hilda doodles

Kiana Khansmith
š
Noah Kahan

#extradirty
No title available
hello vonnie
taylor price
No title available
The Bowery Presents
ojovivo
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

titsay
untitled
Keni

gracie abrams
šŖ¼

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
Sade Olutola

@theartofmadeline

ā

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from Portugal

seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@profanepower
hilda doodles
āDonāt call Trump supporters nazis, it hurts their feelings.ā
Yes, this is realĀ (link to tweet). Yes, Tucker Carlson is literally repeating Nazi propaganda that aided the genocide of the Romani during the Holocaust. Yes, I am furious.Ā
(Also, although there is a large populationĀ of Romani in Romania, they arenāt indigenous to Romania. Theyāre a diasporic group originally from northern India.)
Romani and Jewish have been screaming at the top of their lungs for years about neo-fascism in Europe, and Americans were totally aloof.
Then neo-fascism reared its head in America, but Roma and Jews were left out of the conversation in terms of people being impacted, because our oppression was āover.ā
Now Tucker Carlson is on live TV using slurs and Nazi propaganda about Romani people, and Iām 90% most people on the left are just going to ignore it.
Itās fucking starting y'all. Itās happening again.
If youāre not Jewish or Roma PLEASE BOOST THIS.
did the aliens from star wars just enjoy that band in the cantina playing the exact same fucking song over and over again or was it a situation like that diner with Whats New Pussycat on repeat
considering that han solo was in that cantina, I think we all know the answer
and then when i was about to request the song for the seventh time, my buddy chewbacca, genius that he is, stopped me and said ārrrRrrrghghghhHhā. and that is when the afternoon went from good to great.
and weāre staring at this one guyāgreedoāand heās like staring at his caf cup like this, and heās been onto us since the beginning, and heās sitting there and his hand is shaking, and he had this look on his face like oh, like he had just gotten his thirty-day chip from anger management, and heās staring like this, and the fourth song fades out, itās dead quiet, thenāand i donāt know if you know this, but the song begins very quietlyāDAH duh DAH duh DADADAAAAAāand he goesĀ āgoddammit!ā and pulls out a blaster
*goes up to a polyamorous triad* so which one of you unspools the thread of fate, which one measures it, and which one cuts it?
Join prof.Peach in the greenhouse this week as we talk about bulbasaur, their common issues and how to remedy them.
*the recipe is acceptable for dogs (and humans) unless you know they have an allergy to any of the ingredients.
smol bat friends
My dad:Ā āSo if your pronouns are they and them, how should I refer to you when I brag about you? My daughter? My son?ā
Me:Ā āMomās just been calling me her kid or her child.ā
My dad:Ā āI shall call youā¦my Eldest Spawn.ā
I feel like itās worth noting that he was wearing a Cthulu t-shirt when this happened.
Here is a baby button quail on a spoon
Here is a baby button quail falling off a spoon
Polished Malachite Stalactite - Copper Crescent, Congo
*looks around*
Is
Is anyone gonna say it
malachite is a poisonous mineral. please do not fuck the malachite stalactite
@lizaleighĀ do you know any rock people that can confirm/deny because I am very curious and really donāt feel like getting into a conversation with my geophysicist brother that MAY somehow get back to the fact I saw a malachite that looked like a weird dildo.
ā¦sadly, I am not on good enough terms with any of our partner geologists to just attach this to an email with the subject line: āEXPLAIN.ā Although I think @mollisaurus is a mineral person. Thoughts?
oh geeze, iām kinda rusty on minerals but malachite is just copper carbonate and is really common in both antique and modern jewelry so i think like if you were really gun-ho about it you could go ahead and put it wherever you want?
Itās really only a problem if youāre polishing or cutting it. The particles would be bad to breathe. Itās rather porous too, so I would worry about bacteria growing. Well, being literal anyway⦠Better to leave the poor thing alone. ._.
I mean it kinda depends on where you stick it because malachite does not like acidic environments very much and the malachite will degrade and also might dye your bits blue-green as the copper dissolves out.
So use a condom when fucking rocks is the takeaway here.
Oh my god guys itās poisonous
It is super poisonous
There is a reason we do not use it in make up any more
Not even with a condom, do not fuck the rock
Try this one instead.Ā
malachite literally explodes in water does it not?
I⦠no⦠I think youāre thinking of pure sodium?
Malachite is however water soluble, which really just means it will poison you quicker
This is both hilarious and cool as fuck because youāre getting all this information on minerals and rocks. Youāre also watching people argue over wether or not you can fuck this rock
I go on hiatus for a week and come back to find tumblr molesting my post, but hey, at least we all learned something so yay tumblr, you just keep onĀ being you.
Iām still not sure if I can fuck this rock.
Iām looking into it.
UPDATE:
Today in āIām so sorry, coworkers, itās for Tumblr,ā I brought this post to the attention the science reporters at BuzzFeed. Dan Vergano did a some research and weighed in on the questionĀ āCan you use malachite as a dildo or is it toxic?ā
The answer is āItās probably fine, just wash it first and maybe use a bunch of lube.ā
Oh man this got so much better than the last time I saw this post
This is my favourite. Science side of tumblr: asking the REAL questions
*biologist crashes through the underbrush* Ok so hereās the thing though Malachite is not poisonous to YOU. BUT fucking this stalactite will probably wreck your vaginal flora and leave you with a gruesome infection within a couple days. Want details? SO GLAD YOU ASKED, āCAUSE HERE THEY ARE. ⢠Malachite is not copper oxide. ItāsĀ Cu2CO3(OH)2. Like most carbonates itās water solubleā thatās how it became a stalactite in the first place! And technically any given chunk ofĀ āmalachiteā isnāt just malachiteā itās a mix of various copper carbonates & oxides. This will become important later. ⢠When malachite dissolves it makes a bunch of copper (Cu++) ions. Cu++ is GREAT at killing bacteria and fungiā so good at it that sprays with Cu++ get used a lot as a spray in agriculture to stop plant disease. It takes such a large dose to harm larger organismsĀ that copper sprays are used a lot in organic agriculture (like Bordeaux mixture).Ā So bottom line, yes malachite is technically nontoxic to humans. But it kills bacteria when it dissolves and releases Cu++. ⢠Malachite dissolves somewhat slowly in waterā but vaginal secretions arenāt just any water. A healthy human vagina has a pH of 3.8-4.5 and a salinity of about 0.9%. Itās also warmer than your average underground cave at 37°C (or 98.5°F in American meat units). As luck would have it, acidity, salinity, and warmth all make malachite dissolve faster. ⢠In other words, the human vaginaĀ dissolves malachite. ⢠I have no deeper explanation for why human females can dissolve rocks with our genitals. It simply is. ⢠Gonna to take a quick moment to point out that sex toys that dissolve when you use them are maybe not the best investment. ⢠Anyway the key question now isĀ āhow fast does the human vagina dissolve malachite?ā Are we talking geological timescale, a Nazis-in-Indiana-Jones situation, or something in between? If the reaction kinetics of dissolution are very slow, then thereās nothing to worry about. An encounter with a stalactite would have to last years for enough Cu++ to leach out to cause problems. If itās quick then weāre in trouble. ⢠Unfortunately it looks like nobody really knows. One of the best sources on how malachite dissolves & precipitates in waterā an EPA document on how to avoid too much Cu++ in municipal drinking water systemsā helpfully saysĀ āThe kinetic constraints on the formation of these solids in water systems are largely unexploredā (p. 42) because end equilibrium points is all you need to run a city water system safely. In other words, the experiments that would tell us how fast malachite dissolves in various types of water just donāt exist because nobodyās ever needed to know before. So weād better assume itās going to happen reasonably quickly, #for safety. ⢠So in best scientific fashion, weāre just going to bullshit our way ahead using what facts we DO have on hand: endpoint equlibria. ⢠Is there any info out there telling us what equilibrium concentration of Cu++ we get in salty acidic water at body temperature? Almost! One J.F. Scaife published some great data on this back in 1957. TAKE IT AWAY, SCAIFE.Ā
That orange box is how many moles of dissolved Cu++ Scaife got from sticking malachite in some water that had 0.171 moles NaCl/L (body salinity is about 0.154 moles NaCl/L so this is slightly less salty than people) at 30°C. Heās got no acidity in there, and again the salinity and temperature are slightly lower than people. But this is probably the closest weāre going to get to data on how malachite behaves in vaginas anytime soon, folks. From this we can take away that if you leave malachite alone in a vagina youāll get AT LEAST 9.12 x 10^-4 moles/L, or 5.8 ppm, of Cu++ at equilibrium. ⢠Recall from above that mostĀ āmalachiteā isnāt actually pure malachite, itās a mix of various copper carbonates & oxides. The EPA document elaborates:Ā ā[T]raditional āeyeballā identification of malachite by its blue-green color is extremely unreliable, because almost all cupric hydroxysulfates, hydroxycarbonates, hydroxychlorides, and even fresh cupric hydroxide can be some shade of blue-green. ā¦Ā Thus, the uncertainty in the computed copper concentration in equilibrium with malachite is at least about a factor of 2 ⦠until further experimental data focusing on this problem is generated.ā In other words,Ā ādo your math and then double how much Cu++ you think is going to be in the water, just in case.ā So that gives us 11.6ppm Cu++, at equilibrium, with malachite in a (til now!) healthy vagina. ⢠Next step: do we have any idea what happens to bacteria in acid conditions with copper? OH MY GOD WE TOTALLY DO. Gyawali et al 2011 checked this out in the context ofĀ āso what if we rinsed tomatoes with a solution of lactic acid and copper, because that would be a safe & organic way to get rid of E. coli?ā So now this post has officially ruined stalactites, vaginas, and tomatoes.
^This would happen. These are the counts of 4 E. coli strains exposed to various levels of lactic acid & Cu++ for 8 hours. This table only shows the end counts but it represents the death of 99.7% of bacteria*. ⢠Losing 99.7% of your vaginal flora is seriously bad news. Youāre looking at really good odds of a yeast infection, bacterial vaginosis, and/or other infection issues. And thatās if youāre lucky enough to not be in the 4% of the population or so thatās sensitive to skin contact with copper. ⢠The good news? Biochemically speaking, youāre probably ok to put it in your butt. Itās not as acidic or salty in there, plus thereās a huuuuuge stockpile of gut microbes right upstream that can quickly repopulate the colon after spelunking is complete. However this stalactite is not flared at the base so it is the wrong shape for putting in your butt. Do not put this stalactite in your butt. ⢠This all looks like fun and games, but I think itās really interesting that the internetās mistake in concluding that this stalactite is fuckable is very similar to the mistake made by the Flint water management system. Hear me out. ⢠Central to the Flint lead poisoning crisis is that authorities only looked at & tested Flintās water in its central treatment plant before it went out through the pipes. Not after it went through the pipes. They did not consider what would happen biochemically as it went through the pipes and metals started dissolving. ⢠Similarly, in concluding that the stalactite is fuckable, the internet only considered the stalactite itself. Not the biochemical processes that would happen to it as it, welp, went through the pipes. ⢠Media frequently reports that the Flint Riverās water isĀ ācorrosive,ā leading many to believe the river is full of industrial waste. This aināt the case. Youād need industry to fill a river with industrial waste, and industry left decades ago. Thatās why Flintās so poor. So what IS in the water? Road salt. Plain old stupid road salt. The old Detroit-based source didnāt have salt because it came from Lake Huron which has a large, mostly rural watershed. Meanwhile the Flint River runs through a lot of towns, making it slightly salty as everything melts down in spring. And as we recall from the stalactite experience, a little salt is all it takes to get metals to dissolve.Ā ā¢Ā Information on this engineering problem was not coming through clearly from the engineering or chemistry sides. It took a biologist, pediatrician Mona Hanna-Attisha, to document the real-time results and provide the data to kick-start a high-level investigation. ⢠Morals of the story: when dealing with a biological system pls consider asking a biologist, your vagina and/or city could depend on this ⢠Pls use a condom when fucking any water-soluble material ⢠Still donāt put the stalactite in your butt -3/10 do not recommend
OK, I havenāt reblogged this before now but the final post takes it to a whole new level and I can no longer resist.Ā
fine, this is the Best Tumblr Post
What a wild fucking ride.
I LOVE YOU SCIENCE TUMBLR
IT GOT BETTER!!!!
Ahem. @buzzfeed things have gotten (even) more interesting on the malachite fucking front.
tumblr is an incredible social networking website
IMPORTANT
kids toy sale at work right now and hull sainsburys store manager came into work other day and was telling me that 2 women nearly ripped an iggle piggle in half down the toy aisle fighting over who was gna get itā¦.. LOVE you hull. your women know how to FIGHT
They really do. Thereās another story about this old woman whose taking an axe to a telegraph pole they put outside her house. She said itās ugly so itās coming down. Itās the spirit of the hessle road matriarchy.
HERE HE IS!!!!
The pumpkin boy!!!
I think the closest I come to understanding Vault-Tec is when I consider how tempting it would be to run Fallout 76 in part as a social experiment by assigning karmetic values to certain actions. On one hand, you could wind up with servers full of people who just want to collaborate and fix the wasteland together, shining paragons of what humanity can accomplish when they unite for a common goal. On the other, players whoāve regularlly been blocked for griefing or harassing behavior that drops their karma deep into the negative digits wind up in the Bad Place server⦠where you can only move to a better server by raising your karma. Which means the only way out of the Bad Server is learning to cooperate with others or at least to live and let live. āFallout 76 is a terrifying hellscape full of bitter assholes!ā one game reviewer says, having little idea heās just revealed he, too, is an asshole. How long before the players wise up to the scheme, and if they do figure it out, who could they really hold accountable other than themselves?
The Good Place irl
Sounds like fun.
he was a skater moth
Iām gonna go ahead and be a film snob and talk about why this is one of my favorite shots from TOS. (I could also say that itās one of my favorite scenes, because the entire scene actually consists of a single shot.)
We donāt see a lot of bald expressions of emotion in film and television, especially if that emotion is fear or sadness or vulnerability. Dramas will give us some tears, but they always cut a way after a few seconds because a closeup of someone crying is deeply uncomfortable and most movies and TV shows arenāt in the business of making their audiences uncomfortable. It just doesnāt sell well.
But in this scene the camera never looks away. It follows Spock as he sits down at the table, and it circles him as he cries. But there are no cuts. We donāt even get music to create some distance, make it all a little more palatable; we just hear sobs and mumbled math equations.
Itās absolutely excrutiating. It would be excruciating no matter who we were watching, because we are so unaccustomed to seeing unadulterated emotion. And then thereās the fact that itās a man. And that itās Spock.
Fifty years later and this is still one of the most daring filmmaking decisions Iāve ever seen on TV (I of course canāt be exactly sure who made it, but Iām assuming it was the director of the episode, Marc Daniels). This shot lasts 1 minute and 45 seconds. Weāre in the middle of space and in the middle of a high-stakes episode where the crew is going crazy and the ship is going to blow up or some shit and everyoneās lives are in danger, but we pause 1 minute and 45 seconds to have an uncomfortably human moment with an alien who doesnāt even want to be human, and itās so awful and amazing.
#this is one of the things that makes me love TOS infinitely more than AOSĀ #because when AOS wants to show that Spock is a deeply emotional beingĀ #they make him angry #angry and violentĀ #macho bullshit that doesnt even come close to the raw vulnerabilityĀ #of Spock sobbing to himself because he never told his mother he loved herĀ #and that was a spock whose mother was still alive!!Ā #it is so much more meaningful to show spock weep than to show him angryĀ #and the thing isĀ #in this episode the virus is supposed to strip them down to their coreĀ #and at his core spock is not angry or violent #spock is a terribly vulnerable manĀ #lost and unsure and feeling so strongly and loving so deeply that it moves him to tearsĀ THESE TAGS HOLY SHITĀ @galaxydorks
So true!
Here is an excerpt from Billās Star Trek Memories.
As originally scripted, the scene would have begun with Spock walking down a corridor openly sobbing. At that point, weād cut away and find that another infected crewman has begun frantically running around the ship, slapping graffiti paint jobs all over the walls of the Enterprise. In subsequent shots, weād find several more crewmen beginning to lose their inhibitions, and just when the pandemonium is beginning to overwhelm the ship, weād come back to Spock.
Spock is now riding in an elevator, crying. He gets to his floor, and when the doors open, the graffiti guy runs up and paints a big black mustache on Spockās face. At that point, Spock cries even louder. Leonard continues:
Now, thatās very imaginative, very inventive, very theatrical and very funny, but I felt that it was not really significant or appropriate for Spock. I mean, Spock was crying⦠but so what? There was no context for it, no discernible root force, no underlying cause for whatās going on. You know, in a strange way, this one-shot extra whoās walking around doing the paint jobs all over the place is a lot more interesting than Spock, whoās weeping. It seemed to me like we were wasting some really strong dramatic possibilities, all for the sake of an easy sight gag.
So I said all of this to John Black, and I also said that what I felt we really need to do her was a scene in which Spockās basic inner conflict, the human versus the Vulcan, rises to the surface and motivates his tears. I mean this draft of the script found Spock fighting through all this emotion in public, and I felt that would be a terrible thing for Spock, because heās a very private person.
So I said to John,Ā āI think Spock would look for privacy when he feels the urge to cry. When he can no longer resist his tears, he would probably look for a private place in which to battle it out within himself.ā
And Johnās reaction was very negative. It was typical producer/writer-under-pressure kind of stuff.Ā āCāmon, leave it alone because Iām working on next weekās script. Shoot it, just shoot it.ā This kind of thing. And he complained about hurting the rhythm of the script.ā
Iāve got to break into Leonardās story here to explain thatĀ āit hurts the rhythm of the scriptā is a sort of basic, all-purpose producerās excuse thatās fed all too often to actors seeking script changes. Good, bad, legitimate, frivolous, it doesnāt matter. If a producer doesnāt want to deal with your suggestions, heāll probably just tell you that what youāre suggestingĀ āhurts the rhythm of the script.ā Itās the TV producerās equivalent ofĀ āthe dog ate my homework,ā orĀ āthe check is in the mail.ā Itās just an easy, somewhat plausible excuse that generally has no basis in reality. With that in mind, Leonardās determination and fiercely protective nature in regard to Spock drove him over Blackās head to Roddenberry.
I called Gene about it, and I told him just what Iād told John. In talking to Gene, I was very careful to be politically supportive of his producer but about an hour and a half later, here comes John Black out to the set. So now Iām feeling,Ā āAhh, this great!ā Iām feeling that someoneās actually listening to me.
And Black was funny, he cam onto the set and said,Ā āLetās go talk someplace.ā We went to my dressing room, and he said,Ā āOkay, tell me your idea again. Daddy says I have to listen to you.ā And I had already formulated a basic concept of the scene, so I said,Ā āLook, John, just get me into a room, and write me a half-page, a quarter-page, where you see Spock walk down a corridor and slip inside a door. As the doors close behind him, heāll burst into this emotional struggle.ā And John asked,Ā āWell, whatās this struggle all about?ā And I said,Ā āItās about love and vulnerability and caring and loss and regret, versus C=pi-r-squared and E=m-C-squared. Spock is a scientist, he is logical, and he feels this canāt be happening to him. Itās that kind of struggle. Itās logic versus emotion. Itās rational control versus uncontrollable urge. With that in mind, going behind closed doors will speak to the basic privacy of the character.ā
So John wrote that and some other stuff, six or eight lines maybe, and it was exactly what I needed. Spock was now able to slip inside a door, close it behind him, struggle for a moment, then cry. At this point, he would start babbling, and the cause of the internal struggling would become obvious. Problem was, when it came time to shoot this stuff, a whole new set of obstacles had to be overcome.Ā
Marc Daniels, who was directing this particular episode, came up and asked,Ā āWhat do you have in mind for this scene?ā So, playing director, I said,Ā āJust put the camera here, behind the desk. Iāll come in the door, Iāll walk toward you, Iāll come around, Iāll sit in the chair, and Iāll start this babbling conversation with myself, and Iāll cry. Now, if youāll dolly around getting closer and closer we can meet at the end of the scene. We can see Spockās entire breakdown in one long dramatic shot.ā
Okay, now itās five-thirty, I got out to get my ears and makeup touched up, and the time is important because weāre on a very rigid schedule. With overtime being so ridiculously and prohibitively expensive, weād have to wrap each evening at exactly six-eighteen. Didnāt matter if you were in the middle of a sentence, come six-eighteen, we wrapped.
So now Jerry Finnerman starts to light the scene and itās obvious that this will be our last shot of the day. Iām in the makeup chair, getting touched up, and now in comes Cliff Ralke, our dolly grip, who was always a very supportive person, and he says,Ā āExcuse me, Leonard, but youād better get out there, because theyāre changing the shot you guys just talked about.ā
So now Leonard comes out to the set, and the director has indeed changed the shot theyād just agreed upon. Itās important to note, however, that the reasoning behind this change, though not particularly sensitive to Leonardās needs, was rational and perfectly valid. You see, as previously discussed, this shot would have entailed a one-hundred-and-eighty degree camera move starting from one side of the set, then slowly dollying completely around to the opposite end. This caused problems because the long, involved shot required a lot of lights and a time-consuming, involved setup that Jerry Finnerman didnāt think could be accomplished without going into overtime. Finnerman discussed this situation with Daniels, and together they decided that the most efficient way to shoot this scene would be in a series of brief cuts, each of which could be lit quickly and with relative ease.
They were going to have Leonard enter in a wide shot, then cut. Next, in a slightly tighter framing, theyād follow him as he crossed the set and sat down. Cut. An even tighter frame would catch the beginning of the speech, and they planned to cut once more, zooming to a close-up as Spock began weeping. This made sense in terms of production efficiency, but Leonard felt this shooting sequence would really damage the dramatic impact of the scene. He continues:
I said,Ā āYouāre going to lose the continuity and fluidity of the scene if you shoot it this way. I will not be able to do it as well, and I think the end result will just seem choppy and phony.ā
By now itās five forty-five, and with no time to debate the situation, they got hold Gregg Peters, our first A.D., who was the equivalent of the hatchet man. He was the guy whoād always call the six-eighteen wrap, and we all discussed the situation. Finally Marc Daniels said,Ā āLetās go for it. Letās try to get it done.ā
Now the lighting crew ran around setting up the shot, and I think it was about six-fifteen when they finally said,Ā āWeāre ready.ā Marc had me walk through it once, and by now production types were standing around behind the camera, looking at their watches and saying,Ā āHe wonāt make it. Heāll never do it.ā So the tension was really mounting.
So basically I know this has got to be a flawless, one-take thing. Yāknow, Iāve got one crack at it before they shut us down for the night. If I were to screw up, weād almost certainly have gone right back to the cut-and-chop scenario come morning. Anyway, this was the scene that Iād asked for and fought for, and now the logistics of the situation were such that there was absolutely no room for error. There was a lot riding on this, and I wouldnāt have been so adamant in my battling if I hadnāt felt that this scene was extremely important. I felt like it merited my efforts, in that it truly defined, for the very first time, what the Spock character was all about.
Now the lights go on, the cameras roll and we nail it. They get the pan, get the one-hundred-and-eighty-degree dolly shot and the scene was ultimately worked really well in illustrating Spockās inherent inner conflict. This went directly to the heart of what Gene and I had originally spoken about in regard to the character of Spock. It was an opportunity that I absolutely did not want to miss, and an opportunity to plant a seed in defining a certain edge of the character.
There is nothing funnier to me than poorly redrawn trollfaces made around the time everyone was mocking people who made rage comics