#knoweldge

[thepersonalwords]

Knowledge without Truth is information without illumination and its all like icing without cake, can be sweet, but it ends up making you sick.

Kingsley Opuwari Manuel

[loveyourlovelysoul]

Abandoment wounds and how they may show up: - when we meet someone we are interested in, we are more concerned about how they feel for us than what we really feel for them - we have an hard time leaving relationships, even those that hurt us; we may even try to reconnect with an ex or a person that has made it clear they aren't interested - if we perceive the other as if they're lacking interest we think the fault is ours and feel bad about it (we may simply be different people with different interests and it's fine; or they may be distant for any other reason: they have a life and feel emotions too) - we tend to people please, give too much and too easily away; we may also accept to have our needs unmet just to keep a quiet environment and not upset the other with "our stupid needs" (so wrong! our needs are as worthy as the other's person; we are teaching them we're not worthy by doing this and not everyone can see this as a mental/emotional issue) - we may date people that we think we can fix or save, and find comfort cause we kinda have a goal and feel needed despite the whole relationship is prolly toxic and we're only ending up burning out and neglecting ourselves - we try to avoid difficult or serious conversations and avoid conflicts cause we feel we may upset the other person and they would like us less or even leave us (so we wear masks and don't allow ourselves to have deep and meaningful relationships that have solid bases) - we may have trust issues, not see the other person's intentions or not trusting their words and only worry they will leave us (spoiler: it may happen cause the relationship may grow tense and stressing for both of you... and mostly cause of your mind talking you with fear. So have a talk first with it and also about all your fears with the other person)

[noosphe-re]

To me it is clear that, however intelligent other creatures may be, the distinguishing feature of human intelligence is that we use it to analyse and speculate about the world and the cosmos and, in the Anthropocene, to make changes of planetary significance. As I have said, I believe only we do this, only we are the way in which the cosmos has awoken to self-knowledge.

James Lovelock, Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence

[physiqueenlightenment]

[ihearyourmelody]

I cannot make you understand. I cannot make anyone understand what is happening inside me. I cannot even explain it to myself.

Franz Kafka, The Metamorphosis

[03x]

“I am fully aware and in full possession of myself. I have no desire to be understood, admired, pitied, or even known”

[missloyalty40]

If they spoke badly about you to others when things ended, they were speaking badly about you to others the whole time.

[liberatingallselves]

Everyday life is the Path

Joshu asked Nansen: `What is the path?'

Nansen said: `Everyday life is the path.'

Joshu asked: `Can it be studied?'

Nansen said: `If you try to study, you will be far away from it.'

Joshu asked: `If I do not study, how can I know it is the path?'

Nansen said: `The path does not belong to the perception world, neither does it belong to the nonperception world. Cognition is a delusion and noncognition is senseless. If you want to reach the true path beyond doubt, place yourself in the same freedom as sky. You name it neither good nor not-good.'

At these words Joshu was enlightened.

 Mumon's Comment: Nansen could melt Joshu's frozen doubts at once when Joshu asked his questions. I doubt that Joshu reached the point that Nansen did. He needed thirty more years of study.

 In spring, hundreds of flowers; in autumn, a harvest moon; In the summer, a refreshing breeze; in winter snow will accompany you. If useless things do not hang in your mind, Any season is a good season for you.

 I find this koan to be a beautiful description of one’s true nature but wish here to focus on the koan’s use of the word study. Namely, the seeming contradiction of Nansen’s caution not to study the path and Mumon’s comment that Joshu needed to study thirty more years to reach Nansen’s point.

Anyone who studies koans should keep in mind that English translations may not do full justice to the meaning of a word or phrase originally written in the Japanese (or Chinese) language. In the case of this koan, ‘study’ has one meaning when used in the sentence, “If you try to study, you will be far away from it.” And another meaning when Mumon speaks of the need for thirty more years of study.

The first usage refers to intellectual study. Through intellectually study, a dichotomy or sense of separation is created, chiefly through the intellect’s dependence on language which is its main tool. Language uses a subject/object structure that by its very nature separates the subject, “I,” from the object, and any given object from all other objects. When everyday life is studied this way, separation is a natural by-product.

In his essay, “To Study the Self,” Shohaku Okumura translates the Japanese word study as “to get accustomed to,” “to become familiar with,” “to get used to,” or “to become intimate with.” He goes on to say that the Chinese character for study represents a baby bird watching its parents so that it may learn how to fly. In the koan the second usage of the word study refers to this kind of study. It is a watching that naturally turns to action, or non-action, without the intermediary of thought. It is intimate in the sense that there is no sense of separation between the Knower and the Known.

It may be concluded from the way study is used in the koan that there are two types of knowledge being presented. The first is relative knowledge, so-called because it is based upon the relationship of the subject to the object (and the relationship between objects). The second is absolute knowledge. In absolute knowledge there is no subject/object separation. Here, identity is found to be identical to the object.

The identity of the Subject with the Object is not a new idea. In his aphorisms, Patanjali referred to lower levels of samadhi as the mind achieving identity with its object of concentration. In higher levels of samadhi where there is no object of concentration identity is achieved with emptiness. In the koan, absolute knowledge is found where the path does not belong to the perception world, nor to the nonperception world. Where “Cognition is a delusion and noncognition is senseless.”

In his book, “Pathways Through to Space,” Franklin Merrell-Wolff called this type of knowledge “Knowledge through Identity.”

As Knowledge through Identity is not based in the subject/object field, language is not a reliable tool to transmit It. Language is of course used by the Mystic but often just to stir the transcendent knowledge that lies deep within his listeners. Jesus’ use of parables is one example of this kind of transmission.

Absolute knowledge is fully realized by a newly Awakened One yet when it comes to expressing it, he finds himself in the same position as a baby bird who wishes to fly. He must watch those who already know how to fly and through them learn how to express the higher knowledge through his own individual talents and abilities. He must learn how to express it in his everyday life.

Mumon suggests that it may take thirty more years of study for Joshu to reach the point Nansen did. I suspect Mumon was trying to remind us that if even the Awakened cannot perfectly express the absolute in relative terms that we should not take our understanding too seriously. Just let everyday life be your path. And don’t let useless things hang in your mind.