love me like a brother. dustin and steve play loch lomond, 1996.
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
AnasAbdin
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie
Sade Olutola
Game of Thrones Daily
Peter Solarz
One Nice Bug Per Day
$LAYYYTER

@theartofmadeline
h
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from Taiwan
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Brunei

seen from United States
@queerfables
love me like a brother. dustin and steve play loch lomond, 1996.
what’s the rush?
Liam roamed around the stage more than usual, or more than I've seen, and he did his usual stuff, like reaching out and touching a chick's hand, and pressing his back up against the stack of amps. He was handed a Union Jack at the end of Walrus, and he wrapped it around himself like a skirt. A roadie brought out Noel's army coat and laid it over an amp or stand, and before the end of Walrus, he put it on and stuck his hand out for Liam, and they skipped off stage together, laughing all the way.
—Review: Oasis plays Verizon Wireless Music Center in Noblesville, Indiana | The Tour Of Brotherly Love | 1st June 2001 | Written by John Anderson for The-Masterplan.com
Copyright governs who has the "right" to produce and distribute "copies" of books/music/movies/creative works. This is where fair use doctrine applies, because most creative works are referential by nature.
Weird Al is allowed to parody everything because he's operating under copyright law, not trademark law.
Trademark governs who can "trade" under what "mark" i.e. the brand identity of a company. Companies don't own their trademarked word forever, but they maintain the exclusive right to sell things under that brand in their specific market sector. Patagonia doesn't own the name of a geographical region, they just own the right to be the only company using that name to sell clothing and outdoor gear.
A drag queen name can be a parody of a clothing and outdoor gear company.
A company's trademarked logo can be used in parody creative works, with more leeway if it's not for commercial purposes. Trademark parody is allowed! Patagonia has been aware of and allowed Pattie Gonia's trademark parody for years.
Trademarks are specific to market sector. Actress Chase Infiniti could start a makeup line named after herself and her trademark would not infringe on the Infiniti car brand because they are different markets and there is no risk of confusion. Pattie Gonia could probably trademark her name to sell frozen veggie burgers and Patagonia would not care.
Drag queen Jan Sport did a collab with JanSport bags. What Jan Sport almost certainly did not do is independently apply to register "Jan Sport" as a trademark in order to sell bags on her own, because that would infringe on JanSport's own trademark in the bag market sector.
What Pattie Gonia is not allowed to do -- the thing that Pattie Gonia actually did do and is being sued for -- is apply to register "Pattie Gonia" as a trademark to sell clothing, because apparently Pattie is in talks with North Face and HydroFlask to sell "Pattie Gonia"-branded gear. These companies probably won't finalize anything unless Pattie shows that she actually owns the trademark. Unfortunately, "Patagonia" is already a registered trademark in the clothing market sector, and these two names are too similar to exist in the same sector (see: "likelihood of confusion" legal standard).
Your drag queen name can parody a clothing company. You can parody the trademarked logo of a clothing company. But you cannot use the same name to then go on to also become a clothing company.
In order to maintain their own trademark, Patagonia must sue for trademark infringement. If they don't sue, and Pattie Gonia gets her own trademark, Pattie could sue Patagonia for infringement on her trademark. You can see why Patagonia won't be dropping this suit no matter how much you harass them.
Yes, Pattie's legal fees to fight this will cost more than the $1 she's being sued for. Pattie could also not fight this, withdraw her trademark application, not spend any money, and carry on being an environmental activist drag queen named Pattie Gonia. She would probably be better off making nice with Patagonia in the hopes of a Jan Sport-esque deal where Pattie designs an exclusive fabric and Patagonia maintains the trademark, but apparently Pattie's legal team has been sassing off to Patagonia in their communications for years, has applied for a trademark they should 100% know they'll never get, and has now decided to play the victim on social media just in time for Pride month, so I don't know how likely that is. I guess we'll see!
This is mostly correct, but I’d like to offer a small correction. The product deal with Hydroflask and North Face apparently occurred in 2022, and HydroFlask got Patagonia involved to make sure everything was in the clear. It seems like Patagonia was very agreeable about everything at the time, and only asked that Pattie Gonia and her partners avoid using the Patagonia logo and font or similar images, and to avoid putting the words “Pattie Gonia” on any products. This is the email exchange from 2022, from the recent Patagonia trademark complaint, including Pattie Gonia apparently agreeing to the limitations.
The new conflict is from Pattie Gonia using the Patagonia imagery and the Pattie Gonia name on her own merchandise. This is the email Patagonia sent, with the images they feel conflict with the 2022 agreement.
Pattie responded to that by disagreeing that she had broken any agreement, and also obliquely threatening to expose Patagonia for making tactical gear for the US military?
It’s possible that Patagonia understood the terms from 2022 to be a good-faith ongoing agreement about keeping the brands separate, and Pattie interpreted it as an agreement limited to the now-ended North Face and Hydroflask collaboration. It’s also possible that Pattie Gonia didn’t believe she was actually agreeing to anything at all, since her responses were very neutral, though positive in tone, up until 2025. The email chain does, however, show what I think is a very clear effort on Patagonia’s part to protect their trademark while also showing support and goodwill towards Pattie in her use of the Pattie Gonia stage persona.
borrowed gestures. pencil
Ted Lasso + The Wizard of Oz
"Do you ever dream of land?" The whale asks the tuna.
"No." Says the tuna, "Do you?"
"I have never seen it." Says the whale, "but deep in my body, I remember it."
"Why do you care," says the tuna, "if you will never see it."
"There are bones in my body built to walk through the forests and the mountains." Says the whale.
"They will disappear." Says the tuna, "one day, your body will forget the forests and the mountains."
"Maybe I don't want to forget," Says the whale, "The forests were once my home."
"I have seen the forests." Whispers the salmon, almost to itself.
"Tell me what you have seen," says the whale.
"The forests spawned me." Says the salmon. "They sent me to the ocean to grow. When I am fat with the bounty of the ocean, I will bring it home."
"Why would the forests seek the bounty of the oceans?" Asks the whale. "They have bounty of their own."
"You forget," says the salmon, "That the oceans were once their home."
Last year I finally had an excuse to illustrate this simple little Tumblr story I've had bookmarked forever for class.
I hope you like it :]
levels of mutualship :
the closest thing to real soulmates you can find
we fought in the same trenches and have a warrior's bond that carries over into every stage of life
friend i sit next to in every class and pass notes to/whisper to constantly
academic peer/colleague that i respect and have a little intellectual crush on
neighbour in the same apartment block that i say hi to on the stairs
neighbour across the street who i wave at every morning and evening
we're regulars at the same bar
i can't even remember who you are but if you weren't here there would be something fundamental missing
which mutual is prev?
the closest thing to real soulmates you can find
we fought in the same trenches and have a warrior’s bond
friend i sit next to in every class and pass notes to constantly
my little intellectual crush
neighbor in the same apartment blog that i say hi to on the stairs
neighbor across the street who i wave to every morning and evening
we’re regulars at the same bar
i can’t even remember who you are but you’re fundamentally important
nuance/prev is bald/tags
i polled it 👍 pls reblog for a larger sample size guys. get your mutuals to vote on which mutual you are. cmon
(x)
Liam Interview With Q Magazine, October 2016
Liam Interview With GQ, October 22, 2019
🤔
Some time ago i almost accidentially (thanx to instagram algorithms)noticed that Sara M. wife of Noel G. follows bunch of kink/fetish/bdsm accounts. You can check yourself. Her love for latex is explained lol
For how long? I don’t know, i didn’t closely monitor her social media. But i was curious and decided to dig up more. I found рher friend who frequently post on insta and who is dating columnist for one paper. She is Sara’s age, and, unlike all those socialites from Noel and Sara’s circle, seems to be actually close to her. Could Sara confine to her and could she post something about new interest of her friend? Bingo!
Why do i think that "Zoe" is Sara? Well, for one thing i doubt that the author has more than one close friend who is into this stuff. But that is not all. plus this friend of her posted pics with Sara, supposedly from that night when they went to Torture Garden. Look at this dog collar and all this latex, on that bald guy too. Sara’s face hadn’t "settled" yet after facelift/fillers or whatever it was, that’s not newish photos
The columnist could, of course, completely fictionalize the story. So it is all assumptions ⬇
Does it mean that Noel and Sara unofficially separated? Idk. Officially they are still a couple, but no red carpets, no fancy parties together. Only Noel solo lol. Iirc they went to their friends birthdays and family vacations. But that’s logical if they are still officially together, would look weird for their friends and children otherwise? They need to keep up appearences until... who knows. Are they divorcing? Or do they have some kind of arrangement, officially together and do whatever they want with whoever they want in private, because they don’t want to divide assets or for the kids’ sake? Open relationships? Or maybe everything is alright and they are happy couple? But this is weird, happily married woman goes to sex parties w/o her partner all over London.
Anyway that is all I have. What do you think @devilsrefugee?
girl... this is the kind of detective work and gossip I come to tumblr for💀💀💀 we hadn't had something like this for ages. I mean, Sara could be a third friend joining 'Zoe' and the columnist on this outing, there's no way for us to know. Either way, interesting find! I'd counted divorce out when they went to Ibiza together, but this is worth speculating over.
I know that they went to Ibiza together but it could be you know for for kids and family. Didnt Noel and Meg go to Ibiza together few months before their divorce was announced and Noel were already dating his next gf Sara? Smoke and mirrors. For me its more telling that Noel went to all official events like movies premieres alone (so far), w/o his wife unlike all these years before. thats why i think that it is good chance they unofficially separated. I can be mistaken of course but it looks for me as rich, bored and may be little bit desperate newly single middle aged woman going wild. I dont think they are divorcing (it shouldve leaked by now? altho who knows) but privately living separate lives. If i were them, rich, in their 50s, with kids I wouldnt go for divorce tbh (unless i fall in love with someone else). Divorce is very expensive and money wouldnt be only thing id lose. They own at least two houses, their life can still be very comfortable
Another SS. facebook memes teas
All Noel girlies should book tickets to London just in case i think lol
I remember when this came out, my jaw was on the floor. And it made sense with all the Matt Morgan podcasts with Noel talking vehemently about conservative old women in latex and filler and midlife crises. Talking more and more about other hot women. He was so miserable and this all confirmed it. Omg I wish we knew what was coming.
Ahhhh the detective who discovered it all was @magicaltababe!!! Legendary fandom sleuthing! All done through sheer powers of observation on publicly available materials! A queen!!
I didn't disbelieve it back then, but I was cautious - sooo cautious in talking about this because it was truly all speculation and detective work. Even though, as @35mmmmmm said, it made EVERYTHING make sense. You would hate for the rumor to break containment and bring bad attention to our amazing little crew. But time has told and she was SO FUCKING RIGHT!!!!
this isn’t like revolutionary information or anything but i’m looking up teenage stories of noel and liam smoking weed and liam talks about how he would always go to his friend’s house and this friend would make him listen to pink floyd’s “the wall” and so naturally i’m like aw noel loves that album but i wonder what he was listening to when he got high. you know. assuming they didn’t hang out with each other every second of every day. but of course when noel is talking about how “the wall” is one of his favorite albums of all time he talks about how he used to get high and listen to it after he left school. Oh my god so they were hanging out. and they were friends. Oh my god i’m gonna be sick
Happy, carefree days 😇
this being Liam’s friend btw who was just a year older than him is so. imagine you’re ~14 year old liam gallagher and your friend from school wants you to come over and smoke weed and listen to music and you’re like Hey can I bring my older brother Noel who’s older than all of us he’s kind of a gay emo stoner but I like him a lot and he’s my best friend. or better yet you and your brother hang out so much that people just kind of assume he’s going to tag along. Okay
And, surely, so very tiring?
The argument was sparked when Liam claimed, falsely, that Noel wasn't the biological father of his daughter Anais. In Q last July, Noel said that Liam had yet to apologise for this and that an apology was required. Has he done so since?
“Has he apologised? Has he fuck. But let me tell you, that thing about my daughter was only the tip of it. There was more he said that night - much more - that he will never be able to take back and he should be ashamed of himself for it. He isn't, of course, because Liam can do no wrong in his eyes. The man is 33 years old, and people still treat him like he is 18, largely because he acts like he is 18.”
In the studio, meanwhile, Noel has to exercise diplomacy to UN levels.
“If I'm not happy with a vocal of his, I can't tell him direct because he'll think I'm trying to embarrass him in front of the others. And if he thinks that, he'll scream and shout and demolish things, then storm out. So I have to get the producer to have a quiet word while I nip to the bog. Insane, isn't it?”
And, surely, so very tiring?
"It is, it absolutely is, but that's just what we have to go through in order to be Oasis, I suppose. And anyway, one of my greatest traits is that I have a very long fuse."
At this point, Liam wanders over: "Talking about me?" he leers.
Noel gives him his most withering look. "Who else?" he says.
I mention to Noel that they appear to be getting on rather well.
"We are. For the first time, he is actually making an effort not to fuck things up in this band,and that,for him,is a pretty big step. I think it's because he's a songwriter himself now, he feels more involved. Before, he was just this drunken buffoon who became a rock star because his brother wrote all these brilliant songs for him, but now that he's writing them as well, he's starting to get respect. He'll never admit this, but that's important to him."
And do you claim any credit for this?
“Too right I do. I held my tongue when he first played me Little James and I believe if I'd told him the truth - that the song was no great shakes - he'd never have written another one again. But now he has and his confidence has grown out of all proportion. Whether he is actually as good as he thinks he is isn't for me to comment on, but I'm glad he feels that way because Oasis without him would be a far more slow-moving machine. And anyway, it's about time he pulled his fucking finger out, the lazy twat. Liam started this band, after all. He should be putting his arse on the line the way I do.”
So, do you think Oasis has a long future?
“I'd like to think so, yes, though I won't say the idea of a solo record doesn't appeal, because it does. But I'd only do it if, say, Liam got banged up for six months. I'd use his absence to my advantage, but I wouldn't quit the band to do it. I've seen other artists do that, and it strikes me as a very long road to loneliness.”
Liam swaggers back from the loo, and I ask him the same question.
“I’d rather shit in my own mouth, quite honestly, and that’s a stupid fucking question anyway,” he says. “Why would I want to go solo? I’m Liam Gallagher and I’m in Oasis. It doesn’t get any better than that.”
— June 2006 Q
make him wet through his boxer briefs wednesday
Forgive my man he did all of that but he had a good reason (he's in love with his brother)
stop. analyse that text through the lens of its author's intentions and original historical context. okay now take the author out back and kill them dead and analyse that text as though it were published by your mutual yesterday and is in direct conversation with the contemporary discourse that's most relevant to your life. okay now pick your favorite angle of interpretation and come up with the strongest possible argument against it. now imagine that the text is your best friend and that it means you well and that you naturally give it every benefit of the doubt because you're on its side and you want the best for it. now imagine that the text wants you dead and it'll eat you if you don't eat it first. now pretend that you found this text locked away in a cave with no evidence of when or where it came from and you have to divine its meaning solely through its internal coherence and nothing else. okay now address the elephant in the room aspect of the text you've been ignoring because you find it boring or confusing or uncomfortable and become the number one expert on it. now spend forty minutes assigning all the characters dnd classes with at least three sentences of reasoning each. okay now do the cha cha slide.
to be honest, i only personally care about plotholes when they appear in writing i already have a bunch of other problems with. if i like something enough, i'll give it a pass/invent an explanation in my head. i can't find the exact quote, but roger ebert said something about this. to paraphrase: "the movie's problem wasn't [such and such inconsistency], its problem was that i was bored enough to be thinking about that."
Mark Hamill: Shouldn’t I have some schmutz in my hair, after just being in the trash compactor?
Harrison Ford: It’s not that kind of movie, kid