Or Miri. They/them. 25. Queer. please chat with me ---------------------------------------------------------- âcrochet blog: @wholesometropicalfluffâ âresources: @musingsofateenagesidekickâ
AU where Cody gets involved in Fives's investigation and he just be like. Chancellor's a Sith Lord and marches over to the senate building and MURDERS him. He walks in says, I have a message for you. then shoots him in the face. that is what happens. Order 66? Revenge of the SIth? whats that
Fox, who is stationed at Palpatine's office to protect the chancellor, sitting in a chair with a cup of caf and looking down at Palpatine's corpse after Cody just entered the office and shot him down while also having no idea what the single fuck is going on:
[Description: the John Mulaney throwing a peace sign in front of a grace meme with Foxâs helmet edited over Mulaney and Codyâs helmet edited over one of the onlookers. End]
I was gonna describe Palpatineâs spaces as like the bloody insides of a large beast, but the more I thought about it
âŠPalpatineâs office is a womb right? Its where Sidiousâ perfect apprentice is developed. Heâs nurtured in this space by Palpatine until he Anakin leaves it reborn Vader.
Like thereâs really so much to say about Palpatine and yonic symbolism.
Shmiâs child (Anakin) dies and is reborn Darth Vader. Idk itâs just paired with the raw bloody entrance like outfit we wears. Theyâre in this red organ like office and Vader is being born through Sidious. Its almost a gory birth scene.
Then thereâs like the inverse of Anakin with his mother happening in this scene. With Palpatine arriving on time.
...okay I had to read the words 'Palpatine and yonic symbolism' with my own two eyes so now you do too. I wish I could find one single thing about this to dispute but I can't.
vampires are so full of shit. "oh the human race is beneath us, you're just livestock to us" I don't think you know what livestock is. do you feed us? care for us? protect us from predators? no. you just slink around dark alleys and ambush people. that's not what a higher being does. that's a bottom feeder. a parasite. karate punches your head off
you can kinda tell when a writer has spent a lot of time around kids bc they avoid most of the pitfalls that come with writing children. namely, not giving them a too cutesy or twee voice but making them sound more like extremely weird little adults. kids playing pretend will almost never cutely slot into some romantic scenario for the adults' benefit bc the adults are usually too busy cleaning up or wondering what the fuck is wrong with their child. kids also have surprisingly stringent hangups ranging from very petty grievances to downright chauvinist gender roles, more often than not the result of a tragic education but sometimes far surpassing what they were taught in intensity. what im saying is there's nothing inherently wrong with treating fictional kids as stock characters but it's always quite nice to see when they aren't
It's extremely common for very young children to suddenly say something extremely cogent and articulate, that's jarringly inconsistent with their normal speech. This is usually something that they heard an adult say recently. A kid will spend ten minutes telling you a story about how they fought a wolf yesterday using simple sentences of fifty cent words, then nibble a snack, wrinkle their nose and say something like "I feel like Mum was overenthusiastic with the salt today, and not for the first time either" before going back to their clumsy story. (They do understand what they're saying when they do this. Kids' communication is usually held back by their vocabulary and pronunciation, not their understanding.)
Young kids are also a lot more socially aware than people give them credit for. Young children are perfectly aware that adults don't take them seriously. They know when their parents don't actually like them. They listen and remember when adults talk about them while they're in the room. Kids will develop basic abilities to charm etc. from babyhood and will begin experimenting with social norms and concepts of deception, appropriate information, and acceptable language and attitudes in toddlerhood. By the time a kid is five or six, they have solid social strategies for relating to adults and separate ones fr relating to their peers, that they'll continue to refine for the rest of their lives. They will also say completely off the wall shit because they don't have the context to know what is and isn't considered super fucked up yet.
By the time a kid is eight or nine, their main difference from adults is in experience, interests, and ability for long-term focus. An eight year old can think as intelligently and coherently as a thirty year old, they just have less experience and information to draw from, and are likely interested in very different things. They're also likely still slightly hamstrung by vocabulary and literacy, though much less so than a younger kid.
Teens will behave like adults who have little power (a teen is often at the mercy of their parents and the state and rarely taken seriously, which is extremely frustrating) and who are high stress and mid-crisis, because they're going through a transitory period where their bodies and moods are changing and are having to constantly learn and adjust; a fourteen year old in a stable situation will act pretty much like a thirty year old with an oppressive boss who's just left a tumultuous relationship.
#oh is *that* why i feel 14 again after my fiance broke things off with me and i had to move halfway across the continent back in with my ma?
Yeah that's just what humans feel and act like when they're unmoored and powerless and unpredictably changing. Teenagers are pretty much constantly unmoored and powerless and unpredictably changing, and react reasonably to those circumstances.
thereâs a thing I think about sometimes when Iâm writing that I call âthe rabies conditionâ
by which I mean: there are no contraindications to getting the rabies vaccine for post-exposure prophylaxis.
every other vaccine usually has a few contraindications like âdonât take this if youâre allergic to itâ or âif youâre pregnant discuss the risks and benefits with your doctorâ or âdonât give to children below age 6âČ or something, but not the rabies vaccine. if youâve been exposed to rabies, there is literally no medical reason that can justify not getting the rabies vaccineâyou can be deadly allergic to literally every single ingredient and the correct decision is still to administer the vaccine, because if you donât, youâre 100% guaranteed to die of rabies. even the life-threatening allergies are a step up in survival rate (especially since anaphylaxis is something that can be managed, even if there are risks associated with it)
which is to say, the rabies condition: if a character has been âexposed to rabiesâ, aka, in some impending absolute worst-case scenario, like the apocalypse or some death curse or the destruction of their entire city via demons or whatever, then that character has to take action and the consequences and risks no longer matter, because literally any other outcome would be better, and 1% chance of survival is still better than 0%. that doesnât make those actions necessarily good, the same way that injecting yourself with something you know youâre deadly allergic not a good thing to do, but itâs still better than dying horrifically of rabies. desperate times and desperate measures etc
and then, after your characterâs prevented some horrible thing by doing some almost equally bad thing, they should absolutely experience the consequences of those choices.
i canât get over how crazy much ado is sometimes. it feels like a deconstruction of shakespeareâs other comedies when you look at how quick and lovesick and beautiful hero and claudio are and how well they fit the script of just classic young lovers, things like how hero is one of the only characters to speak in verse, the way claudio praises her to all his friends etc. and then how in the middle of the play the script is completely flipped. now hero is in danger because of what claudio believes and no one can help her. and suddenly the love story shatters because the same willingness claudio has to fall in love with her at first sight is the same willingness he has to believe a baseless accusation and the love story starts to descend into horror because thereâs no legal course of action hero can appeal to her and her own father insults and disowns her at her wedding and sheâs quite literally left for dead fainting on the ground with her father saying let her die, what is it to me? itâs insane because like 30 minutes before itâs just a happy comedy love story but shakespeare shows a real darkness to the genre because claudio may think he loves her but when it comes down to it he will never trust her. her word isnât good enough. no one is going to listen to the woman
Oh oh oh but this is why Much Ado is so subversive (and my fave)!
No one listens to Hero, BUT Benedick takes Beatriceâs word. Yes, thereâs a moment when heâs like âyou donât mean actually KILL Claudio, amirite ha ha ha?â
But when he realizes she is in earnest HER TESTIMONY IS ENOUGH.
âEnough. I am engaged.â
It is one of the only times we see a womanâs word taken at face value and action taken on her part.
Benedick for all his bluster is the only one to BELIEVE WOMEN.
my mom just had a 7cm brain tumor removed and since she's woken up she's been talking nonstop about this dream she had about going to an art gallery full of colourful paintings by a 'homosexual artist' named klimsdorf who was ethereal and wise, both young and old... at first she was convinced he was a real person but after failing to find him online she's accepted he was a figment of her subconscious mind and is now determined to bring him to life via painting his portrait herself. she's 67 and has never drawn in her life. and now this. blorbo from her tumor
Not that it was necessary, but I looked up definitions, and yeah, obviously "taking a photo under someone's skirt" is literally it. Fuck Snopes so fucking hard. I need them to explain to me how it doesn't fit the definition to a fucking t:
And what the FUCK do they mean, "public setting"?? Yeah, upskirts are mistly taken in public fucking settings! That's not an eycuse, that's part of the fucking issue
And truly what do they mean it was in public? Does that mean that the upskirt photos people take on subways dont count because other people are around? OF COURSE IT WAS IN PUBLIC THATS HOW THE PHOTO GOT TAKEN IF SHE HAD BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED AT HOME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BREAKING AND ENTERING
what do they mean "it wasn't taken surreptitiously"? there isn't any implication here except that because Freda Wallace was in public, she consented to any pictures that might be taken of her? this is just "look at the way she* was dressed". snopes is doing rape culture.
according to archives the first version of the snopes article listed it as "true," but it seems to have been changed. given rowling's widely known history of extreme and aggressive litigiousness i'd be willing to bet her legal team probably objected and snopes caved
Indian Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned on Saturday in response to rising pressure from student-led protests.
âCockroach Movementâ Forces Out Indiaâs Education Minister
"Indian Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned on Saturday amid mounting pressure from the âCockroach Movement,â which demanded major government reformsâstarting with his departure. Student activists accused Pradhan of failing to safeguard a competitive medical school exam, the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET), after authorities concluded that its contents had been leaked online. ...
Without accepting fault, [Education Minister Pradhan] explained that he had agreed to step down in order to prevent âanti-national forcesâ from exploiting the upheaval.Â
Abhijeet Dipke, the founder of the CJP, celebrated the resignation with fellow protesters in New Delhi on Saturday.
âIt's a victory for the people of India,â Dipke said to the crowd. He later posted an image of Indiaâs Constitution on social media, with the caption: âThank you.â ...
On the advice of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Indian President Droupadi Murmu appointed Pralhad Joshiâwho already oversees the ministries of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, along with New and Renewable Energyâto oversee the Ministry of Education âin addition to his existing portfolio,â which is a typical arrangement in India following a Cabinet vacancy and does not preclude a later permanent appointment...
CJP Spokesperson Saurav Das said in an interview with local media ANI following the presidentâs announcement that the party members will be meeting the new education minister âvery soon.â ...
What Comes Next for the CJP?
The CJP established its list of demands on May 16. In addition to calling for Pradhanâs resignation, the CJP asked for compensation of 10 million rupees ($104,000) for each student who died by suicide following the leak.Â
They also sought greater legislative oversight of the educational system, gender equity in government roles, a fully independent media, and certain reforms to the electoral and political systemâsuch as creating a 20-year ban on politicians switching parties before seeking election.
Adding to those mandates, the CJP last week asked that the central government drop any potential charges against protesters, after claiming that several had been âillegally detainedâ by police.Â
Following Pradhanâs resignation, representatives from the CJP met with officials from the Indian government to discuss the rest of the partyâs demands. In a press conference following the meeting, Das said on Saturday that the negotiations had been successful.
"All our demands have been accepted,â he said, without elaboration. âWe request the protesters to withdraw immediately and return home peacefully."
The CJP added during the press conference on Saturday that representatives from the movement would meet with officials again in four weeks to work on broader reforms. Its spokesperson told local media that the fight for a transparent educational system is far from over.Â
He said that members of the CJP conveyed to officials that if the issues are not addressed, the protesters will reconvene âand demand accountability.â
-via TIME, July 25, 2026. Non-paywall version here via MSN, July 25, 2026
if you sexually harrass men you're more than an asshole, you're a sexual predator. youre a sexual abuser. youre probably a rapist and are friends with rapists
one thing as a trans man in particular that ive noticed is that the very "conventionally attractive" trans men who post online are very routinely sexually harrassed by mainly cis women. the cis gsy dudes might be flirting, but most of them arent as overt and vulgar as cis women. sometimes ill read comments and i get uncomfortable just seeing someone talk that way about a stranger. i feel like cis queer women feel like they have a special pass to sexually harrass trans men (and really all marginalized men) because they view themselves as inherently safer than men and so they dont think that they can be predatory or inappropriate to men
regardless, i think its important to call it how it is. a man who catcalls a woman on the street isnt an asshole, hes a sexual predator. people who sexually harrass other people are sexual predators
Did I just employ the "Treat Them Like You are A Kindergarten Teacher Again" method with my insurance company today? I surely did. Did it work? Probably better than intended because I made an actual doctor feel contrite.
So, my insurance has been trying to not cover my SNRI because it is new on the market and no generic available yet, so pricey.
I apply for a refill and the request gets locked for review. Again. For the 3rd time.
This time I call and immediately ask to speak to the actual doctor making these clinical decisions. Very politely. Must be a slow day because they allow it.
ME: [Teacher voice] I'm calling in regards to the SNRI you have placed a lock on. Why was this decision made?
DOC: Well, there are dozens of other medications on the market in that tier, and far cheaper for you and [insurer]. We have sent a request to your doctor to consider alternatives.
ME: I am aware of that. So, can you do me a HUGE favor and look up my prescription history really quickly and tell me how many SSRIs and SNRIs were only filled once in 2022 for me, showing they were poorly tolerated?
DOC: It looks like eight.
ME: Great job! Now, can you please look at my genetic test for psychiatric drug tolerance and tell me how many medications are listed in the safe category?
DOC: Two.
ME: Awesome! Now, can you tell me what type that other drug is that I'm not taking?
DOC: Yeah, totally, it's an MAOI.
ME: That's correct, you're really knowledgeable! Should I be taking something as dangerous as an MAOI with my other medications, or even just in general?
DOC: It's contraindicated for sure.
ME: It is! So true! So, last question since you've been incredibly smart and helpful. Is it less expensive for [insurer] to pay out for the medication knowing they already get a huge manufacturer discount anyway, or is it more expensive for them to pay for me to need potentially long-term inpatient psychiatric care?
DOC: I'll clear the code, ma'am and flag it as medically necessary. I'm sorry about this.
ME: I appreciate you SO MUCH. You have a great day now.
WALGREENS PHARMACY TECH WITH 5 NOSE RINGS AND PURPLE HAIR STARING AT ME: ........... OKAY! It'll be ready in five minutes. You wanna come work here?
Totally normal for a legitimate for-profit company to refuse to reclaim or stop running their products even after they're no longer being paid to do so. I'm sure it's very normal to just keep running your service for free when your contract's been terminated. Spending money to continue running cameras that supposedly no one is looking at is definitely not an indicator they are just run by the federal government to spy on everyone and only a wacko conspiracy theorist would think so.
pop health science is so annoying bc it'll be like "did you know? eating strawberries will give you mega cancer" and you're like pfft whatever begone influencer. but sometimes then you'll see a reasonably credible article like "Study Shows Possible Link Between Strawberries and Mega Cancer" and you're not usually the type to follow that kind of thing religiously but idk maybe you should consider not eating strawberries? but then there's another article saying "Strawberry/Mega Cancer Study Debunked" and it turns out the original study had a sample size of 3 and was funded by Big Blueberry, and strawberries may have a small connection to mega cancer but only if you are genetically predisposed to mega cancer and eat 50 strawberries every day. so you return to your strawberry eating life. but whenever you eat strawberries in public someone tells you about the mega cancer.
theartofmadeline
gracieabrams
discoholicmusic
snowghoul
izzy806
turnnoffyourmind
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
andulkaphoto
gummygunk
ellievsbear
