todays bird
Show & Tell

Origami Around

Product Placement
RMH
d e v o n

Love Begins
trying on a metaphor

No title available

shark vs the universe
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
macklin celebrini has autism

No title available
I'd rather be in outer space šø
noise dept.

gracie abrams
Sweet Seals For You, Always

PR's Tumblrdome
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
@sunlitcourts
āYou look better. California agrees with youā.
Mandatory mermay jerejean š§š»āāļø
Jean la esta pasando bien raroš¶ā
WIP
Okay, I think I'm totally in favor of Jean being passive and Jeremy being active, as long as they maintain their true personalities. What they do in bed doesn't alter their dynamic outside of it at all, nor does the fact that Jean is fierce and very protective, or that Jeremy is cheerful and a little mischievous, but also firm.
Now, and I think this is one of the main points of contention in the fandom when talking about thisā¦
How do you think they'll arrive at these preferences? For obvious reasons, I don't think this will be Jean's first choice at first. How do you think they'll overcome that hurdle together? I think Jean will be quite reluctant to accept that he prefers this position (again, for obvious reasons, especially after learning what Grayson forced him to say ).
What do you think?
Hey anon! Thanks for your ask. I had to sit with this for a while because it's a very sensitive topic. Just to be clear, this is my personal reading of Jean and not a statement about how survivors "should" recover. I'm also not pretending to be unbiased here, I prefer Jean as a bottom, so that's naturally the lens I'm viewing him through.
I think it's contentious because there's no textual answer. TSC hasn't shown Jean rebuilding a sexual relationship other than the scene where Cat tells Jean Laila will get him a toy, so people inevitably fill in the gaps with what feels emotionally satisfying to them. I'm fully aware that the "Jean prefers topping" crowd, if they read this, will probably be like, "Well, that's certainly⦠an opinion." And truly, they are free to roll their eyes at me. But, anyway, let's get into it for the vers and bottom Jean peoples.
I think people often treat "he'll top first for a while and eventually bottom" as a training wheels recovery of male survivors, including Jean from what I have seen around, but that's really just one trajectory. There's another romance novel that comes to mind, Save the Game by JJ Mulder, where a survivor follows exactly that path. He eases back into sex by topping despite having preferred bottoming before the assault and eventually rediscovers his joy for bottoming. It works because it makes sense for that character.
I don't think Jean necessarily needs to fit that model.
To me, "he can just top until he is ready to bottom" doesn't automatically address Jean's trauma about coercion, violence, and not having ownership over his own body and choices. Which is why my answer to "How does he discover he prefers to bottom?" is not "he tops first" but that he learns to separate what was done to him from what he actually wants. His recovery isn't about finding the "safe" position, but rather about recognizing that he gets to have preferences at all.
I imagine it beginning with learning that intimacy doesn't come with expectations. He and Jeremy build trust through affection first, then through physical intimacy that always has an off switch. They kiss, they touch, they stop whenever Jean wants to stop, and nothing bad happens because of it. As that trust grows, they start exploring sexually without worrying about roles or penetration, just figuring out what feels good, what doesn't, and giving Jean the space to discover that his body can belong to him again.
Maybe they experiment with toys or other forms of sex, maybe Jean tries topping at some point simply because he's curious, not because it's a prescribed step in his recovery. It isn't because "this is the safe version." It's simply another thing to explore together. Jeremy's curious, Jean's curious, so they try it. To be clear, I'm not imagining Jean topping for months or years as some sort of stepping stone. If it happens, it's just one experience within a much broader process of rediscovering intimacy. It doesn't actually feel more like him. It's good because it's with Jeremy, but it doesn't unlock the realization that this is how he wants to experience sex. Instead, it helps him understand that what he truly needed wasn't a different role; it was the freedom to discover what he genuinely prefers.
Then, when he chooses to bottom, it isn't because he's finally brave enough to do the "hard" thing. It's because he's reached a point where trauma is no longer making the decision for him. He realizes that what happened to him and what brings him pleasure are two entirely different things. I find it emotionally meaningful that, after so many instances of having his body used without consent, he discovers that his authentic preferences were never erased.
To wrap this up, since canon never shows us this part of Jean's life, there's not one definitive answer. This is simply the path that makes the most sense to me when I think about his character, his trauma, and the kind of relationship I think he'd build with Jeremy.
And before anyone asks: no, I'm not saying Jean would never top again. I just don't think it becomes his preferred role. If it happens once in a blue moon, I imagine it's because the circumstances, the mood, and the emotional context make it appealing in that moment, and that's it.
ANYWAY! Thank you anon for your question, and I hope my answer was satisfactory (I'm sorry if you were expecting a short, very NSFW answer in the smutty side of things...).
Top Jeremy energy!!!
ok I know everyoneās considered Ryland grace wearing an āI put the ace in spaceā t shirt but. have we considered the infinitely funnier option of putting this shirt on eva stratt
I had to draw this
CW: mpreg, pregnancy symptoms, nausea, mentions of throwing up
When Omega Jean is late in his first trimester, Jeremy starts feeling sick. It's the small things: getting queasy and nauseous out of nowhere, finding food he likes tastes bad for no reason, he's more tired than usual and he guesses that's making him grumpy. He tries to ignore everything and focus on Exy and supporting Jean. He's so excited for their first pup, he's not going to let some random symptoms keep him from being there for his mate every step of the way. Things, however, escalate when the nausea turns into throwing up and not being able to keep food in his stomach.
Jean forces him to go and get himself checked out.
They go together, and Jeremy explains his symptoms. They get some testing done and the results come out normal except for a small imbalance in his hormones. Nothing to worry about, the doctor tells them.
Then she hummed and looked at Jean. Asked if they were mates and if Jean happened to be pregnant. At their nod, she smiles and tells them she's pretty sure Jeremy's having a case of Couvade Syndrome, also known as sympathetic pregnancy. Basically, some Alphas and Betas with pregnant mates develop phantom pregnancy symptoms. While there are no known causes, it might stem from a complex mix of biological, psychological, and social factors. A mate that's very present during the pregnancy, and feeling strong empathy for their mate, and so on. In other words, Jeremy's Alpha is so in tune with Jean's Omega, his need to protect has him mirroring what his mate is going through.
They leave the office with some nausea meds for Jeremy and the reassurance that it will eventually go away: if not during the pregnancy, soon after their pup is born.
Jeremy is morose on the way home, an unusual scrunch in his usually smiling face. When Jean asks him what's going on, Jeremy says that he's not the one pregnant, he should be able to give his 100% to Jean and yet... Jean smiles and kisses him and repeats what the doctor said. "You love me so much your Alpha didn't want me to go through the symptoms alone. It's not ideal, and I hate that it makes you suffer, but you shouldn't be blaming yourself."
It takes a couple months of neither of them standing the smell of broccoli, a very weird week in which Jeremy wanted to eat strawberries all the time, and plenty of visits to the toilet, but as Jean's morning sickness subsided so did Jeremy's. The symptoms never fully went away until the birth, but they were minimal enough that Jeremy was able to live his life normally and support Jean every step of the way.
When their child finally arrived, red-faced and screaming into the world, Jeremy felt the last of the discomfort in his stomach dissolve into something warmer ā relief, wonder, love, all tangled together. He looked down at them, then at Jean, exhausted and glowing in the hospital bed, and thought that if his Alpha wanted to carry a piece of this journey for him, he'd do it again in a heartbeat. Every symptom, every sleepless night, every craving he never understood...all of it had just been his heart's clumsy way of saying I'm right here with you.
He pressed a kiss to Jean's temple, then to their baby's tiny forehead, and finally, for the first time in months, felt completely, perfectly fine.
Dear anon, who didnāt want me to publish their ask:
Thank you for sending me your thoughts! I still wanted to share my thoughts with you, so instead of publishing your ask, I will just talk about it! I hope you see this.
Iām not going to lie, hearing this from someone who doesnāt even read explicit fic was incredibly validating. I struggle with some Jerejean fics because even without anything explicit, the personalization (and I really mean personally) just grates on me. I kept wondering if I was imagining it or being too sensitive. With Jean, people tend to crank up a few of his canon traitsāthe possessiveness, the jealousy, the violence, the intensityāand, it does makes me incredibly uncomfortable sometimes, but with Jeremy, they sometimes strip away whole parts of who he is in canon. Itās such an odd imbalance, and itās reassuring to know Iām not the only one who sees it.
This ābottomā or "submisive" version of him exists because they seem to want Jean to be the stabilizing force in their relationship, rewriting Jeremy in the process. In my very personal opinion,Jean can absolutely be a stabilizing force for Jeremy in the same way Jeremy has been for him, but that doesnāt require turning Jean into a macho savior daddy and Jeremy into a damsel in distress. Jean wasnāt āsavedā by Jeremy in canon. And Jeremy doesnāt need to be rescued from himself by Jean eitherāhe might need help, grounding, or someone to lean on, but thatās not the same as being fragile or helpless. Their relationship doesnāt have to be framed as Jean swooping in to save the day; it works because they steady each other, not because one of them is rewritten as weak so the other can play hero.
And I am quoting you in this because YES YES YES: it might be just me, but I never considered Jeremy to be outright insecure. Having low self-worth and being insecure are not the same in my eyes. Jeremy is confident in many things: socially, athletically, sexually, etc. He doubts his value, not his competence, not really. His confidence is gentle and wavers sometimes, but itās there.
I also agree that with what we know about Jeremy from before Noah's passing, whatever softness he grows into later, itās layered over a core thatās always been sharp, reactive, and not submissive.
And Iām not saying people who prefer bottomāJean never go too far to make Jerejean fit more into the top and bottom rolesāthat definitely happensābut in general I feel they at least try to keep the two of them balanced. And thatās really the heart of it for me: when people lean toward bottomāJean, I feel like thereās usually at least some effort to keep both characters intact: Jean gets to be soft without losing his edge, and Jeremy gets to be warm without losing his backbone. Their dynamic works because theyāre both complex, both capable, both shaped by trauma and growth. Theyāre at their best when theyāre allowed to meet as equals.
I donāt want to tear down anyoneās preferencesāI keep repeating that everyone has the right to interpret the characters however they want, but it's necessaryābut for me, itās like wasabi. A lot of people genuinely love it, and thatās great for them, but I canāt stand even the smell. So when those particular tropes show up, especially the ones that flatten Jeremy or turn their dynamic into something I donāt recognize, itās just not something I can enjoy, even if I understand that others do.
Hiii I just wanted to add my thoughts regarding the recent asks you've posted!
I think you gave a really good example with the hotel scene and regarding Jeremy being proactive in his sex life because I definitely feel like the way we perceive certain scenes will obviously be different depending on preferences. That's not to say there's anything wrong with having those preferences but I'll give an example of what I mean,
I've seen a lot of posts that refer to tidbits from Jeremy's hookups such as him being choked, being "good with his tongue", and him liking larger dicks (I often see him labelled as a 'size-queen'). I've definitely read enough to know that a good share of people read these as traits of Jeremy being a bottom or more submissive in a sense which was interesting for me because I had read these all very differently at first. I saw all these examples through the lens of Jeremy being a service-top. I thought it made absolute sense that Jeremy was good with his tongue because he loves to give! It hadn't really crossed my mind to read it in a more submissive way? Same thing with not needing to necessarily be a bottom to like larger dicks, be a 'size queen' or even to be choked (which I have seen treated as a strictly-bottom thing here and there).
I want to emphasise that there's nothing wrong with the way others perceive Jerejean's dynamic but rather I just found it interesting because to me, the second I heard about service-top Jeremy, it just felt right and made sense with everything I read you know?
~š©·
Hey anon! Sorry it took me this long to get to your ask, but it's been a week. BUT! I'm back, and thank you for sending it!
I totally get how one's preferences change the light of certain scenes, actions, dialogues, and decisions made by the characters. I've always read Jeremy as a top, and just as you, service top Jeremy felt right and none of those moments said, "He's actually a bottom," to me. I'll go through them, but as you'll see, they align with your views:
Him being chokedāJeremy could've been choked by that person riding him. We don't have many details.
Being "good with his tongue"āgiving or enjoying blowjobs is not a "dynamic specific" sex act; the same could be said about eating someone out, though I do see that as more top-y. So there's that.
Him liking larger dicksāMaybe they've never heard a top say how they enjoy when the bottom has a big dick they can see bouncing as they fuck them? Besides, I never saw the large dick comment as a hint to anything because it was saidāin my interpretationāas something distinctive about that particular partner. Like being blonde. Or having big boobs. Jeremy himself reacts to the innuendo that he has a small dick: "I don't have anything to be defensive about!" If someone insists Jeremy mentioning a partnerās anatomy means heās āobviously a sizeāqueen bottom,ā then⦠why would that same Jeremy react so sharply to Jean's innuendo? And linking it with his previous comment, āItās not about size, anyway," we can argue he doesnāt build his personal preferences around dick size (or if I stretch it, that he doesn't have a small dick and even if he did, that he knows how to use it).
And so on, and so forth.
I completely accept that readings are personal and everyoneās characterization is shaped by their own lens.
But anyway, thank you for the question. I love getting to ramble about these two, so my inbox is always open.
āWhereās the trophy? He just comes running over to meā but itās Jean running across the whole court, all the way to Jeremy after they win the championship game and he picks Jeremy up into his arms and spins him around as if heās never won a game before in his life as Jeremy laughs and kisses the top of his head.
Jean: Jeremy is a thief. He steals my clothes, he steals bites of food while I'm cooking... well, he didn't steal my heart because I gave it to him freelyā
Jeremy: aww baby that's so sweet š„°
Jean: but on good days he also steals my ability to walk
What do you think of Power bottom Jean and Service top Jeremy?
Personally, I think that's how they can work best.
Besides⦠I think it's the sexiest thing.
Jeremy would kneel with a snap of his fingers, delighted.
Hey anon! I love this convo!
I completely understand why it's your favourite. I think it's a reading that allows Jean to have control while bottoming, and Jeremy to provide pleasure to Jean in the safest way. He would indeed kneel immediately, puppy eyes bright and waiting. I do talk a bit about it in my very long Service Top Jeremy post, if you've seen that one around.
To be fair, I also love power bottom Jean and top Jeremy, or Bottom Jean with Service top Jeremy or Just top and bottom Jeremy and Jean, hahaha. I love thinking about how the different options work for them, you know? While still enjoying my favourite dynamic.
Please feel free to share more of this with me, I'd love to hear it!
Okay, I'm sorry I'm using you as a way to vent/analyse, it's just so good to find someone who mostly agrees with me.
But anyway, this is more of a mischaracterization thing again, than a top/bottom thing. I still think this is part of it, because I have noticed that people in the fandom tend to distort both Jean's and Jeremy's personality to fit their ideals of 'top' and 'bottom', even if it goes against their established characteristics (like Jeremy being jealous much more, yet Jean being to one constantly portrayed as possessive). Admittedly, probably I'm guilty of this as well. Hopefully this is a safe space to admit, that in my reading of the characters, Jeremy fits into the traditional 'top' personality more, and Jean very much into the traditional 'bottom' one. But my characterisations might affect the way I read the characters' dynamic.
Now in regards to that, I find it surprising how much people feminize Jeremy, when other than his gentleness and kindness (and openness) which are associated with femininity, he's a very much masculine? Masculine isn't the right word, but he's in a leading position that he does very well in, a direct, problem-solver, charismatic, popular etc.
Meanwhile, Jean is a very traditionally feminine. He plays a supporting role in Exy (reminder that Neil considered strikers as attention-seekers). Other than his scary facade, he is gentle, kind, soft, nurturing, and devoted. He has traditionally feminine interests, like cooking and gardening, and was the one to sew his sister's dresses. Me and my friend always joke that his dream is probably to be a tradwife.
Now, again, before someone gets the wrong idea, I'm not saying that men can't be kind or nurturing or can't enjoy cooking, but they're traditionally feminine, even though I think they shouldn't be. Also again, 'feminine' traits don't affect who's the top and the bottom. It's less about that and more about how the fandom tends to characterise gay couples by giving them the traits associated with 'tops' and 'bottoms'
Oh, anon. Please feel free to keep using me like this. I love analyzing like this, it makes me happy. I know for a lot of people itās not that deep but it is to me. Not because it affects my daily life or anything like that, but simply because itās a way to express how much I love and care for these characters. Itās how I make sense of them. Itās how I feel close to them.
And having someone on the same frequency is even better.
I want to start here: But my characterisations might affect the way I read the characters' dynamic.
Yes, it does. And youāre not the only one. It affects me too. It is a general thing. And I think the key thing I want to clarify is that Iām not talking about reality here. In fiction, traits are tools. Theyāre one of the ways to build relationships, contrast characters, and create emotional rhythm.
I agree with your readings of Jeremy and Jean, too, and your view on how people push certain traits or make them bigger to fit certain roles. To be honest, part of why my preference solidified is because the way Jeremy and Jean were characterized in a lot of bottomāJeremy/topāJean fics (or even posts and HC) eventually grated on me. Even when the fic said they were verse, the characterization you talk about was so present that I started avoiding that dynamic altogether. Iām not saying everyone who prefers that setup writes them that way, but it was so present and so common it felt like playing Russian roulette for something that wasnāt even my main preference, so I wasnāt going to fully enjoy it anyway. Itās been a long time since Iāve read anything with that dynamic, so I canāt go deep into specific examples, but if you want to tell me more about how you see those character changes, Iād genuinely love to hear your perspective.
And okay, sure, Iām human, sue me. I do feel the little internal buzzer going WRONG sometimes when I see certain takes, hahaha. But thatās my own reaction, not a judgment. Iāll never tell someone their reading of Jerejean is invalid. If someoneās personal canon is that Jeremy has secretly been a bottom all along, waiting for Super Top 3000 Jean to unlock his final form, thatās their business. Iām not here to police anyoneās imagination when we all want Jerejean to be happy. People connect to characters in different ways, and thatās part of what makes fandom fun. But at the same time, I want to be honest about what feels right for me and maybe find people that vibe with that. And thatās exactly what Ive been trying to do here.
So yeah, if you have any other thoughts or want us to go deeper on something or if you wanted something more specific from my response, dont hesitate to send another ask. I also would enjoy to keep talking.
I think people in the fandom tend to forget how proactive Jeremy's regarding sex. He texts Sheldon with the big dick, despite the dude saying that Jeremy should lose his number, he says he picks up people with a lighter in bars, and when him and Kevin talk about a player that Jeremy should have easily outplayed, Jeremy mentions that he slammed that player in to the wall in a hotel, and he's the one who initiates with Leo. Cat even insinuates that Jeremy should hold himself back with Jean, which implies Jeremy goes after what he wants. And even then Jeremy's and Jean's first conversation is Jeremy making an innuendo, which he continues to do so. (Also during their phone call, Jeremy calls Jean back again, with 'oh I think our call must have disconnected' which effectively shuts Jean down).
What I'm trying to say, is that the only reason Jeremy doesn't initiate with Jean, is because Jean's in his care and clearly not well when he arrives. Now, I'm not saying that bottoms can't take an active role or can't initiate, and I'm not bringing it up as a proof that he's a top. I just think people have a fundamental misunderstanding about Jeremy, which might contribute to people seeing him as a bottom. Again, it's not that he can't be a bottom, but that he isn't a passive participant in sex.
Dear anon,
Thank you for your ask!
I agree with you completely. Everything in canon points to him being someone who acts first, reaches out, and sets the tone when it comes to his sexual life. He's not proactive with Jean because of his specific circumstances.
To add another example to yours, we can see this in the hotel room before the banquet in TGR. People look at that momentāJean hovering over Jeremyāand they read it as passivity. They see the physical positioning and see it as a reflection of their dynamic. But from Jeremyās POV, we know heās not passive or frozen or yielding. Heās fully aware of whatās happening and fully aware of what he wants and fully aware of how he would act if it were someone other than Jean. He just refuses to let that want become another demand on someone whoās already drowning.
And I want to add a bit more that I have mentioned before about Jeremy: People in the fandom have a hard time separating how much of the present Jeremy has always been Jeremy and how much of him was built after the trauma of the banquet and what happened after. In other words, how much is Jeremy's true core, and how much is a performance he puts on? So if someone looks at his proactiveness in his sexual encounters and interprets all of it as traumaādriven peopleāpleasing, then itās easier to assume the opposite must be the authentic Jeremy underneath all the coping mechanisms. And I disagree.
Iām not even getting deep into dynamics here, because that didnāt feel like the space for it, but I think the way this ties into those conversations is pretty clear. At the end of the day, weāre all just trying to make sense of characters we care about. This is simply the version of Jeremy that feels the most honest to the text for me, the one that makes the story make sense in my head and in my heart. And I am happy there are others who seem to share it even a little bit.
in my mind heās just a baby