Apparently somebody Did at least once
@ominous-signs
Official ominous sign
ojovivo

PR's Tumblrdome

JVL
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

shark vs the universe

bliss lane

Love Begins
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Noah Kahan
Claire Keane
taylor price
Xuebing Du

titsay

#extradirty
RMH

gracie abrams

No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
trying on a metaphor

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from Belgium
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Ecuador
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from India
@pandaofsecrets
Apparently somebody Did at least once
@ominous-signs
Official ominous sign
How important are birthdays and ages in stories?
Both are equally important
Birthdays are more important
Ages are more important
Neither are important
Unless you're really pedantic about timelines birthdays don't really matter all that much. Ages do matter, though, especially when you're talking about teenage characters. Even a two year difference can mean a gigantic gap in maturity. Even if you're willing to be a little vague with that, the characters' age relative to each other will also completely alter the dynamics. It's why I'll never get over Luka being retconned from Juleka's older brother by two years to her twin. Those are not the same thing, writers.
MY NAME, IS FRICKIN MOON MOON. I’D BE THE MOST IDIOTIC WOLF. ‘OH SHIT WHO BROUGHT FUCKING MOON MOON ALONG?’
the post that started it all
oh god
Never not reblogging.
I’ve only seen this post in screenshots
I’m very surprised this post hasn’t broken a million.
Jet from atla is so funny bc like, he's fighting zuko and taunting him being like "bet you wanna use some fire instead of those swords, dont u fireboy" which is a funny thing to say to a guy who is clearly very eager to fight using swords
someone pointed out (1) time how big of an a-hole move it would have seemed like for jet to accuse the kid with the giant visible burn scar on his face of fire bending.
not only was zuko very clearly eager to fight using swords, i'm betting several members of that crowd were also eager to see zuko kick jet's ass with said swords
Epic tag discourse going on here
# There is no good conclusion to come to about Zuko’s scar.
This is the truth. Zuko’s scar is too carefully placed and too old to be anything other than the act of a firebender deliberately burning a child. A child who would have been held or restrained in some way for the damage to be so contained.
That’s the sort of thing that once the tea shop patrons realized that, it didn’t matter where “Li” was from, only that he never be forced to go back.
Im so sick and tired of people claiming that the current Marinette Controll Arc is 'balancing out' Chat Noir having issues in the early show. In the early show, both Chat and Marinette had 'unrequited crush' issues. But the narrative even then treated them very different. Adricat was actually really good about staying on the 'Im honest with my emotions but acknowledge you dont owe me anything'-side of the 'unrequited love sure is a bitch'-spectrum. Only having 3 or 4 incidents across 4 seasons where his detractors claim he almost-crossed it. Chat in the early show knew very well that his affection was unreciprocated and didn't even pretend his feelings needed to be answered in the positive. His interactions were tinged with flirtation, but they were honest and clearly safe for refusal. Contrasted by Marinette, who crossed moral boundaries for her unrequited love as part of regular episodic structure, to the point of a running gag. And was egged on at every opportunity by her girlsquad to continue breaking more. With the notion of possible-maybe-refusal consistently treated as a fate worse then death. Which is to say that, though obviously Adrien couldn't outright say 'I only like you as a friend' because he didnt know her affection. The idea of him refusing a hang-out scheme was consistently treated like him denying Marinette a victory to which she was entitled. Where Adriens unrequited love was safe-to-refuse and communicated with open honesty. Marinette's affections were treated as a moral obligation and constantly cloaked in schemes, duplicity and manipulation. (IE: Setting up date-activities under false pretenses, the various attacks on other girls).
Marinette's "S5 god-complex abuse apologism gaslight tour" isn't balancing out early cat. Early Marinette's own struggles with unrequited affection did.
Casual reminder that this used to be common fucking knowledge in this fandom. That Marinette's and Chat Noir's behaviour served to balance each other's out. The problems came with season 4's retooling now catering the show's entire moral system to Marinette and her stans.
So whatever favoring Marinette already got back then due to being the main character got amplified by a 1000 and turned into a #girlboss incel's moral disaster of a paradise.
This is how we are now at the point where Marinette in Werepapas is willing to risk killing Adrien with her own hands because the mere thought of risking a future where he wouldn't wanna marry and fuck her anymore is treated as a fate worse than (HIS) death.
She'd rather grief him than in the end "just" being a dear and close friend of his.
Mostly true. But remember that Adrien salters were always this bad at media literacy.
The current "it's not Marinette's job to tell Adrien about the secrets she made everyone else keep from him" is the direct successor to "Chat Noir wanting to be included in this team he's a founding member of is really selfish of him actually".
Like, even pre season 4 there were people who actively ignored Marinette's stalking/ bullying Adrien's friends who happened to be girls. In order to paint Adrien as a misogynist.
All the Maripologist talking points are just recycled Adrien salter nonsense. The main difference being that now the fandom is perfectly fine with abuse apologism as long as you package it as jokey fanart. I mean, as being "pro-Marinette".
"Chat is a harasser, Chat never takes no for an answer!!"
..and yet..Marinettes the only one of the two that's stolen his phone, stalked him countless times in each season to see what he's up to, planned several dates and weddings, broken into his house, tried to sabotage a girl cuz she liked the same guy as her. Gets weird whenever he's in the same area as her..and now, she stalked his friend cuz she felt 'inadequate ' and THEN when Adrien told her he didn't wanna go to the movie night (twice mind you) she assumed he would just show up, disregarding his 'No'
..but yeah. CHATS the fucking problem, yeah ADRIEN doesn't know how to act 🤨
Both of them have their faults, but when Adrien "doesn't take no for an answer" it happens out in the open, when the other person can see and respond to that. Marinette will go behind people's backs and try to maneuver the situation in such a way that the other person doesn't even know there was a say to be had, which is 1000 times worse.
Twilight Deleted Scenes: “I do love it when men chase me” (requested by @copperspoon)
Laurent:
sorry i’m reblogging this again but this just makes me so fucking angry. this reminds me of those dudes running game of thrones who had virtually no experience and were allowed to just. treat a multimillion dollar franchise as their little fuck-around-and-learn-about-tv sandbox. why are white men with no credentials allowed to get away with this over and over again while the rest of us have to fight tooth and nail for literal crumbs. i fucking hate the entertainment industry
tfw you realize you put more thought into your self indulgent fanfic in middle school than someone in charge of a multimillion dollar franchise that employs thousands of people and is watched by millions.
I know you’re more of an “Adrien centered” criticism/defense blog but I am curious about your opinion on this.
What is your opinion on the “Chloe deserves/doesn’t deserve redemption” situation or the “Chloe wasn’t meant to be redeemed and there for what happened to her is fair game” stance?
---
My thoughts on the Chloé situation are kinda complex. Back when the show only had three seasons, I did think Chloé’s character trajectory made sense. Sure, she’d saved people when she was acting as Queen Bee, but she still treated her classmates the same. In fact, she started treating Sabrina worse than before because she considered being anything other than Queen Bee hanging out with Ladybug was slumming it. For me, it really was a 50/50 on whether or not Chloé would be redeemed or fall into actual villainy.
Because, here’s how I saw it: I didn’t think Chloé was an actual villain-villain in seasons 1-3. She was Marinette’s school nemesis and a decidedly defanged one. Marinette was scared of her exactly once, in Origins, a flashback episode meant to showcase how much more confident being Ladybug has made Marinette that she views Chloé as small potatoes. The season 3 finale could have been the culmination of an arc where Marinette accidentally causes Chloé to become a villain and ally herself with Hawk Moth in the future.
And it would have been caused by Marinette, even if unintentionally. It would have shown how good intentions can have unforeseen consequences, especially when you don’t know what you’re helping someone with or what they want before you do so. Marinette doesn’t really understand what she’s trying to help people with whenever she does try to be helpful, because she assumes what they want and need instead of asking and listening (like in Reflekdoll, the latter part of Ikari Gozen and Quilt Trip). Many heroes create their own villains this way, and Marinette could have done so as well since she was the one to strengthen Chloé’s bond with the person who taught her to be an entitled bully and then she dragged her feet on whether or not she could use the Bee Miraculous.
The season 3 finale shows Chloé brought to a new low. The following New York Special gives us a glimpse of a Chloé who is withdrawn, like she’s reconsidering her life. This could have led to Chloé deciding that she would have revenge on Ladybug for leading her on and then dumping her (as a teammate). But, it could have also have led to Chloé realizing that, while Ladybug wasn’t her friend, Sabrina was, and she pushed the latter away in pursuit of being the Bee Miraculous holder. Chloé could have gained new insight that would have led her to start working on how she treats those closest to her, finally starting to treat her schoolmates with decency and, maybe, with time, kindness.
Then season 4 came along and all that foreshadowed introspection was dumped out the window in favor of having Chloé do cartoonishly stupid school antagonist character things. In season 4, where this kind of hijinks are so incredibly low-stakes that it’s both laughable to see, and laughable to realize the writers think this is good television.
I think the writers realized this too, because then comes season 5 with the retcon that, actually, Chloé is an evil mastermind who is so heinous that she orchestrated a traumatic event that led to Marintette’s character flaws and therefore Marinette should be forgiven for her flaws and Chloé blamed for them. Never mind the damage this episode does to Kim’s character, turning him from an oblivious to jock to a total creep, it also tries to convince us that Chloé is this big threat despite that it happened at least a year ago in-universe and that she had never done anything even close to this bad since. It just makes no sense when contrasting with the early seasons, where Marinette treats Kim as just one classmate among many and Chloé as a low-threat nuisance.
The problem was that they decided that they didn’t want Marinette to hold any responsibility for anything she does anymore. This is why they wrote the episode ‘Derision’, to absolve Marinette of all responsibility in her stalking of Adrien, even though them making it a serious trauma response instead of a cartoon-logic joke means that now she absolutely should take responsibility for her behavior and get therapy. Because they wanted to give Marinette a retroactive justification, the episode just doesn’t mesh with the rest of the show. But, like, the writing in Miraculous seasons 4-5 is so bad it’s of course never just about a single episode, it’s all about how the Miraculous writers don’t know how to build up arcs that then come to a logical conclusion, which is why all their story arcs’ endings fall flat and leave viewers thinking “where’s the rest of it?” when they’re not considered one of the worst finales for a show.
Basically, making Chloé a villain could have worked, but it would have required her getting built up into such a status. The Chloé of seasons 1-3 isn’t a monster, she’s a brat. But the writers didn’t want to do that work despite wanting that story, thinking some repetitive episodes of Chloé being a brat some more will accomplish the same thing. So, Chloé just keeps performing petty bullying until the writers think the viewers forgot that she’s like this because of her mother, who Marinette reunited her with, all the while pretending the woman who calls her by the wrong name to her face on purpose has done nothing wrong as a parent other than “leave”, before she randomly turns on Miss Bustier and starts working with Hawk Moth for supposedly no reason in Collusion.
And, like, the thing that really grinds my gears is that it worked. So many people forgot that Chloé’s bullying was modeled to her by her mother, who Marinette reunited her with. Marinette repeatedly tries to fix abused kids’ relationships to their parents with no regard for how that could harm them in the long run (Adrien, Chloé and Kagami). It’s a pattern, but the show thinks Marinette’s missteps shouldn’t be pointed out because she “had good intentions” when her intentions in the instances of The Bubbler, Style Queen and Ikari Gozen were nothing more than: “Well, my parents are great, so these kids are obviously safe with the parents I just saw make them miserable!” The accusing finger for Chloé’s behavior should be pointed at Audrey. Marinette being “triumphant” over Chloé because Chloé is now stuck with the abuser who made her is already iffy without the added grossness of Marinette being the one who reunited them in the first place.
why are people so against negative character development? characters don’t need to improve and become better people they can get worse and make mistakes and end up in a worse state than when they began and it’s just as interesting and entertaining as characters developing positively
Just a reminder that Bella and Jacob's fathers are named Billy and Charlie so by the law of Bella making the worst possible decisions her son with Jacob would have been named Barley
And then presumably when Edward falls in love with Barley he'll nickname him Bar-Bar Binks but human Bella won't be able to beat his ass for it
Behold, the worst written line of all time:
Aro laughed. “Ha ha ha,” he giggled.
-Stephenie Meyer New Moon
Good lord
Please tell me that this is not real
these are the only times he laughs in New Moon that i could find
i was really bored
audreyii-fic
*eye spasm*
you once said you're not a fan of Marinette being a fashion designer because of the show being 3D. do you have an idea of what you think would've worked better?
Honestly, I'd rather the show was 2D animated. It's not just the fashion designer thing, the show also does a ton of anime-esque visual gags that straight-up don't work in 3D. That being said, if the crew really wanted the show to be 3D, they should've had Marinette design literally anything other than clothing. I'd go with Marinette wanting to become an engineer and designing a lot of Rube Goldberg machines, mostly because we already have some of that in canon with her diary box in Darkblade.
Also, while we're on this topic, I just can't see Marinette being a fashion designer in the traditional sense. She strikes me as the type to have a small tailor's shop where she designs custom-made clothing, not really making the kind of (un)wearable art pieces you see on runways. And the show seems to agree with me, because in Pretension, she has this to say to Gabe: "You're wrong! Fashion is about listening to people, it's about understanding who they are, what excites them and creating the clothes that will help them express their inner world. Help them connect with others and make their dreams come true."
If you see this post, back up your writing
Official ominous sign
1hr sketch practice i forgot to post here
“Don’t worry, we’ll find you a teacher. There are plenty of amazing earthbenders out there.“
“Not like her.”
For @rllyaangrlly, who was requesting more Taang edits!