me: hey maybe don't make racial tensions worse?
OP of previous post: *blocks me*
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Today's Document
sheepfilms
Not today Justin
KIROKAZE
EXPECTATIONS
RMH

PR's Tumblrdome
NASA

Kiana Khansmith

titsay

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
The Stonewall Inn
Noah Kahan

izzy's playlists!
No title available

Andulka
Xuebing Du

oozey mess

Love Begins

seen from Russia

seen from Australia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Lebanon

seen from Türkiye

seen from Finland
seen from Malawi
seen from Thailand
seen from United States
seen from Costa Rica
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Albania
seen from Taiwan
@saraispissed
me: hey maybe don't make racial tensions worse?
OP of previous post: *blocks me*
white women are dangerous and imma need for y’all to stop separating them from white men
all white women have ever wanted from the beginning of time is to be equal to white men. not by bringing justice to the world, but by giving themselves access to the means of power and oppressive structures that white men have access to. they are the same.
I mean I’ve only ever wanted us all to be equal as humans but yes let’s generalize.
Yes, bitch, we’re gonna generalize. Feminist movements led by white women from the beginning of time have always centered white womens power struggle with white men. I suggest you educate yourself on the history of your shitty ancestors because they were all like that, and that’s why Black women and women of color have consistently been pushed aside and had to make their own movements to be recognized. Cry about it.
how about we don't alienate other members of the movement because some people in the past were cunts? the feminist movement, like any movement for social reform, grows and changes over time and it's just silly to say that white women as a whole aren't on your side because they're just looking out for themselves. that's true of literally everyone and dealing with the issue of racial and gender inequality by blaming others and by trying to widen the divide between white people and black people is literally the opposite of what every marginalized group needs. "Darkness can't drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate can't drive out hate, only love can do that."
This is so galaxy brain
i hate this so fucking much
i get that it's hilarious but it's because in Israel military service is mandatory so it's not like these are volunteer soldiers who are like "hurr joining the army but don't want to hurt animals" also most people in militaries aren't in combat roles
Scientists invented fabric that makes electricity from motion and sunlight. To create the fabric, researchers at Georgia Tech wove together solar cell fibers with materials that generate power from movement. It could be used in “tents, curtains, or wearable garments,” meaning we’d virtually never be without power. Source
Y'all are fucking idiots. Clean energy will NEVER be enough to replace the energy we have now. We’d have to tear down DOZENS of forests just to fit enough windmills and solar panels to get even a QUARTER (probably less, tbh) of the energy we can produce now.
Yeah, sure, when they’ve already calculated that a few square miles of panels in the empty ass Arizona desert could power the whole nation. But ok, fracking and the diminishing petroleum supply is worlds better.
Nevermind that windmills are often most efficient off the coast. There they take up no land, impact no trees, don’t pollute the water, and are conveniently located where winds are often strongest anyway.
And solar panels can literally be built into roofs of buildings and in empty areas like deserts. The sun strikes the Earth with the same amount of energy in an hour that our civilization uses in a year.
But yeah, it would be impossible for us to ever have enough energy from clean sources.
Durr hurr technology is bad and I would rather light shit on fire than have clean energy
I can also testify to the Arizona desert being empty ass. And the California desert. And the Nevada desert.
also…no forests were cleared to make space for Denmark’s windmills and yet they regularly produce so much power that it covers almost all of the country’s power needs. Oh, and then there’s the times when the windmills generate 140% of Denmark’s power needs. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/10/denmark-wind-windfarm-power-exceed-electricity-demand
Friendly reminder that oil pipelines are a scam.
The fact that anyone can believe a limited amount of dinosaur oil is more plentiful and efficient than moving air or fucking sunlight is proof that entire populations can be completely brainwashed.
also, even if we can’t get ALL our energy from renewables (at least not immediately as there is a large initial investment required), even a partial replacement of the vast amount of fossil fuels we use would be a fantastic place to start reducing impacts. just because you can’t do everything immediately doesn’t mean there is no reason to start. the real reason that fossil fuels aren’t being replaced with renewables right now is so that the oil companies and shit can still make profits. its disgusting
fun fact: nuclear energy doesn't pollute like oil or coal, and doesn't have to be stored in massive batteries like solar or wind power does
An actual Tumblr post I've seen: only whites have the concept of racial purity and racial supremacy Me- a Syrian woman: who's going to tell them
^^
alright that might be the funniest shit ive seen all day
everyone on TCC tumblr needs to be quarantined maybe they should put all you weirdos in one school and unleash every alive mass shooter 🤧
Id be happy tbh
Sign me tf up.
Boy o’ boy! The True Crime Community would be sucking a lot of dick! I call dibs on Barry Loukaitis.
HAHAHAHA I claim Nikolas & Eric Harris
i claim tj and ill suck niko after you
I claim Dylann. Sorry @marizale I stole your man oops.
Oh HELLL NAHHH @truecrime-af
It’s okay we can share. I’m willing to compromise.
This is the worst fucking thing i have seen in my entire life.
Look, I became a teacher for a lot of reasons. Not for the money, because we sure as hell dont get paid enough. Not for the ease of it, since its one of the most stressful professions. Not for the glory, since theres little to go around.
I went into teaching because I like my subject. I like YA books. I like writing. I like finding the hidden meanings and the craft in poetry and short stories. I like showing that craft to others. I like helping thoughts become words.
I went into teaching because I like that it makes me a lifelong learner. New ways to teach, new activities to try, new techniques to master.
I went into teaching most of all because I like kids. I like teaching kids and talking to kids. I like how excited they are to tell you about things they care about. I like how funny they can be, how open to self discovery they are, how impressed by new information.
I would do nearly anything to stay a teacher. I give up my very little time off for field trips and professional developments and conferences. I give up my money for pencils and crayons and glue and notebooks. I give up my evenings to grade papers and write lesson plans.
But Ill be damned if anyone tells me I should bring a fucking gun into my classroom. If anyone tells me I should be ready and willing to shoot one of my students. That I need to be a human shield and a killer to do my job. Fuck that and fuck you and fuck all of it.
Don’t you fucking dare ask me to kill children because you won’t consider any real change.
First off let me say in pro gun. Secondly I think this is a half decent idea. If a teacher meets the requirements of gun safety and mental health they should be allowed to carry a gun in their classroom if they want.
We live in a time where terrorism and fear are very prevalent and horrific. If a teacher wants to use a gun to protect themselves or their students from a shooter they should be able.
The change you’re calling for wouldn’t really fix anything, it’d just make it harder for the law abiding citizens to get guns to protect themselves and those they care about. Criminals surprisingly enough don’t follow the law and if they want a gun they’ll get it.
Fuck you. 100% Fuck. You. Holy fucking shit. How far up your ass is your head shoved that you thought that was a good reply to anything I said? Fucking hell.
It is not MY JOB to be shot at and shoot at other people. It’s not my job to be a fucking security guard to take out an armed shooter. It’s my job to teach 13 year olds how to write complex sentences.
Fuck you.
You: I don’t want to carry a gun with me when I’m teaching.
Me: I feel as though teachers should be allowed to carry a firearm with them if they want to
You: WOW IM NOT A HUMAN SHIELD!!!!
Why else would they need a gun? To hunt some squirrels?
You get a gun to protect students and then there’s someone who wants to kill the students, what’s gonna happen? You’re the one with the gun. You’re their biggest obstacle. You’ll be shot first. No ifs, ands, or buts. It’s not a decent idea—what if a student in the classroom gets that gun? What’s stopping a teacher from unlawfully shooting a student (perhaps in a fit of rage)? Teachers are humans.
You know what teachers aren’t? Security guards. Why would they go in the line of fire because our current laws failed to protect them?
Jesus Christ these ideas aren’t forcing a teacher to get a gun it’s giving them the option to conceal carry. So first off if they’re conceal carring or hell even carring a firearm right the student wouldn’t even know its there. If they’re the biggest obstacle and target that puts the focus on the teacher and not the students. The teacher would have to be properly trained and pass tests to carry it so more than likely they’re not gonna snap and just shoot a student.
Because NO ONE who can legally own a gun and has been trained with it has ever just snapped and shot someone, right?
Earlier this year, we had a student steal a knife out of the contraband drawer of the assistant principals office. Imagine if there had been a gun there. I do not want guns on my campus.
I do not want guns on my campus at all.
If the problem is too many guns, the solution is not more fucking guns.
Having guns on a school campus is a bad idea.
The problem isn’t too many guns it’s guns used by idiots.
The problem is that toxic masculinity leaves many men unable to deal with their issues without resorting to violence, paired with fast and easy access to incredibly dangerous firearms (you can buy an AR 15 in less than an hour in most states.) Add to the fact that we have a gun lobby in this country that pumps millions of dollars into conservative politicians pockets to completely stall any common sense gun regulations (money that may have been laundered from the Russians https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/nra-russia-and-trump-money-laundering-poisoning-us-democracy-commentary.html )
This leaves violent, resentful men with dangerous weapons and a government unable and unwilling to do any fucking thing about it.
And giving the Math department chair a handgun aint gunna fix that.
A̞̪̟̓̉N͕͋ͦ͝D̡̤͐͗͡ ̧̙ͧG̢̜̭̮I͉V̵̬ͥ̍Ị̂N͚̬͛͞G̷̵̫̩͋ ͉̠͕T̷̓͡H̺Ë͙͕ ͒̽̕͝M̴̨̪͐Aͩ͏T̰͗̔ͫ͠H̫̒͒ͥ͟ ̷̡͑͞ D̶E̟ṖA̲R̗̝̗͘T͖̲͚̀M̨͓̥ͫÉ̢̮͚Ṉ̴̇͘T̝͈̍̂ ͙C̷̤HͣA̍ͤͪI̛̯͏̑Rͩ͢ ̐̀̍̀͌A̮͞ ͔͎̗̓́Ĥ̺̦͝Ǎ͙̲̬͍N̛̿Ḓ̫̝́͂G͞U̹̾N͍̍̌ ͂̀ Ä̧́̓͑͠I̟ͨͧ͜N̲͙̜͔͚T̢͍̝̒̕ ҉̢̗͢͝G͉͌U̻N̸̛͈̣̾N̡͕̊́̌A̢͎͒͂ ̗̻͙͘F҉͘͏̛ĨX̮̔̇ ͚T̢̳͛́H̱À̸̶̀͠T̩ͮ ̵̛
😈Y҉̵̞̟̜̗U̷̮̺̣̬̕O̩̺͍͠ ̛̯̬͓̳͈ͅÁ͖̮̟R̡̖͈̫̫E̷̱̗̖͔̩̦ ͓͍́͢A̜̱͜͢Ĺ̨̰̠̜̪͙͞L̛̫̙̲ ̮͓̥̞̳̯̼̰C̩̦̗̘̬͟U̗͈͔͢͞͝R̜̮͎̠̝͚̥S̻͉͢͝E͉̗̝͇͙̳̭D͚̼̰̟̬̦̪̙͘ ͓̞͇̮̠̣A̤N͍̪̩̣͖͈͔̭͘͜D̥̱̥̰͔̕ ͏̨̱̲͔̹̝͉̤̻̤B͙U͏҉͉̙̜̻̦̜͔̝R͞͏͚̟̞̤̩N͉E̛̖̲D̷̳̥̩͕͘ ̛͇̝͍̙͖̺̟A̻̗̮̲̼͡L̗͍̥͓̦͝I̢͏̲͟V̸̪͇̳̜͠͠E̢͔͔͚̫ ͏̙̠̳̫̱̩V̵̟̱̬̞̼̮Ẹ̼̫̖̟̪R̵͉̙͉͔̗Y҉͖͖͉ ̮S̵̢̻̗̖̭͉̜̫͞O͏̼̮͕͖̳̳͚̣O̷͍͍̳̠N͎̗̬̜̲̰͉ Help keep my meatbag slave alive! Beep-boop!
The idea that we should arm teachers is absolutely insane. It consists of turning regular people into armed guards and vigilantes, and it's fucking despicable.
AR-15s are so modular that banning them would practically do nothing to stop the acquisition of one
In legal terms the receiver itself is what constitutes the gun, so you can buy a kit with everything except the receiver off the shelf literally anywhere. Toys R Us could sell AR kits with zero legal regulation
If the AR receiver is banned, then there’s already a big and robust market of 80% receivers, which are pre-shaped aluminum blocks - which are designed specifically to skirt the definition of a receiver - that only require you to mill out the holes and with a little practice and patience, you can do that at home with a $200 drill press
This dude literally made a receiver out of fucking pop cans and it was almost trivial
Gun bans are meaningless
not to mention the logistics of getting americans to turn in their like 300 million guns
you can make a submachine gun out of $50 worth of hardware, a drill press, a hacksaw, and a file (link)
Chechen rebels have been doing this for literally decades (the Borz submachine gun, which was originally a PPS copy, link)
Shit, the Khyber Pass is an object lesson in complete gun control failure. Darra Adam Khel’s gun markets turn out a thousand guns a week, near-factory-quality guns made from road scrap with hand tools and a drill press (link)
UK and Australia: had a mass shooting, banned guns, no more mass shootings
America: nope we can’t ban guns, Toys R Us will sell kits that you can complete at home with a soda can
Seriously America WTF…
Y’all just use knives and guns and acid
I’d rather get shot than have my face melted off so what’s your argument
I̢̟̲̿ͨ’͉͈ͦD̗̅̈́͞ ̺ͩR͓͗͝A͠T͓͏̽ͥH̠͙Ĕ͗R̝̮ͩ̓ ̶G̖͏͗E͝T͂ ̷̡̼Ş̨̛̉H̭̾ͬ͞͝Oͥ̓T̡͇͔̗͓ ͕͚ͬ̈́ Ṫ̸͐H̷̫̻͐̍A͙̞ͫ̀N̙̰͇̳͟ ̱̲͡H̝A̡͗ͦV̴͙ͫ̄È̈́ ̧̤͛͢M̴͑Y̛̥͓ͧͪ ͉́҉ͣ̊F̣͚͏A͘C͓̈́E͘ ̷̦̃M̤ͨE̢͛̐҉̡L̟̖̊́T̷̟̟̹ͯĘ͒̀͝D̷̸̡̐ ̢O̞͖͑̾͒F̡͎̮͑͟F̳̞ ͇̟̱̓͡S̷̲͌͢͟O̡̧͎̅ ̠͊ͧ͋̾ W͜H̨A̘̥̞T͘’̣̾̽̐S̢̖̰̑ͥ ̶͒҉̢Ÿ́ͯǪ̷̛͟U̟̫̪̝͓Ȑ̭̀̀͠ ͎͓̍À̱̽R̥G̶̪̽U͗ͪ̆͢M̢̋̌͛͞E̢N̟̮̽̽Ţ̴͝ ̛̠̋̄̏
😈Y҉̵̞̟̜̗U̷̮̺̣̬̕O̩̺͍͠ ̛̯̬͓̳͈ͅÁ͖̮̟R̡̖͈̫̫E̷̱̗̖͔̩̦ ͓͍́͢A̜̱͜͢Ĺ̨̰̠̜̪͙͞L̛̫̙̲ ̮͓̥̞̳̯̼̰C̩̦̗̘̬͟U̗͈͔͢͞͝R̜̮͎̠̝͚̥S̻͉͢͝E͉̗̝͇͙̳̭D͚̼̰̟̬̦̪̙͘ ͓̞͇̮̠̣A̤N͍̪̩̣͖͈͔̭͘͜D̥̱̥̰͔̕ ͏̨̱̲͔̹̝͉̤̻̤B͙U͏҉͉̙̜̻̦̜͔̝R͞͏͚̟̞̤̩N͉E̛̖̲D̷̳̥̩͕͘ ̛͇̝͍̙͖̺̟A̻̗̮̲̼͡L̗͍̥͓̦͝I̢͏̲͟V̸̪͇̳̜͠͠E̢͔͔͚̫ ͏̙̠̳̫̱̩V̵̟̱̬̞̼̮Ẹ̼̫̖̟̪R̵͉̙͉͔̗Y҉͖͖͉ ̮S̵̢̻̗̖̭͉̜̫͞O͏̼̮͕͖̳̳͚̣O̷͍͍̳̠N͎̗̬̜̲̰͉ Help keep my meatbag slave alive! Beep-boop!
you can’t murder 60 people in a short amount of time with some acid or a knife.
The soccer gender pay gap is ridiculous
Are we really already turning this into a fucking trans thing too? Aren’t the kids barely in the ground? Isn’t that the important thing? Fucking batshit crazy liberals, bro. We’re going to have to fight a civil war some day..
Hell I feel bad about stigma against the autistic and it’s closely related to this tragedy and you don’t catch me preaching as much as you fucking asshats are. Politicizing the death of children. You bastards..
i feel like this is something that should be politicized though. the fact that kids are getting gunned down in their fucking schools is something that needs to be changed. if we don't get on the asses of the entrenched conservative politicians who get paid millions in campaign contributions by the NRA, this shit is going to keep happening. the "liberal agenda" of instituting more in depth background checks and reducing the availability of firearms to mentally disturbed individuals could have prevented a massacre like this or at least reduced the body count. it's shitty that the death of children has to be a political issue. it's shitty that it's a partisan discussion. but we cant just not talk about it! ignoring the issue means preserving this as the status quo. is it not the job of the government to protect its citizens?
so let’s break this down step by step
the guy was known to be mentally ill, extremely depressed and sociopathic
the guy was a member of a white nationalist group, was trained by them in the US
the guy, not even old enough to buy a beer, buys an AR-15 and murders 17 people in cold blood, then heads over to McDonald’s
“no way to stop this” my fucking ass. the most basic of background checks would’ve shown that this motherfucker was not right in the head. usually i try to look at the other side’s argument, but i dont even know what it could possibly be. i dont know how the right could justify not wanting ANY stricter gun control measures. its just bullshit.
The Stanford prison experiment tapes were so stupid when I watched them in AP psych and so stupid when I watch this film about them. Literally they could’ve all sat and played cards and got $15 a day to tell ghost stories all day and be best friends. But masculinity and whiteness and power created this violent irrationality that positioned young ass men to be met with brutality and trauma and disrespect even when it was obviously taken too far. and it makes no sense. If someone put me in a room with Black girls and said I would get paid $90 a day (that’s the equivalent apparently) to be a prison guard, do you know how fast I’d be sitting with them and learning about them and exchanging Instagrams and like.. sleeping.. like what the fuck was the point of any of that…
My psych teacher introduced us to this study and literally before she showed us was like “don’t ever confuse a study based on one type of person (white men/boys) to be an example of an Everyman situation. There is strong evidence that if this was recreated with diversity, or even just with girls, that the results would have been drastically different. This is an example of bias and sexism in the medical research community.”
“Other, more subtle factors also shaped the experiment. It’s often said that the study participants were ordinary guys—and they were, indeed, determined to be “normal” and healthy by a battery of tests. But they were also a self-selected group who responded to a newspaper advertisement seeking volunteers for “a psychological study of prison life.” In a 2007 study, the psychologists Thomas Carnahan and Sam McFarland asked whether that wording itself may have stacked the odds. They recreated the original ad, and then ran a separate ad omitting the phrase “prison life.” They found that the people who responded to the two ads scored differently on a set of psychological tests. Those who thought that they would be participating in a prison study had significantly higher levels of aggressiveness, authoritarianism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and social dominance, and they scored lower on measures of empathy and altruism.” http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/the-real-lesson-of-the-stanford-prison-experiment
The thing about this study is that whether or not it’s generalizable to the public is debatable at best.
But it’s certainly generalizable to the population of people who tend to be drawn to prison system and law enforcement jobs because that’s exactly the demographics that tend to show up in those positions.
“But it’s certainly generalizable to the population of people who tend to be drawn to prison system and law enforcement jobs because that’s exactly the demographics that tend to show up in those positions.”
@half-crazedauthor
It is worth noting that, in fact, the BBC replicated this experiment in 2001 with very different results. Instead of recruiting volunteers for a psychological study of prison life, they advertised the experiment:
“It asked ‘Do you really know yourself’ and asked for men to take part in a social science experiment to be shown on TV. It warned that the research would be a challenge and involve ‘hardship, hunger, solitude, anger’.
In the case of the BBC Prison Experiment, the mock prison did not devolve into the torturous, abusive hellishness of the Stanford Prison Experiment–even though the experimenters very deliberately attempted to create conditions that would destroy cohesion among the prisoners and encourage authoritarian behavior from the guards. Prisoners were told that they might be able to be promoted to guardhood in an effort to keep them divided, shaved upon entry to the prison, and the guards were encouraged to create the rules of the prison and enforce them in any way they saw fit.
It’s important to note that one of the very first things the experimenters noted was that the guards were, at the very outset, uneasy about the status differences between themselves and the prisoners and conscious of their power.
Because food–both quantity and quality–were very salient and powerful status treatment differences in the prison, there was almost immediately a showdown over food. (Prisoners were fed much, much smaller and worse-tasting food than the guards, and indeed prisoners were made to serve the guards their meals and watch them eat in part so everyone would be aware of these status issues.)
The guards almost immediately felt guilty and attempted to share their sausages with the prisoners by giving them the guards’ leftovers… and the prisoners immediately go “not until we consult with the other prisoners,” and then collectively decide to refuse absolutely to take small rewards from guards in lieu of the right to good food.
Guards tried repeatedly throughout the study to get prisoners to see them as basically equal, bar the circumstances of their current positions; prisoners instead repeatedly pointed out the actual circumstances of their current situation placed them at very different power levels indeed and insisted that guards actually change the system in order to make the conditions fair and equal. In general, prisoners quickly and collectively exploited the guards’ shame at the unequal conditions in order to receive fair treatment.
At this point, out of curiosity, the experimenters introduced a new prisoner into the system, one who had been trained as a trades unionist…
….and this unionist prisoner quickly chose to approach a disaffected guard, empathize with his unhappiness, and turn the blame for the situation at the unequal and unfair conditions set in the prison. Those conditions, of course, were set not by the guards–they were set by the experimenters. The very first thing, then, that this unionist does is build bridges to unify all the people in the prison.
Prisoners steal the guards’ keys; guards choose instead of “cracking down” or punishing the prisoners to ask politely for the prisoners to help them find the keys, and cheerfully accept them when provided. This gives prisoners leverage for a negotiation, which is then deftly picked up by the experienced negotiator (although not without some pushback from another charismatic and decisive prisoner).
Here’s what the negotiator had to say:
Negotiations begin. pDM outlines the forum proposal. One of the Guards points out that the Prisoners are asking to be rewarded for stealing the keys. pDM responds by outlining a stark choice. Certainly the Guards can refuse to accept his plan, but the alternative is a return to conflict: “It’ll not be the keys tomorrow, it’ll be something else. It’s a game. All I’m saying is that there is a way to resolve that game”.
pDM is confident. He knows he speaks for the Prisoners. The Guards, even in their own mess, are despondent. They know that they can’t handle the Prisoners. And so they accept the new order. Even if they have given up much of their power, at least this system might work and offer them some respite:
gTM: I’m in high spirits after that. gBG: It actually went alright. This geezer is alright. We can all deal with him.
At this point, experimenters withdrew the negotiator to see what would happen to the egalitarian vision he set out. As it turned out, the prisoners peacefully overthrew the rule of guards (by, effectively, mounting a sitdown protest in the guard’s sanctuary) and decided instead to organize an egalitarian commune for the remainder of the experiment.
so OP’s really not that far off the mark!
So literally the only thing the Stanford experiment proved is “all cops are bastards,” and the followup demonstrated that, in the absence of bastards, socialism works?
I know you saw this wall of text and scrolled right past it, but I’m sharing it because this is so interesting and raises issues that we don’t think about enough. A lot of you are the same age as my kids, and you’re going to be in charge of the world that I’m an old man in, and I really hope you’ll study and learn from things like this. So what I’m saying is, I know it’s a long read, but go read it, anyway. You’ll gain emotional and intellectual experience points.
I hope one day that history looks back on ronald reagan as one of the 20th century’s most vile and disgusting serial killers
may i ask why
Remember when like 6 Americans had ebola and it was an international emergency, and Obama flew out to meet survivors? Here is a list of things the United States government did in response: -Increasing the number of Ebola testing labs throughout the U.S. that can quickly and safely screen a potential Ebola specimen -Educating more than 150,000 health care workers on how to identify, isolate, diagnose, and care for patients under investigation for Ebola -Developing countermeasures — including the first Ebola vaccine to progress to Phase 2 testing — to prevent and treat Ebola -Converting at least 10 of the Ebola Treatment Centers into long-term Regional Ebola and Pandemic Treatment Centers for long-term readiness for years to come -Helping state and local public health systems accelerate and improve their operational readiness and preparedness for Ebola or other infectious diseases Source: https://whitehouse.gov/ebola-response
When the Reagan administration was faced with tens of thousands of gay men dying, they did nothing. They made jokes. They laughed. They caused an epidemic that killed 40 million people, because they hated gay men and thought we deserved to die.
There is so much more to it. There is a myth perpetuated by Reaganites that he was an historically significant President, in some positive sense. If you are old enough to have voted in 1980, you probably know differently. If you were born after 1980 you have been raised on this myth. He sold Americans a fable about a Hollywood movie-like exceptional past and destiny, and led ordinary people around with portrayals of that mirage while his reactionary robber-baron friends set about dismantling 50 years of progressive advancements for working men and women, on their way to returning themselves to the position of unfettered economic domination they held between the Civil War and the Great Depression. He was a union buster. He gave us Scalia – need I say more? He tried to give us Robert Bork (does anyone under 30 even know who he is?). He lied about Iran/Contra. He avoided dealing with AIDS. He sealed the political sham-show between right wing capitalist kings and the evangelical thought-control snake-oil salesmen. Americans don’t want to hear that they are ordinary citizens of the world, and they don’t want to hear that the aren’t anointed by some deity to lead the world to salvation. They lapped it up, and they continue to do so.
I have to wonder how the response of a more competent presidency to the AIDS crisis might have changed even the global impact of the disease. Where might we be today? How many millions of people would be alive and not suffering? Yes, Reagan was historically significant—for fucking things up in a globally devastating way.
When you hear how he slashed Income taxes, he did on the Wealthy, but he increased the lowest tax rate from 10% to 15%.
His campaign was funded by Christian radicals, whose entire goal was to dismantle Roe vs. Wade and see American women relegated once more to back alleys and dirty knives. He opened the door to religion in politics in a way the postwar McCarthyists never dreamed possible. Now, 36 years after his election, maybe a third of American medical schools offer proper access to even first-trimester abortion training (in an era where that should mean a pill or vaginal suppository), and there are currently fewer doctors trained to perform late stage abortions for the entire US than there were pre-RvW (when such operations were only performed as a heroic measure).
And no one has even touched on his legacy of racial hatred, deliberate destruction of black communities and establishing of COONTELPRO to destroy the lives of black panthers and black activists, his actual murder of black activists and more. He was actually a demon.
If you want to know how many lives could have been saved if the Reagan government had just fucking BUDGETED for AIDS research instead of telling AIDS researchers that they had to beg, borrow or steal any money for AIDS from other programs–then read And The Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic, 20th-Anniversary Edition by Randy Shilts. And be prepared to have your heart broken at the unadulterated and wildly irresponsible waste.of time and human lives.
Other shitty things Reagan did:
1) He almost tripled the National Debt. And you need to see the difference with zeroes:
When Reagan took office in 1980: $909,100,000 owed.(909.1 billion)
When Reagan left office in 1988: $2,601,300,000,000 owed. (2.6 trillion)
2) He raised taxes on the middle class and the poor ELEVEN TIMES while in office.
3) Unemployment soared after Reagan passed his tax cuts for the rich, and it took decades to get back down again.
4) He turned the U.S. into an illegal weapons dealer.
5) He funded terrorists, helping create the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. From NewsOne:
After Ronald Reagan was elected in 1981, U.S. funding of the mujahideen increased significantly and CIA Paramilitary Officers played a big role in training, arming and sometimes even leading mujahideen forces.
The CIA trained the mujahideen in many of the tactics Al Qaeda is known for today, such as car bombs, assassinations and other acts that would be considered terrorism today.
6) When his economic policies began wreaking havoc on the government, Reagan stole from Social Security–to the tune of 2.5 TRILLION–treating it for eight years as the private slush fund of himself and his rich friends.
7) [T]he Reagan administration demonized opponents of apartheid, most notably the African National Congress, as dangerous and pro-communist. Reagan even vetoed a bill to impose sanctions on South Africa, only to be overruled by Congress.
They called him the Teflon president for a reason. All this shit–and none of it stuck to him. He got away clean every single time.
Reagan is also almost entirely responsible for making colleges in California tuition-based. College used to be far more accessible to more people before Reagan saw to that. Most of what makes Reagan popular today (especially among conservatives) are actually the result of popular myths.
wow fuck him I honestly never knew all of this
Look at what yall mother fuckers did. Now my dad is probably gonna ask me if im eating fucking detergent to be cool and im gonna have to say “no Dad im not that fucking stupid” fuck yall.
Not to be rude but this isn’t caused by memes on tungl.hell its caused by the “challenge” trend on YouTube and there’s a new one every few months, always dangerous. Shit, kids have been challenging each other to do dangerous shit before we were able to record it.
It’s peer pressure mixed with a desire for attention and shit like that gets views. It’s bad, it’s dangerous, but don’t spread misinformation and put blame where it shouldn’t be bc I guarantee you 6 months from now there will be another horrifying and dangerous challenge on YouTube.
The concept of doing something dangerous for views and because you’ve been “challenged” by peers needs to be addressed in a serious way, so don’t pawn it off on silly memes and forget about the issue later.
Like, I’m not joking,
YouTube challenges like the cinnamon one sound more innocent but “dry cinnamon coats the throat and mouth, which can lead to gagging, vomiting and inhalation of the powder into the lungs. Between January and March 2012, U.S. poison control centers received more than 120 emergency calls related to the “game.” Some suffered lung scarring, ephysema, and — in one case — a collapsed lung.” (source)
Salt and ice challenge is another that sounds more innocent, but “when combined with salt, ice actually becomes colder than the standard freezing temperature for water, exposing the body to extreme cold. Several participants, one as young as 12, sustained second- and third-degree burns; amputation is also a risk.” (source)
Kylie Jenner Lip challenge sounds bad and is bad. It “involves grabbing a shot glass and putting your lips inside it and then sucking as hard as you can. It artificially plumps your lips and the results are startling and dangerous. Experts say the shot glass can break under the pressure, resulting in broken blood vessels, requiring stitches, and other issues when undergoing this challenge.” (source)
The choking challenge, obviously very dangerous. “To get a high or faint, kids either choke other kids, press hard on their chests, or hyperventilate. Obviously, this is very risky, and it has resulted in death.” (source)
Car surfing challenge, also obviously dangerous. “ In this challenge, a teen “surfs” on the roof, bumper, or hood of a car. This game has led to multiple deaths and many horrible injuries.” (source)
The eyeballing challenge, you guessed it, dangerous. “Teens take a shot of hard liquor…into their eye socket. This can cause cornea scarring, swelling, irritation, and plenty of other issues.” (source) Also see “butt chugging” which is very similar.
And the fire challenge where “teens put flammable liquid on themselves and then light a match. Hazards are obvious and range from serious second and third-degree burns, all the way up to death.” (source)
I mean, shit, did you hear about the Blue Whale Challenge? “ Over the course of 50 days, an anonymous “administrator” assigns self-harm tasks, like cutting, until the 50th day, when the participant is supposed to commit suicide. It is rumored to have begun in Russia, and there were reports that suicides were tied to the trend, but those are unverified and likely not true. Apps related to the Blue Whale Challenge were said to appear and were then removed. The biggest concern is teens who are at risk and may be susceptible to trends and media about suicide, because even if the challenge began as an isolated incident or hoax, it could become real.” (source)
Be careful with the links, some of them show graphic injuries.
These aren’t isolated incidents, these pop up routinely. These are just a small sampling gathered from the first 3 articles that come up when you google “dangerous youtube challenges” and it’s not hard to find for yourself. I remember these being popular, knew people who did them.
Like, I’m not trying to be an asshole, but the tide pod challenge is part of a larger, specific problem that deserves to be addressed and to be honest its irresponsible to suggest that “forbidden fruit” memes have led kids to do this on their own.
It’s like the 100th post I’ve seen saying, “way to go guys, your meme broke the kids! they think the pods are ok to eat!” These kids aren’t stupid, they know tide pods are dangerous to eat. It says so on the box, and it’s common sense. But their brains are still developing and their risk/reward ratio is skewed and the possibility of getting views and subscriptions to them IS WORTH THE RISK. Additionally, being bullied for not trying it seems WORSE than eating the pod. No teen wants to seem lame, and you’ll do things you don’t want to if it makes you cooler or everyone else is.
Like the YouTube “challenge” trend is something that needs to be discussed and addressed and prevented, and pinning it on silly memes and moving on with your life won’t help any kids.
When I was in primary school (we’re talking before the internet was much of a thing, like, porn took hours to buffer and Facebook didn’t exist), there was an assembly because the kids in the year above me (I think it was when I’d been put up a year, so they were two years older than me) were engaging in what would now be called the “break your own chin challenge”. Yeah, that’s what it sounds like - purposefully squeeze, compress, punch, or otherwise pressure your chin until it broke. Mostly it just resulted in bad bruising, cuts, but a few kids succeeded - bear in mind, this wasn’t a “get out of school with self-injury” thing, they took as little time off as possible - it was a status symbol, like, a bloodied and swollen chin earned you congratulations and respect amongst your peers, a display of strength. These kids were like seven or eight.
There was also the holding your hand in a bunsen burner flame for as long as you could and the fucking about with the DT equipment stuff in secondary school.
Like the other person said, these people know that the stuff that they’re doing is dangerous - that’s part of the point. Maybe they haven’t yet grown to value their health or experienced enough pain to know that it’s not worth the fickle approval of other kids, maybe it’s because (as said above) they haven’t yet developed enough to accurately assess risk and reward, but either way they’re not doing it out of ignorance. There’s peer pressure, there’s doing wacky shit for a laugh, there’s the perceived promise of increased popularity or “cred” - whatever reasoning they have, “this shit could kill you” actually seems to increase their desire to do it rather than shrink it, I think because “I could’ve died” sounds pretty badass to them.
But yeah, I wouldn’t even blame YouTube - kids have been saying “I bet you can’t jump the canal” “I bet you can’t hold your hand over the lighter longer than me” “I bet you can’t down this entire vodka” at least since my parents’ parents were kids. All YouTube and Twitter and memes have done is expose it to a wider audience, thus increasing the pool of people doing each “challenge”, thus increasing the likelihood that somebody is going to end up getting thoroughly fucked by it.
But whether it’s a teacher in an assembly or a newspaper article, all those kids do is sit there murmuring amongst themselves about how the adults always exaggerate, how the adults don’t get it, how the adults don’t have any balls - you can’t convince a group of brats with their own social rules and hierarchies and ideas about fun that not breaking your chin is the “cool” and enjoyable thing to do; you can’t get it through their heads that the “cred” that they earn or fun that they have by injuring themselves is fleeting and will be overshadowed by their lifelong regret as they despise the scars and forget the names of everybody that they went to school with.
This is coming from the guy who could hold his hand in the flame longer than anyone because he couldn’t feel heat or pain properly.
Oh yeah, I engaged in this shit. I watched my friends drunkenly punch each other to see who could leave the biggest bruise. (Thankfully, I was never stupid enough to break my own chin.)
We didn’t think of it at depth, it was just fun. I think that’s why it’s so hard to explain to them why it’s not worth it - they’re not self-critiquing and observing all of the complexities of their thought processes, they’re not really developed enough for that kind of thinking, it’s just “this is fun”, “this is cool”, “everybody else did it and they’re all fine”.
I think we really need to address how we talk to kids about this stuff, because at the moment nobody seems to be hitting their “don’t do this” buttons, we’re just the adults who don’t get it and try to ruin all of the fun. Do any of you remember being a teen and hearing some grown-up tell you that “the kids who smoke aren’t cool, they’re just ruining their lungs” or “those people on the YouTube aren’t clever or cool”, and you just sat there like “uh huh, well, with all due respect, you are a fucking loser”? Does anyone remember the peer pressure talks and “don’t do drugs” ads that were nothing but patronizing, old nerds trying to tell you how to live your life? Well, we’re those loser, grown-up, patronizing, old nerds now.
Even the words “peer pressure” sounded patronizing - kids thought “I decided to do this, I want to, they’re not forcing me”. Like I said, they didn’t think about or understand the complexities in that way.
TL;DR - Kids have been doing this shit forever, they think it’s fun, they’re not really thinking complexly about this, and when we tell them not to do it they just think that we’re boring, controlling, old buzzkills.
~ Vape
This is why you all parents out there need to give your kids attention
this is why you all parents out there need to give your kids attention
^Haiku^bot^7. I detect haikus with 5-7-5 format. Sometimes I make mistakes. | Who do I read? | Contact | HAIKU BOT NO | Good bot! | Selfie | Meep morp! Zeet!
Wtf lol did they legit take a comic drawn literally and accurately about capitalism and say “socialism”
your friendly neighbourhood guide to not believing everything you see on the internet
1. if there’s not a source, find a source. if you can’t find one, ask the person. if they can’t find one, don’t believe it.
2. if there is a source, click it. people sincerely reblogging those ‘shocking’ posts where the source leads to a rickroll or something, and they don’t know because they never clicked it: this one is for you
3. if you’ve clicked the source, look at what it is. is it the onion? Is it the daily mash? look at the other articles on the site and look for the ‘about’. please don’t be one of those people who takes the onion seriously.
4. if you’ve clicked the source and it’s not satire, how reputable is it? bbc news is a lot more reputable than supermystichoroscopesforonly99p.com. who is saying it matters. this can be hard if you don’t know much about the site, but a bit of research can help. wikipedia is a dodgy one because whilst anyone can edit it, lots of articles are under strict surveillance and will quickly get edited back. if you see a claim on wikipedia that looks strange, refer back to point one. wikipedia sources/ cites too.
5. anecdotes are not evidence! someone going ‘one time my dog ate a can of woofers dog food and died two days later’ doesn’t suggest woofers kills dogs. the plural of anecdotes is not data. sure, when 100 people are all going ‘hey, this thing makes XYZ awful things happen?’, listen, but don’t take one person’s experiences as gospel
6. ‘idk, some news article’ is not a source. ‘I saw it in some random interview a few weeks ago’ is not a source. ‘I can’t remember’ is definitely not a source.
7. if something seems too good, bad or weird to be true, maybe it is! a two minute google search may help!
8. basically ignore the daily mail bye
9. if it’s something that would make major international news if true but you can only find one source talking about it, it’s not true
10. Check the date. Don’t be the one to freak out over a five-year-old hurricane warning.
11. If you see anyone laughing at/disregarding/demonising people who reblog to ask for a source, don’t trust that person.
12. Read the whole article! So many times a headline is completely misleading, and created only for clickbait. See that recent “Clinton doesn’t believe in free college” headline. She actually said she doesn’t believe the state should pay for free college for the wealthy.
13. Screenshots of tweets and Facebook posts aren’t sources, they’re unverifiable and usually unashamedly biased towards the writers views and agendas.
Especially when the person making the Tumblr post is also the person who all the tweets belong to. It’s amazing how many times I’ve seen “Look at the storm X is causing on Twitter!” and it’s literally the same username as the blogger…
14. If you’re curious about a claim on wikipedia, you can also always click through to the ‘Talk’ page – very commonly there’s a debate there documenting the history of the claim, objections, and counter-objections: that discussion gives you a LOT more info to base your judgement on. Sometimes there’s even a formal dispute process back there, which again, gives you some context for the claim in the article itself. The article’s edit history can also be enlightening. That takes more effort to search through, but if nothing else, you can check to see if a claim was added two minutes or two months ago, and how actively the page is being monitored/edited. If the edit history is a ghost-town, there haven’t been a lot of critical eyes on the article, and you should proceed cautiously. Flipside, a lot of activity doesn’t necessarily mean the article is sound, but it DOES mean there’s been more opportunity for problems to have been caught and fixed, and more opportunity for substantive discussion to have appeared on the Talk page (should discussion be warranted).
Corollaries to #3: 3a. Absolutely check out the source’s “About” and other articles, but also do a quick internet search to learn about their credibility or lack thereof. For instance, while it’s pretty immediately obvious that The Sun isn’t a credible source, the layout of the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror may make them appear vaguely credible to someone who isn’t aware that they’re both sensationalist tabloids (albeit with the former considerably more sensationalist than the latter). 3b. Here is a list of known fake news sites for your perusal. Familiarize yourselves with the names/URLs for future reference. Similarly, here is a list of potentially unreliable sources on Wikipedia (which is somewhat ironic, seeing as Wikipedia itself isn’t the most reliable of sources).
Corollaries to #11: 11a. OP may have already been sealioned to the point that their natural assumption is that you’re doing the same thing. 11b. The post’s claims may be something that it’s very easy to find a source for with a quick internet search and—especially if the post is popular and gets a lot of notes (and thus a lot of people individually asking for the source)—they may be irritated that you couldn’t take the initiative to do so yourself. This is especially true if they’ve already answered this question on their blog… so check the OP’s blog before you ask, please! All of this goes double for people who are posting something about a form of marginalization that they personally face, as it may feel to them that you’re asking them to do additional free labor to educate you. Being snarky in return isn’t the most high-minded thing to do, but we’re all only human. That said: Always, always be careful about who you trust online. (And offline!) Someone who is an asshole to someone who asks them for a source may or may not be trustworthy… but either way, it’s up to you whether that’s someone you want to spend much time around.
Corollary to #13: 13a. Screenshots from any form of media aren’t credible sources. They’re very easily falsified. This is how we can get screenshots that show a user making posts that they never actually made (someone cut and pasted the user’s icon and username over the actual OP’s) and this is how we can get screenshots that aren’t of the complete post, thus totally altering the content’s message. Try doing a reverse image search on TinEye and filter the results by Oldest. If that doesn’t yield any results, ask OP for a link. 13b. Sometimes posts are deleted and screenshots are all that are left. If OP provides you with a link that is invalid, try entering it into the WayBack Machine and see if you have any luck there. If not, don’t discount the screenshot altogether… but don’t count it as evidence in and of itself.
15. Check the notes on the post. OP or other users may have added additional relevant information… or debunked the post’s original claims altogether.
16. Reverse image search (Google, TinEye, etc.) is your friend. Really. That’s how you can learn, say, that that photo of a destroyed city isn’t actually of the city that the post purports it to be at all… and that the photo is also five years old.
17. Snopes is your friend.
18. Learn to use basic search engine modifiers. (The technical terms used may sound intimidating at first, but I promise that the actual process of using these techniques is pretty simple.) This will allow you to pinpoint the information you’re looking for much more efficiently, saving you the time and energy to fact-check other claims you run into! ;-)
19. If a source is a scientific research or anything of the likes, check its impact factor. Find the journal the study was published in, and Google “nameofthejournal impact factor”
Google will already give that to you, but it’s even more useful if you look for the impact factor on researchgate. There you will find a graph of how the journal has been doing in the last few years.
An unknown journal with low impact factor but that is steadily rising? Might be something worth checking out, but I’d suggest you to look for references of that article on bigger journals to attest the credit.
A very well known journal with an impact factor looking like a fall into the earth’s core? Seems like they lost credibility, don’t trust them.
Overall, with proper exceptions that need to be analysed if you have the tools for it (for example carefully reading the study and checking if their research is scientifically valid), the rule is: if the journal is big it’s likely legit, if the journal is small check for references in bigger journals; if there are no references in bigger journals the study isn’t worth noticing (yet or never).
It may look unjust because it penalizes smaller journals that might be doing a great job, but in the age of fake news this is how the scientific community protects itself. Even if you’re small, if you’re legit your study will be crossreferenced and repeated by bigger journals, and you’ll get your credit (which will raise your impact factor, which will make your journal more legit etc).
Do keep in mind, Journals and Articles have independent research/impact factors. Check both of them.
Also this is handy if you want to read journal articles that are paywalled: https://scihub22266oqcxt.onion.link/
(a small note before you read. I have grown significantly (135-215) in followers since I posted this last and I might repost it every time I get a large number of new followers simply. I want some of y’all to see this because it will explain a lot of my motivation in what I do here on the site and gives you a sight glimpse into my life) Alright kids check your clocks and sit down with some drinks and a snack because it’s story time and one of the reasons why I am anti-fem and anti-SJW to boot at the end of it
Ok so first things first this is a personal story kind of and may contain information you do not want to know about me (my past nothing like NSFW or anything like that) and if you feel the need to reblog this and share this story do so. I have become comfortable sharing it on a public site so I do not mind if it spreads people should learn the dark side of this world,
OK, So the story starts with a 16 year old me and involves my 18 year old freind (we will call her Diana) and the girl I had a huge crush on (we will call her Lila) (not divulging any real names because I don’t want any bullshit rising from this. it is said and done)
Ok so I had this big crush on Lila. I often thought about asking her out but I was far from what you call a ladies man. Shit I was a coward. even the act of complimenting women was a challenge for me because I was so scared of rejection. Well, I decided Lila was the first girl in highschool I would ask out.
Now Diana was a good friend of mine and she was always supportive me. One day I told Diana of my plans to ask Lila out and even pointed Lila out to her to ask her to help me in doing so. Diana agreed and I was hyped. We went to work and after work we went to the park so she could give me pointers on asking a woman out. Well I didn’t know Diana could not stand men to pay attention to other women but her. She was a self centered one and I had not known she had drugged my drink. I awoke I do not know how much time later to find her on top of me. I shoved her off grabbed my clothes and ran. I was raped by someone who I loved and trusted. and Statutory to boot.
for the next week I was lost in a haze. I couldn’t think straight and I couldn’t eat. I stopped calling my friends and was generally lost. I couldn’t understand what happened. One day I got up the courage to call the cops. I feared my mom would be embarrassed by me but she understood it wasn’t my fault. The cops however, did not. They claimed they would investigate but they did nothing. I never heard anything back from them and after a couple of weeks I lost hope. Even the urges from my mum to go with her to the station and tell my story I ignored. I was convinced the detectives would just laugh at me. I had saw the comments on the news stories. men couldn’t get raped. I was a faker and a liar. My rape wasn’t real I enjoyed it. Except I didn’t but would anyone believe me? I doubted it
After about two months I started to calm down and finally, shakily I decided to ask Lila out. she wouldn’t even look at me. she cried and told me no, she would never date someone like me. I was taken aback. I never was rude and always tried to be nice to her. What could I have done wrong
I later found out (some years later) that she had video taped it and sent it to Lila and I saw the video the day I was told about it by the one who filmed it. even though I was unconscious I looked like I wasn’t and that tore at my heart this is why Lila couldn’t look me in the eye.
A little over 2 years ago I went on tumblr. it was a popular site and seem funny from the text post I had seen on facebook. But It held not comedy or interesting reads. but post after post telling me that I was scum. that being White, Straight and male made me a demon from hell. I did not deserve to live but worst of all I saw what struck the deepest cord. I saw a long elaborate post telling me (not me specifically but males) that I deserved to be raped because that is revenge for all the women being raped. I began to doubt my life once more. after a couple of weeks of seeing these I saw one I didn’t think I would see. it was a blog that I have forgotten the name (had followed it on my old account) They were arguing on my Behalf. and they were female. I started following them and seeing post telling me I wasn’t scum. Telling me that I mattered and so did my rape. And things began looking up and now, recently after making this account (I forgot the old one like a clutz) I found some great blogs standing for what this very person stood for. So now I stand with them. I will refute idiots. I will Debate those who are wrong and I will stand up for the ones truly threatened. Everyone’s problems matter. Everyone deserves to be loved equal. and those who spread nothing but hatred and scorn for someone who cannot control the way they were born while claiming not to do it. the hypocrites in other words will hear from me. because there might be someone out there like me. Who is white straight and male. and told his abuse doesn’t matter, his rape doesn’t matter he doesn’t matter. You do matter Kid. To my 16 year old self, you do matter as well. I rose past all this and am a new man from it and I thank everyone on tumblr who has stood up for those who need it. who stand for true equality. Thank you and keep on fighting.
Sorry this post was so long guys. Thank you for reading all the way to the end. I know there will be those who claim I am attention seeking because that’s how Dumblr works. But to those with working brains What I want is to have my story out there and to be an inspiration for someone who may be going through similar shit. just know It’ll be ok. whatever it is. You do matter and it will get better. this is Kaiser Signing out for now.
Thank you so much for sharing this a while back.
God this is so fucking terrible and disgusting. It's terrible that someone would do this to another human being, or say that it's justified in the slightest.