designs), look up Castelli.
My current fave. No feathering, no bleeding, works perfect with ballpoint pens and with fountain pens, and the paper is super smooth. I’ve literally written novels in these fuckers. Also: cheaper than moleskine.
@jimtheviking already mentioned Leuchtturm; I’m adding Black n’ Red, Clairefontaine and Rhodia.
All have better paper than Moleskine, which has been milking its early reputation for years while product quality went downhill. Now they’re just another Lifestyle Accessory for people who shop by brand-name.
I know I have a lot of artists who see my stuff
So, to recap
moleskine paper is wholeheartedly shit. it is complete fucking garbage.
Oh, so a little cannibalism is "problematic" now?
I mean, yes, prion disease alone is a serious issue, nevermind all the other disease propagation potential inherent in consuming flesh so genetically close to your own. Stick to ritual symbolic cannibalism like the Christians, it’s better for your health and public health in general.
God forbid women do anything
today my wisdom is: the ecological crisis of our planet is not a thing that will Suddenly destroy us sometime in the next century—it has taken decades of continuous work for our biosphere to be preserved thus far, and it will take decades more of continuous work to continue preserving it.
The apocalypse is not a single event hovering in the future bearing down on us while we sit helplessly. We are at least 150 years into an ongoing "apocalypse."
Things will continue to steadily get worse without steady action, but "augh! it's already too late to stop climate change and mass extinctions!" is specifically the worst response
>i am given a choice of 3 doors. two have goats. one has car >i choose door #1 >door #2 is revealed to me to have a goat
"game theorists" justify to me why i am playing the game wrong if i don't switch to door #3. because from where i am standing you are all insane and taking schrodinger's cat in the wrong direction. door #1 does not magically become worse as a choice if it's revealed i didn't make the wrong choice and the right choice is not there yet.
i am not decreasing my odds by not swapping to door #3. by sticking with door #1 my odds have not changed in step 2 of the game. i am choosing door #1 instead of door #3, which still gives me a 50/50 shot of winning a car and not a goat.
the key to this apparent paradox is something they don’t usually say explicitly: the host is not allowed to open the door you picked.
at the beginning of the game you picked door #1. suppose it does have the car behind it: then the host can open either of the other two doors, and you will lose by switching. but, if door #1 has a goat behind it, then the host must open the door with the other goat behind it, and you will win by switching.
thus, you win by switching if and only if you didn’t pick the the car at the beginning of the game -- and your odds of not having picked the car at the beginning of the game are 2:1, so your odds of winning by switching are also 2:1.
if the host was allowed to open the door you picked, then they wouldn’t be forced to reveal the second goat when you’d picked the first goat, and that would make your intuition accurate: revealing one goat would leave you with 1:1 odds of winning by switching.
triops are one of my all-time fave little guys
#congrats on making it back to the cambrian