i donât mean to be political, but what if everyone had basic human rights

Janaina Medeiros
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
untitled
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Show & Tell
Fai_Ryy
sheepfilms
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
$LAYYYTER

Discoholic đȘ©
official daine visual archive
Misplaced Lens Cap
will byers stan first human second

Kaledo Art
Stranger Things
One Nice Bug Per Day
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
No title available
Xuebing Du
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Iraq

seen from Italy
seen from Indonesia
seen from Canada
seen from Morocco

seen from Germany
@reneedenoailles
i donât mean to be political, but what if everyone had basic human rights
Roxanne Montgomery
Dude living downstairs has been loudly rapping for like 10 minutes, then suddenly did a high pitched scream, and now its silent down there
he got raptured
not everything is getting worse. at least you don't hear high hopes by panic at the disco every day anymore
"There's no platonic explanation for this" <-you need to be nicer to your friends. Right now
imagine if you woke up and your name was your url and you looked exactly like your icon
Youâre not depressed. You just need $250,000 in your bank account.
Reblog to materialize $250,000 in prev's bank account
me on an average day: i need a treat
me on a bad day: i need a deluxe treat
I think all computers should have cd slots and all phones should have headphone ports send tumble
You just teleported to the last movie you watched! how is it going?
good
bad
great
awful
FUCK YOU I'M IN THE BACKROOMS NOW
dead
results
saw this being debated and just wanted to talk about it too.
"is it rude if I politely ask a writer if they use ai or chatgpt on their works because I'm almost certain they do?"
yes, it is rude. no matter how polite you are being when you ask them this.
you say you are almost certain. so you are not absolutely certain.
unless you are absolutely, undoubtedly certain â with actual proof â that their writing is ai generated, never ever ask an artist if their work is ai generated.
I know several writers who would stop writing and delete all of their works if they were ever accused of using ai. so it doesn't matter if you are polite when you ask them this, you are suggesting that their works are ai generated, that they didn't create the works they could have spent hours, days, weeks, months or years working on.
ai and chatgpt are trained on real humans' works, they are trained to mimic the way real humans write. so if you say a genuine writer's work "looks ai", I'm gonna have to ask you what you think ai was trained on.
a writer whose English isn't their first language may also write in a way that "looks ai" to some, if they write in English and have to rely on translator.
using em dash isn't a sign of ai. I do it all the time. my fellow writers all love em dash.
having long paragraphs with "overly described scenes" isn't a sign of ai. I do it all the time, and so do my fellow writers.
all the "ai signs" are actually just what most writers actually do. they get mistaken for "ai signs" because sometimes the way writers write or describe a scene in a fanfic or an original work is different than the way people talk or text. because they're writing a fic and describing a scene, not chatting with a friend. the way I talk is different than the way I write my fics.
if you suspect a work was ai generated, but are not 100% sure, you can always just stop reading said work without saying anything.
if someone does use ai to write, they will either a.) deny and continue using ai to write or b.) admit because they see nothing wrong with it and continue using ai to write.
if a genuine writer was wrongly accused of using ai, they may stop writing altogether.
asking a writer if they use ai or chatgpt to write will always do more harm than good. witch hunting will always do more harm than good.
you are not "fighting against ai" by throwing around such accusations. you are harming genuine writers and artists.
It isnt an accusation. Its a fucking question. One that protects the very communities and artists that this post claims to defend.
all of the fanfic writers, whom I personally know, say the same thing that they would feel discouraged and might delete all their works if they were asked this.
itâs not âhey do you like x or yâ question. itâs a subtle implication that your work looks like it was written by a robot within a minute. if you personally donât find that offensive, thatâs cool. but I know a lot of writers do. and they have the rights to be discouraged by it.
also we are talking about fanfic writers who write as their hobby, getaway or safe place, writers whose works you read for free. not writers who sell their works and are making profit from what they write. fanfic writers donât owe you anything.
This just came across my dash. I'm going to be blunt.
Asking a writer or artist if they âuse AIâ is an accusation, no matter how you dress it up. Itâs not neutral. It implies you think their effort, style, or voice is artificial. It implies that their human work doesnât look human enough for you.
You donât protect the community by policing people who are actually creating from scratch. You protect it by supporting human creators, reporting confirmed AI misuse when thereâs evidence, and learning the difference between this sounds different than what Iâd write and this is machine-generated.
Writersâespecially fanfic authorsâalready pour their time, emotion, and identity into what they share for free. They donât owe anyone proof of authenticity on top of that. And if your question makes someone want to quit writing, itâs not protecting the community. Itâs shrinking it.
If youâre not 100% sure, just scroll. AI ethics donât need to turn into public inquisition season.
âAnd if your question makes someone want to quit writing, itâs not protecting the community. Itâs shrinking it.â
^^^^ this
I also saw a video by T. B. Skyen on YouTube where he said that accusing (or """asking""") an artist of using AI is not protecting the art community. It is signifying to the AI bros and corporate bastards that you, the consumer, cannot tell the difference. This enables them to replace more of their art and writing staff with AI, because if you're not going to be able to tell, the fuck does it matter?
So, you might not think it's hurting anybody to level AI allegations against your fellow artists and writers, but the reality is that it very likely could affect another artist or writer's livelihood in the future. Maybe not an amateur fanfic writer, but maybe the writer of your favorite show when the evil corporate powers that be realize that even other artists and writers can't tell what's manmade and what isn't. If you think the work of real artists looks like AI slop, then more AI slop is what you're gonna end up with in the long run.
If you care at all about protecting the arts, then you should be spending more time appreciating and lifting up the work of artists, injecting joy and love and whimsy back into the community, instead of staying hypervigilant and fearful that you might accidentally enjoy work that was made by AI. Instead of asking someone if their work was made by AI, just fucking tell them you liked it. If you spend all your time trying to maintain some moral high ground about being a "true" appreciator of art because you make extra sure it's not made by AI first, you're gonna end up not appreciating very much art at all and pushing away a lot of the artists who would otherwise be overjoyed to have you in their space.
I need to make a masterlist of my writing
Iâm calling your phone and youâre not picking up đ
And I still don't know when you left me you just went and closed this door đđđ
this did make me giggle during the update
Bugs Bunny accidentally transformed the word nimrod into a synonym for idiot because nobody got a joke where he sarcastically compared Elmer Fudd to the Biblical figure Nimrod, a mighty hunter.
Etymology is ridiculous and terrifying sometimes
Bugs Bunny is more powerful than God
He also solidified the idea of rabbits loving carrots when carrots actually carry very little nutritional value for rabbits. The funniest part of that is that the original joke was a reference to a Clark Gable film where Gable munches on a carrot, it was never meant to imply that rabbits love carrots. The Clark Gable reference wouldâve been obvious to audiences in the 40s but it has been pretty much lost to time.
Bugs Bunny has too much power and should be feared.
and for the lady, perhaps a love so pure?
You / Me / Her.
fandom: shakespeare's code pairing: roxanne montgomery / edward pembroke rating: m word count: 1192 words. tw: mentions of nudity, mentions of suicide mc: mariana, curse + sin notes: this is part one of my four-part series on my sc mcs in a modern au ! i was thinking about posting it all in one go but i think it'd feel nicer for me to post them one by one. i hope you all enjoy â€ïž tagging: @rc-catalog, @juicyrottenapple
he's pointing at stars in the sky that have already died.
đ” sun has set â beabadoobee.
"Well. "