Person: "Hello sir." he pets the frog with one finger.
Person: "Have a good day. Actually wait a minute. You missed a bug, but I got you home boy. Hold on." he picks a bug up and throws it next to the frog.
Frog: turns around and eats the bug.
Person: "OHHHHH-" sings high pitched and angelic like he witnessed a miracle.
the thing is that the way people treat trans women they don't like is that the behavior they're engaging in is like as old as (and even older than) the modern generation of transphobic backlash against the trans liberation moment
Beth Elliott is a transfem folk singer who was involved with West Coast lesbian political movements in the 70s. her inclusion was debated for a while, partly because she was transgender, but also because a lesbian who she used to have a relationship with was involved with a separate lesbian group, who protested against her inclusion at a lesbian conference that she had helped to set up. the conference took a vote that resulted in the majority saying she should be allowed to stay, but the trans-exclusive lesbians refused to allow the vote to hold. she performed once on the first night, and then didn't return, and the next night one of the speakers delivered a speech that was changed from her original notes to be more of a transphobic screed against Elliot, alleging her of having "the mentality of a rapist". this incident certainly didn't *invent* the idea of trans women being rapists, but it does predate The Transsexual Empire by several years and was definitely a contributing factor to its creation.
and i say "is" at the top of this story because Beth Elliott is still alive!!!! this incident was not that long ago!!!!! it DID damage her career, however, and it practically made her a social pariah. but it's the same type of shit people do to trans women to this very day. these tactics are relatively recent overall but they are still time honored traditions with trans-exclusive feminists.
this isn't even about michfest is the crazy part. this incident happened in 1973, and michfest as an event started 3 years later in 1976. the first michfest where trans women were explicitly removed from the event took place in 1991, after it had already been running for 25 years. the type of thinking that caused the organizers of michfest to push trans women out of participating in an event they had long been a part of was the same type of thinking that had caused lesbian activists to push Beth Elliott out of the event she had organized as well as her career, and it's the same type of thinking that led to writings like The Transsexual Empire coming into existence.
the statement: "a legal theory was proposed in which trans women could be targeted without violating the Constitution because other women and other trans people are excluded from our specific oppression, which suggests that transmisogyny is real and that transmisogyny affected and exempted are meaningful categories for analysis of our material conditions."
the response: "you are sowing divisions in our community by saying this. everyone has to get on board to fix things, which will only happen if you stop bringing this up. you are crazy, paranoid, and confused and the more you talk about your problems, the more we'll blame you for the violence that's done to you."
the smug condescension of a man who, upset that his privilege has been identified, asserts his male privilege knowing that a fair number of people will hop on board the "trans women are paranoid and divisive" train rather than interrogating their own biases and coming to the defense of more vulnerable members of their community.
the cherry on top was the tags, where he addressed the transfem he reblogged by name and said "I'm disappointed in you" as if she had done something wrong by sharing a post about her specific oppression. it's genuinely gross how trans women are treated so poorly so casually. how dare we speak?
And the original statement is really intersectionality 101.
In Crenshaw's original paper, the literal first example was a company that fired all the black women but successfully argued in court that it wasn't discrimination on gender or race because they kept the black men and the white women.
Changing the context from black women to trans women doesn't fundamentally change the applicability of intersectional theory, even while the specifics of the oppression may change a lot.
We're at the "JK Rowling is personally funding litigation to try and destroy AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL" stage of rabid UK terf brain.
Screenshot via Alejandra Caraballo @esqueer.net on bluesky
Tldr Amnesty International, global human rights organisation, published a report called 'A growing threat: the anti-rights movement in the UK'. In it is detailed, amongst others, a whole bunch of transphobic groups and organisations, including Beira's Place, JK Rowling's trans exclusionary sexual violence support service. JK Rowling threw a shit fit and got Amnesty to take the report down by threatening libel. This was obviously not enough, because you can't appease a fascist, so now she's going to bankroll a bunch of lawsuits anyway through the JK Rowling Women's Fund.*
You can read an archived version of the report here, please save it and share it.
*Not so friendly reminder there is no way to engage in the wizard books without enabling this shit.
I finished my new Imperishable Night Yukari!
I also made a brand new umbrella with a gap underneath. This will also be used for a new PCB Yukari I'll be wearing soon. Can't wait to take photos in this soon!! <3
not even a little bit real. not even a little bit. you can quote me on that. "tumblr user realshy said misandry is 'not even a little bit real" end quote.
anyone with a "puppy play" blog regardless of gender identity should be lined up and shot in the back of the head for fetishizing the sanctity of nature and treating animals like a commodity to be owned
Why are trans men, and generally non-transfems allowed to be kinky and have full-on fetish blogs? Why are trans men allowed to have puppyplay kinks, but if a trans woman has an ageplay kink, suddenly she's a pedophile, a child predator, an abuser, literally hitler, and all of the transphobic slurs in the book?
Why are non-transfems allowed to be kinky in "weird" ways but once a trans woman has a kink that she plays in private, shes constantly sexually harassed and possibly even doxxed?
Why aren't trans women allowed to be adults that have fetishes and literally just normal sexual behaviour that they act consensually with another adult? Why not?
anyone with a “puppy play” blog regardless of gender identity should be lined up and shot in the back of the head for fetishizing the sanctity of nature and treating animals like a commodity to be owned
why transgender voices project / transmasc voices project should not be taken seriously
To anyone who supports transgendervoicesproject (formerly transmascvoicesproject), here she is, presented in her own words...
She talks over, ignores, mocks, or doesn't believe survivors who disclose abuse if they are also criticizing her
When hoveringwatcher criticized the blog's aims and disclosed her own experience, transgendervoicesproject screencapped her comment and posted it as if it was a submission. When hoveringwatcher commented on that post calling her out, transgendervoicesproject never responded.
Here she is mocking and refusing to engage with a rape survivor because the submitter was criticizing her. Update (7/26): and here she is doing the same thing on the same post when mousidy criticized her.
Here she is arguing with and diminishing another survivor. On the same post she misunderstood the submitter's situation and when she got called out for it, she claimed the submitter "literally rewrote [his] own story in real time."
Here she is condescending and arguing with a survivor after the survivor explained that places like transmascvoicesproject are why they struggle to come forward with their story.
Update (7/27): Here she is accusing a trans man of “weaponizing” his trauma to attack her. She also then suggests that he should submit to mousidy’s TVP despite that being a project for transfems.
She has continuously stolen other people's disclosures off of reddit. Links here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. In many of these threads the OPs specifically mention not wanting to cause harm to the transfem community as a reason they struggled to disclose the abuse. By taking these disclosures and putting them on her blog, transgendervoicesproject is going against the explicit wishes of the survivors she claims to care about. In this thread multiple replies outright state they would never want their abuse used to further an agenda.
An anon saying they are the OP of one of those threads messaged her about it. She claimed the anon was lying just to "shut down a space for survivors." Previously she had said that "survivors deserve to be heard, believed, and protected." Seemingly that's only true when its beneficial to her.
In the comments of that anonymous ask, several people ask directly and indirectly if she got consent to post any of these reddit disclosures. She did not reply to any of them.
Her actions make it clear that she only cares about survivors when it is beneficial to her and her blog. If you criticize her, you are a rape apologist at best, and an abuser at worst. Here she is saying that everyone she has placed on her blocklist is just that. And then here she is denying she ever implied that.
She has no regard for transfems
Despite the blog's name implying that it would be a space to discuss instances of sexual assault targeted toward either transmascs or trans people in general, up until very recently she only allowed submissions where the perpetrator is TMA and the submitter is TME. Currently she does allow submissions from people who are also TMA, but again only if the person who abused them is also TMA. Her blog exists purely to catalogue rape by transfems.
Here she is agreeing with an anon saying that some trans women transition to escape rape allegations. And here she is platforming and agreeing with something that is somehow even more obviously TERF shit. But she denies that she has ever reblogged or platformed anything terf related.
She has called five different trans women "rapey" or outright rapists. Here she is calling mousidy "insanely rapey" for saying trans women are coerced into topping. And here she is doubling down when she got called out for it. Update (7/26): here she is tripling down and further misinterpreting mousidy's post. And then here she is quadrupling down. Update (7/27): here she is pentupling down
After storyweavingspider criticized transmascvoicesproject for calling mousidy "insanely rapey," transmascvoicesproject reblogged doxxed information about storyweavingspider. She has gone on to call storyweavingspider an abuser.
Here she is calling doyoulovethewayzeylily a "modern, digital-age charles manson" for DMing her and warning her about potential pushback from her blog. In the same post she accuses it of being a gaslighter and an abuser.
Update (7/26): Here she is misinterpreting yay-bunnies-world so she can imply yay-bunnies-world is a rape apologist.
Update (7/26): Here she is implying storyteller1029 is a rapist because she's critical of the blog.
Update (7/26): Here she is platforming a transmisogynistic book created by two well known terfs. Feel free to read the book here and judge for yourself. Here she is in a subsequent post denying knowing about this book and then asking for proof of "whatever fictional book [velvetvexations is] pulling out of [her] ass right now." Transmascvoicesproject refutes ever knowing about the book despite at least one comment on the original post telling her it is written by a terf. She later edited the post to explain that she had gotten the book confused with a "completely different, much older trauma-related book." In another post she revealed the book she was thinking of was "Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men." Why did she assume that a book about "angry and controlling men" is the book that the anon was talking about when they referred to it as "similar to what [her] blog is intended for"?
Update (7/26): Here she is calling velvetvexations "unapologetically a demon." In this same post she asks for "where [she has] said anything remotely transmisogynistic," despite several comments across multiple posts pointing out the many instances she's said something transmisogynistic. *gestures vaguely at this entire post*
She steals from and obsesses over mousidy to a suspicious degree
The first post on her blog is from July 13, 2026, roughly six hours after Mousidy announced she would be taking a break from Transfem Voices Project.
Her original mission statement was copy and pasted from mousidy's TVP mission statement. She denied this fact, saying she was only "mirroring a format." Here are the two posts side by side by the way. She then denied it again and again.
Following mousidy's post explaining the personal significance of the pink glitter heart emoji used in TVP, transmascvoicesproject changed her icon to a custom made blue version of that emoji.
She lifted the naming convention of her blog from mousidy's Transfem Voices Project. Mousidy stated that she is uncomfortable with people creating projects clearly stylized off of hers, and when transmascvoicesproject decided to rebrand, she continued to use mousidy's formatting and theming.
Following the name change, she started using TVP as her own acronym despite mousidy very explicitly stating that TVP is the acronym for her project. And then here she is arguing semantics and misinterpreting the criticism of her stealing the acronym TVP.
She has routinely accused mousidy of using Transfem Voices Project as a way to "farm donations" and as a way to "prophit" off of survivors. She also claimed that mousidy was using her "targeted harassment campaign" to get more donations.
Oh, and here's a silly one, she has on multiple occasions suggested that this very parody blog is run by mousidy: in this post, this post, and in the tags of this post.
She is now asking her followers to mass report mousidy, falsely claiming she "has repeatedly directed her followers to harass and mass-report me." The timing of which is extra suspicious given that the rebrand seems to exist to co-opt the TVP acronym and mousidy had just announced she was taking another break.
A few interesting oddities
In this post she says she's "old" and that she remembers when the terms transmasc and trasfem were invented, meaning she was around in the 80s to 90s. But then in a recent post she revealed she is 21.
Despite not knowing how to navigate an image board and also not realizing mousidy's comment contained a link, and also not being able to figure out what "HAL-ing" meant, she claims to have enough technological know-how to operate and maintain this pc setup.
She has a fear of being doxxed, but willingly posts her age, and then casually drops that she's related to David Lynch. She's either lying about being related to him so she could one up her criticizer, or she really isn't that worried about being doxxed. Update (7/27): she says the David Lych comment was a deliberate lie to throw off anyone trying to doxx her.
Update (7/26): Here she is agreeing with an anon stating that the people criticizing her "never posit what the right way [to operate the blog] should be." On the day before that ask, here are three instances of people suggesting how to do the project "the right way."
In summary:
I no longer believe transmascvoicesproject was created out of any genuine desire besides to hurt transfems and to target mousidy. Her behavior and her posting being as consistently contradictory and inflammatory as they are, her weird obsession with stealing from mousidy while refusing to acknowledge her rushed copy and paste jobs, and the way she parrots terf talking points while claiming not to be a terf is incredibly suspicious. Even if you disagree with this assessment, it is undeniable that her actions stand in opposition to her stated goal of providing a safe space for survivors. She refuses to listen to criticism, she denies things that are easily fact checked, and she will outright call survivors liars if she can't twist their disclosures into serving her own agenda. Whether she's a troll/terf is irrelevant because the damage she is causing is real no matter what her intentions may be.
I will continue to add on and update this as more things come out. If she truly does care about accountability, then she shouldn't have an issue with someone simply cataloguing her posts. She will almost certainly continue to play the optics card, saying that the transfems (who are probably rapists) are criticizing her for simply "providing a space for survivors." Don't fall for it. She is being criticized for lying, for harassment, and for all her weird transmisogynistic behavior.
gummygunk
romaincrisis
amandla
areudirty
tangentwithtanner
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
