[looking at people younger than me] you have your whole life ahead of you [looking at people older than me] you have your whole life ahead of you [looking at myself] its over

Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
hello vonnie
$LAYYYTER
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JVL
cherry valley forever
Stranger Things
Misplaced Lens Cap
Show & Tell
art blog(derogatory)
Three Goblin Art
d e v o n

ellievsbear
tumblr dot com
Peter Solarz
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
styofa doing anything
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from China

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@sttufff
[looking at people younger than me] you have your whole life ahead of you [looking at people older than me] you have your whole life ahead of you [looking at myself] its over
Everything used to be 20 dollars and now that I finally have 20 dollars everything is now 200 dollars
rewatching a movie you loved as a teen and realizing it’s actually really really really really not good
[AFTER REVEALING VERY TELLING PERSONAL INFO] But don’t read into that. let’s move along
Goddamit i hate this fucking post. I hate it because obviously if “twelve” followed the same pattern as the other teen numbers it wouldn’t be “twoteen” it would be “seconteen”. Think about it. It’s not “threeteen” it’s “thirteen” as in “third”. It’s not “fiveteen” it’s “fifteen” as in fifth. So with that in mind, you count “first, second, third, fourth, fifth,” and so on, so eleven would be “firsteen” and twelve would be “secondteen” or “seconteen”. “Firsteen, seconteen, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen….” It just drives me absolutely mad everytime i see this post that this obvious pattern was overlooked and i cant hold in my rage anymore.
Consider thirteen:thirty and fifteen:fifty instead. So, rather, it should be twenteen on the model of twenty
Completely agree with twenteen, and it shouldn’t be second but twenth.
Completely agree
with twenteen, and it shouldn’t
be second but twenth.
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
Big fan of how we’re slowly converging back on twelve
affirmations they will not kill me at work today. it is not in my job description to get killed. if they did kill me at work that would be weird and probably not worth it for them
I loooooove getting rejected. People should reject more. It's the "maybes" and ghosting that's just like too much. A firm but polite "no" is infinitely more respectful of everyone's time and feelings. Can we just do that?
You guys know this is a pretty normal human want and not a special accomdation to be saved for people with autism right?
Everyone say thank you black women
THANK YOU BLACK WOMEN
LOUDER!!
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
Clarification from the notes, the poll is specifically referring to generative AI.
I voted less inclined to visit (etc), but I will add that, if you find a way to word it right, you might be able to leverage it as a volunteer draw? I'd be more inclined to start volunteering at a museum if I saw that the alternative was the museum using gen AI.
this too shall pass but the fuck was that for
What they aren't telling these kids that's really dangerous is that if you do make it all the way to the heart of a Scientology building, the autosave will lock you into entering the Tom Cruise boss fight chamber, and you won't be able to leave until you defeat him in combat.
we’re about 60 days away from 2013 just think about that for a sec
yet another cosmic unfairness: a manatee is some kind of big fat dumpling beast of the sea that wants you to pet it so bad we had to make laws against doing just that for their safety
Half the people on the internet for some reason