I want to write something long form about the teacher strikes and the state of education in England right now.
Youâll hear a lot of teachers in the coming days and weeks say they donât want to strike, or they feel guilt about striking. Iâve thought about it, and I want to strike, and I donât feel guilty, and I think I owe it to students to strike. Maybe not the ones I teach now, but the ones I might teach in five years time.
I owe it to some of the Y7s, 8s and 9s I taught last year who were deeply passionate about science. In particular, Iâm think of the Y7s who loved our space topic, and may never get taught by a qualified physics teacher. Iâm also thinking about the sort of country theyâll grow up in, the opportunities theyâll have and the future they deserve.
I can write some arguments within the liberal, capitalist context we live in, Â for improving education, and specifically why pay and working conditions need to be improved for teachers and why striking is our only option. I know thatâs not what a lot of you follow me for, but they may be persuasive if you know teachers or want to talk to people about why they should support the teacher strikes.
1)Â Â Â Â There is a national shortage of teachers. This is a fact- we know a large number of teachers do not stay in the profession long term- 1/3 of teachers who trained in the last 10 years are no longer teaching. Other research suggests many of these teachers quit in the first 5 years of teaching. This year, we have struggled to recruit across secondary subjects. In subjects like maths, science, MFL, geography and more, the situation is especially dire- but this crisis is even starting to impact primary schools now. First and foremost, students are going without qualified, subject specialist teachers. In other professions, the Tories acknowledge high pay is needed to recruit suitable staff. Why not teaching- which after all requires a specialist degree and often a post graduate qualification too.
2)Â Â Â Â This doesnât just hurt individual students, it hurts the whole country, because it leaves us with a lack of people who are capable of becoming doctors, dentists, engineers, entering other health care professions, working in the STEM fields that are meant to drive our economy. Investing in education grows the economy long term, and is better for society as a whole.
3)Â Â Â Â But it does also hurt the social mobility of individual students. Richer families can pay tutors, or go private to make up for deficiencies in teaching. But those from low income families canât. Few parents have the time or ability to bridge the gap themselves.
4)Â Â Â Â Furthermore, if we think about really vulnerable students- who, make no mistake will be used as a weapon against teachers during the strike- they benefit from well funded schools. They benefit from having consistent adults in their lives. They often take a long time to form relationships with staff. A revolving door of supply teachers (which is the reality in many secondary schools) really hurts them.
5)Â Â Â Â Teachers struggle to negotiate pay for themselves. Many schools will baulk at the idea of a teacher negotiating on their own pay, and take deep offense, as if the idea of negotiating pay in a capitalist society when you have an unusual skill is totally unreasonable. So, teachers can only negotiate pay on a national scale. And because the government wonât sit down and negotiate, the only thing we can do is take industrial action.
6)Â Â Â Â Ultimately, schools canât afford to pay teachers well- so any pay rise needs to be fully funded. Again, hence strike action.
We can say that the teacher shortage is about working conditions too- and it is, for sure. But itâs also true that the teacher shortage appears to be most acute where a teacherâs pay wonât stretch as far because accommodation costs and other costs are high.
I want to take a moment at this point to address the idea of âwork to ruleâ- which doesnât actually exist in English law, btw.
Action short of a strike in teaching would likely take the form of teachers not running clubs and trips, maybe refusing to do marking as well. These are all things that would negatively impact students, but have a totally negligible economic impact, if at all. It would, inevitably, drag on for months, because the government simply would not notice.
A teacher strike, ideally one that shuts a large number of schools, will have a noticeable impact on the economy, because some parents wonât be able to work or travel. Yes, itâs rubbish for parents, but the impact on students will genuinely be lower than weeks or months of action short of a strike. And itâs the only language the government will listen to, unfortunately.
I want to talk also about what the Tories are doing to education. I alluded to this earlier, but I think it bears exploring specifically.
The Tories are destroying education. At this stage, I think itâs gone beyond neglect, into a deliberate policy to damage state education. They canât say that out loud, of course, but why else, at a time of massive teacher shortages, would they cut teacher training places from 2024? Why else would they implement the ECT program in such a way itâs driving early career teachers out of teaching? Why else would they starve schools of funding to such an extent?
Why would the Tories do this?
Iâve got two possible theories for you.
One, they want a poor, uneducated underclass, with limited job prospects, in order to exploit them. And educating the working classes and providing them with opportunities for social mobility runs against that.
Two, some tories take a more eugenicist outlook, they think education is simply wasted on said âunderclassâ. That no amount of good education would improve the prospects of certain groups, so why bother?
Perhaps itâs a little of column a, a little of column b. Certainly, there are strong objections to teachers in state schools sharing opinions that might be contradictory to the governmentsâ.
So I strongly believe this strike is to preserve the future of education.
Obviously, if we consider the wider state of the country, there are lot of important reasons to join a wider workerâs movement. And Iâm going to come back to that point about working conditions, because part of that is the shortage of funding in other public sector areas, meaning schools are asked to do more and more with less and less.
Itâs increasingly clear Rishi Sunakâs Tories are both fascists and disaster capitalists, who are going to take what they can from this country before their party implodes. And you all know what I think of the political alternatives. Itâs also true if we wait two years for an election, people will die- not least in A and E waiting rooms, or waiting for an ambulance.
The Tories are happy to let ÂŁ42 Billion in tax go unpaid (largely by the rich and mega-corporations), and then they turn around and say thereâs no money.
I genuinely think this wave of strikes could be the start of something- of meaningful political change that carries this country to the left. Maybe the some of the current union leaders will not push things far enough, but we are the union, so we must push further. And we can use this opportunity to really influence the UK political landscape, and build solidarity for a mass workerâs union.