Quick question: how the fuck does someone have 3 different personality disorders?? Also it pronouns are transphobic, sweaty
it's true i;m the Transphoeb committing crimes against humanytea by stating my own prawns
we're not kids anymore.
No title available

No title available

Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty
h

Andulka
Mike Driver

roma★

No title available
taylor price
Show & Tell

shark vs the universe
Monterey Bay Aquarium

PR's Tumblrdome

★

Origami Around
sheepfilms
Misplaced Lens Cap

Product Placement

seen from Germany
seen from Belarus

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Greece

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Azerbaijan

seen from United States

seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@septered
Quick question: how the fuck does someone have 3 different personality disorders?? Also it pronouns are transphobic, sweaty
it's true i;m the Transphoeb committing crimes against humanytea by stating my own prawns
the real threat behind ISIS? they’re aphobic
haha what the fuck
Op being white is the least shocking thing tbh
Your “let’s systematically oppress X” jokes are distasteful, tumblr. Don’t do that. I don’t have the energy to explain why, so I’m gonna go to bed and anyone who wants to explain is free to do so cause there’s a 90% chance I’m gonna forget I made this post.
it makes a joke out of others’ oppression. and as someone can’t experience all kinds, ur making the joking on behalf of groups u potentially have privileges over.
additionally, antagonism like this can lead to people becoming paranoid or feel bad, for no real reason really other than to make a FunnyMan Joke on tumblr for.. uhh. reasons, i guess?
but yeah, even if these jokes aren’t outright bigoted or horrible, you can’t say they’re morally justified either. also, i notice a lot of these jokes are targeted at groups that are often bullied and made fun of already…
and that can be pretty shitty to people who were bullied for their style, interests, and what not.. it’s definitely another one of those “let’s normalise bullying!” mentalities tumblr has.
and it’s like, people always thinking jokes about oppression is only bad when it’s oppressors joking about people they can marginalise.. but like, it’s also bad if you turn it into a joke on others’ behalf, and also encourage bullying and what not.
also, for example, when people talk of Oppressing certain sub-cultures, and say that it isn’t bad or whatever because only whiny privileged people would bring up being bullied for their sub-culture.. seem to forget a lot of sub-cultures are often safe ways for particularly autistic or trans people to express themselves.
for example, goth is an easy way for trans people to be androgynous without standing out as non-cis, and a lot of nerd stuff is just straight up autistic stereotypes. i mention these things because that’s what’s relevant to my experience with groups people make fun of, but is directly tied to my experience as a marginalised person.
Yes there it is thank you
jokes like these also stem from actively wanting to enact the role of an oppressor. even if the group that's being joked about isn't ostensibly oppressed already, all this amounts to is "let's create an arbitrary divide in society so that i can live out my fantasy of being a bully". i don't trust anyone who finds that funny
I mean I’ve heard that some people don’t like the word allosexual because something about it being like the word allistic and autistic people not wanting this word to be used which honestly makes no sense because no autistic I’ve seen (including myself) thinks the word allosexual is bad and I think it was mostly allistics assuming things and talking over autistics. (At least I swear I remember seeing discourse about this somewhere)
That’s like saying we need to get rid of the word bisexual because it’s too similar to bicycle like what even
Autistic ace here saying fuck those guys. They’re the same people who think we’re somehow trying to be special by just existing and using the proper labels and they’re jealous because the feel like we’ve stolen the spotlight and they want to fake being discriminated against so the attention is back on them.
If you think allosexual or allistic is an insult and not a neutral term, then fuck you in particular.
Friendly Reminder that allistic and allosexual were both coined by the Exact Same (autistic asexual) person, and the similarities between the two are 100% intentional
exclusionists: we cant let [insert group of the day] into our safe spaces because they’ll fake marginalized identities for discourse points
also exclusionists: 95% white cis women parroting radfem ideology on sideblogs where they pretend to be any number of things they arent for discourse points
As an autistic a-spec person "a-spec" always was and is for asexual and aromantic people and you're allistic fuck off you're speaking over me
The term you’re confusing a-spec for is probably ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Because, yes, autism is a spectrum
But it’s always been called the autism spectrum and literally no-one says “a-spec” to refer to the autism spectrum
Much like autism, asexuality and aromanticism are ALSO spectrums
So together they are “a-spec” and individually they are “ace-spec” and “aro-spec”
So fuck you
as an autistic person who recently learned from my therapist that a-spec has been used to describe the autistic community since at least the 60s, shut up
?????!! your therapist is lying to you!??? autism as a spectrum has only been recognized clinically for four years???????!!!! it was only separated from schizophrenia in 1980????!!!!!
one day i too will have the nads to make up absolute lies with this level of disinterest in making it even slightly believable
what if I identified as “ocpdgender.” think about that for a second: ocpd (heavily simplified for this example) involves a need for perfection. we could even say that the definition of “ocpdgender” is “needing a label that fits perfectly but being unable to find one because none are perfect.”
but doesn’t that sound harmful? making up an identity to describe how my symptoms interact with my gender? it’s very anti-recovery — and I know “anti-recovery” doesn’t really work when in reference to personality disorders, so how about “anti-positive coping” — because it makes my symptoms part of my gender. it makes it so I am unable to distance my neurodivergency from my identity, which is quite harmful. you are not defined by your mental illness.
re: your tags
the same can kind of be said for autigender. when you combine your neurodivergency with your gender, youre effectively limiting how much youre able to do in regards to coping because you grow attached to the label and want it to fit. you suddenly stop trying to remove yourself from stressful environments because your discomfort feels validating. you stop trying to cope because your symptoms become a part of your core being, rather than just something you need to live with
you become dependent on your disorders to make you feel like a real person, and thats the farthest thing from healthy ive ever heard
me im the alligator
anyways allistics can fucking choke
autism isn’t an illness, there is no “recovery,” it’s part of you forever, it’s literally how your brain is fucking wired. it’s not like depression, which would be a computer virus on a windows pc, but it’s own thing, like having a fucking mac
love when exclusionists pretend to give a shit about nb/gq people's ~health~ while actively contributing to an environment that makes them unsafe
“actually the a is for-“
ain’t no fucking a !!
Sure there is, it stands for asexual/aromantic. Sorry no one ever told you that before. Must be embarrassing for you.
your whole blog is embarrassing
tbh, what’s embarrassing is the amount of cognitive dissonance it took for you to make this post after declaring the need to “delete” the supposedly (according to you) non-existent A, which you very adamantly believed to be real and in need of revocation just a few days prior
i deleted the a
exclusionists always do this when they have to backpeddle bc they contradict themselves in public and tbh it’s hilarious and gets funnier every time
anywho, I’m super happy to answer your question for you!
if you’d have clicked on my “about” (you know, the linked text directly below where you found my age listed, which you definitely saw and definitely read) you would have all the answers you needed lmfao
had you only done that, you might have been able to say something of substance in reply to me instead of flexing your insult skills in the tags to cover up for your back-to-back contradictory posts about whether or not the A in the LGBTQ acronym actually exists, according to you
you’re right! i was just more than a little shocked that someone who is 25, with a real job and married spends their time arguing with teenagers on the internet about whether or not cishets are lgbt.
this might come as a total shock to you, but did you know that queer adults who have careers and thus can pay for their very own internet service are 400% allowed to discourse with uhhhhhh other adults (which you are, you are 18, you are an adult) on sites such as this in their free time?
but more importantly than my boring-ass adult life, why in the world are you speaking to minors like this? why are you using this sort of sexually-charged language on a sixteen-year-old? why are you assuming anything about their anatomy, and speaking about them in a sexually explicit situation like this?? with an adult, no less.
they’re underage, what on earth is wrong with you?
Also, kitty has mentioned that she’s not only a minor, but a victim of past abuse involving pedophilia. As an adult, this is so harmful on so many levels and shouldn’t be something that’s brushed off. Shame on you.
i know why exclusionists are always shitty people but also why are exclusionists always shitty people
I was gonna block op but it turns out I already blocked them
Reblogging this to make those salty, disgusting exclusionists mad 😘
Holy fucking shit why are exclusionists all pedophiles
I’m actually going to recirculate this post bc fuckmogai is not only refusing to address their behavior via complete radio silence, but is instead choosing to actively discourse on this post with other exclusionists as if none of this ever transpired
screenshot excerpt for easier reading -
although I’ll say the most bizarre part of this whole shitshow is that just a few days ago, fuckmogai was actually complaining to me about how inclusionists were a collective mess bc “they’re all pedophiles”
if pedophiles bother you so much (as they should do) then why on earth is any of this recent behavior of yours acceptable to you? or was the bit about being against pedophillic behavoir preformative rather than sincere?
i really don’t wanna be the one to say this but
you know what? i’m just gonna say it.
people tend to forget that terfs are feminists??! like, they’re vile and revolting and demonic but they’re feminists, and therefore tend to… well… agree with many of the things that non-terf feminists say. they talk about sexism, lesbophobia, rape culture, misogyny, etc. when there’s a post that is completely unrelated to trans exclusion and there are many terfs reblogging it, that doesn’t mean that it’s ~~~terf rhetoric uwu~~~, it just means that terfs agree with it, and while this may come off wrong, not everything that terfs say is bad.
before you decapitate me, let me explain. i hate terfs as much as the next guy. they piss me off and make me want to cry out of frustration and rage. i love my trans sisters and would defend them with my life. HOWEVER. i am also a feminist, and therefore i tend to reblog/make posts that some terfs will agree with, as much as i don’t like it. take for example a post about how casual sexism affects women on their daily lives. we can agree that this isn’t “terf rhetoric”, it’s basic feminism. however, terfs are gonna agree with it, not because it’s fucking “terf rhetoric” but because it’s about feminism and TERFS ARE FEMINISTS. shitty ones, but they’re feminists.
so when you see a post that has nothing to do with excluding, belittling, misgendering or mistreating trans women, and it has several terfs interacting with it, you should think critically before saying something stupid like “wow op this is terf rhetoric because a lot of terfs agree with you :/” in a post about like, lesbian issues. “terf rhetoric” (note the misuse of the term rhetoric but whatever) means “excluding and mistreating trans women”. anything that isn’t about excluding or mistreating trans women isn’t terf rhetoric.
believe it or not, terfs don’t sit around all day plotting the ultimate demise of trans women, they also have concerns about things that are Not Bad. i just saw a post where a lesbian talked about her negative experiences with mogai identities and some dumbass said “hey op… notice all the terfs in the notes??” one time i made a post about misogyny and a lot of terfs were interacting with it, so when i added something like “terfs fuck off” some dumbass replied “well this is Terf Rhetoric™ so…”. and just… no. nope! learn to think critically before saying this kind of senseless bullshit. bye!
(and before any of you assholes makes a “user cherrydiscourse is being a terf apologist :/” callout post or something, read what i actually wrote and think. critically.)
hand in your performative trans ally card and punch yourself in the face
it’s infinitely more accurate to characterize a trans woman as a woman pretending to be a man than it is to say she’s a man pretending to be a woman
This is such an important point, and it hits at the crucial problem that even when cis people do genuinely try to wrap their brains around trans people, they tend to have trans men and trans women entirely reversed.
When a cis man tries to imagine what it would be like to be trans, invariably that man imagines what it would be like if he “wanted to be woman,” because that’s what many people think trans women are.
Instead, he should be trying to empathize with trans men. He should be thinking about his own childhood and relationship to manhood, and then asking himself how it would have felt if he’d grown up being told he was a girl, forced to wear dresses, never recognized by other boys as a boy, and then experienced the horror of going through the wrong puberty and becoming a giant estrogen factory.
Many cis women, particularly in LGBT spaces, will fall all over themselves trying to empathize and identify with trans men, because the same transmisogyny that tells them that trans women and cis men are connected tells them that cis women and trans men are connected.
Instead, cis women should be asking themselves what it would have been like if they had never been allowed to have their womanhood acknowledged. How would it have felt to grow up being told you were a boy, not allowed to deviate from male stereotypes (often with violent repercussions if you did), always viewed by other women as an icky boy or predatory male, exposed to the utter horror that is being a woman in male spaces where they think no women are around, and had testosterone distort your body irreparably only to have everyone around you use your anatomy and appearance to forever deny your womanhood and where your best possible outcome is to transition and live your life in abject poverty fighting loneliness and dysphoria and surrounded by people who think you’re a disgusting, subhuman monster who should be locked away or put down?
If you want to worry about men pretending to be women, pay more attention to trans men. They are men who are forced to pretend to be women, and while that is immensely fucked up for them to go through, it doesn’t change the fact that they are MEN in WOMEN’S spaces, and many of them take advantage of transmisogynist ideas about gender to stay in those spaces even after coming out and transitioning. Just look at all the trans men at women’s colleges – schools that in most cases will not allow trans women.
Trans women have always been women. Trans women have always been female.
Trans men have always been men. Trans men have always been male.
A trans woman cannot be a “man pretending to be a woman” because by definition we aren’t men and never were.
Needed to hear this today.
If you wanna have a clue what being a transgender person is all about, read this.
“exposed to the utter horror that is being a woman in male spaces where they think no women are around”
So many people have no idea how true this is. Almost no statement I have ever read has resonated with me more than this.
One of the arguments certain people (mostly terfs, but dishearteningly often well-meaning feminists who have accidentally been corrupted by terf rhetoric) make about trans women is that we experience “male privilege.” This is a muddy topic, because there are certainly some situations where being socially read as male is a convenience (it is much easier to apply for jobs pre-transition and then transition while employed than it is to apply for jobs during or after the more awkward and difficult parts of transition, as an example).
There can be benefits, here and there. But to call it privilege, especially with the term “male” attached to it, is horribly misleading.
Trans women can, in the earlier parts of our lives, EXIST in male spaces. That does not mean we belong in them. Or feel comfortable anywhere near them. Even if you look outwardly male, being in male spaces is terrifying. Even being in NEUTRAL spaces is terrifying. You are in a constant state of panic around men. And you fear rejection and ostracization from other women – the people you most empathize with and understand, whose personalities and ways of thinking most closely match your own, whose communities you desperately crave to be a part of because that’s where you belong – almost as much as you fear breathing the same air as any man you aren’t comfortably out to, including friends and family. We NEVER feel safe. And we are firsthand witnesses to all the reasons we SHOULDN’T feel safe around men. They’re horrifying. What was so frustrating about the “Locker Room Talk” scandal during the 2016 election, as a trans woman, is that you know from personal experience that it was “anywhere and everywhere outside the earshot of a woman” talk. Dozens of sports teams came forward and said no, we don’t talk like this, we would never say things like this, we would never disrespect women like this. I have never been an athlete. My only experience with locker rooms was required as a high school credit, and made me extraordinarily uncomfortable. I ASSURE you, I have heard talk like this OUTSIDE of the hypermasculine world of sports. The level of total disregard that men have for women’s most basic humanity is STAGGERING. Men don’t see women as less than human. They see women as less than ALIVE, nothing more than usable, disposable objects.
Trans women’s great “privilege” of existing “safely” in male spaces is being exposed to this world and these people up close, alone, (if in a locker room, without most of your clothes, and with all the added shame about your body that comes from that) in a state of absolute terror that ANYTHING about your personality, your mannerisms, your body language, the way you don’t quite fit in with the way they talk, will tip them off that you’re not one of them. Your LIFE depends on whether they notice. That’s not safety. That’s Russian Roulette where you don’t get the option to stop playing, and not only do you not know if or when you might get the bullet, you don’t even know how many bullets are loaded in the first place. Every single interaction with another human being is a trigger being pulled in slow motion, in overwhelming, agonizing detail as you can only wait to find out if you drew a blank.
We spend our lives pretending, often badly, to fit in with these people. Not because we have or want any god damn thing on this earth in common with them, but because the alternative – that they will know we aren’t – fills us constantly with a paralyzing, spine-chilling terror that is almost impossible to describe. Even when real benefits that do come from being read as male (again, this is usually socioeconomic factors), we are constantly, inescapably aware that all of these things come at the expense of our own authenticity. We have to lie to get them. We live in unbearable discomfort with the fact that everything good that happens to us is because other people are making these massively incorrect assumptions or judgments about the kinds of people we are. We live with the fact that everything good could be taken away the second anyone finds out we’re not what they wanted based on our appearance, because often it’s the only way we can survive at all.
Let me rephrase that last part for emphasis, because it’s integral to understanding the core of this issue, and the core of the argument that OP (and the excellent addition) wanted to make. If your takeaway is just ONE part of my addition to this post, let it be this:
Every single interaction we have with another human being is based solely on the value assigned to us based on our physical appearance, and how well we can conform to those expectations, which leaves us feeling suffocatingly, deeply uncomfortable and often terrified for our personal safety and livelihood.
Think about that before you put the words “male privilege” anywhere in a conversation about trans women.
For parts of our lives, we can exist in male spaces. But even in them, we are still always, at our core, women. Everything else is social. Everything else is acting. Trans women pretend to be men until we just can’t take it anymore, and we either live as the women we always were, or one way or another, we die. We can never really be anything other than female.
Womanhood is not the thing trans women have to fake.
Cis folks, read this.
u kno ill just go out n say it.. im done with this anti-mogai shit.
its the same shit as ppl have been doing to make fun of nb n pan ppl for years now.
same shit, “special snowflakes”, made up identities, and mocking others’ identities.. like u all make no effort to distance urself or distinguish urself from the previous bunch of anti-mogai ppl.
i’ve seen this shit for years now, largely from anti-sjws and anti-tucutes.. and i’m meant to just put up with it now that another group is targeted?
also, i’m noticing a huge pattern of binary trans and cis people doing this shit too.. even reusing the arguments used against nb people or to mock em.
talks of oppression fetishes, tainting our image, just so much respectability politics and identity policing? i can’t believe you all just thinking we gotta put up with this.
so anyway, please fuck off if you unironicly make fun of mogais in this year of 2017, and stuff refer to shit like “made up mogai identities” or refer to some deceitful n bigoted “mogai ideology”..
And honestly, what do you even hope to gain by this?
Cis and/or straight people are not going to take you any more seriously, if they’re transphobic, homophobic, biphobic, etc. etc., then they will be no matter what. If it was not for that teenager using bunself pronouns, do you seriously think they would be giving you rights and championing you when they still dead name famous trans folk and think you can catch queerness? You think they respect YOU any more?
You don’t win points with them by calling some random person on the internet a bunch of names and misgendering them because you don’t like their pronouns and think they use too many labels for themselves. You just look like a huge asshole.
“Being able to tell the difference between fiction and reality” is kinda… not the point. At all.
It’s a lousy argument that completely misses the point entirely.
Cultivation theory, at it’s baseline, doesn’t say that consuming, say, violent media makes you wanna kill or hurt people. What cultivation theory IS is saying “the proliferation of excessive violent media can influence how the people who consume that media perceive about the world” ie a person with already violent tendencies might be more likely to act on those violent tendencies because, due to the sheer glut of violent media, violence might seem more acceptable than it actually is culturally.
And this shit is subconscious, you can’t say you’re not affected by it because “you know the difference between fiction and reality”, because often time you don’t actively register that it IS influencing you. Or, in the case of many ads, you do know it’s trying to influence you and you put up guard walls - but that burger on screen DOES look delicious and the Burger King is only down the road so why not grab something to eat? The decline of sharks due to Jaws is people perceiving the sharks as inherently dangerous to human and, thus, to keep people safe, need to be culled. The rise of the KKK in the late 1910′s and early 20′s was due to Birth of a Nation portraying the KKK as sympathetic and cool. The decline of the KKK in the 40s can be attributed to their mocking portrayal Superman radio serials. This shit all matters.
This shit is all people being influenced by fiction even if they can acknowledge that fiction isn’t reality.
To expand and reiterate. Yes, not everyone is going to be affected by cultivation theory the same way or in some cases, even at all. This varies from individual to individual and from society to society, and the effects of said “cultivation” can be stronger or weaker, once again, depending on the individual. To name the name of one of the most famous studies on the subject “Some Genres have Some Effect on Some People”. However When content is consumed by thousands, or in the case of big budget stuff, millions. “Some Genres have Some Effect on Some People” has a non insignificant chance of impacting society. And just because you know this, and can tell yourself “Pfft, I’M not being affected! It’s only IDIOTS and KIDS who get affected by this stuff!” You’re not as ironclad and immune as you think.
The third-person effect is a very real and prevalent type of cognitive dissonance. Sometimes people who say “I’m immune to being influenced by media” are the ones being influenced the most.
Btw asexuality and aromanticism remain valid orientations and anyone who says otherwise is very full of shit
(This absolutely includes calling other ppl’s orientations “modifiers” like shut up)
i guess my college human sexuality textbook that was printed last year is full of shit then :/
yeah it is glad we grasped that
@exyclusionist yeah it’s a good thing we figured that out for you, you’re welcome.
-sincerely an ace
God you’re all cringey ugh
lol someone for the block list
nice to see aphobes have reached the “thump your textbooks if you don’t have an argument” chapter of the radfem manual.
hey quick question are you a terf/radfem or something? or did you post that by accident?
Hey!It was an accidental reblog, I was going to post it with a caption for a side blog. Really sorry. If you have questions feel free to talk to me off anon.
lmao was it this sideblog
congrats on hiding it this long tho!!! honestly you completely blindsided me, i thought you werent swamp scum slapping a keyboard!
exclusionists, to me, An Autism: ur fuckin dumb lol. also ur pretending to be sensitive. pee ur pants. u cant b triggered by discourse
everyone: ..
an inclusionist: exclusionists should maybe read my posts before responding to them
everyone: wow /: ableism at its finest right here folks ////: inclusionists take out your trash
it's kind of incredible that they actually consider "pee your pants" a progressive insult like how many levels of cognitive dissonance
arohet man: hey girl lets do everything a relationship entails except I don’t love you lol
do you know what aro means
it's true i'm the arohet man
If your argument EVER rides on “but x group wasn’t at stonewall” you’re a fucking tool. MOST community terms and language are new and folks talk constantly about how they identified as other groups back in the day before they created terms for more specific identities.
Not to mention, this is incredibly US centric and an illogical spot in history to mark as “if you weren’t here you aren’t part of the community,” considering it was completely different in other parts of the world.
Stop being little pricks
also i feel this kind of logic also implies that the english words are objectively the default, and that no alternative definitions or wordings in other languages or countries matter..
and it also down-plays the significance of the fact that many people in the greater community do not in fact identify with any english word at all, though because of sentiments like you just mentioned, a lot of people feel forced to do so even outside of speaking english.
so imo, this is both america-centric and anglo-centric. because lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender are all words in english. - and it is very narrow to think equivalents have the same history and connotation and history.