Blogs like this one [link]
[PT: Who owns this blog?]
Hello! I am Kris, the owner of this blog. I am intersex transmasc non-binary and use they/them pronouns. I am part of @dhddmods system, though I tend to function on my own.
I run five other blogs, known as @androqueer-struggles (focused on the struggles and/or oppression of intersex mascs, peritrans mascs, butches, etc), @this-is-varsexism-transphobia (focused on oppression towards genderqueer and sexqueer people), @this-is-amato-heteronormativity (focused on amatonormativity and heteronormativity), @this-is-deformimisia (focused on the oppression of people with physical deformities & disfigurements), and @thisisparamisia (focused on the oppression of people with paraphilias, especially paraphilic disorders.)
What is this blog? What is the tagging system?
[PT: What is this blog? What is the tagging system?]
This blog is centered around anti-masculinity, as well as toxic masculinity (from a "this is how toxic masculinity affects other masc people" perspective.)
Anti-masculinity is the fear-mongering or hatred of masculinity. Some examples of anti-masculinity include the following:
-The demonization of BIPOC masculinity, disabled masculinity, fat masculinity, and queer masculinity.
-Treating androgenized characteristics (beards/hairiness, penises, deep voices, etc) as scary, ugly, or undesirable due to being "masculine."
-Assuming that masculine individuals are dangerous, predatory, or abusive by default (ie; viewing a father on a playground with their kid as inherently suspicious, viewing a butch lesbian as unsafe to be around women, etc.)
-Assuming that because masculinity is so "undesirable" and "scary", masculine people can never be victims of abuse.
Toxic masculinity is the pressure to conform with a specific form of masculinity. Some examples of toxic masculinity include the following:
-Telling mascs that they should be "protectors" and enforcing an idea of physical strength (possibly even violence/aggression) on them, and degrading their masculinity if they don't fit this archetype.
-Telling mascs that they should be hypersexual and degrading their masculinity if they don't fit this archetype.
-Telling mascs that they should suppress all emotions except for anger.
-Telling mascs that they should not seek help for anything and should "tough it out" or "learn how to deal with it", and should be hyper-independent.
The tagging system will go as follows:
-Anti-Masculinity: General anti-masculine sentiments.
- Toxic Masculinity: General toxic masculinity.
- Homoandrophobia/Gayphobia: Oppression towards achillean mascs.
- Andro-Monosexism: Oppression towards m-spec mascs.
- Andro-Amatonormativity: Oppression towards a-spec, non-partnering, or non-monogamous mascs.
- Transandrophobia: Oppression towards transmascs or people perceived as transmasc.
- Androqueerphobia: Oppression towards queer masculinity/masculine-perceived queers; intersex mascs, transmascs, butches, etc. Aka, oppression of genderqueer or sexqueer mascs.
- Androracism: Oppression towards BIPOC mascs. Andronoirism is a subset of this directed towards black or brown mascs.
- Androableism: Oppression towards disabled mascs.
- Androsizeism: Oppression towards mascs of specific body types (typically mascs who are fat, but could apply to skinniness or height.)
- Androclassism: Oppression towards mascs who are not economically privileged.
Isn't "misandry" anti-feminist?
[PT: Isn't misandry anti-feminist?]
Yes, misandry is anti-feminist because it is a term that was bastardized by incels and anti-feminists to imply that the patriarchy doesn't exist.
However, anti-masculinity (and toxic masculinity's impact on mascs) does exist. BIPOC mascs, disabled mascs, fat mascs, queer mascs, and economically vulnerable mascs face the most of this.
Some people still use the term "misandry" when describing anti-masculinity, but I personally think this muddies the water of what is and isn't true anti-masculinity.
"Aren't BIPOC mascs just oppressed for their race?"
"Aren't disabled mascs just oppressed for their disability?"
"Aren't fat mascs just oppressed for their weight?"
"Aren't queer mascs just oppressed for their queerness?"
"
No. Their oppression directly intersects with the demonization and/or strict ideals of masculinity.
For example, black men are treated as aggressively masculine criminals who cannot be trusted, and will use their masculine aggression to harm white people. BIPOC masculinity is treated very differently (but not any "better") than BIPOC femininity.
Another example would be masculine disabled people who have "scary" disabilities - masculinity causes them to be treated as far more dangerous than their non-masculine counterparts.
And for disabled men with high support needs, they are treated as "failures of men" or told they are "weaponizing their incompetence" or are otherwise misogynistic.
Fat and poor men are also often treated as dangerous, disgusting predators due to their fatness + masculinity or poorness + masculinity.
As for queer masculinity, I am just going to redirect you to this post [link] I made about transmascs.
"But you acknowledged toxic masculinity exists."
Yes, it does, and toxic masculinity harms mascs just as much as it harms non-mascs.
That doesn't mean ALL masculinity is toxic. Not to mention, toxic femininity exists as well - that doesn't mean misogyny isn't real.
"Systemic oppression for masculinity isn't real. Thats basic feminism."
1- Yes, it is true that systemic oppression against femininity is more generalized against all forms of femininity, which isn't the case for masculinity. But systemic oppression does exist for atypical masculinity; just not for generalized masculinity.
2- Basic feminism wasn't written with every marginalized group in mind, and thus, has shortcomings. It's not a bad thing to broaden your definition of feminism. Feminism =/= being feminine-centric; feminism is meant to be gender equality, and that includes equality for oppressed mascs.
This blog is safe for people of any weight or body type, and does not tolerate body shaming.
This blog is safe for people with physical/sensory disabilities and neurodivergence of any kind (including cluster b personality disorders, behavioral disorders, paraphilic disorders, addictive/dependent disorders, etc.)
This blog is safe for non-disordered systems/plurals, non-dissociative systems/plurals, and endogenic systems/plurals.
This blog is safe for alterhumans.
This blog is safe for "contradictory" labels (ie; transfems AFAB, transmascs AMAB, lesboys, turigirls, etc.) Being against these identities is deeply exorsexist, intersexist, and pluralphobic at its core.