Another consequence of overturning Roe: charging mothers who donât provide the absolute âbestâ environments for their babies.
In 2019, a pregnant woman gets into an argument, and the other person shoots her in the stomach 5 times - obviously the baby is lost. The pregnant woman (who got shot) was charge with negligent homicide for âbringing her baby to the fight.â It took 7 months of protest for her charges to be overturned.
Now that Roe is overturned? Can a mother be sued if she doesnât take folic acid pills and her baby is born with spina bifida? What about the mom who doesnât realize she was pregant until the 2nd trimester, drank in the 1st, and decides to keep the child? If her baby is born with fetal alcohol syndrome, is she charged with negligence for not keeping her body in tiptop shape, even though she didnât know she was pregnant?
These are not hypotheticals. If a womanâs body is no longer her body, but *always* either a potential or future baby carrier, then weâre in for a whole host of crimes against pregnant people.
*Women. Pregnant women.
Women are people. OP obviously showed they know how big this issue is for women, but women are not the only ones that can get pregnant and therefore not the only ones affected by this. Why are you so determined to never refer to women as people?




















