Pride Poll!
Queer!
Normal.

seen from India

seen from Malaysia
seen from Taiwan

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Yemen

seen from Malaysia
seen from Luxembourg
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Syria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Yemen
seen from France

seen from France
Pride Poll!
Queer!
Normal.
So the queer doctor doesn't have the right to speak on plurality now???
No. You're all just saying bigoted stuff and are somehow chronically incapable of hearing how bigoted the things you say are.
Like, this is still someone with a doctorate in psychiatry. He still studied psychiatry FOR YEARS to be able to pass.
Becoming a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association requires years more of work in the field.
Imagine for a moment doing all of that, everything you achieved. And then you write a book for the American Psychiatric Association with its lengthy and arduous peer and editorial review process. The foreward in your book is written by another doctor with extensive experience in the field who read it and describes your book as a watershed moment.
The American Psychiatric Association puts their seal of approval on the book and publishes it.
And then... THEN some snotnosed kid on Tumblr with no experience in psychiatry whatsoever, barely out of high school, shows up and tells people that you didn't have the right to speak about plurality!
Turns out, the 'normal blocked me for being too direct.
Should be careful what you ask for...
Guess radnormals are just as cowardly as any other sysmed.
Funny isn't it? For a group that makes such a big deal out of being aggressive towards people they don't like, they sure can't take it when it's dished out back to them. 🙄
Bigots once you debunk literally every single claim they make with sources...
I'll be honest, I'm kind of disappointed this is where they gave up. I was really looking forward to the part of the conversation where they would try to argue the Dalai Lama wasn't a good source on Tibetan Buddhism.
What it feels like trying to get radnormies and other sysmeds to understand the most basic concepts...