I finally remembered to post this. Feel free to correct me on any part.
It's no secret we all struggle with seeing the divide between the Old Testament's "Dont eat pork" type of laws, Moral Laws (which cannot be changed), and the laws affirmed by Christ in the New Testament.
This is a common Reverse Uno Card of apologist trying to justify sin, by saying (vaguely) "why abide by moral laws stated in the OT when you don't follow all the theocratic and ceremonial laws anyway?"
🤦♀️See.. here's the thing..
Moral Law = rooted in God’s unchanging character
Ten Commandments, prohibitions on murder, adultery, idolatry, etc.
Civil/Theocratic Law = laws that governed ancient Israel as a nation-state under God’s direct rule
land boundaries, penalties for theft, dietary laws(such as no shrimp, no pork, etc.), marking Israel as set apart.
Ceremonial Law = sacrificial system, ritual purity, temple ordinances
animal sacrifices, priestly rituals, clean/unclean rules.
/// Ashahad 'nna Yasu huwa al-Rabb
Moral Laws are eternal. They do not change.
Murder is murder, even if it was done in a drunken rage. It was a sin even before there were Ten Commandments.
Lust is lust, even if you frame it as "Love". Just because you're both having fun, and it's consensual, that doesn't make it holy. (Jewish scholars believe God personally smite Er, a direct descendant of Abraham, because he kept wasting his seed, refusing to impregnate Tamar and continue the covenant line.)
Even if your nation says something is legal, that doesn't change the fact that it's immoral. And just because it's legal, that doesn't mean you have to agree with it - in fact, you have a moral obligation to voice it out.
You don't change Morality - you repent.
/// La ilaha illa YHWH, wa-Yasu huwa kalimatuhu al-mutajasidah
Civil/Theocratic AND Ceremonial Laws were temporary.
These were tied to Israel’s covenant identity as God’s chosen nation and to the sacrificial system.
When Christ came, He fulfilled the ceremonial laws (Hebrews 10:1 to 14. Christ is the once-for-all sacrifice). That's why we dont sacrifice animals anymore. Christ was the final lamb.
And Israel as a theocracy no longer exists, so the civil laws don’t bind Christians. Which means Christians can eat pork and shellfish, and they can wear clothes of different pelts sewn together.
BUT MORAL LAWS STILL STAND.
Jesus didn't abolish morality in the New Testament during His ministry.
Pork is now ok. But Greed, Gluttony, and Envy are still sinful. Coveting material wealth and riches and clinging to that which are temporary is still a sin.
Shellfish is now ok. But Wrath, Sloth, PRIDE, and Lust are still sinful. You're free to eat clams, as the law is temporary and bound to the theocracy of Israel, but to fornicate for pleasure is still a sin in the eyes of God, a violation of eternal Moral laws, from which no man or woman of any sexual orientation is exempt.
So if liars point to the Old Testament ceremonial and civil laws, point out the new covenant - the Moral Laws affirmed by the perfect lamb, Jesus Christ, and the imperfect apostles; we are no longer bound by the civil and ceremonial laws of the old Israel theocracy, but we are still bound by the eternal moral laws of God.
example: Christians do not have to rebuke the eating of pork, as it was ceremonial, but we do still need to rebuke sexual immorality.
People love quoting obscure Levitical laws (like “no mixed fabrics!”) as if Christians are hypocrites for rejecting some Old Testament commands but not others.
OT laws are optional to follow — but not required for salvation
You can follow dietary laws, festivals, or other OT customs if you want (Romans 14, Colossians 2:16), but:
> They don’t make you righteous before God.
> Paul warns against making OT laws mandatory for Christians (Galatians 5).
Meaning, if you want to follow your FB group's "No Meat Friday" tradition, have at it.... BUT-
DO NOT treat it as a requirement for salvation, which Paul flat-out rejects (Galatians 5:1-4).
NOR Judge other Christians for not doing it - which Paul also forbids, saying “One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.” ( Romans 14:5 )
So yeah, Christians have freedom in Christ to follow such practices as long as they don’t turn it into legalism.
✅ Doing “No Meat Friday” because you want to honor God? Great.
✅ Skipping it entirely? Also great.
❌ Saying “God loves me more because I follow No Meat Friday”? That’s where Paul throws a theological brick....
Moral laws = eternal, reflect God’s nature, still binding.
Ceremonial & civil laws = fulfilled in Christ, optional to follow, not required.
Following OT laws today is fine = but they don’t save you and shouldn’t be imposed on others.
Perfection is not a requirement when the Laws written in your heart compels you to rebuke sin; if perfection had been a requirement, Jesus wouldn't have encouraged His disciples to spread His message - the apostles wouldn't have allowed themselves to be martyred for the Good News, that a sinful world might know that repentance is open to those who believe in the Son of God, who said,
"Love thy neighbor", as well as,