Art commissioned from @dokelsss. I just think she'd enjoy the club :)
Claire Keane
we're not kids anymore.
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
taylor price
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

Origami Around
hello vonnie
Misplaced Lens Cap
sheepfilms

romaâ

â
h
One Nice Bug Per Day

Kaledo Art

oozey mess

pixel skylines

ellievsbear

seen from Indonesia
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Singapore

seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Serbia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
seen from TĂźrkiye
@pseudonomicons
Art commissioned from @dokelsss. I just think she'd enjoy the club :)
Medieval execution method
In pursuit of Ronnie Glow.
to be honest, i only personally care about plotholes when they appear in writing i already have a bunch of other problems with. if i like something enough, i'll give it a pass/invent an explanation in my head. i can't find the exact quote, but roger ebert said something about this. to paraphrase: "the movie's problem wasn't [such and such inconsistency], its problem was that i was bored enough to be thinking about that."
love love love when a particularly manipulative character is lying off their ass about something and then throws in one hauntingly genuine line
there should be a term for characters you personally don't care about but you defend them anyways because the way people treat them is really uncomfortable. like ok this is a very middle-of-the-road character for me but the fandom's either been super misogynistic, racist, etc. about them or harassed innocent people who try to genuinely explore that character warts and all, and i find that more annoying than the actual character.
the term should by 'my client', like you're a lawyer defending your client that you are completely indifferent to but you are obligated by your job (or your morals) to defend
Character duo where one *remembers I donât like fitting characters into trope boxes* is a completely fleshed out and realised person *remembers treating characters as real people and not story devices written with intent is bad* who is written by the author and *remembers death of the author* uh. And *fumbles and drops my pile of queue cards* ah fuck wait no *the menacing horse* what was that.
Katya's first looks.
They couldn't have picked a better character for the trash queen herself.
the thing is I am pro-rpf on principle, but I do think you should keep it away from the actual people you're shipping. but it is NOT out of concern for their comfort (insert pete wentz bank account post), it's for the same reason that like animal behaviorists and field biologists and such try to stay out of view when they're observing animals in the wild. don't tip them off it's gonna to skew the results of my study.
A huge congratulations to Terror Camp 2025 presenter Kaitlyn Gorsalitz @alongblank on her contributions to the recent identification of the remains of FOUR (!!!!) new Franklin Expedition men, as part of Dr. Douglas Stenton's research team.
You can read the full scientific paper here!
And for access to Kaitlyn's presentation âWhen We Meet Nextâ: Investigating Franklin Men and Their Families, please email command [@] terror dot camp for last year's TC recordings.
đ
Researchers at the University of Waterloo have identified the remains of four more crew members of Sir John Franklinâs ill-fated expedition
HELLO
no no, i get it. i can see why you're confused- I want the CANON to be completely platonic, fucked-up exploration of intimacy that transcends human sexuality but never includes human sexuality.
I want to be the pervert that makes them fuck.
My current working theory is that Taskmasters are a race of alien who are trying to gather data on human behavior in ways that are beyond our comprehension. Itâs hard to tell with Greg Davies who appears entirely human aside from a minor mishap with the scaling on his teleporter, but with Jeremy Wells you can tell that he doesnât quite understand the cover story of âbeing funnyâ, plus there are words he pronounces as no other human ever has (including other New Zealanders)
âI donât put politics in my storiesâ is the literary equivalent of a cishet guy going âI donât have pronounsâ
the natural lifespan of a fandom is unlimited. when well tended a fandom can be functionally immortal. and yet everywhere you look you see newly bred fandoms withering and dying when theyâre barely a year old. barely even six months old. fans are looking at their six month old fandoms and saying i think itâs on its last legs, should i euthanise it? when with the proper care that fandom could outlive them for decades. itâs sad. sad state of affairs weâre in.
I have a pretty firm stance on horror where the premise is âthereâs an evil childâ, namely, I think itâs a reflection of adult fears about childrenâs agency and ultimately it is more comforting to imagine that children can be Born Evil than to imagine the way you treat children is wrong. Which at least feels like it has sociological grounding as an opinion
However
I do also feel the same about evil puppets
"if you have any concerns, raise your hand" and the med students get nothing </3