my body is a plagarism machine that turns tumblr posts i saw 18 months ago and mostly forgot into worse versions of them that I think are original until after i post them
d e v o n
KIROKAZE
cherry valley forever
ojovivo
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

No title available
Stranger Things
The Bowery Presents

blake kathryn
Jules of Nature

roma★

Andulka
Misplaced Lens Cap
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

titsay

oozey mess

if i look back, i am lost
One Nice Bug Per Day
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
seen from Vietnam

seen from Russia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Israel

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
@stormywormy
my body is a plagarism machine that turns tumblr posts i saw 18 months ago and mostly forgot into worse versions of them that I think are original until after i post them
I love how the "save post as image" feature includes a fake button that says "see full post on tumblr" as if anyone would
1) try to click the fake button for some reason or
2) be able to find the post using tumblr's famously awful search function
I don't think this is possible????
Hello Ryan I am here to help. So the first step is pretty easy: Three cheeseburgers are worth 18, so each one is worth 6. If these are dollars, that's a steal!
From the second equation we get that cheeseburger plus fries-squared is five. Subtracting cheeseburger, which is six, from both sides, we get that fries-squared is negative-one. Math fans will know that there are two solutions to this; either fries are the "imaginary unit" 𝒾 or they are its negative, -𝒾. We'll do the rest of the problem with 𝒾, keeping in mind that at the end we should also take the complex conjugates as solutions.
Finally, we have that cup to the power of fries, minus cup, equals three. Replacing fries with 𝒾, and moving a cup to the other side, we get that cup-to-the-𝒾 is equal to cup-plus-three.
Now, the weird part about this is the cup-to-the-i. The problem with this is that complex exponentiation is technically not a thing. That is to say, there is no one function which is mathematically equal to "input-to-the-power-of-𝒾". In fact, there are infinitely many such functions.
Fortunately, due to reasons that take about six pages to explain (trust me I've done it), there is one particular function that many people have agreed is "the most reasonable one". This is not a mathematical notion, but a human preference. Seeing as this question was presumably written by a human, I am comfortable with using this function.
So, what function is this? Well, given a complex number r∠θ written in polar form (if you don't know what that means don't worry), where -π < θ ≤ π, then (r∠θ)^𝒾 = e^(-θ)∠ln(r).
Applying this to our problem a value r∠θ will be a possible solution for cup if e^(-θ)∠ln(r) = r∠θ + 3. Splitting this into real and imaginary parts, we get two equations: e^(-θ) cos(ln(r)) = r cos(θ) + 3 and e^(-θ) sin(ln(r)) = r sin(θ). We can graph these equations on Desmos:
The possible values of cup are the intersections between the red, green, and purple. There are infinitely many of these which have an angle of around -π/3, and there are two weirdos: One which is a complex number very close to -2.98, and one which is somewhere around -25. The possible values for cup are all of these infinitely many solutions, and also all of their complex conjugates.
They were right, 99% of people can't solve it.
i've actually been working on some formulae to give all possible solutions to complex exponentiation problems recently, so here's my take on this:
let the value of the glass = z, for z ∈ ℂ:
z^(±i) = 3+z
let z = r·e^(iθ) for r,θ ∈ ℝ, -π < θ ≤ π
∴ z = r·e^i(θ+2πn) for all n ∈ ℤ
∴ (r·e^i(θ+2πn))^(±i) = 3+r·e^i(θ+2πn)
distribute powers (apologies for the use of ∓):
r^(±i)·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = 3+r·e^i(θ+2πn)
convert to the same base:
e^i(±ln(r))·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = 3+r·e^i(θ+2πn)
split into real and imaginary components:
re: cos(±ln(r))·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = 3+r·cos(θ)
im: sin(±ln(r))·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = r·sin(θ)
in effect, all this changes is the restriction on the domain of theta to be between -pi and pi, so you can just ignore that constraint.
This is missing the full context, which is even better/worse
"hey it feels like even amongst people who considered themselves committed to social justice and at the recent high-water-mark of that social current, it's never been fully & satisfactorily discussed digested & absorbed that trans women consistently get depicted this vile way in media"
"um people have definitely mentioned that out loud before lol you are young and therefore stupid and entitled and though i'm not saying it i'm also implying that you (trans woman) are being overly sensitive and nitpicking and nobody cares lmao"
she's obviously right. what the fuck is wrong with you people. this is funny? this is some kind of Epic Own to you? you dunk-brained shit eating peanut gallery motherfuckers are so twitter poisoned that all someone has to do is be snide, they don't even need to have a point, you'll all bark and clap like fucking seals. kill yourselves
People that are TME have started tagging my post about v-coding as just "lgbtqia", as if this is a general queer issue...
Just some very literal "all lives matter" bullshit.
This isn't done to gay men, or cis lesbians, or TME bisexual people, it's not even done to transmasculine people. It is done exclusively to trans women and transfeminine non-binary people. We are being legally sex-trafficked by yhe government within the men's prison system. And this has been happening for generations!
This is not something that "effects all queer people." The only way it effects TME queer people is by making them a little sad when they have to read about it. We, trans women and transfeminine non-binary people, are the ones being fucking legally sex-trafficked by the state.
So you call this what it is, transmisogyny, or you get the fuck away from me and my posts about it.
Why do people here think "tme" refers specifically to any flavor of trans person besides trans women. "Tme" refers to the the ~99.5% of the population who aren't trans women/transfem.
Someone joking about a "bomb that kills all tmes" is obviously hyperbolic by the nature of it essentially being a planet wipe, akin to a "this world sucks" or "humans are shit." It's emotional pessimism with no possibility for political action.
"Bomb that kills tmas" has been the default societal stance for all of human history.
going by the tadc reaction, when ralsei comes out the fans will all pivot to Evil Ralsei Theory probably
Ralsei will abruptly start being referred to as a top
God I really hate that one post going around of that one "transfemmasc" who is "both a trans woman and trans man" being a huge transmisogynist.
I don't imagine anyone following me needs this to be explained to them, but I need to just make this post explaining this or I'm going to yell it directly at a stranger on the internet, and I'm trying to cut down on that. Not very successfully, I admit, but gotta start somewhere.
Trans woman is not a separate gender from women as a whole. Trans women and cis women are the same gender. Trans is an adjective that we use as shorthand for "my sexgender assignment differs from the gender with which I move through the world". This is why twerfs say "transwoman" as one word with no space- because they're trying to imply that we're actually a wholly separate thing from cis women. You can be a man and a woman simultaneously, but you can't be a trans man and trans woman simultaneously because that's simply not how transness, sexgender assignment, or transition work. I can imagine some well meaning people not understanding these things and thinking this describes them, but a tme person claiming that it is both of those things simultaneously and consequently trying to claim epistemic authority to shout down tma people kind of gives the game away on why this term and these ideas ACTUALLY exist
reblog this post to temporarily buff the brightness of the green pixels on your screen
the transfem friends who spent valentines day together are still hungover and covered in lube.
this post only gets funnier the later you reblog it
silicone lube is a bitch to wash off im trying
Try some baking powder on it
now covered in paste ready to be deep fried
maybe im just drunk but there is a deep sadness in my life of being a closeted trans woman living with unsupportive family, and convincing myself I'll transition "next year" despite how many times I've been told and told myself I need to act now
convincing myself I'll live my life in the future instead of right now had to be one of the worst brain worms I've given myself, after all of the religious shame burned into my psyche
maybe im just drunk but there is a deep sadness in my life of being a closeted trans woman living with unsupportive family, and convincing myself I'll transition "next year" despite how many times I've been told and told myself I need to act now
To put it simply a lot of attempts at complimenting trans women imply that we are really good imitations rather than just women outright.
been reposting my tumblr posts on bluesky. don't tell those chumps i'm feeding them my leftovers lmao