photos vs paintings!
About 35 minutes each!
Jules of Nature
Today's Document
No title available
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON

★
𓃗
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

PR's Tumblrdome
The Stonewall Inn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
hello vonnie
tumblr dot com
icyghini twinkie
Claire Keane

gracie abrams
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
noise dept.

@theartofmadeline
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Nigeria

seen from Singapore

seen from Bahamas
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Bahamas
seen from China
@paniniwitharugula
photos vs paintings!
About 35 minutes each!
but on the real though, here is your guide to assyrian rice preparation from your friendly neighborhood assyrian:
start wanting rice. (or, if you are traditional, simply recognize your constant desire for rice.)
measure out two cups of rice. then one more. then two more. then another. this seems fine. you love rice. there is no way that this will backfire on you.
remember that your great-great-uncle’s recipe says it should be soaked overnight.
become consumed with despair.
decide to soak it for half an hour instead, acknowledging that the final product will be inferior and anger your ancestors but will still satisfy your now almost-overwhelming need for rice to be inside your body much faster.
remember that you should have set the water to boil when you soaked the rice. goddammit.
once the water boils, put the rice in until it is half-cooked. the eyeballing or intuitive method is less effective than a timer but that’s how your aunt does it so you feel compelled to meet her standards.
now that the rice has fluffed up, realize how much rice six dry cups really is. holy shit. you’ve fucked up immeasurably.
take a minute to dwell upon your failings.
grease a baking dish with butter. this will never be as elegant as you want it to and your fingers will get greasy, but the slightly shameful, self-indulgent joy of licking your fingers afterwards will make up for it.
pour the rice into the dish. wonder immediately if you actually buttered the dish beforehand and if you’ve just fucked up.
melt approximately one thousand pounds of butter in the microwave and pour it over the rice, pondering your imminent death from rapid-onset arterial clogging. put a small pat of butter on the top to properly gild the lily.
put your pan into the oven, which you have absolutely preheated after your previous lack of foresight. shake the rice once or twice while it bakes to make sure the butter is well distributed. resist the impulse to climb into the oven with the rice. for the last ten minutes, sit next to the oven and count the seconds until it’s done.
remove the dish from the oven. shed a tear or two at the perfection laid before you. if you are dining with others, this is the time to serve the rice while making passive-aggressive statements about how oh no, you don’t need any help, you just made dinner all by yourself, you can serve everyone as well. (this is still fun if done alone, but optional.)
CONSUME THE RICE.
realize that you have eaten half of the dish in one sitting. no matter how much rice you made, this will always happen.
put the leftovers away, if there are any, and enjoy a cup of chai while marveling at the amount of food you have just eaten. if possible, fall asleep in an armchair, sitting up, head tilted slightly back, like a grandpa.
for the rest of the evening, think fondly of how much rice you have in the fridge now and how many meals it will supplement, refusing to acknowledge that you will almost certainly eat the rest of it in a few hours for a midnight meal.
i really played myself with this post huh. every time it gets a note i start wanting rice.
for anyone who wants it, here is my family’s actual recipe for assyrian baked rice:
1lb / approx. 2 ⅓ cups basmati rice (any long-grain rice will do)
3 tbsp salt
8 tbsp / 1 stick butter (you can reduce this if you don’t want to have a heart attack)
Put the rice in a pot and cover it in cold water and salt. Let it soak overnight. (If you don’t have the time to soak it, rinse the rice with cold water until it runs clear.)
Edit: The reason you want to soak basmati and other aromatic rice before cooking is to preserve more acetylpyrroline, the compound that gives aromatic rice its characteristic scent and flavor. Soaking rice allows the grains to absorb water, which reduces the cooking time, which means less time for the acetylpyrroline to cook off. It’ll still taste pretty good if you can’t do this, but you don’t want “pretty good”, you want mind-blowing, so for that perfect flavor you’ll want to soak your rice overnight. The soaking process also washes away the layer of starch on the outside of the rice, which allows the grains to separate rather than sticking together; this is why you want to rinse your rice thoroughly if you don’t have time to soak it.
Preheat your oven to 325°.
Boil three quarts of water in a separate pot. Once it’s at a fast boil, drain the rice and add it to the water. Boil for 5-7min or until one grain tastes half-cooked, but not soft. Pour the rice into a colander and rinse with cold water.
Edit: This step also helps get rid of any remaining starch on your grains, for perfectly separated rice. If your colander or strainer has large holes, you can put a paper towel/cheesecloth/clean dishcloth on the inside in order to drain your rice. Pour carefully if you’re using a paper towel, though, and put a bowl underneath your colander; I once lost a heartbreaking amount of rice when my paper towel got oversaturated and tore open.
Liberally grease the bottom of your baking pan with some of your butter. Pour the rice on top. Melt the rest of the butter in the microwave and pour on top of the rice.
Bake for 45min. (If you like, cover the rice for part or all of the baking time, but I find it gets less crispy on top if you do this.) Shake the pan a couple times during baking to ensure that the butter distributes throughout the entire dish.
Eat.
Serves four. Can easily be scaled up if needed (or down, but why would you do that?). Best enjoyed with a nice cup of chai.
(cc @raisedbyhyenas )
reblog for the awesome recipe and to make op want rice (rice is so good. ofc you want rice)
>:(
“Teachers are often unaware of the gender distribution of talk in their classrooms. They usually consider that they give equal amounts of attention to girls and boys, and it is only when they make a tape recording that they realize that boys are dominating the interactions. Dale Spender, an Australian feminist who has been a strong advocate of female rights in this area, noted that teachers who tried to restore the balance by deliberately ‘favouring’ the girls were astounded to find that despite their efforts they continued to devote more time to the boys in their classrooms. Another study reported that a male science teacher who managed to create an atmosphere in which girls and boys contributed more equally to discussion felt that he was devoting 90 per cent of his attention to the girls. And so did his male pupils. They complained vociferously that the girls were getting too much talking time. In other public contexts, too, such as seminars and debates, when women and men are deliberately given an equal amount of the highly valued talking time, there is often a perception that they are getting more than their fair share. Dale Spender explains this as follows: “The talkativeness of women has been gauged in comparison not with men but with silence. Women have not been judged on the grounds of whether they talk more than men, but of whether they talk more than silent women.” In other words, if women talk at all, this may be perceived as ‘too much’ by men who expect them to provide a silent, decorative background in many social contexts.”
—
PBS: Language as Prejudice - Myth #6: Women Talk Too Much (via misandry-mermaid)
Every EVERY women’s studies class I’ve been in has had this problem and failed to address it.
(via iamayoungfeminist)
fanfic about the LIS specialists recruited onto Project Hail Mary to make the library of All Human Media Ever sorted, catalogued, searchable, and useable to a team of astronauts from three different countries
As you know speculative LIS is becoming my niche of choice, so I am going to be thinking about this all day during work. Frankly my instinct with a project of this scale would be crowdsourcing/folksonomy. Make all the content publicly accessible and encourage the online community to tag and translate it. If you run with the idea that historian Stratt also intended the media library to be a record of human civilization if the project failed and our species was wiped out, why stop at English/Russian/Mandarin? Let everyone take a crack at it. Everyone's probably feeling very scared and helpless with the astrophage crisis; offering a massive citizen science project would be a good way to make regular people feel like they're contributing. Then have some experts do a final pass for QC and massage the user tags into a better indexing system. (I assume you'd need indexing to speed up searches--idk the power of the computers on the Hail Mary but I feel like they'd crash if you tried to full text search All Of Humanity's Media Output.)
That's how I'd do it but given that her 'I do what I want' evasion of copyright might not extend to making everything accessible to the entire online population and iirc Stratt being kind of controlling and particular about who she works with, I'm not sure that's how she'd do it. Unfortunately since she made everyone speak English as the lingua franca (authorial bias showing imo) she might just put everything in English to shrink the amount of data. That would simplify the project but you lose a lot in translation, so that's better if her goal was simply to aid the mission crew vs preserve Earth's cultural heritage.
I'll have to chew on this more while at work switching every link I've ever made away from open in new tab rip
#I LIKE open in new tab #but it doesn't meet WCAG 2.2 AAA #we're not being held to that yet #but I might as well brace in case we are later #project hail mary #this is also a situation where a machine learning tool could be very useful imo #more on this after work. I'm imagining a #crew and SME interviews -> ML tool development -> automated indexing and abstracting -> human QC workflow for a non-crowdsourced approach
Actually I have 7 minutes before I have to sign on. If our priority is just mission effectiveness rather than cultural preservation, the strategy I'd probably take off the top of my head is:
Qualitative interviews with the crew and relevant subject matter experts. Go through that data to identify themes/topics most likely to be relevant to the mission.
Have LIS or related experts transform those themes into a controlled vocabulary.
Develop an automated tool that can ingest your content, generate a brief abstract, and assign index terms from the controlled vocabulary.
Have human expert review of the tool's output. (This will probably need to be spotchecking if you've got a small team of experts; again we are talking about all of human cultural output here.)
This is basically the other side of the scale from the first suggestion - it would give you a faster, more targeted search that would help you zero in on mission-critical content. (After all you probably don't need your search tool running through the scripts for 50 years of General Hospital when you're trying to find emergency treatments for a crewmember experiencing arrhythmia.) The tradeoff of course is that if you end up needing something you weren't expecting (like, say, linguistic theory because you just met an alien) it might not be as effective.
(None of this is touching on how this much data is being STORED of course. I have to imagine at least the audiovisual content is compressed and only the index is being actively searched, and content is unzipped if it needs to be accessed. Which again points to needing a really good indexing system. But I'm not a computer scientist.)
Ok now I am really signing into Microsoft Outlook. Goodbye
This is really interesting! These are really cool ideas.
Would it make sense then to have a two-tiered system:
One for scholarly work and relevant nonfiction overseen by a team of specifically selected specialists focused on mission-critical topics, probably first prioritizing medicine, engineering, biology, genetics, astronomy, chemistry, physics, computers, and psychology (though I do think translation and linguistics would go in a high priority tier—if the paper they really need is in French or Japanese or isiZulu they don’t want to leave their astronauts SOL) and then as time allows branching out into food and nutrition science, ecosystem and environmental science, geology, mathematics, history, archaeology (look. you don’t KNOW what you’ll find out there), with academic work on topics like economics and music and literature probably being at the end of this priority scale or put into…
The folksonomy/citizen science initiative specifically for fiction, popular media, and entertainment topics, on a separate indexing track so if you’re looking for actual medical information it won’t turn up House M.D. but if you want to see what nonsense the House writers came up with it’ll still have been fully tagged and searchable by dedicated show fans. If Stratt expects to go to prison anyway and the world is dying, I can easily imagine her concluding that either no one is going to be paying money for media in a few years as global economies collapse, or certain softwares will become globally critical and the owners of it don’t retain the right to profit off the end of the world, so sure, release the archive of pop media to everyone and give them a crack at it.
They can be going in tandem, with the categorizational whims of the world not affecting the organization of mission-critical data but also the specialist team not having to spend their time also going through 16,000 episodes of General Hospital.
I also imagine the ship’s computers would have to be programmed in with the index of physically Where each SD card on each topic is…
Lol I saw this after I made the last post. I agree, I'd definitely split fiction and nonfiction at the very least. (Might want to continue splitting into more specific subject areas to speed up searches and avoid tons of irrelevant results; I often bypassed the discovery tool in favor of subject databases for a reason.) Lots of scholarly academic content already *has* indexing applied to it; the role of experts might be mostly to massage the different thesauri into one controlled vocabulary (which probably would be in English unfortunately, just based on how the majority of scholarly work is published + existing database interfaces + what machine learning tends to handle most easily + the common language of the crew). That being said they might need to do more indexing work for content that never made it into major databases. After all, they brought Grace on specifically recognizing that sidelined work and/or people operating outside of academia still have valuable ideas. He might have Opinions on this matter.
Folksonomies focusing on fiction/cultural work would make sense, especially for webnovels/webcomics/youtube videos and other stuff that doesn't already have a MARC record. The tough one for me is the open web since it's such a mishmash of format and genre. Some professor's janky web 1.0 HTML webpage might have valuable information but it's not going to be indexed in Web of Science. Could you automated a webcrawler to identify academic/nonfiction vs fiction/entertainment webpages? (Beyond just registering .edu domains.) Probably, with human QC followup, and then the sites get sorted into the appropriate bucket.
I'm contemplating what organization you'd want for the fiction. Title search, obviously, if you're searching for something familiar, but beyond that, what would the crew be looking for? (LIS saying: you organize in order to retrieve.) Language, culture of origin, medium, obviously, but I'm imagining they might look for content based on mood or feel and am now envisioning folksonomy contributors in a vicious war over whether something is uplifting or not. The sun is being eaten by alien microbes but the hot topic on Twitter rn is whether The Murderbot Diaries is #cozy or not.
TIL a family in Georgia claimed to have passed down a song in an unknown language from the time of their enslavement; scientists identified the song as a genuine West African funeral song in the Mende language that had survived multiple transmissions from mother to daughter over multiple centuries (x)
In 1997 Amelia’s daughter, Mary Moran, and other members of the Moran family were invited to Sierra Leone, West Africa, where they were welcomed in Freetown by Sierra Leone’s President and then flown by helicopter to the country’s interior. There, in the small village of Senehun Ngola, Mary and Bendu Jabati met and sang this song together for the first time. Years earlier, Bendu’s grandmother had told her that this song, which had been passed down in her village from mother to daughter for centuries, would one day reunite her to long-lost relatives.
In addition to finding out where in Africa her ancestors were abducted into slavery, Mary Moran discovered the meaning of the Mende song: a processional hymn for the final farewell to the spirit, it was sung in Senehun Ngola by women as they prepared the body of a loved one for burial.
(The OP's link leads to a site with a recording of the song sung by both Mary Moran and her mother, Amelia)
it’s infuriating when the customer is wrong yes we all know this. however it’s probably 10000x worse when the customer is right, because what do you MEAN my coworker deleted 7 of your fucking accounts off of your profile when you just wanted to edit them and now I have to deal with it??? i can’t even be pissed that you’re being a bitch about it because i would be too!!! fuck!!!!
Pro tip for when you run into this:
1) take a deep, irritated breath and go "oh" in a voice of sudden, ground-down revelation. Let the customer hear you.
2) "you're right. I see what they did. That is...okay. I don't know why they did this. Let me straighten it out. I'm so sorry." <- do this in a tone that makes it clear Your Coworker Is A Moron. Now it's not you versus the customer, it's You And The Customer Versus This Dumbassery.
It won't make the rest of the job any easier, but it should defuse the customer.
Good advice, but also, when you are the customer, don't be nasty to the person who didn't screw up. It's not their fault.
And if you do go off at someone whose fault it isn't, apologize. "I'm sorry. I know it's not your fault," can go a very long way.
I often have the problem of having to communicate "I know you have no reason to think I'm different from the last three people who promised to call you back, but I am in fact different from the last three people who promised to call you back" without actually saying that. Being upfront about the timeframe in which I'm going to call them back (quite possibly not today) sometimes helps.
It's often the most male-catered to and even misogynistic media that feature some of the deepest and borderline homoerotic relationships between men. But that is to be expected. People think that patriarchy enabling homoaffectionate relationships between men is a bug, but it's actually a feature. True love can only come from a place of respect, and men often don't respect nor esteem women. They don't see women as capable of intellect, or strength, or imagination or even humanity. Those attributes are reserved to men. Which is why men's true love is often reserved for other men while women are just props to them. That's why it's easier for a lot of male writers to create stories about supposedly heterosexual male characters having the most world-shattering (accidentally romantic) bonds with other men, but not with women that they're canonically attracted to. It's because they can't fathom their male protagonist being so deeply affected by a woman's character, since women are to be lusted for and kept as props for their little domestic fantasies but never truly respected or admired as individuals. The ancient greeks were more honest about this stuff because they understood that patriarchy and male/male affection went hand in hand.
stop calling it a girl dinner and call it by its formal name: Fend For Yourself dinner in an ingredients household
[image description: iMessage screenshot. Sent text: “are you guys gonna be home for dinner or do i have to fend for myself” Reply from Dad: “Fend” end description]
okay here's a poll
fanfic is for
shipping
torment nexus
no you don't get to say both or neither or a secret third thing. pick a side.
modern day fandom vs hipsters
'women have too high standards for men' 'its impossible to live up to what women want from men' 'women are too picky and bitchy and mean to unattractive men' thats news to me because i keep meeting and learning about women who would be better off snorting arsenic than even associating with the men that they are dating
sometimes jakey is an ok guy who is just annoying to have around and sometimes jakey needs to actually die for the betterment of society
hey people with uterusussys if you are bleeding a fuck ton with large blood clots you need to go fucking get checked for cancer. This is a massively overlooked sign for endometrial cancer. If you've ever bled so much you need a transfusion go get a biopsy. If you've told yourself you'll just bear the super heavy three month long "periods" go get a biopsy. Stage 1 endometrial cancer basically quadruples the number of potential treatments you can do. Source: it was cancer.
Before this, did you know that 'baby shark' was around in the 2000s as a campfire song and used to have lyrics about losing limbs?
Before this, did you know that 'baby shark' was around in the 2000s as a campfire song and used to have lyrics about losing limbs?
Yes
No
the only “data centers” we need are public libraries
imagine a goat with a hat
STOP-
what hat did you give the goat what is the instinctual hat you gave to this goat