trying to give a object an eating disorder means you have to figure out how objects eat.im spiriling. Jeff you should never have tried to learn biology and then watch battle for dream island
i understand why folks turn off reblogs on a post but part of me always feels so betrayed by unrebloggable posts on my dash. like oh okay shops closed? just when i get to the door
Apologies if there's any inconsistency between the first 4 images and the last 2 images (i forgot to continue working on the visuals for nearly a month)
My abortion was really one the most hated kind of abortion. I wasn't underage. I wasn't raped. I wasn't in medical need.
I got pregnant not through some fluke or 1 in a 100 contraceptive failure. I got pregnant because I was knowingly and willfully having unprotected sex. Out of wedlock too if that matters.
It was my own fault, I was being irresponsible because I knew I could always get an abortion if I got pregnant. My abortion was as close as it comes to 'using abortion as a contraceptive' as anti-choicers love to say.
I didn't abort it because my health was in danger or because I didn't have the ability to care for it or whatever else. I did it purely because I didn't want a child. I wanted sex and I didn't want to deal with any consequences from it.
There's no moral here. I don't feel bad about it whatsoever. I suffered no karmic consequences or punishment from god. My life is amazing. I want to rub this in the face of every conservative and anti-choicer. I did the terrible thing. I had an abortion for the most selfish of reasons and literally nothing happened. Suck it.
*as in other objects kinning other object types (e.x., a telephone kinning a clock) within the fictional world. this guide is not to discredit anyone and their experiences but rather my take on it fictionally. always open to conversation and debate.
1. What “kinning” even means in this context
In an anamorphic object world, an object usually has:
a physical category (coin, CD, sponge, etc)*
a social role attached to that category
an implied function or expectation, or at the very least what certain objects should NOT be doing.
When an object “kins” another object type, it usually fits without one or more of these categories:
identity resonance
aspirational selfhood
coping or misidentification
symbolic self-translation
literally feeling like another object.
So a key who kins a lock might not be a lock, but feels more aligned with:
being opened by others rather than opening things
being stationary, waited on, depended on
existing as a threshold rather than a tool
literally feeling like a lock
honestly it would probably be more.. transgender kinda in nature? in my mind i don't think objects being different types of object is the same as people here wanting to be different type of species but the nuance is still there. more arbitrary, built around personality/actions/looks rather than objecthood itself.
2. Why this would naturally happen in object societies
A. Functional dysphoria
Some objects are deeply uncomfortable with their “intended” use.
A knife kins a spoon → hates sharpness, violence, expectations of harm.
A battery kins a charger/outlet → resents being drained, wants constant connection instead
A receipt kins a diary → wants permanence, not disposability
B. Social mirroring and proximity
Objects surrounded by one type may internalize it.
A plastic cup raised among glassware may kin fragile, “classy” objects despite being durable.
A nail raised in a family of screws might kin screws due to perceived competence and respect.
C. Survival and narrative coping
Sometimes, a way to survive a something you can’t escape.
A medal kins trash → emotionally prepares for being discarded
A remote kins a button → simplifies identity to avoid responsibility
A mannequin kins a mirror → reframes being looked at as reflection rather than objectification.
3. How society reacts to kinning
Different cultures would respond differently, I'd imagine. Two examples below, but the possibilities really go on forever.
A. Acceptance
Even in “accepting” societies, kinning is rarely treated as fully real
“That’s just how they express themselves!”
“It’s a phase.”
“They’re just being metaphorical.”
This frames kinning as aesthetic, emotional, and harmless as long as it doesn’t interfere with productivity. Once kinning does affect how an object behaves, works, or refuses certain roles, tolerance collapses. For example, A USB who kins a power adapter is allowed to talk about it; but the moment they refuse to do something or complain because “that’s not what adapters do,” it becomes a problem.
B. Utility-first
In many object worlds, usefulness isn’t just economic, it’s moral.
Believes objects are born with an inherent role, and function = identity. Deviating from function is wasteful. Here, kinning is framed as malfunction, miscalibration, inefficiency, entitlement. (“You think you’re better than what you are?”)
rap is awesome btw anyone who screams about it being overstimulating or bad is just racist. like i'm a ~high support needs~ autist with brain damage. crazy... how rap has never bothered me in the slightest.... 🤔 isn't that interesting . you'd think i would be the most sensitive to the apparently "oh-so-overstimulating" rap music..... maybe you should just get your shit together or admit the real reason you avoid it !
dude 😭 you can't make posts like this without people proving you right!!!! get away!! get off my post!!!! oh my g-d!!!! white devils one billion white devils
theartofmadeline
areudirty
pixelskylines
snowghoul
origamiaround
turnnoffyourmind
vaporwave
