LMFAO??
Claire Keane
🪼
tumblr dot com
we're not kids anymore.

JVL

JBB: An Artblog!

if i look back, i am lost

⁂
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
DEAR READER

No title available
No title available

pixel skylines
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Kaledo Art
AnasAbdin

ellievsbear
RMH
Xuebing Du
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ireland
seen from Tunisia
seen from Pakistan
seen from Germany
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Mexico

seen from Malaysia
@rantinglizzi-blog
LMFAO??
I had to walk around the whole walmart because all the wheelcarts were taken and the god damn salvation army bitches wouldn't stop screaming and dinging and I came home to find my roommate blaring sounds and having rearranged the kitchen. Fuck everyone.
Sudden thought: why do so many people who do not identify as queer and don’t want anything to do with the word think they can police who is queer and who gets to reclaim or use the word?
We’ve gotten to a point where “LGBT” and “queer” mean very different identities, communities and philosophies; they are not the same thing. Rather, LGBT and queer are more like two different communities under the LGBTQIA+ umbrella. So why aren’t we taking this separation to its ultimate conclusion? Why are we still allowing non-queer people to police what it means to be queer? Why are we still entertaining the “queer is a slur so don’t use it ever” or “only SGA and trans people are queer” conversations as valid when they come from people who are not queer and reject queerness? People who are so violently opposed to the word that they’re on a quest to eradicate it from all LGBTQIA+ spaces?
They are not queer, yet they’re continually speaking over queer-identified people in the attempt to restrict, define and silence a word and community that isn’t theirs.
If you don’t like how many different identities and relationships are welcome in queer spaces, your thoughts on this, as a non-queer person, are superfluous and irrelevant. You don’t get to make strawman arguments about BDSM-practicing heterosexuals considering themselves queer: this isn’t your concern. Dealing with BDSM-practicing heterosexuals, and figuring out whether or not they can call themselves queer or if their identification is valid, is our job, as queer people of the queer community. You don’t get to make lists of the precise identities targeted by queer-as-a-slur and argue only those people get to use the word; deciding who is queer enough to use the word is our job, as queer people of the queer community. You don’t get to decide when queer is permissible to reclaim or if folks who have never been explicitly targeted by it can use it; that’s our job, as queer people of the queer community.
(And if queer people want to share the word with anyone who isn’t cis, heterosexual, heteromantic or perisex, as seems to be the consensus among a vast majority of queer people? If you’re not queer yourself, you don’t get to have a say in this. You don’t get to take your toxic exclusionary rhetoric and apply it to a community not your own.)
If you’re not queer, your opinion on who gets to be queer and just who reclaims or uses the word is worthless. You don’t belong in this conversation. You have no authority on this subject. You’re just another annoying invader attempting to derail and erase.
It is past time that we stopped engaging with non-queer people attempting to police queer and started treating them as we treat cis folk attempting to police trans/NB/agender/cultural gender spaces and conversations.
Of course, we’ll see an upsurge in “I could be queer if I wanted” and “discoursers IDing as queer only for the purpose of discourse”, but we handle that dishonesty in other conversations. We can handle that here as well.
TL;DR: Queer and LGBT are not the same communities, so why are we allowing non-queer LGBT people to have a say on who is queer and how it is used?
If you're still doing the name thing could you do Lizzi ? Its short for Elizar I feel the context is important
a shack deep in the woods, alchemy, wooden channeling symbols, moon worship, newts, white rabbits
Tbh the idea that German is an angry or ugly language is just French propoganda to divert attention away from the fact that French sounds exactly like when your dog is choking on some plastic wrapper he found somehow
As an avid french speaker.. Yeah tbh
december 1st! the first day of
not drawing jewish characters in christmas sweaters and honoring canon jewish characters and jewish headcanons by drawing them in hannukah sweaters with menorahs and blue and white instead of christmas sweaters and pine trees and red and green
Ice or Heat?
THIS IS SO INFORMATIVE!
@chronicillnessmemes @spoonie-life-hacks, maybe useful for your followers?
Nerdy Fact #1434: Wonder Woman was originally based on two women: the wife of creator William Marston and one of his former students that both he and his wife had sexual encounters with.
(Source.)
How about you actually name ‘em?
Elizabeth Holloway Marston and Olive Byrne were among a number of women who contributed to the original Wonder Woman, and they’re fascinating people in their own right.
Elizabeth Holloway Marston was a brilliant woman. She earned three university degrees in psychology and law at a time when few women received any tertiary education. She was a successful career woman who assisted her husband with his work and was frequently the breadwinner of the family.
The main reason she was able to continue working after having children? Olive Byrne, who was not simply a casual “sexual encounter”, but the Marstons’ lover and life partner. To enable Elizabeth to work, Olive stayed at home and raised both her and Elizabeth’s children. She also wrote for Family Circle and contributed to Marston’s research.
Elizabeth is credited with pushing her husband to create a female superhero, and after his death she worked hard to preserve his vision for the character, urging DC to employ her as the comic’s editor (she was ignored).
Wonder Woman’s bracelet’s are Olive’s bracelets: Olive was known for wearing a pair of wide silver bracelets, and Marston had these in mind when he envisioned Diana’s bullet-deflecting accessories.
Marston died in 1947, but Elizabeth and Olive continued to live together until the end of their lives.
Wait. Clarification please. Are you telling me that the creator of Wonder WOMAN WAS IN A POLY-AMOROUS RELATIONSHIP?
Yep! They were in a poly relationship and had four children together, two by Elizabeth and two by Olive.
(And for those who’ve asked about sources, the Marstons’ story is covered in detail in The Secret History of Wonder Woman by Jill Lepore and Wonder Woman: The Complete History by Les Daniels)
Wonder Woman was inspired and shaped by not only a man who was incredibly progressive and awesome by todays standards let alone the standards of the day he lived in but also by a fierce, intelligent and awesome bisexual woman
This is one of the many reasons why the ways DC has ruined Wonder Woman in their pursuit of making the book as backwards and heteronormative as possible pisses me off…
Not a fierce and intelligent and awesome bisexual woman.
Two fierce and intelligent and awesome bisexual women.
You are correct :D
Imagine growing up in that house
“Mom wants to see you.”
“Psychology mom or bracelet mom?”
“Bracelet mom.”
According to Lepore, the kids called Elizabeth “Keetie” and Olive “Dotsie”!
That is adorable.
I have reblogged this before and will continue to do it until the day I die. The origin story of WW comics is as fucking great as the character herself.
Fun fact: Olive’s bracelets were a gift from William and Elizabeth, and were basically an alternative to a wedding ring, since she couldn’t legally marry them. Diana’s bracelets, 70+ years later, are a symbol of that relationship.
Another fun fact: There’s a movie coming out about their relationship, starring Luke Evans and Rebecca Hall and Bella Heathcote that was written AND directed by a woman (Angela Robinson)
let’s get one thing straight
fish woman = mermaid
fish man = merman
fish nonbinary person = merrow
don’t let traditionally gendered terms stop u from living all ur good fantasy dreams 👍🐠✨
I was just saying ḩ̸̨̣̜̖͍̳̯̻̇̾̈́͜ë̴̖̼̱̬̞̳͙̉̓̏̇͂̃̃l̵̢̢̨̰͇̝̩̘̳͓̉͌͋̊̇̿́̈́̆͑̈́͠͠ͅl̶͈̪̒̈̋̉̇̎̅́̽o̸̯̳̖̙̹̹͐͒͘͝ͅ
When you've been so abused that basic respect makes you 😃😃👌🏼👌🏼😊😊😊😀😀😀
I literally can’t get myself to sit through movies that don’t have women. I’m like where the fuck are the women? Why are there so many men? This is boring as fuck goodbye
Even if it’s historically accurate?
as everyone knows, women were invented in 1990
All the notes of “women weren’t on old time battlefields” are wrong. There were more prostitutes and merchant women than there were soldiers in most every encampment. They followed the armies, marching alongside them, and notably ran the camps.
Many more women dressed as men to fight.
Long before female nurses were officially considered to be a part of the military, they were already on the battlefield. They merely didn’t get written into official reports because they were “invisible women”, “not supposed to be there”. Usually they would be local women running a makeshift care center out of their homes.
Movies involving ancient societies? Guess how many had female fighters?
Spies? Mostly female. Yeah, only the men were caught, usually (because nobody suspected the servant woman), but historians believe most cases had more women spies than men. Most cases meaning across time and continents.
Giving me a movie on samurai? Women were trained as well to avoid being captured and raped, and often fought just as hard as men. One woman notably survived multiple battles, and became a hero alongside her sisters after taking out 7 men before dying in her last fight (usually in sword fighting you’d be lucky to take out 2 enemy soldiers. 7 is fucking insane, but because she was a woman it was shoved under the records how the lord managed to survive).
Women have ALWAYS been on battlefields. Women have an intense history in driving victories and losses alike. They were supply runners, fighters, spies, assassins, prostitutes (look up how prostitutes essentially ran the western world, or even the social status of harem members. They literally fucking ruled), even underground activists.
The only time there weren’t many women were with cowboys. Actual western cowboys tended to be both POC and gay. In fact, any time women didn’t have a near equal or greater presence, there was a LOT of gay men.
History: either 80% female or 100% gay. And it’s 95% POC.
Ah yes my local library, or as I call it, “an autistic book hoarder’s dream home”.
The hottest thing about BDSM is consent. I watch a specific series/site online and I love it. They do their knots correctly. They do their weight distribution correctly. They do their pain giving correctly. And they don't show it (or its very subtle, if you know what to look for you can see it occasionally) but I know these girls are in control of the whole thing. They make a point to show how the girl is "locked" in. But there's someone just off set to help unlock/untie if needed. I've seen it happen. I've seen a girl say she's uncomfortable or hint that x is no good, move on. And changes are made.
The best part of BDSM in consent.
Shout out to all my trans friends who have to wear clothes that make them dysphoric.
To those who have to wear certain things because of sensory processing disorders.
To those who have to wear certain things because of psychosis and hallucinations.
To those who have to wear certain things because they just aren’t comfortable in anything else.
To those who have to wear certain things due to disability.
To those who are forced by family or school or work to wear something that makes them uncomfortable.
Your gender is not defined by what you wear, even if it feels like it.
You deserve to have the right name and pronouns used.
Your gender identity is valid.
You are valid.
Preparing to meet with a potential employer today.
Mentally preparing myself to get misgendered, misgender myself, and refer to my wife as my “roommate” if it happens to come up. Because where I live, there are absolutely no protections for queer people in the workplace.
But marriage equality fixed everything, everyone!
Thanks to everyone who sent me well-wishes–I got the job!! <3
I encourage everyone who needs it to use your mobility devices when you need it - even if you’re not quite at the point where you absolutely cannot get around without it.
Just because you’ve not wrung yourself out to the brink doesn’t mean you don’t need it and aren’t allowed to use it. Protecting yourself from getting to that point is absolutely okay and encouraged, so please use your mobility devices. Anyone who says otherwise can kindly go smell some pretty flowers.
For the longest time I’d been afraid to use my wheelchair unless my legs had zero functionality or until I actually fell down. And you know what? It sucks to fall down, it’s scary, and it hurts. But I felt like I wasn’t allowed to use it unless I absolutely, positively had no other choice. And that, my friend, is internalized ableism.
Being a part of the spoonie community here on Tumblr has helped me so much. Just this weekend I went on a retreat thing and brought my wheelchair just in case I might need it. And it’s really the only reason I didn’t have to go home early. I waited till I absolutely needed it the first day. And even after my meds kicked in and my legs were a tiny bit steadier but still scary and difficult to walk with, I used it - as a wheelchair and as a sort of walker. I used it how and when I needed it and I helped prevent my condition from worsening.
I love my wheelchair. It helped me take care of myself this weekend and I was lucky to be in a really supportive group who were understanding not only about needing my wheelchair, but also when I went non-verbal.
So please, fellow spoonies, use your mobility devices whenever and however you need to. You’re allowed to, you’re encouraged to. Take care of yourself and protect yourself. ❤
!!!! Yes!!!
I "technically" don't /need/ my cane. I get around my small house okay and if I had to I probably wouldn't die of pain and passing out going to a small store without it. (Probably)
I "technically" don't need my wheelchair when I go to parks or malls or museums. And I "technically" don't need the grocery store wheelchairs when I go shopping. Would I end the day in incredible pain and have to sleep for at least the next day? Yeah.
I use these not because I cannot exist without them. I use them because I cannot live even a little productively or comfortably without them. As far as I know, lots of people are like that.
Never be ashamed of using what you can to make your life easier. Especially if abled-people hate it.
(We don't shame people for using lightbulbs, cars, heaters, toilets, or shoes do we???? Unnecessary, but make life easier..)