orca!merman x human!fem!Reader
Good to know: foot fetish
Summary: No summary, the warning tells you everything you need to know.
Pathetic, pathetic orca merman who is completely obsessed with your legs. And he is not ashamed of it. Not even a little. He is a shameless pervert for them; for the soft skin of your thighs, for the way his hand fits perfectly to the back of your knee, for the curve of your calves, for that delicate little bracelet with the tiny shell dangling around your ankle, and for the cute colors you paint your toenails.
The obsession in his chest, quiet and innocent at first, more curiosity than attraction, until, somehow, it moved south and turned into a filthy, burning need to feel your pretty feet wrapped around his cock.
And you are such a sweet thing, of course you give him exactly what he wants.
The merman is already panting, his slit parted and cock jutting out, pale at the base, flushed pretty pink at the swollen tip.
And the second you press your soles together around his erection-
he loses it.
"Look at them squeezing me like that-" His black eyes are glued to the sight; your pretty pink toenails smeared with his sticky precum, and the little bracelet bounces and jingles with every thrust of his hips. Water splashes wildly around you as he ruts between your feet, webbed hands gripping your calves to keep you in place for his own pleasure.
"You’re too sweet to me…" he moans, gaze flicking up to your exposed pussy every few seconds. "Fuck, I don’t deserve you…" He is getting louder as he keeps dripping onto your feet.
"Fuck, I’m so close- gonna-" A broken, pathetic moan tears out of him as thick ropes of cum erupt across your legs. He keeps thrusting through it, shaking, chirping weakly, painting your arches, your toes, and that jingling little bracelet in messy, sticky white streaks. Cum drips down your ankles in fat globs as he rides out every last spurt, completely lost in his pleasure.
When he finally slows down, he nearly collapses forward onto your lap, trembling, face buried against your thigh, still twitching between your cum-slick feet.
And he is not done.
He is already grabbing your thighs, eyes wild and hungry as he stares straight at your exposed, dripping pussy because, after your legs, the second thing he loves most is the sweet cunt between them.
anglerfish!merman x human!gn!Reader
Good to know: fluff
Summary: You volunteer at Grimbrook Aquarium because of one clingy merman.
The anglerfish merman latches on you whenever you volunteer at Grimbrook Aquarium.
It started when the workers moved the anglerfish mer into a new tank. The poor guy was smaller than the others, shorter than you from head to tail, and the staff had to separate him because the others kept bullying him.
You were standing in front of the empty tank, peering inside, when chaos erupted above. The little mer was thrashing wildly as the others tried to lower him into the water.
Then he spotted you through the glass.
He froze mid-thrash. His huge black eyes locked onto you. And a second later, he launched himself into the tank. He swam straight over to you and slammed both palms against the glass right in front of your face. With his mouth slightly open, he stared at you like you were the most fascinating thing he had ever seen.
You smiled and gave him a small wave. "Hey there."
That simple little wave apparently sealed your fate at the Aquarium.
The moment you left that day, the tiny anglerfish mer threw an absolute fit. He refused to eat, barely moved, and caused such a ruckus that the staff eventually had to hunt you down. One of the caretakers practically begged you to take a volunteering position: come help with him whenever you could, and they would give you free entry plus free food from the café.
You accepted.
And ever since then, the small, clingy anglerfish has been completely obsessed with you. The second you walk through the doors, he presses himself against the glass like he is trying to melt through it to reach you.
The first time the staff sat you down at the edge of his tank with your legs dangling in the cold water, you nearly jumped out of your skin. The mer shot up from below and grabbed your ankles with his webbed hands. You thought he would yank you down with himself. But instead, his fingers slid smoothly up your calves, head resting on your lap, and you found yourself raking your fingers through his soaked black hair while he chirped happily and tried to climb higher onto you.
And his attachment never eased.
Now he latches onto you every single time you visit. Whenever you get into the water with him, no matter what you are wearing, he finds a way to cling. His arms curl around your body, his lips seal onto whatever bare skin he can reach. The first time he did it, you panicked. You knew how real male anglerfish latch onto females and basically merge with them like parasites. The staff had to pull you out of the tank and calm you down while the poor mer cried and wailed in the water.
That day, you learned that he can't actually fuse with you.
But he can leave marks.
And he does. A lot.
Ever since you started coming weekly, your skin is almost always decorated with dark little hickies where his lips have sucked and clung. They are all over your neck, shoulders, chest, hips, thighs, everywhere. You learned to just let him do it. It’s honestly kind of cute in a weird way. He is so happy and content whenever he is attached to you, sighing and drooling softly, half-asleep and relaxed in a way the staff says he never is with anyone else. They tease you about it, too, they call you his favorite human. And you just laugh and shrug, because yeah, probably you are.
um actually there's nothing wrong with letting cats be outdoor pets. your cat is depressed locked inside forever. it's animal abuse. let it outside. more cats should be let outside more often. especially overnight.
it's exhausting to see constant TMA/TME discourse that fundamentally does not understand intersectionality. Transmisogyny affected, TMA, describes someone who cannot leverage your assigned gender to mitigate the oppressive force of transmisogyny. Transmisogyny exempt, TME, describes someone who is able to leverage their assigned gender in some way to mitigate the oppressive force of transmisogyny. They are not identity labels; they describe a person's relationship to transmisogyny.
these labels also do not categorize people as ontologically "victims" or "oppressors". everyone, including TMA people, can wield transmisogyny and everyone can wield it most effectively against TMA people. just as cis women can perpetrate and enforce misogyny against other cis women, so too can trans women leverage transmisogyny against one another. however, given the relative lower social status of TMA people, we are less able to advance their own social standing by leveraging transmisogyny. Caitlin Jenner is both TMA and openly transmisogynistic, but she is less successful in advancing herself compared to TME people like Marjorie Taylor Green. this is similar to how cis women can wield misogyny against men (like suggesting that an fashionable man is inherently less masculine), but a similar criticism from another man will generally be a more potent attack.
oppressions can look similar: racialized women, particularly black women, are often degendered in ways which superficially resemble transmisogyny. for example, Michelle Obama was mocked for having supposedly "mannish" features. to the extent that transmisogyny might have impacted her, she was able to mitigate it by leveraging the fact that she was assigned and conformed to expectations of women. she was unable to leverage her race to deny the full extent of this public abuse because degendering is a tactic empowered by both racism and transmisogyny. a black trans woman who is similarly degendered cannot leverage TME privilege because of her gender assignment at birth. both people are targeted and harmed in some way by degendering, but one is more able to mitigate that harm due to being able to exempt herself from transmisogyny.
in a similar example, Imane Khelif was subject to simultaneous pressure from transmisogyny, racism, and intersexism. because she is TME, she could leverage her gender assignment and was not barred automatically from competing in women's events at the summer Olympics (an option unavailable to TMA athletes facing similar scrutiny). she also enjoyed an outpouring of public support in favor of her continued participation, whereas TMA athletes received little sympathy or support in the press (in fact, the event that prohibited them was hailed as especially inclusive for lgbtq+ athletes). however, she was still pressured sufficiently by racist and intersexist policies to undergo invasive medical procedures and to publicly reveal medical details that she might have preferred to keep private. the fact that Imane Khelif was subject to other systems of oppression in no way disproves the validity of transmisogyny because she was able to do the thing that defines being TME: she leveraged her assigned gender to exempt herself from transmisogyny.
in Kimberlé Crenshaw's formulation of intersectionality, she describes the unique marginalization of black women. unlike white women, black women cannot leverage their race to mitigate the impacts of racism. unlike black men, black women cannot leverage their gender to mitigate the effects of misogyny. thus, black women are demonstrably subject to a unique synergy of white supremacy and misogyny (misogynoir) from which others are able to exempt themselves to varying degrees and by various means. the same formulation can be applied to TMA people, who are unable to leverage either their gender assignment or social identity, to mitigate oppositional and traditional sexism, thereby rendering us uniquely vulnerable to the synergistic oppression of those forces. (and of course, we cannot forget that TMA people can also be subject to other discrimination from which they cannot exempt themselves; TMA people can also be variously racialized, disabled, poor, intersex, and so on.)
I'm glad the tone i struck was accessible to you. I'm going to continue to be very generous right now: this response is transmisogyny. one of the kinds of privilege that TME people experience is getting to be judged as individuals whereas TMA people are always judged collectively. TMA people should not have to be as precise, nonjudgmental, and even in tone as i was in this thread. i chose to put in the effort to explain things in these terms, but i did so because when TMA people like me aren't, we get taken with the worst possible faith.
if a cis woman wrote a post like mine about the ways in which men leverage misogyny against her, it would be obviously misogynistic for someone to reply "oh thank goodness. i never really got feminism because they're always just so bitchy about men". this would be the case regardless of who said it or what their proximity to misogyny is. the same is true here: i made a long post with very precisely chosen language, and this reply contrasts me against all those other, apparently uncouth trans women who don't haven't decency to be nice about our oppression. (if you know trans women like that, please send them my way. they sound based.).
TMA people do not owe any deference to TME people's feelings when talking about our oppression. y'all can get away with shit on the regular, usually against us, that is far crueler than incivility. TMA people shouldn't have to make posts that are hundreds of carefully chosen words long with step-by-step logical constructions from first principles and real-world illustrations whose relevance is spelled out on exacting detail. this was a high effort post and WE DON'T OWE THAT TO ANYONE. we shouldn't have to do that every time we want to talk about the fucked up things that happen to and around us, especially not to TME people who benefit from doing those fucked up things to us.
(and if you think my reply here is veering into incivility, let me invite you to examine why it is that you're feeling so defensive. let's internalize and practice those analytical skills which i described apparently so well in those first canonically non-bitchy posts.)
a common (and exhausting) misconception seems to happen around the word "exempt". let's be clear: transmisogyny isn't just "misogyny that happens to trans women". transmisogyny is a social force which influences *all* people which posits that differently gendered people are intrinsically different in some meaningful way and that one gender is in some way socially superior to another. the ways that we construct, define, inscribe, navigate, and relate to gender are all influenced by transmisogyny. if getting to wield misogyny without consequence is the carrot of patriarchy, then the threat of faggotization for being too great a failure to one's assigned boyhood is the stick. I've seen transmisogyny described as the psychological lynchpin that holds patriarchy together. some people can leverage their gender in some way to mitigate the impact of this force, but it is a fundamental part very sea that we all must swim in.
the same can be said for other marginalizing forces. temporarily nondisabled people can experience negative consequences of ableism, but feeling burnt out from an excessive workload is a fundamentally different experience when not fully exposed to ableism. for instance, you might have your exhaustion taken more seriously by your doctor if you are not yet disabled and consequently receive better medical care. a straight man might be mistreated if others believe him to be gay, but he's dealing with one moment of interpersonal bigotry rather than an entire lifetime of being under threat (for example, his right to the social and financial benefits of marriage are far more guaranteed than they might be if he was gay). and so on.
TME people experience transmisogyny but they are not its primary targets and can exempt themselves from scrutiny and mistreatment by leveraging their gender in some way that TMA people cannot. one pernicious way that this happens is through a kind of affected incompetence, positioning themselves to always be seeking education from TMA people about transmisogyny and offering shallow rebuttals and critiques such as the images attached (which they may not even consciously recognize as such). this positions TMA people as bearing the expectation of answering and clarifying on demand and being held to account for all the other TMA people who have come before her.
like i just spent nearly a thousand words giving the piss easiest "intersectionality 101" and you're complaining that the language is unclear or flawed in some way that precludes your understanding or prevents you from internalizing what you've just read, complaints which would be irrelevant if you just read the first paragraph again in which the terms were defined in clear, simple language. if this is your response, you are exactly who i was complaining about from the beginning.
see every time i see this status i get angry because i’ve played through literally every scenario in rct1 and there is no place where this is a thing. there is never more than one park per map. and in rct2 you can’t make that happen i the scenario editor either. it is not remotely within the game’s functionality to simulate two discrete parks and these games were coded in assembly for christ sake so it’s not like someone modded it in by adding the line “int const TOTAL_NUM_POSSIBLE_PARKS = 2;”. there is no conceivable way this post is anything close to true and even though i know how writing all this out reflects upon me as a person and even though i know exactly how meaningless and trifling of a takedown attempt this is on some random facebook screencap with hundreds of thousands of notes im going to post it anyway because i’m too petty to have any say in the matter