if you want me to, i won’t!

[outro: john lennon] yes, you will!

[sont-des-mots]

𖤓 jude (they/them)

✽ paulcoded johngirl or johncoded paulgirl ?!?  ✽ TERFS GET THE FUCK AWAY ✽ serial blogstalker  ✽ i love my ringo #mydaisy @daisymayys <3 so i will sometimes rb things about f1 or les mis ✽ queer (adjective and verb and noun and lover of the book w/ the same title) ✽ White; italian and american (unfortunately not italian-american but i do like the sopranos…)  ✽ uni student  ✽ i like soviet & russian literature, documentaries & new wave & cine du look, horror & thrillers, the beat generation, jazz & samba & r&b & funk & hiphop & classical, cooking & baking, critical theory, and linguistic anthropology ✽ beyond the beatles (and associated acts): devonté hynes, magdalena bay, ike quebec, jj cale, lily allen (mostly old), solange, remi wolf, daft punk, amy winehouse, the clash, the smiths, the talking heads, rilo kiley, brockhampton, ramones, steely dan, abba, nina simone, stevie wonder, bob dylan, paul simon (and on occassion garfunkel), norah jones, madonnaaaa ✽ i post abt mostly the beatles, some american politics & random stuff ✽ inbox always open! ✽ letterboxd! & spotify! & discord! 

[dogpuppy]

Me when my asshole itches and I’m on the moon

[dogpuppy]

My best post.

[probuccalfat]

men used to deal with loneliness by writing shit like catcher in the rye or the death of ivan ilyich but now they go right to manosphere podcasts and peptides

[europe-abolitionist]

(popular leftist voice) these right wingers are so mad because they get no women. if you are a Good Person a woman will appear and suck your dick.

[lilkakow]

(popular leftist voice) these right wingers are all sooo poorrrr and stupid. They are stupid because they are poorrrr, racism would never exist in my suburban area

[zitongzi]

Popular leftist voice: these right wingers must have brain damage. They must be bigots because they are literally reta suffering from blsck mold, or brain damage.

[oatmealdiva]

t’es woke toi 😦🫵 toi t’es un woke left😔🙄 tu supporte les trans pis les pronoms toi 🤨🏳️‍⚧️ veux-tu savoir mes pronoms? 🥱🔥 mes pronoms? 😳😤 que/bec. fran/çais. bar/be/que. go/habs/go.🍁🏒 bleu pis rose 💙🌹 toi c’est quoi tes pronoms? vas-y. dis moj tes pronoms?🧐😪 joe/bi/den? ru/paul? 🤭😒 j’vas prier pour toi 🫤🙏

[usagifemme]

ARGENTINA YOU WILL BURN IN HELL FOR THIS

[strangestcase]

This is UNTRUE!!!! If you’re new to Catholicism you HAVE to listen to MEEEEEEEEE. Here’s my advice:

Leave

[tahthetrickster]

did a bit of driving through the state of georgia today and wound up driving through a small town that i later discovered was called newborn, which is an odd name but doesn’t technically have anything wrong with it, except for the fact that i nearly gave myself whiplash doing a double-take at a building sign advertising NEWBORN TAXIDERMY

[o-craven-canto]

NEWBORN TAXIDERMY

your move, Hemingway

[quantumshade]

everyone be quiet. marsha with her snoopy.

[uncertainlys]

i hope everything works out in the end because i am so so scared

[sapphireh3arts]

i know folks are gonna call me a pedo for this one, but i grew up seeing my mom and grandma naked. they had health issues and at times needed care and help showering. and i truly think more kids need to be shown the nonsexual reality of naked women at a young age. there is nothing sexual about my grandmothers breasts, they were simply body parts. more women die of heart attacks because people are too afraid of breasts to do real chest compressions, because they are scared to touch their breasts. the sexualization of our bodies literally kills us. i need people to be more normal about naked bodies and i'm 100% serious.

[necromycologist]

not to say bridgerton is s miracle of modern cinema. but why isnt a single gay regency good

[necromycologist]

notes on things about queer regencies that are bad and ponderings upon the regency genre as a concept: 1. i think like a decent amount of romances written today they fall prey to the Therapy Is Sexy attitude that no amount of historical trapping will ever make not jarring. relatedly. its not enough to say 'homosexual' you do actually have to research historical understandings of sexuality and queer culture i think. 2. and related to this you have to let your principals be monumental asses to each other.its like some of you bavent read pride and prejudice seriously. which 3. hm well not to say your characters have to adapt fully the sentiments of the period but like they should exist as background u know? 4. this one is maybe more controversial also but you need to have charavters that arent the two mcs and maybe a younger sibling. who will personify the scanadalized ton in a vacuum BOOOORING u r all boring. 5. im that one friend thats too shakespeare but like i think many regency novels would be improved if the authors framed them less like a romance plus cravats and more like a comedy of manners. plus cravats also lol. but i think inchresting how the genre of regency has lost this framing so quickly ?? put more social commentary and negotation back in the regency novel. this is also why 6. and this one is. definitely personal but idk if its possible to untangle regency romance from an ending of marriage/working everyone back around to an acceptable normative uninterrupted society. to me that narrative of conservative restabilization is kind of at the root of it for better or worse. not that it cant be done but i cant quite see my way to it

[wearegoingfuckinganywhereman]

[irisasis]

oh there’s a common theme…

[mousidy]

sex workers should be allowed to kill their clients if they feel like it

[austsakurakyzor]

...why don't they?

One of the universal rights is the right to unionize one's career.

As far as I can tell there's literally nothing stopping sex workers from unionizing or forming a guild in order to protect themselves. Union bosses could even call themselves Madames if they wanna.

Plus, pooling their resources will help them gather their assets in order to hide bodies.

[mxjackparker]

Whether a sex worker union is permitted depends on the laws of the country we're living in. In places where it is illegal to sell sex, creating a union of prostitutes amounts to a criminal syndicate.

In countries where selling sex is only partially criminalized under various legal models, unions often can (and do!) exist, but their power is limited. In the UK we have SWU (Sex Worker's Union) which I am a member of, but our laws make it so that my union can't support me with a huge range of issues because my union rep would be charged as a pimp if they did. Our efforts to organize for better working conditions always have to come second to pushing for full decriminalization.

There are only a few places which have full decriminalization of sex work. In Belgium, there's the sex worker union UTSOPI. Since it's not illegal to do full-service sex work or any surrounding acts there, UTSOPI is able to have much more influence on public policy and is far more empowered to support their workers.

I realize this was a question, but I do wish people wouldn't start making claims that something is a "universal right" (it's not) and suggesting there's nothing stopping us, as if sex workers are simply too stupid to have considered this already. Sex workers are an incredibly engaged group of workers highly prone to becoming class conscious and politically radicalized.

(Side note: sex worker unions typically have policies against including bosses, whether they also happen to be sex workers or not, and no sex worker union rep or leader would want to be compared to some of the exact exploiters we're organizing against.)

[depsidase]

[ragsy]

Contemporary art haters will be like "i don't get it" and then not read the title or artist statement or the medium or the year or